Superintendent: Prelim Budget Reduced to $185.9M from $190.3M. Layoffs Planned

 


 


WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. February 23, 2009 UPDATED 10:30 A.M. EST February 24, 2009: The White Plains Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors introduced a Preliminary Budget for the 2009-2010 school year of $185.9 Million Monday night, trimming the budget through targeted layoffs and a policy of not filling retiring positions, without identifying who and how many teachers, teaching assistants, secretaries and custodians would be affected by the personnel cuts.  The budget, year to year is up  less than 1% (0.81%) from the current budget of $184.4 Million.


 



Timothy Connors, welcoming the public for the Budget Unveiling.


 


Reduction of the number of certified teachers, secretaries, teaching assistants and custodial personnel make up the bulk of the reduction and reduction in fringe benefit costs, lopping $4 Million from the previous suggested 2009-10  budget of $190.3 Million  the Superintendent submitted to the Board of Education in January.


 


The Superintendent declined at this time, in an interview to specify the total number of persons losing their positions and who they were and what their positions were. He said he had the areas for personnel cuts identified, however. The new budget was described by the superintendent as an “austerity budget,” and was described by the Assistant Superintendent of Business as the equivalent of any Contingency Budget the district would be forced to if the budget were voted down.


 





The Superintendent said that attrition, retirements and layoffs could be anticipated across ranks of Certified Teachers, Teaching Assistants, Custodians, and Secretarial Personnel to achieve a little more than half a percent reduction in salaries from $100.2 Million this year to $99.6 Million in  salaries a reduction of $607,240 in salaries for 2009-10.


 


Teacher Settlement Anticipated and Provided for in Salary/Fringe Benefit Allocation


 


He said  the $99.6 Million figure included wage increases expected as a result of any settlement achieved in the teacher-school district mediation process which resumes Thursday at 4 P.M. He said any layoffs of teaching personnel would not impact class size significantly and would maintain the class size parameters White Plains expects.


 


In an interview with WPCNR, he declined  to place a number of actual layoffs at this time, pending public reaction to the preliminary budget which the board seeks Wednesday evening from the public at a forum to be held at the high school at 7:30 P.M. He said if the public requires more cutting, the layoffs would grow, and he had identified the layoff sectors already and knew where more would come from.


 



Fred Seiler, the Assistant Superintendent for Business said the Preliminary Budget would be equal to about what a contingency budget would call for based on the subustantial decline in inflation the last six months.  He points out here that the Preliminary Budget at an increase of just 0.81% year-to-year is less or equal to any possible contingency budget the school district would be allowed to present, should the budget be defeated in voting May 19. Last year the budget increase year-to-year was 5.95%.


 


The $4,387,958 in reduction from the $190.3 Million January budget,  saw $607,240 in salaries being the biggest dollar reduction followed by a big $768,391 in “other expenses” —the bulk of which was $468,900 saved in maintenance and service contracts, followed by $88,000 cut from curriculum and staff support, $82,579 from Administrative, $50,000 from legal and $34,689 from Graduations, admissions, subscriptions.


 


BOCES services were reduced $246,156; Equipment was reduced $166,169, Tuition $393,262, Supplies by $152,589.  The budget goes up $1,491,183.


 


No comments were made as to the expected revenue from the district.


 


Mr. Connors said the district awaits the finalization of the city tax roll Monday March 2. Currently the roll is at $288.4 Million. The City Assessor expects that will decline several hundred thousand dollars up to a million dollars, when interviewed last week by WPCNR.


 



 


In the Preliminary Budget presented tonight, the Salary Forecast was cut $3.4 Million to $99.6 Million from the previous  09-10 Preliminary Budget (submitted last month) for Salaries of $103 Million.


 


Fringe Benefit costs were trimmed $1 Million from the $2.3 Million previously projected in January. $300,000 more in savings from the $190.3 Million target were achieved by $200,000 more culls in maintenance, with $100,000 from postage, contractural printing, rentals, advertising.


 



 


One new program was added, language instruction for both Middle School campuses in Italian, French, Spanish beginning in sixth grade.


