Two Decision Days for White Plains

WPCNR NEWS & COMMENT. By John F. Bailey. May 19, 2009.Portions of this column were published two years ago and have been updated to reflect what has happened since then:Today  (May 19) and Thursday, May 21 are pivotal days for the citizens of White Plains. Today just about now the School Budget and Board of Education Elections have begun at 6 locations around the city.  On the budget choice voters have a decision as to whether to pass the $185.8 Million budget or vote “No” and go to a Contingency Budget of $185,553,036, just about $250,000 less. Plus you have some spirited competition in the Board of Education elections, so spirited that the Democratic leaders of the city in panic apparently have endorsed two incumbents responsible for creating the recent labor contracts that have created the present precarious position the school district faces next year as labor contracts run out.


On Thursday now, (postponing Wednesday’s scheduled meeting to adopt the budget),  the Common Council of the City of White Plains meets at the odd hour of 5 P.M. to pass a city budget, and meets again in a Special Meeting at 6. Since they were supposed to meet again to decide on final cuts after last Tuesday’s rancorous meeting, one would presume they would not be meeting at 6 to pass raises for all the City Commissioners and themselves, but you never know, as has been their nefarious and deceptive practice in the past. How else will we attract talent for the city next January, and start White Plains on a new high road of fiscal responsibility? Why wouldn’t we give our out-going Commissioners a nice boost to their retirements? I am being mischievous here. How could the council even think about increasing Commissioner salaries in this economy given the $12 Million deficit? Silly of me.


But, really this Common Council has not even begun to think about the budget Armageddon they’re going to face next year. Perhaps they should for the next seven months. Obama Bucks are the only answer.






 


To cut or not to cut that is the question for the 2010-11 School Budget. Will the incumbents have the will to slash their favorites, the administrators and supervisors who earn more than Supreme Court Judges thanks to the present School Board giveway contracts? What do you think?  Perhaps we can keep the school budget under $190 Million next year but that depends on the bleeding White Plains Assessment Roll.


And another thing, could we have a longer campaign period for the Board of Education elections. These citizen-“managers” “manage” a $185.8 Million budget — badly. They dabble and babble and say it’s “for the kids.” 


 Currently candidates get petitions in by May 1, and have 18 days to get the issues out before the elections. How absurd. That has to be changed if you are ever going to get persons who are not “politically correct” on this board to look down range and see what’s coming.


Could White Plains realize that there are persons in this city who have brains that do not live in the southend of town? In fact, they may have better math skills. Anyway, let’s have the Board of Ed campaign start earlier at least — and do away with the contrivance of the League of Women Voters Forum. Have a caravan — going around to the PTAs at least. At least one tough question was asked by Carrie Kyzivat — what the candidates would do about finances going forward, though all the answers to that question mystriously were given off-mike on the telecast replay of the forum — the microphones were off — so it was very hard to understand. But of course, there are no conspiracies, are there?


The results today in the school board election will most likely be the results like any other year.Budget passes. The usual suspects reelected.


Which means next year will be fun and we should pay real close attention.


 


Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors departs his position in July. it is not too early to be thinking about what new School Superintendent. Dr. Christopher Clouet will inherit.


Few can argue that Connors has been a decisive, politically astute leader, persuading the district parents (because that is who votes in school board elections and bond referendums) to take on the mammoth $69 Million Capital Improvements Project.  He has kept the wolves at bay on the achievement gap in White Plains by at least getting the tedious bureaucracy of the district to focus seriously on the district’s Hispanic and African-American population of which about little more than half can read proficiently two years ago, and  write and do basic math when they enter high school. That may sound harsh, but that is what the statistics showed. Now latest results from Dr. Margaret Dwyer show that has been turned around by extensive remedial work in the middle school.


 


On the other hand, how much more improvement can the district make if they do not address the language problem facing the Hispanic community by not hiring and installing bilingual education in the lower grades?  The African-American academic achievement gap is another problem. When parents are involved children learn regardless of their race or creed or background. Perhaps Dr. Clouet’s ability to connect with minorities will provide a new incentive to improve the learning ethic and needed parental involvement.


However the overriding issue facing the next Superintendent of Schools is the budget. As reported by WPCNR for years, the city blithely continues to rollover for certiorari suits by businesses that are the premier properties in town, continuing to erode the tax base on which the school district taxes for the balance of its budget. The city continued to bet the taxpayer’s wellbeing on development, while agreeing to tax givebacks and assessment reductions based on owner numbers which when you think about have to be contrived via accounting creativity.


