America’s Birthday

WPCNR MILESTONES. Remembrance and Photographs By Carl Albanese. July 4,2009:



Fifth Regiment Reinactors of Westchester and White Plains at Purdy House in White Plains.



On April 19, 1775 the inevitable first shots of American Independence are fired at Lexington and Concord Massachusetts at Concord’s North Bridge.

On or about April 15, 1775, the famous words rang out over Boston,
“The British are Coming” Paul Revere, mounts his horse at the shores of Cambridge rides inland spreading the word in the middle of the night, warning Sam Adams and John Hancock.


Through the night the British Red Coats marched north, Minutemen and Militia gathered and marched towards Lexington through the brisk cold night took up arms, By days break the British troops took clear notice of armed men forming over the fields of battle as the Red Coats marched past the town of Menotomy, drummers drumming, bells ringing, horses galloping,

“The British are Coming, the British are Coming” We will never know who fired the very first shot at Lexington Green. History has it the trigger man was an American. What we do know, it was the very first shot of American Freedom, Independence, America a free nation is born and the start of the Revolutionary War gives birth to our new nation.

These new American Veterans, the very first freedom fighters, were ordinary people, farmers, townsmen, local business professionals, teachers, blacksmiths, local workers, and family men. Men and people with one cause and purpose, unity to live free, be free and rid of government rule, oppression and tyranny.

Willing to die for a principal, and ideology, a dream, willing to pick up arms to do it, defend themselves, their loved ones and family.  Little did they know they created the greatest nation in the World, the free world, America.

A Democracy is born, governed by the people for the people!

On Independence Day, July 4th, we remember the birth of our “Great Nation and those who gave birth to it.  Our early American Veterans, the original Veterans of Americas freedom fighters, ordinary people.





Honor all of our Veterans on Independence Day and fly the American Flag in Honor of our Veterans and American Independence.

Posted in Uncategorized

County : WP Shouldn’t Change Winbrook Zoning W/O Full Enviro.City:No Money

 


 


WPCNR THE HOUSING NEWS. By John F. Bailey. July 3, 2009: The Westchester County Planning Board in a letter from Deputy Commissioner of Planning Edward Buroughs dated June 19, cautions the City of White Plains strongly not to pass the zoning change clearing the tracks to rebuild Winbrook by adding  Winbrook  into the Central Parking District. Mr. Buroughs says it violates  standard New York State Environmental Quality Review procedures. Nevertheless, council is proceeding on schedule for the approval Monday night.


 


The major zoning change is on track for a continuance of its public hearing Monday night and an expected  “super hot rush approval” by the Common Council  Monday evening because, because the White Plains Housing Authority.


 



 


Commissioner Buroughs advised the city June 19 that due to the “significant impact on community character, makes the concurrent review of detailed site plans and the proposed zoning amendment all the more important.”





 



 


Commissioner Buroughs expresses the county’s reluctance to bless the zoning change, after noting that  “Planning for a mix of fair and affordable housing to a range of incomes, integrated with commercial services, should set the framework for creating a more attractive, functional and vibrant community. We are further encouraged that the proposal calls for on-site relocation of current residents.”


 


However, Buroughs is troubled, nonetheless:


 


In a paragraph in a letter to Anne McPherson, the City Clerk, on “Procedural Considerations,” He writes:


 


“When zoning ordinance amendments are proposed in support of  a specific development concept on a specific site, the NYS Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) generally suggests that the evaluation of potential environmental impacts of the zoning action be considered in tandem with the evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed site development. To do otherwise could be considered  to be segmentation of the environmental review. While the most recent submission includes a conceptual site plan, it is impossible to conduct a full environmental review of the proposed site improvements without detailed site plans.”


 


Mr. Buroughs worries:


 


“Furthermore, we note from the site plan that the proposed development would include four 15-story towers, which would have substantial aesthetic impact on the character of the site and the surrounding neighborhood. The potential for such a significant impact


on community character makes the concurrent review of detailed site plans and the proposed zoning amendment all the more important.”


 


Mr. Buroughs closes with no green light:


 


“We respectfully request that the City forward additional materials related to this project, including full site plans, as they become available.”


 



The White Plains Commissioner of Planning, Susan Habel,  in her written discussion of the Zoning amendment to the Mayor and Common Council explains the White Plains Housing Authority has no money to execute a full environmental review at this time:


 


“Based on the amount of development contemplated by the Housing Authority, a full Type I Action environmental review, including an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) should be prepared and reviewed for any future development of the Winbrook property.


 


It is not possible to conduct such a review at this time because with HUD (Housing and Urban Development) funding approval and the development of other public-private partnerships, the Housing Authority does not have the resources to undertake a full review and cannot determine what the full development program would be.”


 


At one of  presentation to Winbrook residents last Monday, attended by this reporter, the residents (17 attended by this reporter’s count),it was said that the zoning change at this time before an environmental review was so that White Plains Housing Authority can apply for Obama Administration “Stimulus Money” for the project, in addition to HUD funding.


 


Usually in SEQR Environmental reviews, the cost of the EIS is borne by the developer.


 


The Housing Authority position is that it needs the zoning to prove to HUD and potential developer partners that White Plains is in favor of the project.


