County Forced to Expand Affordable Housing Efforts to Low Minority Communities

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From Westchester County Department of Communications. August 10,  2009 (EDITED) UPDATED (ITALICS) August 11, 2009 1:15 P.M. E.D.T.: Westchester County under terms of a settlement with the Department of Housing and Urban Development of a case brought by the Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York,  will now build affordable housing in communities with very small minority populations. The settlement is being announced jointly by HUD and County Executive Andrew Spano at a news conference at noon today.


Under terms of the agreement announced today:


·        The county will pay to the federal government $21.6 million dollars, which the government will then return to the county’s HUD account to be used to build fair and affordable housing in communities with less than 3 percent African American population and 7 percent Hispanic population as well as in specified census blocks. An additional $8.4 million will be paid to the federal government (of which approximately 20 percent will go to ADC) and $2.5 million will be paid directly to ADC’s counsel.


 


Donna Greene Director of Communictions for Westchester County, confirmed to WPCNR  Tuesday that the affordable housing income levels for eligibility for rental and home ownership government-built affordable housing are based on Westchester County Average Median Family Income (not the median income of the community where such affordable housing would be built or acquired).  The Westchester County 2009 median income is presently $105,000 a year for a Family of Four. She said, for rental housing income eligibility for a family of four  would be 65% of median income ( $63,180) and for home ownership eligibility for affordable home units, it is 80% ($84,200). Greene said the process and guidelines and procedures  have yet to be determined, and the county will be working with the HUD-appointed monitor to implement the program.


For a complete explanation of the income guidelines by family situation , go to http://www.westchestergov.com/pdfs/HOUSING_HUD_IncomeRentLimits.pdf


·


      Additionally, the county will add to its capital budget $30 million to build fair and affordable housing developments over seven years. (This is nothing new since the county has traditionally set aside millions of dollars to build housing. What is different is the locations where the housing must be built) Long-term bonds will be issued as developments proceed. 
            The agreement specifies in detail how many units must be built but, the federal government recognizing that the county does not control local zoning, has left it up to a monitor to lower the number of units or give the county more flexibility as to the time period and location. Much of the development depends on the county getting state funding and local inclusionary zoning regulations.


 


            Faced with the threat of losing a $180 million lawsuit filed by the Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York as well as the possibility of being cut off from another $30 million in federal housing aid annually, Westchester has agreed to build this housing as part of a settlement with the federal government, which intervened in the case at the county’s request.


 By settling with the federal government, the county admits no wrong doing and avoids the possibility of a tremendous penalty – including $50 million that would have gone to the Anti Discrimination Center of Metro New York, if the case were lost. Under the settlement with the federal government, that money will instead stay in Westchester and be used to build more fair and affordable housing here.


The settlement is based on HUD’s new focus to ensure that all recipients of their funds implement methods to affirmatively further fair and affordable housing to ensure non-discrimination in its programs. In Westchester this means building housing in areas with few or no minorities. HUD’s new philosophy will have a sweeping effect on communities nationwide that will now have to document and make major efforts to analyze race as an impediment to fair housing and to take steps to reduce housing discrimination so that all communities are open to everyone.


         The settlement has been signed by County Executive Andy Spano and will be sent to the Westchester County Board of Legislators for approval.
    
     “We have always been committed to fair and affordable housing, and believe we have lived up to HUD’s guidelines,” said Spano. “We have worked zealously to develop and preserve these housing opportunities throughout the county. We have been considered a model program. Never has HUD denied our funding and we have been identified for best management practices. Then out of the blue comes this lawsuit. The first of its kind anywhere in the United States, it was brought by ADC who wanted to use Westchester as a test case. What they stood to gain was $50 million of county money (out of the $180 million to the federal government) to pay themselves, their lawyers and to promote their agenda to continue filing these kinds of lawsuits throughout the nation. We wanted to make sure that this sum did not go to them, but that it instead be used to build fair and affordable housing here in Westchester. Therefore we asked the federal government to intervene.”


           The case focuses on HUD’s Community Development Block Grant Program administered by the county’s planning department, which gives millions of dollars annually to communities and agencies to create, among other things, fair and affordable housing.


