Exec Spano on County Finances: Postioned to weather Money Storm

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From Westchester County Department of Communications. March 5, 2009 EDITED:  County Executive Andy Spano has released a video message to Westchester residents, reassuring them that the county government is well positioned to deal with the continued economic downturn affecting the nation. 

       See the message at: http://www.westchestergov.com/news_spanovideoecon.htm


       In the message on the county’s Web site and on YouTube, Spano states that the county government is “well prepared to meet the challenges ahead.”


       “We go over the county budget line by line every year and make adjustments based on changing economic times… That’s one of the reasons why we are the only county in the state with triple A bond ratings from all three rating agencies. And why we have been able to keep county taxes down to an average of 2.6 percent over the past five years,” he said  in part. “…  While we cannot predict what lies ahead,  we do not expect to have to take drastic actions that would result in the loss of jobs or jeopardize vital county services:”


     WPCNR notes that the county is in such financial shape it hired two replacements for the departed aid to the Westchester County Board of Legislators, at the cost of $50,000 and $80,000 each.

                                                           

Posted in Uncategorized

Brodsky Notices Strange Volatility of Electric Rates Just like WPCNR

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. From Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, 92nd District. March 4, 2009: Over the last year,  readers of WPCNR know it has been the only medium in the metropolitan area to report the  amazing runup and slow spiraling down of Con Edison electric rates that dramatically outpaced the rate of inflation (blamed partly on the “run-up” of oil prices and natural gas prices) and took a long time to come down after inflation cooled in the fall of 2008.


Most recently a report on the WPCNR television show, White Plains Week revealed for the first time that Westchester electricity consumers do not pay the actual cost of generating the electricity as they consume it, they pay a pre-negotiated price hedging against “anticipated” costs at the time of consumption. A Con Edison spokesperson confirmed to WPCNR last month that consumers pay more for electricity than producing it actually cost and sometimes they pay less. The customer does not pay the real-time cost of producing the electricity they use. WPCNR also reported that Con Edison hedging sets prices months in advance of when customers use it.


 WPCNR also pointed out last fall how the New York Independent Systems Operator charges a median price for electricity bought off the NYISO market, setting one price for all, which may be much higher than the lowest supplier’s cost of producting electricity.  


Assemblyman Richard Brodsky of Greenburgh has noticed, too. He is aware of this odd purchasing arrangement and is holding a hearing Thursday on a bill he and others are sponsoring to ban  the “Market-Clearing Price” mechanism and save New York consumers $2.2 billion a year.


Brodsky in a news replease, cited a  report by McCullough Research entitled “New York Independent System Operators Market Clearing Price Auction is Too Expensive for New York”  which reveals $2.2 billion in excessive electric bills for New Yorkers, caused by a system that sets artificially high prices for electricity through its “Market-Clearing Price” auctions. These auctions, according to the report are designed by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), a private, not-for-profit entity that operates the market for electricity in New York State, require all buyers of electricity to pay the highest price available in the market on any given day, rather than the lowest price.


In the news release announcing the hearing, Assemblyman Richard Brodsky  Chairman of the Assembly Committee on Corporations, Authorities, said that New Yorkers now pay the fourth-highest electric bills in the nation.


In comparison to New York, states that have regulated electricity markets offer the lowest cost of electricity at 10 cents per kilowatt-hour, while other deregulated electricity markets provide electricity at 13 cents per kilowatt-hour as of November 2008. 


The McCullough Research report quantifies the excess payments made by New York electric utility customers at $2.2 billion annually (the report is attached). The reasons for the excess payments include:



  • The “Market-Clearing Price” auction requires utilities to pay excessive amounts of money to generators, which yields excessive electric bills for ratepayers. 


  • The secretive auction process leaves the public without the ability to understand the market, and to protect themselves from efforts by power producers to create artificial scarcity.


  • A handful of buyers and sellers have controlled the market and the price of electricity has done nothing but increase.