 


$2.9 Million in “Other  Expenses” Escape Scythe From January Budget


 


The Superintendent did not make any cuts in the $190.3 Million budget submission involving a number of significant six-figure budgets, classified as “Other Expenses,” that total  $2.9 Million—and do not involve staff personnel, including:


 


 Joint Facilities (with City), $60,000;


Fees and Dues $3,000;


Insurance, $660,000;


Educational Support Services $775,000;


Curriculum, Staff Development Support, $225,000;


Adminstrative, $237,450;


Medical & Pyschological Services, $55,500;


Legal Services, $350,000;


Accounting & Financial Services, $170,000;


Environmental Safety, $120,000;


Software, $174,200;


Local Travel, $19,350


Conferences, $60,000


Sewer Tax, $260,000


 


None of the above categories escaped further cuts. The bulk of the $4.3 Million decrease falls on the teachers, teaching assistants, custodians, secretaries. To be fair, insurance, legal services, and sewer tax may of course not be available to cut.


 


Fred Seiler said that the district has saved substantially on contributions to the teacher and New York State employees retirement funds (down $65,465 and $220,645 respectively), but cautioned that the hemorrhaging of the stock market this year will result in a substantial increase in those two categories next year because there is a one year lag in contribution adjustments based on state retirement fund performance.


 


Included in the budget was a new $598,000 for additional language courses beginning in sixth grade in the middle school — the only new program.


 


A total of  $200,000 was cut from Summer Enrichment Programs including the much-touted Emerging Scholars program for grooming minority youth for advanced placement classes.


 


The complete list of Summer Enrichment Programs that have been eliminated at the present time:


Enrichment summer classes 2-4 for 101 students


Enrichment summer classes 5-7 for 107 students


Enrichment summer classes 8-11 for 179 students


Emerging Scholars Institute for 28 students

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Prop Tax Increase On Track to Balloon Over $1,000.

WPCNR QUILL & EYESHADE. By John F. Bailey. February 23, 2009 UPDATED 4:12 P.M.: Last week, the City Finance Commissioner, (exclusively reported by WPCNR), told the Common Council the city was projecting at this time a revenue shortfall of possibly $11 Million in the current budget year. That in itself is stunning news considering the city pronounced nervously on target three months ago.


 


This report is not in any way an attempt to pick on the city, but even this simple calculator analysis by the WPCNR Math Lab,  reveals  the ghastly money pit the city and the school district are now freefalling into.  An analysis of simple tax mechanics shows the dramatic significance of tonight’s School Board introduction of the Preliminary Budget.


 



 


If the school district does not deliver a budget the same as this year – the property tax burden soars on Mr. and Mrs. And Ms. White Plains to over $14,000  for school, city and county property taxes — on the average home and higher if your home value is over $700,000.


 


 The meeting to pay attention to is tonight at the Board of Education, 5 Homeside Lane, 7:30. 


 


The outgoing Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors is expected to announce a Preliminary School Budget, which is currently sitting at $190.3 Million, when the other city tax guillotine will fall on city taxpayers’ collective necks. The more your home is assessed, the more you will pay –thousands more and that is just in one year.  If the school budget is not at least $1.2 Million less than this year’s budget, the typical home of assessed value of $15,000 will be forced into a $2,000 and up tax increase.





WPCNR observes, (as reported on White Plains Week, our television show Friday evening, you may see it tonight at 7:00 on FIOS TV 45 or Cablevision Public Access Channel 76/,  that if your home is worth from $650,000 to $700,000 – if the city deficit holds, and the School District does not get the budget down below this year’s budget of $184.4 Million – you face a $1,800 tax increase from the school district, city and county combined. If your home is assessed based on a value over $700,000 you’re paying a lot more.


 



 


If the city is not high balling the deficit to make a point with the unions, whose contracts all run out in June,  the city will have to make that $11 Million up from its undesignated fund balance dropping its rainy day fund to below $20 Million. The fund balance will not be available to fill the $11 Million money hole created by the bottom dropping out of Mortgage Taxes, Building Permits, and sales tax erosion suddenly gripping the city. Slide by White Plains Week


 


Strategies of what to do in “crafting” the 2009-2010 budget, with that $11 Million shortfall likely —  due to continued softness in sales tax collections —  have to consider a whopper of a city tax rate increase if city spending continues at the same rate.


 


 


WPCNR Projects the City Property Tax Would Rise 33%.


 


Let’s take a look. As the legendary City Executive Officer George Gretsas, architect of the White Plains Renaissance in the first years of this decade,  once told this reporter,  for every $1 Million of budget increase you have to increase property tax 3%.


 


If the city does not cut its $161.7 Million 2008-09 budget for 2009-2010, you are still going to have to allow for the no building permits and license fees, the eroding mortgage tax, and soft sales tax shortfalls going forward. The decline has no end in sight, especially with major big box retailers rumored, in addition to Fortunoff to be closing 


 


The city is going to have to fund the current union wages somehow at the present rate – funded by revenue that the city last week is telling us is just not there.