         ADC, a housing advocacy group, in its lawsuit filed against the county in April 2006 seized on a technicality in the law that required Westchester to certify to HUD that it not only considered race as an impediment to fair and affordable housing, but document it in an analysis of impediments.  
          Despite the fact that the county believes it did nothing wrong, Spano said his administration and the federal government worked out a settlement to avoid the delay, expense and the uncertainly of protracted litigation that would penalize the county.


He said that the county had reasonably believed that it was meeting the requirements of providing fair and affordable housing, because it has given such high priority to the construction, rehabilitation and preservation of affordable housing and that before the ADC lawsuit, HUD had never rejected or disapproved of its plans.


 “The county has for many years considered the impact of race on affordable housing, and the county administration has acted in the way that it determined could best assure the construction of new housing in areas where the people wanted to live,’’ said Spano.


He added, “While this lawsuit is something neither we nor any other county could expect, the ultimate result is that we will continue our ongoing, important effort to develop and affirmatively promote fair affordable housing in this county.” 


           “Although the settlement does not allow us to spend any of this funding on fair and affordable housing in urban areas, we are committed to continuing this effort and will do so with county capital funds that have already been set aside,’’ said Spano.  


                       Since 1998, Westchester County government has helped construct fair and affordable housing through a variety of programs. To date, a total of 1,704 units of housing has been built – including 1,370 affordable rental units and 334 affordable owner units. The funds from HUD that went towards building fair and affordable housing amount to almost $50.2 million from several programs.


                        These units were built in Bedford, Croton, Elmsford, Greenburgh, Hastings, Irvington, Mamaroneck Village, Mount Vernon, New Rochelle, North Salem, New Castle, Ossining Village, Port Chester, Peekskill, Pleasantville, Pound Ridge, Rye Brook, Rye City, Sleepy Hollow, Tarrytown, Tuckahoe, White Plains, Yonkers and Yorktown.

Posted in Uncategorized

City, Firefighters Agree on 2005 Transit Strike Arbitrator. Await City Counsel

 


WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. By John F. Bailey. August 7,2009: The Mayor’s Office reported to WPCNR Thursday the appointment of Alan R. Viani, one of the three mediators whose efforts ended the 2005 New York City Transit Strike, has been mutually agreed on with the White Plains Firefighters union to arbitrate the impasse between the union and the city. Currently, the city and the union are in dispute over the amount of raise the firefighters will receive for two years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. The wage agreement the firefighters reach is expected to set the bar for the other three city unions: police, CSEA and Teamsters.


 



Alan R. Viani, Mediator of the 2005 Subway Strike Settlement, Named Arbitrator in White Plains Fire Union Binding Arbitration. Photo from SEIU News Letter.


 


 Previously the police and fire unions had agreed on work rule changes going forward, but the Common Council rejected the 3.75%  raise for the first year of the contract, followed by 4%  which the Mayor’s Office  had negotiated. Afterwards both parties agreed to private binding arbitration


 


Joseph Carrier, President of the Firefighters union confirmed Wednesday that the city and the union had agreed on who the Moderator would be. Thursday, Melissa Lopez, spokesperson for the Mayor’s Office identified Mr. Viani as the arbitrator who will listen to the arguments of both sides, and draw up a settlement.


 


 


Carrier said that proceedings are not expected to get underway for at least two weeks because the Common Council Monday evening tabled a resolution to appoint the firm of Lamb & Barnosky at a fee of $108,000 to represent the city in the negotiations. Councilman Tom Roach introduced the motion to table because he wanted to interview the firm. It is presumed the Council will act on the appointment August 27.


 


Mr. Viani has had a career of 35 years in labor negotiation, collective bargaining, arbitration, mediation and fact-finding according to his resume. .He was previously Deputy Chairman, Dispute Resolution, New York City Office of Collective  Bargaining.


 


He was former Director of Research & Negotiations for District 37 of the American Federation of State,County and Municipal Employees, built up by the well-known labor leader, the late Victor Gotbaum.  Viani took over as the union chief negotiator in 1973.


 


He is a member of the American Arbitration Association, National Academy of Arbitrators, Association for Conflict Resolution, Industrial Relations Research Association and the Society of Labor Relations Professionals.


 


He is known for being one of the three mediators (Mr. Viani, Richard Curreri and Martin Scheineman)  who negotiated a return to work by the New York City Transit Workers Union in December of 2005, when the union went on strike halting subway and bus service in Manhattan over the MTA’s effort to curtail pension payouts. Viani,Curreri and Scheineman shuttled between MTA, the city, and the Transit Workers establishing ground rules to get a return to work, and  that achieved, a settlement requiring the union to pay more for health care benefits, with pensions left intact was reached.