How can buildings sold in a thriving downtown be assessed for less? But try and prove it. The city continues the certiorari givebacks and the school district continues to go along with them.  If the Bradley Administration coming in (no Republican Mayoral challenger or Common Council challengers yet as of May19) does anything, they have to impose a city wide commercial certiorari “make-up” charge of some kind that will mitigate the assessment impact.


School taxes that traditionally have made White Plains attractive in the real estate market are going to have to rise about 10% a year to sustain the current level of district spending – which was brought to its lowest increase level in a decade last year but still 7% — double inflation, and this year they held the tax increase to 2.4%.  But, how can they continue to fund their increasingly militant labor force? Teacher rapport is shot thanks to the gobs of cash thrown at administrators each of the last three years. The district negotiators continue to focus on holding the line on the merit raises, without looking seriously at  the step contracts and longevity increases that really kill the district budget. How about lowering the starting salaries for  new teachers? How about doing away with the automatic longevity raises – negotiated in deranged moments in the past?


 The new Superintendent will face a budget that is out of control in a district that shows little heart for reining in spending until this year.


The present Superintendent made very token inroads on the teacher salary structure limiting the year to year contract salary increase to 3%, and negotiating token increase in what teachers pay for their health insurance. And the new Superintendent will  have to negotiate this again a year from now. (Any arbitrated settlement will only be for two years, which will include this year (08-09) and 2009-10).


The portion teachers pay of their health benefits has to go up to trim the 10% increase in health benefits costs that continue to afflict the district.  The negotiations in the first Clouet contract will have to begin with overhauling the structure. You have to lower starting salaries, and revamp the step levels (for degrees) for new teachers being hired into the system to assure the long term health of the district. It is easy to say this, hard to negotiate, but for too long the district has paid such generous salaries compared to other districts that when shown the White Plains schedules, teachers in similar sized districts drop their jaws in disbelief. I know, I’ve showed the salary and step schedule around.


 The relationships in the district between White Plains administration and teachers have always been so cordial and mutually symbiotic. No more. Two thirds of the budget goes to salaries for teaching and administrating.  One could argue that a spirit of mutual cooperation where administration and teaching professionals work together is great for the district. But, the district, thanks to the city fiscal mismanagement of the tax roll, especially the last eight years, can no longer afford business as usual.


The new Superintendent taking over in July will also have to deal with the very secret process of the District Strategic Plan – in which action plans are being devised for presentation to the Board of Education this fall without any public airing to date. But who knows what those action plans are?  The goals are generic.  Not lower  budget to inflation levels. Not attritition of  staff by 10%. Things like that Are they even discussed?


Tomorrow and Thursday, the district gets together on the Strategic Plan. We shall see what comes out of it. The Mission Statement is fine. But what will they be doing?


Specifics have not been divulged, and oddly enough there has been no public recognition by the Strategic Planners (most of whom are school district employees) of the financial plight of the district and how to address it. 


Creating a strategic plan with goals of a lofty variety that do not engage the issues threatening effective efficient, economic education of our youth in the face of a plummeting tax base is wishful thinking.


It’s living in wonderland.


Creating a strategic plan for a decade without coming to grips with the deteriorating buildings at Highlands and Eastview and George Washington School – in the face of cross-your-fingers population estimates based only on birth rate every year – is ignoring reality. The district is at the limits of what it can handle now.


Creating a strategic plan for a decade without coming to grips with the question of why we need to do $17 Million of infrastructure improvements the next two years when we supposedly have been spending $3 Million a year for building upkeep begs the question – how good is the fiscal plant maintenance year to year that is in place now? You have to ask those questions in any strategic plan. If you’re maintaining yearly, you should not have to upgrade $17 million-dollars worth in one crippling debt blow.


These are old schools, too.  How long will they last? Where will the new school school buildings come from to handle our gradually increasing population?


The public needs to see those specifics. If they care. The City School District is essentially where they were seven years ago when they dismissed the previous Superintendent, but the financial pressure has increased substantially thanks to their own largesse. The district  is running out of money sources.


 


If the district leaders do not recognize that they are creating a taxing disaster which will cripple the district for years and the quality of our education more than they will ever realize, the fate is sealed. The taxpayer will be bailing out for years to come.