 


Do not forget the Common Council refused the police and fire unions a 3.75% increase in December, perhaps politically motivated at the time, but obviously in retrospect, a thoughtful decision by the Common Council, no matter what their motive.  


 



 


But, you are going to have to do something with the unions, whether the demands for wages are dictated by mediation, arbitration or fact-finding, and the only way to do that, (short of state aid of some mechanism, or another ¼% increase in the sales tax urgently requested in a letter from the Civil Service Employees Association in a letter to the Mayor, putting the pressure on Assemblypersons Adam Bradley and Amy Paulin and State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer) is to increase the city property tax. The CSEA has been without a contract since June of 2008. The Police, Fire and Teamsters unions contracts expire in June.


 


Because, do not forget, city hall has to pay the unions, the commissioners and the expenses at this year’s rates any way in 2009-10 – with according to the projection, $11 Million less in revenue. How is it going to do that?


 


City Hall will have to do that because apparently it has not cut substantially to reduce the $11 Million deficit the Commissioner of Finance expects this year.


 


No detailed department-by-department list of cuts was issued by the city Thursday evening. The Mayor said in December he was seeking $4 Million in cuts.


 


So far that list of cuts has not appeared, despite repeated requests by the media. Now, they do not have to give it to the media, but they should at least have furnished it to the Common Council Thursday, and the Council strangely has not asked for it.  How much of the $4 Million has been realized and ponied up in actual city cuts?


 


Using that yardstick of 3% property tax for every $1 Million in spending and assuming the sales tax  trend continues its sluggish pace,  the sales tax collection is not going to meet the $45 Million projected revenue. WPCNR notes it should hit $43 Million at the present rate of decline in retail sales, computed by WPCNR to be 14%


 


Mayor Pleads with Landlords to not Gouge Businesses.


 


Mayor Joseph Delfino is well aware of the cascading malaise in the White Plains retail sector. In an interview on News12 over the weekend he pleaded with landlords in the White Plains downtown not to raise rents on retail tenants and called for the landlords to be flexible and work with tenants so they will not have to close.


 



 


 


The Commissioner of Finance reported Thursday, the city is down $2 Million in Mortgage Recording Tax; $600,000 in Charges for Services; $1.5 Million in Licenses and Permits; $1 Million in Fines and Forfeitures; and $2.3 Million in miscellaneous – the deferred payment for the municipal parking lot postponed indefinitely because it is payable after LCOR builds the 55 Bank Street project, not even started yet.


 


When you include projected sales tax shortfall of $4 million based on the current rate of retail sales being down 12% (in the holiday quarter just completed), the city could be facing an $11 Million deficit if they keep the city budget where it is ($161.7M)


 


If union contracts are settled at 1, 2 or 3% (by negotiation, an arbitrator, or whatever it takes, and city has no other sources of income, “one-shots,” state aid or whatever),  a 33% tax increase is what the city may face. 


 


In the following chart we take the $650,000 to $700,000 White Plains home, which currently pays $2,724 in city property tax. If the city tax rate must increase 33% (3 x 11, figuring 3% increase for every $1 Million you need to collect) then your city property tax on a $650-$700,000 home goes up $899 to $3,623 as opposed to $2,724 this year almost a thousand dollars. If your assessed value is more than $15,000 that year to year increase, of course, will be more.


 



 


Now, that’s only possible if the city budget remains at  the $161.7M spending level. 


 


Say, the city based on union settlements by arbitration, mediation, fact-finding or election year largesses decides to lift expenditures say 4%. Then the city property tax increases proportionately.


 


 You have to make up the $11 Million revenue shortfall in current income next year PLUS another $6 Million in budget, because the fund balance will be for all intents and purposes be too low to touch.


 


The city fund balance, sitting on $28 Million last April will be depleted by the $11 Million shortfall projected last week – which was supposed to come from projected revenues that are not materializing.


 


 The city has to make up that revenue in 2009-2010 since undesignated fund balance will sink to $17 Million if the dire prediction of last Thursday comes true, and the city appears reluctant to snatch more of that.


 


 The city notes in the 2008-2009 budget, “The City’s largest percentage increase in the tax rate (14.4%) for Fiscal Year 1992-1993 occurred after fund balance fell to a low $10.4 Million.” So it would be unlikely for the city to just run out more undesignated fund balance in 2009-2010 in the face of the economy meltdown on recently demonstrated retail sales softening.


 


Increase of 4% in city budget for 2009-10 hits the $650,000-$700,000 home with a $4,000 city property tax.