 


Viani is Chair of Local 726, Amalgamated Transit Union and Metropolitan Transit Authortiy, NYC Transit; Chair of American Maritime Officers and Deep Sea Operators; Chair of the League of Voluntary Hospitals and SEIU, Local 1199, National Health Care Union – Health and Welfare Benefiuts; Chair, Uniformed Firefighters Association and City of New York; and Impartial Hearing Officer of the Westchester County and Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Assocaition. This according to a resume of Mr.Viani circulating on the internet. The resume lists Mr.Viani’s fee as $1,200 per day.


 


Both Councilpersons Rita Malmud and Benjamin Boykin, contacted last night said the first time they had heard of Mr.Viani’s appointment was when WPCNR informed them of it.


 


WPCNR asked Rita Malmud if the Common Council  could refuse to go to binding arbitration and give the Mayor suggestions to resolve thedispute. I also asked Malmud if the Council had been asked by the Mayor to approve the Binding Arbitration, and Malmud indicated he had not.    I also asked Ms. Malmud if the council could refuse the agreement if the council had not been consulted.


 


Malmud in a statement said No, on all  three counts:


 


No to all three questions.  Only the Mayor has the authority to bring the City to binding arbitration; the Common Council does NOT have that authority.


 


 Earlier Mrs. Malmud lamented the labor situation the city faces in this statement:


 


You are correct that the binding union arbitration over salary increases is a very important matter.  After the Common Council rejected unaffordable salary increases of 3.75 and 4%, the Mayor (without any Common Council communication or involvement) voluntarily placed the City into binding arbitration.  I regret that the Mayor does not see fit to offer any information on his selection of arbitrator to thecCommon Council, the press, or the public.


 


Subsequently, city hall named Mr. Viani as the arbitrator to WPCNR.


 


Mr. Carrier, of the Firefighters Union, said his union was willing to negotiate even while the binding arbitration process was taking place.


 


Previously, in the White Plains Teachers and School District wage dispute, a settlement was reached in June before the fact-finding phase of mediation (being conducted under the auspices by the New York State Public Employees Relations Board)


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Louis Cappelli Home On Road to Full Recovery.Tells His Aneurysm Story.


WPCNR MAIN STREET JOURNAL. John Bailey Interviews Louis Cappelli at home.  (C) 2009, White Plains CitizeNetReporter. All rights reserved. August 5, 2009: The only inkling Valhalla’s Louis Cappelli had  he was suffering from a brain aneurysm  in progress was a persistent headache for 72 hours prior to his being hospitalized when the aneurysm burst July 20. He was operated on for eight hours for the condition at Columbia Presbyterian Hospital July 21.  Wednesday evening, Mr. Cappelli recounted the story of what happened to him to WPCNR.


 



Louis Cappelli of White Plains and Valhalla in April. The man who created the City Center, the Ritz Carlton Westchester, New Roc City has returned home and shares this personal account of his experience.


 


He never lost consciousness prior to going in for his operation.


 


At 6:30 P.M. Wednesday evening  Louis Cappelli, thoughtful, clear of voice, and philosophical, sensitively  told his story to WPCNR of his brush with fate  in a  25-minute telephone call from his home.


 


Mr. Cappelli said he is being monitored every two hours for his blood pressure and with various technological “windows”  because he is considered  still at risk for a stroke. He told WPCNR he is hopeful of returning to his offices in White Plains next week  and that his company had managed terrifically without him.  The WPCNR-dubbed “Super Developer,” told an emotional, thoughtful narrative to WPCNR — the story of how his life changed forever just 20 days ago in an interview from his home tonight.


 


WPCNR: What are your feelings on weathering this horrible thing?


 



 


Louis Cappelli: “John Bailey. It’s good to hear your voice. Did you ever think that the new and improved  me would ever say that? I’ve had complete reconstructive brain surgery and here I am, just the same old Louis. There you go. That’s great news.


 


WPCNR: Do you feel comfortable talking about this?


 


L.C.: Of course.


 


WPCNR: Was there any inkling this was about to happen to you?