That is the situation the new Superintendent faces now


On the academic side, one wonders, short of bringing in a bilingual education effort which the district is experimenting with next year – an English Spanish class where students are instructed half in English and half in Spanish – how serious they are at addressing the bilingual need. Port Chester has for years been able to handle their Spanish speaking population with a bilingual program.


 The White Plains Board of Education was told that by this reporter seven years ago, and now thanks to Mr. Connors leadership they are beginning to see the light. Whether the administration will expand on this initiative to teach children of Hispanic descent bilingually  is a fundamental part of Strategic Planning and what the new Superintendent will have to address. Are they even doing that? We don’t know because the district planners are not talking.


The new Superintendent, contrary to what one Board of Education candidate said last week, cannot afford to just get comfortable and schmooze the city in his first year.  He must  lead.


Mr. Connors, though we have not always felt he has moved hard and fast enough has taken decades of  laissez-faire management in this district and has started to turn this very large bloated supertanker around out of the shoals, even though it is leaking red ink and billing the taxpayer for it. Had the Board of Education established a Special Education Academy as Connors suggested five years ago they would have a profit center and educational resource that would have paid for itself. So much for Board of Education vision.


Above all – school district and city government need a management that will pay attention to numbers more than two weeks out of the year, and will trim this district’s operating costs; negotiate a teaching salary structure which over time will keep labor costs at the inflationary rate instead of escalating exponentially.  I am not saying you have to eliminate step increases. I am saying you have to stretch them out, negotiate them down – for new teachers being hired. Otherwise things are not going to change. And attack those benefit payments. They are way out of line with the private sector.


The new Superintendent is going to have to trim administration personnel. We have far too many administrators. Attrition after persons leave the district has to be looked at more seriously than it is. The district currently employs one administrator for every 13 teachers it has. That needs to be looked at very closely, and attrition strongly considered.


The city has to examine their labor force, too, with contract negotiations piling up, tax base tanking, and no development in sight.


Cross your fingers, taxpayers.

Posted in Uncategorized

Barbara Benjamin Dies

WPCNR MILESTONES. May19, 2009:  WPCNR has received a  report from Paula Piekos that Barbara Benjamin, long time head of Concerned Citizens for Open Space, advocate for turning New York Presbyterian Hospital property into a city park passed away Monday morning. Alan Teck, her long time associate in CCOS in White Plains, recently penned this tribute to Mrs. Benjamin when she was honored at Sam’s of Gedney Way.


Mrs. Benjamin was a tireless and fearless advocate for what she believed in,and she should be respected for that quality alone.


Mr. Teck wrote:


Barbara lived in White Plains for 53 years, from September 1952 until August of this year (2008).

 

She quickly found her way to the local Democratic Headquarters and began her career as a volunteer to support the candidacy of Adlai Stevenson. Four years later, she was hired to run the county Democratic Headquarters. Her first public appearance was leading a donkey down Main Street.

 

Concerned Citizens for Open Space was started in 1984 as a non-profit, tax-exempt organization advocating the preservation, enhancement and expansion of open space and parkland in White Plains and Westchester County.

 

Ted Benjamin, Barbara’s husband, joined CCOS in the early ’80s and became President soon thereafter.

 

When Ted died in 1997, Barbara, who had joined CCOS with Ted, became President, has been Chairperson for the past five years and is now Chairperson Emeritus.

 

As President and Chairperson, Barbara has been a forceful advocate of the CCOS mission. All CCOS activities and achievements have benefited from her insight, leadership and ability as a speaker and writer.

 

White Plains is better and greener because of her ideas, forcefulness, integrity and boundless energy.

 

CCOS has worked diligently with neighborhood associations throughout White Plains and under Barbara’s leadership has contributed to efforts that have resulted in the designation of two parks and preservation of several neighborhood open spaces throughout our city.

 

Equally as important, under her leadership CCOS  worked successfully with the Common Council to stop several attempts at massive development on what still remains a large, unblemished, Olmsted-designed park near the center of White Plains.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Where to vote for the School Budget and School Board

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. May 18,2009: Tuesday, May 19,. is Vote-for-the-School Budget-or- Against-It Day in White Plains, and also time to vote for who is going to guide White Plains School District with plummeting revenues, tanking assessments, and a top heavy bureaucracy (1 administrator for every 13 teachers) into the future. Will White Plains trust the incumbents who created the present budget crisis, or vote new board members in? You decide. To cast your ballot, WPCNR reminds voters the polls open at noon Tuesday and close at 9 P.M. Here is the district map:



District 1: Vote at the Battle Hill Fire Station 5, if you live on the Northwest Side of the Bronx River Parkway, and West of Tarrytown Road.