“The question to ask is why New Yorkers should pay 2.2 billion more than they would under a different system,” said Robert McCullough.  “The current system at the New York ISO is neither transparent nor efficient.  A system that relies on long term contracts with generators has the potential to provide lower prices and reduce the high and volatile prices from the ISO’s markets.   We should facilitate this transition immediately.  In the interim, the New York ISO should adopt rules that reveal bids, bidders, and the algorithm that turns bids into prices.  In addition, restricting bids to verifiable marginal costs would provide immediate benefits to consumers.”


“New York’s government should not permit $2.2 billion to be taken out of the pockets of electric customers for no good reason. The market-clearing price auction sets prices at the highest level. It is absurd and destructive.  The system of deregulation that the Pataki administration and the Public Service Commission forced down our throats over ten years ago has been a complete failure,” said Assemblyman Richard Brodsky. “We believe we can lower energy bills ten percent through our legislation (A.1563), by eliminating the market-clearing price.”


In February, a report http://www.appanet.org/files/PDFs/EMRICompetitiveMarket.pdf by the American Public Power Association (APPA) also found that wholesale electricity markets, such as those run by the NYISO, has not produced the low prices that were promised under electricity industry deregulation.  The APPA criticizes the secret manner in which the NYISO operates and the inefficient, arcane rules that drive prices higher.


The Assembly Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions, and the Assembly Committee on Energy will convene a joint hearing on Thursday, March 5, at 10:30 a.m. in Hearing Room C in the Legislative Office Building to discuss pending legislation to ban the “Market-Clearing Price” mechanism and save New York consumers $2.2 billion a year.


“I look forward to working with Assemblyman Kevin Cahill who has been an active voice of reforming the energy system in New York State,” said Assemblyman Richard Brodsky.


Witnesses include the NYISO, the Public Service Commission, Robert McCullough, Con Ed, and the Working Families Party among others. The full panels of witnesses testifying are listed below:


·  New York Independent System Operator, Public Service Commission


·  Robert McCullough, Professor Tim Mount, American Public Power Association, Public Utility Law Project, NYPIRG, Working Families Party


·  Con Edison, Central Hudson, NYSEG, RGE, National Grid, PASNY


·  Consumer Protection Board


·  Manufacturers Association, Council of Industry, Endicott Interconnect


·  Independent Power Producers of New York, Alliance for Clean Energy


Legislation to end the market clearing price (A.1563) is sponsored by Assemblymembers Brodsky, Lifton, Bradley, Colton, Destito, Gunther, Jaffee, Koon, Millman, Reilly, P. Rivera, Zebrowski, Gottfried, Fields, O’Donnell, Spano, Peralta, Kellner, Greene, Brennan, Russell, Espaillat, Heastie, Rosenthal, Benjamin, and Jeffries.

Posted in Uncategorized

Cappelli Organization Offers Bonuses to Realtors — Calls It “Stimulus”

 


 


WPCNR THE HOUSING NEWS. From Cappelli Enterprises March 5, 2009 (Edited)– Cappelli Sales & Marketing has announced its very own stimulus program for Westchester County today where agents can earn over $100,000 in bonuses this year selling Cappelli apartments and condominiums.


 


When an agent sells a new home at any participating Cappelli property they earn the standard three percent commission. However, when they sell a second Cappelli home they receive a $5,000 bonus in addition to their three percent commission. The bonuses increase incrementally by $2,500 for each new home sold. For example, the bonus for a third sale is $7,500, $10,000 bonus for a fourth, $12,500 for a fifth and so on. An agent who sells ten homes this year from Cappelli properties would receive a total of $135,000 in bonuses in addition to the 3 percent commissions.


 







 Cappelli Sales & Marketing is launching its 2009 Bonus Broker Program with a direct-mail piece designed to look like a $100,000 bill and bearing the message: ”How Would You Like to Earn an Extra $100,000+ This Year?”