 


L.C.: No. None. My advice for anyone out there today, don’t ignore any signs that your body gives you. My signs were just a simple nagging headache that was unusual for me because I don’t get headaches. Two weeks ago, maybe three weeks ago, maybe Friday (July 17), I started in Long Island having a few nagging, throbbing, aching headaches, no migraines. Nothing that would disable me or immobilize me, almost  like you drink a little too much white wine in the afternoon, you know, John? Sort a dehydrating type feeling in your head, maybe you need a little more water,kind of throbbing. So I had it on Friday night.


 


          I took a few Advil. I didn’t think much of it. Saturday it persisted. I had a little fever, 99 degrees, 100 degrees, nothing to worry about, chills here and there. Sunday it was still with me in more of  just a nagging way.


 


WPCNR: A 72 hour headache?


 


L.C.:  Yeah.


          Then Monday morning (July 20) as I was leaving the Hamptons to come to work here (in White Plains), I was in the shower and I bent over to pick up a shampoo, and my head felt like it essentially exploded, a complete pressure throughout the entire top of my head when I bent it 90 degrees.


 


          Whether it was gravity that caused that, I’m not positive what it was. But at that time, 9 o’clock Monday morning (July 20),  I decided (and my wife certainly decided for me), that I was going to get a CAT scan done, and I went right to Southampton Hospital at 11 A.M.


 


WPCNR: So you never lost conciousness?


 


L.C.:  I never lost consciousness. I had a CAT Scan done and they saw a minor abnormality but nothing that troubled them. They asked me to hang around for three hours  to do an MRI. Of course, I said No. Of course my wife chained me to the car.


 


WPCNR: Good for her.


 


L.C.: Yes. I waited  three hours (at Southampton Hospital). Did an MRI. They then came out to the parking lot as I was waiting out there on the cellphone of course, Blackberry, and they said to me they were bringing an ambulance for emergency surgery that needed to be done at Stony Brook Hospital where there was a  neurosurgical team waiting for me to do an emergency brain operation on a brain aneurysm that had burst. Of course I said I’m not going to Stony Brook, I’m going to Manhattan


 


          The ambulance showed up and they said they wouldn’t take me to Manhattan because my blood pressure was 210 over 110 and they wouldn’t put me in the ambulance because they didn’t think I would survive the trip at 6 P.M. from Southampton to Manhattan an hour and a half later.


 


          They took me to Stony Brook. At which point I signed some additional forms.  They gave me some blood pressure reducing medicine to take me (my blood pressure) down to 140/150. We made the trip to Manhattan in an hour and twenty minutes and I was delivered to Columbia Presbyterian at 8:30 Monday night (July 20) and the operation was performed the next morning for 8 hours.


 


         They cut a nice 2 inch by 3 inch hole in my head. They fixed  a hundred percent the aneurysm which had leaked and burst slowly, with 100% effectiveness and permanencey. They clipped it, left it in my poor little brain and they closed me back up.


 


          And I’m home and hopefully getting back to some sort of normalcy in the next few days, but I’m not out of the woods yet.


 


          I’m a candidate at this point, in the window, for a stroke. Because there was some blood that ruptured from the aneurysm. It did get onto part of the brain. But it’s toxic and not supposed to be on the brain, I’m told. And they’re just watching, every minute now, the beautiful brain fluid washing away, hopefully, the crusted blood that might be in the brain, to try and get me past the window and avoid any spasms there that might cause a stroke.


 


WPCNR: How often do they check you? How do they do that?


 


L.C.: Basically every two hours, I’m being checked for blood pressure, checked with temperature, with EKGs, and they’re doing all of that stuff every two hours and medicating accordingly depending on blood pressure  and depending on a lot of stuff. It’s a helluva a monitoring thing. You really can’t put your fingers on it. I still have some residual headaches today which are of concern to them.


 


          But, I have an 8-inch scar on my head on my head where they cut my head open.So part of the headaches is the healing process.


 


          So the issue is: never think that you’re immortal. Never think that things can’t happen to you. That would have been my thought process. I dished  it off as being a nothing. It took three days for me to come to a conclusion it wasn’t a nothing. Even then I wasn’t prepared to accept the information as to what it would be


 


          Because you know, that doesn’t happen to me. It shouldn’t happen to me.


 


          But the people at Southampton Hospital were phenomenal. They diagnosed it perfectly. Ambulance people who got me there in an hour and 40 minutes. The people at Columbia Presbyterian, the top doctors on the planet, who took me under their wing for eight hours. So I’m here. Cappelli lives.