District 2: Vote at Church Street School, if you live North of Westchester Avenue, and East of Tarrytown Road and Mamaroneck Avenue, North of Hamilton Avenue.


District 3: Vote at Rochambeau School, if you live West of Mamaroneck Avenue, South of Hamilton Avenue and North of Maple Avenue, and on the  North and West side of Post Road.


District 4: Vote at Highlands Middle School if you live East and South of  West Post Road, East to Davis Avenue and West of  Old Mamaroneck Road,


District 5: Vote at Mamaroneck Avenue School, if you live South of Westchester Avenue, South of Maple Avenue, East of Davis Avenue south to Heatherbloom Road, South of Westchester Avenue to Bryant Avenue.


District 6: Vote at Ridgeway School, if you live South of Heatherbloom and Bryant Avenue, East of Old Mamaroneck Road .

Posted in Uncategorized

SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES MINUS 2 PREDICT HARD SCHOOL DAYS AHEAD.

 


 


WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. May 18, 2009 UPDATED 10:25 (Italics): The proposed $185.8 Million School Budget and six candidates for the White Plains Board of Education go before the White Plains voters Tuesday, with six polling places open from 12 noon to 9 P.M Tuesday. 


 



The Candidates Forum Minus Two. Left to right, Peter Bassano, James Hricay, Reynolds Longfield and Donna McLaughlin.


 


At the Candidates Forum held at White Plains High School last Tuesday evening, incumbent Board members, Peter Bassano and Donna McLaughlin did not reveal any plans for scaling back the budget further, except for “watching every penny,” with Bassano the more pessimistic of the two incumbents.


 


 Challenger Reynolds Longfield said he would bring a familiarity with data analysis and pragmatic judgment of data that could yield a better picture of what the district needed to do. He also called for compromise with the Teachers Association. Challenger James Hricay touted his knowledge of municipal budgets in both White Plains and Stamford as enabling him to suggest and work for better budget practices.


 


Timothy Connors, opening the forum, said the current budget was the lowest year-to-year increase in the history of the school district. He said the district would continue to be pressured by certiorari tax refunds until the state legislature called for a “reval” of residential real estate. Donna McLaughlin, one of the two incumbents running agreed saying until the legislature passed two separate equalization rates for business and residential properties, assessment decline would continue to plague the district.


 



Augostino Zicca, Jr., left, and Elsie Lahrmann issue statements (shown at recent Gedney Farms Association Meeting) last week.


 


Augostino Zicca Jr. and Dr. Elsie Lahrmann, who boycotted the debate on advice of their lawyers, due to what they described as a racist Democratic Party e-mail campaign against them, issued statements to the media Sunday on their positions, which WPCNR includes in this report, based on a video tape of the forum that was conducted opposite a Common Council meeting.


 


Incumbents Tout Experience, Continued “Prudence.”


 


Bassano said he expected matters to be considerably worse in developing the 2010-11 budget. McLaughlin said she expected no major changes being brought to the district in his first year by incoming Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Christopher Clouet. She said she expected that he would observe and learn his first year.


 


McLaughlin maintained that the present board cut the budget to a .74% increase this year to prepare for the challenges next year.  She also said she expected the district to continue “what we’ve been doing.”She said she expected that Dr. Clouet would be able to attract grants to the district for programs to ease the financial pressures – a talent that brought New London $95 Million in grants for a magnet school. She also said he brought great communications skills to the district.


 


 In her opening and closing statements, McLaughlin said during her time on the Board, the Board had developed All-Day Kindergarten in the district, built the new  Post Road School and  renovated Mamaroneck Avenue School, renovated two football stadiums with new stands and artificial surfaces, and planned needed infrastructure improvements. (The district has just issued bonds for the final $16 Million in district building infrastructure improvements, which will secure a $6 Million reimbursement from the state on the $66 Million in financing spent on those capital projects).  She also said during her time on the board dual language kindergarten was begun in George Washington School,and in a bit of news, said a similar dual language program would begin at new Post Road School next September.