 


So say the city budget increases 4%, then the $650,000-$700,000 home city tax has to increase 51% to cover the extra $6 Million in change added to the budget. That works out to $1,377, lifting the tax from 2008-09’s $2724 to a staggering $4,101. That is stunning, but that’s the math.


 


 


 


Let’s look at the sobering numbers:


 


If as City Assessor Lloyd Tasch estimates the $288.4 Million City Tax Roll declines $500,000  to $1 Million considering the doubling of the number of assessment challenges he and the Board of Assessment Review are working through, the school board has to cut the budget starting out from this year’s $184,4 Million. If the budget is raised to only $188 Million, then the tax rate goes to $530/M up from this year’s $503/M


 


Why? They are already facing a revenue shortfall since their assessment roll is down from the $291.7 Million of this year.The district, like the city has to play catch up money ball due to the assessment erosion before they even begin to add money for salaries (currently in mediation), new programs ($500,000 being proposed) and the last bond sale for $16 Million for the balance of the $66.7 Million capitol project, (contract bids have been received).


 


School Tax, City and County Tax Pushing $15,000 on the $650,000 home


 


As the chart shows below if the School District settles at the $188 Figure the burden takes the White Plains median home over the $4,000 property tax level.


 



 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Who Wants to Be A Common Councilperson? Democratics Seek Resumes for third Seat

WPCNR BACKROOM BULLETIN. Special to WPCNR February 23, 2009 UPDATED 11:07 P.M.: The Democratics are looking for new blood in the city, interested in running for the Common Council. Presently, Tom Roach, the incumbent councilperson is assumed to be the nominee for one of the Council seats up in November, David Buchwald appears to be the frontrunner for seat number two, being vacated by twenty year Councilperson Rita Malmud, but the third seat on the council ticket is wideopen. The Democratic party welcomes resumes from persons 18 and up, residents of White Plains and Registered Democrats, of course to be considered seriously. Though not being a Democrat doesn’t necesarily rule you out.


Interviews of possible “Councilperson-wanna-be’s”  are expected to start March 3, according to Zelle Andrews, Chair of the Nominating Committee. Candidates should send in their resume, a statement of what they would bring to the table and why they wish to run for council, according to Ms. Andrews. They may fax the material to Ms.Andrews at 914-686-6977 or drop the material off at her building at 10 Stewart Place. Recommendations are expected to be made by the Nominating Committee April 4.


Liz Schollenberger of the White Plains City Democratic Committee issued this statement to the media late Monday evening:


The Nominating Committee of the White Plains Democratic City Committee  will be meeting soon to make recommendations of candidates for local public office.  These recommendations will be made to the full City Committee, which will vote later in the spring to endorse candidates.    The local offices for which the committee will be making recommendations are


 

 Mayor of White Plains  (seat now held by Joe Delfino)

 

Three Common Council seats  (those seats now held by Council Members Tom Roach, Rita Malmud, and Glen Hockley.)   Mrs.  Malmud has announced that she will not seek re-election.

 

Two seats on the County Legislature (those seats now held by County Legislators Lois Bronz and Bill Ryan.)

 

“We’re looking for White Plains Democrats with a demonstrated interest in the future of White Plains, potential candidates who are enthusiastic, intelligent problem-solvers, eager to work as a member of a team with other elected officials and with community residents and groups,”  said Liz Shollenberger, the chair of the City Democrats.   

 

Anyone interested in being considered for the City Committee’s endorsement for these positions should contact Zelle Andrews, the Chair of the Nominating Committee by March  16, but sooner is better.  Potential candidates should send her a resume and a brief statement of  interest.   Such potential candidates should confirm by phone her receipt of the material.   Contact information: 10 Stewart Place, White Plains, NY 10603 e-mail: [email protected]  Phone:  686-6970     Fax:  686-6977    Material addressed to her can be dropped with the front desk at 10 Stewart Place.

Posted in Uncategorized

George Washington–America’s First Leader and Best

WPCNR RETROSPECTIVE. By John F. Bailey. (Reprinted from the CitizeNetReporter, 2003): It is George Washington’s Birthday again. The time when we remember the first leader and the best. It is instructive to look at our first leader, George Washington, the father of our nation.  


One cannot help be reminded of the snowy winter at Valley Forge, when the bedraggled, poorly equipped rebel army suffered but held together, and attacked the Hessians in Trenton on Christmas Eve, 1776, crossing the Delaware River at night. What kind of man was he that George Washington could inspire his troops against all odds?

Washington was a man of tremendous character. Where did he get this character? He specialized in self-control at an early age.

