WPNCR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. March 9. 2009: The Board of Education meets this evening and will unveil the latest version of the touchy 2009-2010 School Budget. Will they cut or will they not?
As analyzed on White Plains Week last Friday night and its internet telecast, at www.whiteplainsweek.com, (see the telecast at 7 tonight on Public Access 76 (Cablevision) or FIOS Channel 45) WPCNR notes that with the drop of the city assessment roll of about $5 Million dollars, the school budget going into this evening’s meeting ($185.9 Million) needs to raise taxes $16 per $1,000 to $519/$1,000 of assessed value to make up for the lost $4.3 Million in revenues due to the drop in the assessment roll to $186.8 Million. Tonight, it is expected the district will go over its expected revenues, which may or may not result in a larger tax increase.
Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors is expected to announce layoffs. The meeting is open to the public at 5 Homeside Lane, Education House at 7:30 P.M. Also on the agenda is approvals of substitute teachers and extra-curricular activity appointments.
The head of the White Plains Teachers Association, Kerry Broderick, told WPCNR last week, the district is planning to fire 24 certified teachers, 20 Teaching Assistants, plus secretaries, custodians and security guards adding up to a total of 58 layoffs in order to make further cuts in the budget. The teachers union is currently in state-supervised mediation talks with the district over their impasse in salary and benefits negotiations,
Broderick said the mood of negotiations is not good. She charged that no administrators were being cut. The Superintendent of Schools, Timothy Connors told WPCNR, he did not know where those numbers came from and that there would “across-the-board” layoffs, including administrators. Broderick said the school board was taking the attitude that “the board thinks we (the teachers) owe them so much.” She charged that “negotiating with the School Board is like negotiating with JELL-O. Every time I think we have something, they change their mind. It (a new contract) is in their hands, I don’t know what they’re going to do.”
Connors said he would detail the cuts in personnel this evening.
From a city standpoint, the Common Council is expressing no interest or concern about the budget publicly. With the drop in the city assessment roll to $285.2 Million, if the city keeps the budget the same as it is this year, $161.7 Million the district needs $1 Million to “catch up” with the assessment drop. The city tax rate will go from $147 per $1,000 of assessed value to $151/$1,000 – if the city keeps the budget where it is.
If they roll over the budget to $168. Million, the tax rate will go up to $173 per $1,000 of assessed valuate. Your city tax for a $700,000 home will go from $2,700 to $3,200, up $500. If the city does a modest budget increase to $165 Million – they will need only a $159 per $1,000 of value and the city tax on the $700,000 will go up only $238 to $2,938.
Since the city has not even projected revenues yet which the city says is expected to be down about $9 Million plus – that would have to be figured into any tax increase in addition, unless of course the city decides to cut the budget substantially.
To date, the city has said they have cut the budget, and there has been talk of the city entailing contingency budgets for next year. To date despite weekly requests by WPCNR for detailed lists of the cuts, the city has not confirmed any, and has not given a list of the cuts.