 


(During those12 years, though, it should be noted the school budget doubled from $92.6 Million in 1996-97 to  $185.8 Million should the district pass the budget tomorrow. She said her twelve years of experience and knowledge of the board, was an asset navigating the district through this tough time. Mr. Bassano and Ms. McLaughlin also approved the present administrator and previous teacher contracts. 


 


Peter Bassano, describing himself as the lead negotiator with the teachers,  said the teachers union contract continued to be hung up on the amount of a merit raise for this year and next, even though, he said,  70% of the teachers had gotten a 2-1/2% raise based on longevity, and others had received increases based on any  progress in achieving new academic degrees.  


 


He said the economy was “unfair,” noting that the 4 Assistant Superintendents in the district were under a wage freeze, (neglecting to mention that those 4 Assistant Superintendents were voted salary increases 7 months ago of 5%, 3%, 3% and 3% by the Board of Education). Bassano expressed disappointment in the leadership of the White Plains Teachers Association in refusing to compromise on the merit increases, saying the union stance  was “detrimental to the children of the district, detrimental to the teachers.” He also claimed he and McLaughlin were the targets of a “jihad” against them by the Teachers Union,  including drive-by heckling of Mr. Bassano when he was mowing his lawn. Mr. Bassano did not elaborate.


 


 Bassano reported that the additional languages beginning in sixth grade at the Highlands next fall was done without costing a penny more in the budget. It was done by going to a nine period day and transfering one teacher.  


 


According to White Plains Teachers Union President,  Kerry Broderick, the district had to offer the same language courses at Highlands as they did at Eastview in the sixth grade, and this was a necessity not voluntary enhancement.


 


Longfield: Compromise with Teachers a Must.


 


Longfield said repeatedly that the district had to work with the teachers to “compromise” without offering bargaining chips or suggestions. He said the district and all parties in the district had to work together. Longfield noted that Hricay (being married to a teacher in the White Plains School District) would have to recuse himself from any voting on teacher contracts, limiting his ability to affect change.


 


McLaughlin: More Data; Sharper Evaluation of Programs.


 


McLaughlin said her goals were to evaluate programs more closely, justifying the performance of each program going forward, and also said better data was another key objective. This has been a repeated complaint of Ms. McLaughlin the last four years with each year the administration making excuses to the School Board for not having longitudinal data on specific classes over the years. First the incompatibility of data in the district was the issue. The next year there was an inputting problem. Two years ago BOCES was going to do it, but apparently overpromised. Now the district has gone to another software system, Infinite Campus. Perhaps this will change now that a new Manager of Information Processing, hired at $150,000 last August is at the helm, who has yet to make any public report on data progress. The  third new software package (Infinite Campus) costing $300,000 is being installed districtwide and should be in use by the end of next year, according to the outgoing Superintendent.


  


Challenger James Hricay in closing statements said he expected the public sector (i.e, the school district) to suffer next year even if the economy recovers because the economic pressures always affect the public sector last.  Hricay said he would work in consort with the Board and not against them.


 


Reynolds Longfield III, the other challenger, said his experience in analyzing data and developing data reporting techniques in his position as developing and then heading the social studies department in a New York City school, would be an asset in analyzing and critiquing what data is presented the district on its performance in the year ahead.


 


McLaughlin and Bassano repeated Assistant Superintendent of Business Fred Seiler’s warning that the district contribution to the retirement fund for teachers would go up substantially next year injecting an advance pressure on the budget.


 


Zicca and Lahrmann State Positions


 


Augostino Zicca,Jr. one of the school board candidates did not appear at the Board of Education Candidates Forum, protesting the way leaders of the Democratic Party had urged Democrats to vote against him in a Democrat canvas e-mail last week. Zicca accused the Democrats of implying he was racist by criticsing  his past suggestions to tackle the dangerous illegal housing conditions in which illegals and legal immigrants live in this city.


 


Zicca and Dr. Elsie Lahrmann sent these letters to the media stating what they intend to do as a member of the Board of Education:


 


 


Letter to Editor,


 


I am a candidate for the White Plains School Board.   Born and raised in White Plains, I attended the Battle Hill School and I am an alumnus of White Plains High School.