 


Despite Mr. Boroughs’ caveat received June22, the hearing is still on schedule and the council appears to be ploughing full steam ahead to pass the zoning.


 


The “detailed” site plans on the project so far that have been made public:


 



Overhead View


 



Street front and building rising above the setback, Corner of Quarropas and South Lexington Avenue.



Portion of South Lexington Avenue street, front, typical entrance to the new Winbrook, at right.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Mayor: White Plains Is the Best of America. Thanks Populace Says Goodbye

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. July 2, 2009: Mayor Joseph Delfino welcomed the crowd of about 7,000 persons who turned out for the rain-postponed Fourth of July Fireworks Display at White Plains High School Thursday evening. Delfino said wherever he traveled he always felt White Plains represented America to him, and mentioning he would not be running for reelection, he thanked the multitudes and his last words  (in his last fireworks display hosting) were “I love you.”  



Mayor Says So Long to White Plains at the Fireworks Thursday Night.


Congresswoman Nita Lowey took the podium next and said we all should thank Mayor Delfino for what he has done for White Plains. Lowey said the annual fireworks display in itself showed what was great about White Plains the way families came together to celebrate the fourth. Then the display, colorful, cachoponous and “ooooing and ahhing and awing” delivered the spectacle of color and sound meant to evoke orginally the awe that Francis Scott Key felt when he saw shells exploding over Fort McHenry  in Baltimore Harbor in the year 1814 at the Battle of Baltimore.


Observing the rockets explode over the fort inspired Key to write “In Defense of Fort McHenry” which became “The Star Spangled Banner,” which was adopted as the country’s national anthem in 1916. 




Then all trouped home in the humid night.

Posted in Uncategorized

Living On a Construction Site, Not the Way Atlanta Revitalizes Its Neighborhoods

.


 


WPCNR THE HOUSING NEWS. By John F. Bailey. July 2, 2009: The White Plains Housing Authority unique plan to rebuild Winbrook with Housing and Urban Development money while residents continue to live next to their future new homes for up to a decade,  is  not the way HUD normally combines with a Housing Authority to execute a project.


 



 


In Atlanta,  one of the model city developments touted by White Plains Housing Authority presenters of the project this week, (see slide above) has not in any of their projects built over the last 13 years, required residents of a project being replaced to have to stay on the construction site.


 




John Sugg, a spokesman for the Atlanta Housing Authority  told WPCNR today that residents living in a project slated for revitalization are given Atlanta Housing Authority Vouchers and the Atlanta Housing Authority assists them to find substantially improved residences. When the project is completed, about one-third of the residents return to live in the typical Atlanta rivitalizationproject, and another two-thirds of the units are either rented at market rates or at tax-credit/percentages of median income rates. Tax credits he said are provided the developer to make up for the reduced rates for the income eligible renters. He said there is some condominium purchases available too. 


 


Sugg said the Atlanta Housing Authority in its various housing revitalization projects the last 13 thirteen years (which Sugg reports will be completed this year), established a joint partnership with the developer executing the individual site. One such developer is H.J. Russell & Company, the largest black-owned firm in the country, Sugg said. 


 


Asked if condominium ownership was a typical option offered, Sugg said most of the units in the new developments Atlanta has opened were rentals, at Centennial Place, he said the majority were rentals, but some condominiumships were offered. Sugg had no statistics on the number of rentals in Atlantas new stock of revitalized developments as opposed to condominiums, but indicated condominium offerings in addition to rentals existed.


 


Sugg said experience has shown Atlanta that if the mix of residents is not altered, the same “project” conditions return in time. He said the Atlanta Housing Authority is dedicated to assisting voucher holders who cannot return to a new AHA project when it opens, to train and prepare them to be successful elsewhere. The AHA efforts have enabled landlords elsewhere around Atlanta to be more accepting of voucher holders just because of the AHA commitment to the voucher holder.


 


 He said, for example that if a person has a criminal record, refuses to work, is unemployed or a history of lease violations, all persons are guaranteed housing assistance. Sugg observed that any of those conditions would prohibit individuals from returning to a newly established AHA community such as Community Place.


 


He said the vast majority of the population in projects Atlanta has demolished and replaced are women and children, a portion of  them have relocated to other rental projects and gone into finished projects the AHA has built.


 


Retail and services are a part of Atlanta’s revitalization projects, Sugg said, sayi


 


In July of 2008, according to a news release from the Atlanta Housing Authority, HUD approved demolition of the final four major family housing projects in Atlanta: Hollywood Courts, Thomasville Heights, Herndon Homes and Bankhead Courts and Bowen Homes. There were 1,850 dwelling units in those projects.


 


Last July, more than 1,300 residents of the projects to be demolished, the news release says, “participated in (AHA-sponsored) seminars to guide them on their transition to housing of their choice. In surveys…only 13 – a mere 1.4%– stated they did not want to move.”


 


In fourteen years, Atlanta has relocated 10,000 households from its housing projects. A total of 80% of the families stated within the Atlanta city limits and the other 20% using housing assistance to move to suburbs of Atlanta. This release may be found at


http://www.atlantahousing.org/pressroom/pressreleases_print.cfm?id=23.


 

Posted in Uncategorized