 


            And it happened one day after I got the biggest vote in my life on the Concord, where the (State) Senate voted 58-0 to approve the  Concord transaction on Thursday in the afternoon. Twenty-four hours later (July 17) I started having a brain aneurysm. Kind of an irony or some sort of thing there, really. Just when the pressure should have been removed after ten years of work, two years of stress and the vote finally came about and the aneurysm popped, after the vote is received in a positive fashion.


 


WPCNR: When will you be out of the woods?


 


L.C.: They’re thinking that I’ll be in the medical world, out of the woods, by the beginning of next week, which will be three weeks from the operation. That would be considered out of the woods as long as the wound heals with no infection. I’m taking medications for infections. We’ll all feel better about this Monday and Tuesday.


 


WPCNR: When will you be able to deal with the day-to-day business?


 


 


L.C.: I’ve been dealing with that the last week and a half. The trusty Blackberry is here. I think for the most part, it really isn’t dealing with the day to day stuff any more. It’s about the intensity and the gravity I give the day-to-day stuff. In the last two and a half weeks, my report card as to what’s grave and what’s not as relates to deals, bank deals, leases, condominium sales, all that stuff that was very grave and stressful in my life two week ago, while all that stuff still exists.


         


        The condo market didn’t change because I had an aneurysm. But the gravity of what more condo sales mean to me as to what more condo sales mean to me or less mean to me,  whether hotel occupancy is 85% or 65%, all those things have taken on less importance to me.


        


         I’m dealing with the day to day for the last week and a half.  But I’m dealing with it differently.  Every day is not crisis management anymore for me.  No it is what it is. I’ve had my crisis management two weeks. Right now just is what it is and it will be what it will be and, (Mrs. Cappelli makes a remark). My wife says she’s Nurse Ratchet. She was looking out for me for two weeks. She’s the one who chained me to the car to make sure I stayed for the MRI.


 


             So that’s it, John.  I’m back. I’m the same Louis. Right now I have 100% of my motor skills. 100% of my memory, my retention. My skill sets. They’re all here.


 


            What was important to me two weeks ago, probably doesn’t have the same importance to me now. Different things are important to me now than they were two weeks ago. I was given less than a 50-50 chance of surviving the operation. Ninety-five percent of the people in my condition would not have made it to the hospital with a ruptured aneurysm, high blood pressure,would not have even made it to the hospital, let alone to be in a position to have an operation, to have it succeed.


 


            I had my discussions with my wife, my kids and my family before the operation, and we’re all of the agreement that what was important three weeks ago does not hold the same importance today, that’s for sure. That’s a hundred percent positively for sure.


 


           I haven’t read a newspaper in two and a half weeks. I don’t care  if I ever read a newspaper again. Don’t know if I’ve been in a newspaper. Don’t care about a newspaper. It is what it is. It was a miracle that I’m here to talk about it .  95% of the time would have shut the lights out on somebody else. It just would have been a light switch that went out.


 


            I said to the doctor how would this have happened? The doctor said to me when your aneurysm broke, ninety-five percent of the time it’s just lights out. It’s not a headache, not some sort of warning.


 


WPCNR: Going forward, you’re taking this day by day, and so at this point, everything is still on the table in your business and you’re going to proceed with a different perspective?


 


L.C.: I think that’s a correct statement.  My organization in the last two and a half  weeks has really shown me a lot of resiliency. Frankly, jeez, I always thought they really needed me. As it turns out, John,  they’ve cut back overhead, trimmed the sales, organized things better and my organization, the leadership in my organization is resilient,strong, it’s there. It will be three weeks this Friday that I’m out. They haven’t missed a beat.


 


          We’re parking cars. We’re serving steaks. New Roc’s still there.City Center is still there. We’re finishing up Trump Plaza, Trump Park in Stamford. It’s opening in three weeks. It’s a magnificent building. We’re selling apartments at the Ritz, and we’re selling apartments at the Trump in New Rochelle.


 


           I’m come to the conclusion thankfully, they don’t need me any more. I can take more time off.


 


WPCNR: We won’t read anything into that, will we?


 


L.C.: No. But taking some time off isn’t the worst thing in the world. My wife loves that. In my mind I feel like I’m 100%.They’ve given me different ground rules for awhile for a few weeks.


 


        I’ve got the same old challenges that are still there.