 


I am a retired IBM business professional with extensive corporate development and global experience, along with being a retired Westchester County Correctional Officer. I was assigned as an officer to the program for our incarcerated youth that allowed them to continue their education while in custody. My years working with this population were rewarding and provided me with experience as a motivational leader for our troubled youth in Westchester County.


 


As a community leader and Vice President of The Battle Hill Association in the City of White Plains, I identified a situation unknown to the White Plains School District.  Due to my advocacy for children and working with many parents in this district, the City of White Plains established a notification system to all residents concerning Sexual Offenders residing in White Plains. Communication and data between the school system and City of White Plains must continue to improve.


 


Transparency between the community and school board is essential to create an enhanced and welcoming relationship with all residents.  It is pertinent that the school board hold meetings in all neighborhoods on a rotating basis to improve relationships and communicate budget issues. As a current member of the Community Block Grant Program for the City of White Plains, I have been able to establish dialogue with our large diverse population.


 


We must create an independent review board to analyze all financial matters affecting the district, welcoming all neighborhood representation, unlike the current board recommendation limited to two volunteers from the community. We need to improve relations with all unions. Transparency and open dialogue will enhance our children’s education and parental involvement. Increased focus on the challenged youth in the district will provide them with all educational tools necessary to become achieving adults.


 


A zero base budget system must be recognized and explored to combat the difficult decisions that we may confront in next years budget.  The last five years have brought almost a 38% tax increase from an experienced school board.


 


It is time to revisit all positions, expenses, and revenues in the White Plains School District.


 


 


Augie Zicca Jr.


School Board Candidate


 


Dr. Elsie Lahrmann, who, with Mr. Zicca also declined to appear at the Candidates Forum on advice of her lawyer, who advised Zicca and Lahrmann they were probably walking into an ambush. Also sent this letter to the CitizeNetReporter stating their objectives should they be elected to the Board.


 


May 16, 2009


Dear Editor:


 


I am a candidate for the City of White Plains school board.  It is necessary for me to tell you who I am and why I will be an asset when I am elected to the board.


 


I am a lifelong resident of the City of White Plains. On a personal note my wonderful husband George and I will be celebrating our 45th anniversary this year.  We have lived in Gedney Farms for thirty six years.  I presently serve on the Gedney Board and as the chairman of the public safety committee and have initiated discussions with the City of White Plains to lower the speed limit in neighborhoods.  The purpose of doing this is that children should be able to play safely in their yards.  On an educational level I have a BS in clinical nutrition and doctorate in naturopathy.  I have a practice in natural medicine in the City of White Plains.


 


             On a professional level my twenty five years with the City of White Plains had many accomplishments that I am still proud of.  As the emergency planning director my grant writing abilities saved the taxpayers thousands of dollars for a Police Captain and a Fire Lt, who served on may staff in an emergency capacity.  I wrote the grant for the City of White Plains with regard to microfilming of municipal records; I also shared these services with the White Plains Board of Education.  At the direction of the WP Common Council I acted as administrator for the upgrading of ambulance service to the paramedic response system.  


 


 I am still proud today, that this program is working everyday for the citizens of WP. I acted as the Regional Vice President of the Emergency Medical Services Council and served as the Westchester County delegate to that body.  I am still proud of the designation of the trauma system and the lives it has saved in the region. I initiated the National Flood Insurance Program for the City of WP and acted as their administrator.


 


            Let’s talk about Board of Education issues.  The last five years of 37.4% increases in the school board budget has hurt many homeowners who are now feeling the effects of this economic crisis.  We must make hard decisions and negotiations on this budget and it must benefit the taxpayer and represent inclusion and fair representation for all who live and attend our schools. Did this board request a grant written for the improvement of drainage problems as specified in the capital projects report? It would have saved the taxpayer 1 million dollars.  


 


I am therefore presenting a zero based budget system be initiated in the upcoming new year, so that all expenditures can be analyzed with proper solutions.  Consolidation of departments must be addressed and staffing patterns must be presented and analyzed (currently not being presented to the public). 


 


I believe that the lack of transparency must come to an end.  The finance committee established by the current board should have representatives from each neighborhood in this city, not just two as directed by the board.  We must educate all children and all parents must have an equal opportunity to serve this district.  As far as the teachers union is concerned the president is a long time family friend.  I did volunteer to assist her, and that is what community involvement is about.  


 


 


Elsie J. Lahrmann


 

Posted in Uncategorized