 


“Our message to the brokerage community is quite simple — You keep selling and we’ll keep paying,” said Marge Schneider, Executive Vice President of Cappelli Sales & Marketing. “This may sound like a challenge in today’s market but it can be done. Last year we had one broker who brought us eight deals,” she said.


 


The Cappelli properties covered under this new incentive program include: The Residences at The Ritz-Carlton, Westchester in White Plains; Trump Parc Stamford in Stamford, CT; Trump Park Residences in Yorktown; and Trump Plaza and The Lofts in New Rochelle. This diverse group of Cappelli properties ranges in price from $400,000 to $8 million.


 


Ms. Schneider noted that the sales offices at the various Cappelli properties are reporting an increase in traffic in recent weeks. “We are seeing more and more buyers coming back into the market. We intend to build on that excitement by energizing brokers with this new bonus incentive program.” 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Sales Tax with 7 Months in Books: $28.8M. On Budget in Face of 12% Decline.

 


WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. By John F. Bailey. March 3, 2009: The city  is on target to make its sales tax despite a soft holiday season, Commissioner of Finance Gina Cuneo-Harwood told WPCNR Monday. According to January sales tax receipts, with 7 months gone in the fiscal year, the city  is sitting on $28.8 Million Sales Tax collected and needs about $16.6 Million the next four months to meet their sales tax target of $45.4 Million.


 


If retail sales remain the same as 2007 the next five months as they did last year the city will make it easily, generating $15.8 Million in sales through May, when the budget has to be approved and stands, even with a decline of 12% in June sales, will still generate $21 Million in sales coming in at $49 Million in sales tax for the year


 


 



 However if the 12% decline in sales that appeared in the holiday quarter prevails the city will generate only $620 Million in retail sales that will produce only $14 Million in sales tax giving the city only $43 Million by the end of May. You could say that the strong June of last year even if it declined 12% due to the economy would still give the city $4.5 Million to close the year so the city looks good for abou $47.5 Million sales tax even if sales continue to be off 10 to 12 % the next four months.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       


This January, the sales tax  is 2-1/4 %. It appears that retail sales for January are flat – even though  the city still generated the same $200,000,000  in spending  they saw last January.  The net sales tax is slightly ahead of what 2-1/4% should bring in, which is good news.


 


Commissioner of Finance, Gina Cuneo-Harwood said, though, that last quarter was up in the first month (October, 08), so she is not as confident that the city will make its projection, since Fortunoff and Circuit City are closing. She is predicting sales tax will finish at about $47.7 Million for the 08-09 year, which appears in line even if you factor in a 12% decline in city retail. Declining automobile sales, though could put a serious dent beyond 12%.


 


To date the city has collected $28 Million. However to do that the city needs to bring in  $16.1 Million,  (without Fortunoff and Circuit City),or close to it through the April figures for the city to be confident budgeting another $45 Million for next year’s sales project.  (The budget is adopted the last week in May).


 


How does it look? From February through April last year taxing at 2%, the city generated $10.4 Million in Sales Tax. In May and June the city collected 8.2 Million.


 


Retail sales in February of last year were an estimated $180,000,000; in March, $180,000,000; April, $175,000,000; May, $170,000,000; and in June, the city did $220 Million in retail sales to generate an all-time record sales tax for a month of $4,794,423. However, with inflation basically at zero now, and major price-cutting in effect, those levels may be off from 2007 levels.


 


Should the city generate the $950 Million retail sales from February through June it generated in 2007 (before the current recession), it will earn $21 Million in sales tax easily making its sales tax target, even surpassing it, hitting $49 Million even in a down economy.


 


With the additional ¼%, and if retail sales do not slump off last year’s levels, the city may make their $45 Million. February and March will say a lot.


 


If the city continues its 12%  decline in retail sales it experienced in the last quarter, that does not necessarily jeopardize this year’s sales tax target, but bodes ill for next year’s budget. It raises the question of whether the city should budget for more sales tax than the $45.4 Million expected this fiscal year.

Posted in Uncategorized