 


 




 


Reenacters Marching to Raise Old Glory at Purdy House in Honor of George Washington’s Birthday. Photo, 2003 WPCNR News Archive.

According to The American President, Washington, at sixteen, had formed a code of conduct. He had written a book of etiquette with 110 “maxims” to guide his conduct in matters. In this etiquette book he had written, Every action done in company ought to be done with a sign of respect to those who are not present. Sleep not when others speak; sit not whwn others stand; speak not when you should hold your peace; walk not when others stop;…Let your countenance be pleasant but in serious matters somewhat grave…Undertake not what you cannot perform but be careful to keep your promise.

The character sketch provided by the authors of The American President, this personal “rulebook” was a book that Washington wrote over the years and referred to it often, “for self-control, to avoid temptation, to elude greed, to control his temper. Reputation was everything to him. It had to do with his strength, his size, his courage, his horsemanship, his precise dress, his thorough mind, his manners, his compassion. He protected that reputation at any cost.”


 



Honor Guard Strikes the Colors to a Drum Roll. Photo, WPCNR News.




Earning respect by example. Quelling rebellion with a few words.

Washington inspired by example. He lived with his troops. He shared hardships with them, and so much was there respect for him that he was able to talk them out of armed rebellion at the end of the American Revolution. Washington had been asked by the army to join them to overthrow the Continental Congress, and make himself King.

Washington had been asked by one of the officers of the rebels to join them, and he wrote them,

You could not have found a person to whom your schemes are more disagreeable. Banish these thoughts from your mind.

Hearing that the rebels who were planning insurrection against the new country due to not having been paid by the Continental Congress, Washington rode to Newburgh, New York, on March 15, 1783, to meet with the dissident insurgents. Washington spoke to the rebellious group, saying,

“Gentlemen, as I was among the first who embarked in the cause of our common Country; as I never left your side one moment, but when called from you on public duty; as I have been the constant companion and witness of your Distresses…it can scarcely be supposed …that I am indifferent to your interests. But…this dreadful alternative, of either deserting our Country in the extremest hour of her distress, or turning our Arms against it…has something so shocking in it that humanity revolts from the idea…I spurn it, as every Man who regards liberty…undoubtedly must.”

The would-be rebels fell silent, digesting what he had said. Then Washington withdrew a letter from Congress, but could not read the text, withdrawing some eyeglasses from his tunic, remarking,

“Gentlemen, you will permit me to put on my spectacles for I have not only grown gray but almost blind in the service of my country.”

The men present were reported to have tears in their eyes at this gesture of Washington’s and abandoned their plot out of respect for their leader.

Washington retired from the military, surprising the entire new country. His action surprised King George III of England, who was astonished that Washington had refused to hold on to his military authority and use it for political or financial gain. The defeated King of England, remarked, “If true, then he is the greatest man in the world.”




Seeker of Diverse Views

As President, George Washington invented the Presidential Cabinet, whom he referred to as “the first Characters,” persons who possessed the best reputations in fields and areas of the jobs he was filling. Washington said on political appointments, “My political conduct and nominations must be exceedingly circumspect. No slip into partiality will pass unnoticed…”

Washington tolerated the relentless clashes between Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, and Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of the Treasury, but lectured them on the necessity for tolerance and moving beyond partisanship:


 


 “I believe the view of both of you are pure, and well meant. Why then, when some of the best Citizens in the United States, Men…who have no sinister view to promote, are to be found, some on one side, some on the other…should either of you be so tenacious of your opinions as to make no allowances for those of the other? I have great esteem for you both, and ardently wish that some line could be marked out by which both of you could walk.”

The Constitution Should be Protected

When George Washington left office after two terms, he made a farewell address which warned future generations of Americans about foreign entanglements and partisanship in the republic:

I shall carry to my grave the hope that your Union and brotherly affection may be perpetual; that the Constitution may be sacredly maintained; and that free government…the ever favorite object of my heart…will be the happy reward of our mutual cares, labors and dangers.”

Washington died in 1800, three years after leaving office in 1797. He was saluted on the floor of congress as being “First in war, first in peace, first in the hearts of his countrymen.”



The Jacob Purdy House where George Washington planned strategy at  the Battle of White    Plains, at a celebrationhosted by the White Plains Historical Society. Photo, WPCNR News Archive




Note: The American President By Philip B. Kunhardt, Jr., Philip B. Kunhardt III, and Peter W. Kunhardt (Riverhead Books. Penguin-Putnam, Inc.,1999) is the source for this information on George Washington.


This article originally appeared in The CitizeNetReporter in 2003.

Posted in Uncategorized