 


        I’ve got the Concord closing in the next 10 days to two weeks. I’m looking forward to closing the Concord financing and starting that construction right away. Before fall, before Labor Day.


 


WPCNR: So the casino, the track will begin going up before Labor Day (September 7)


 


L.C.: Before Labor Day


 



Asked about if he had  sent in Qualifications for the Winbrook Revitalization project in White Plains, Cappelli said he was not aware of it, and would ask Joe Apicella and Bruce Berg to find out about it tomorrow.

Posted in Uncategorized

District to Repair Erosion from Underneath New Stands at Loucks

 


 


WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. August 5,2009: Heavier than usual rains are causing an erosion problem under the new stands at the new $5.4 MillionLoucks Field. This,  according to Russell Davidson of Kaeyer, Garment& Davidson, the architects in charge of designing the new field which opened 8 months ago.  The School District, according to Assistant Superintendent for Business, Fred Seiler anticipates correction of the erosion prior to the start of football practice.


 



 



Stormwater runoff under stands is washing soil into track drain on apron of million dollar world class track at Loucks Field. (Pictured today) The cause is soil is being washed down from underneath the aluminum stands from storm water runoff and soil is being carried onto the apron of the track, Davidson said.


 


 



WPCNR first became aware of it when John Bailey observed and reported to the district a  two-foot wide eroded gap in the blacktop apron in front of the bleachers, which revealed a three-foot hole leading down to dirt underneath the track apron. Bailey reported the apron cave-in, the district replaced it with a circular drain cover pictured above within 48 hours of Mr. Bailey’s reporting the hole last Friday.


 


Fred Seiler, Assistant Superintendent for Business explained to WPCNR the dirt seen under the blacktop apron of the track was a “compaction” problem, but could not explain exactly what caused the gap. He said the district was aware of it and was moving to repair the compaction problem before the start of football practice,  but he could not explain the specific cause.  Seiler said there was no danger of the condition compromising the new track, causing it to heave up  or damage to the synthetic turf. He also said there was no estimate of the cost of the repair as of Monday.



Evidence of erosion and the “Hanging Gardens of Loucks Field” photographed last Sunday. The soil runoff has been clogging the drains which were being cleared today (Wednesday).


 



On Wednesday afternoon, the grates over drains in front of the bleachers were cleaned of dried dirt apparently preventing free flow of surface water, and weeds growing in the dirt had been weed-whacked by a district grounds crew.


 


 


WPCNR contacted Russell Davidson  of Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson, the architects who designed the stadium renovation. Davidson explained the cause was erosion of soil from underneath the section of aluminum bleachers due to “a little bit more erosion than any one expected due to the extensive amount of rain.”


 



 


Davidson(shown at the Board of Education July meeting)  said by telephone today that  erosion is not unusual in stadium projects: “It takes a while for the soil to solidify,” and the heavy rain created more erosion than expected. He said the only other problem  with the stadium was a 12-inch area that had to be patched. That was not the hole that WPCNR discovered last week and that was capped last week. Photo, WPCNR News Archive


 


Davidson said the traditional way to deal with the erosion problem of the nature the field is now experiencing is to lay fabric down over the soil (in this case, under the bleachers). Davidson said KG & D had been in touch with the district, and he said the district is dealing with the problem, but he did not know if Mike Lynch, the administrator of Buildings and Grounds  was going to install fabric under the bleachers as the solution.


 


Out of Warranty


 


Asked how long a warranty existed on the stadium, Davidson explained there was usually a one-year warranty from the date the project was accepted by the school district or entity. He did not know exactly when the project (or specifically the bleacher portion)  was officially accepted by the school district.


 


 



View Under Southend of Bleachers.


 


Examination of the slope under the bleachers today revealed construction debris some black tarpaper covering a portion of the slope underneath the northend of the bleachers, and a large amount of rocks in the area directly adjacent the track.


 



View Under northend of stands in viciniety of the runoff — note black tar paper in bottom third of picture.


 


 



Asked about the drain-pipes installed by the school district last January (in photograph above)  at the base of the grassy banks to the south and north of the new bleachers,after extensive flooding was observed by this reporter spilling onto the new track,  Davidson said those drains were part of the original project, but delayed by the school district until after the stadium was built and undertaken by the school district (at a cost of about $18,000) to “save money.”

Posted in Uncategorized