Latimer Seeks State Senate Nomination, to Replace Retiring Oppenheimer

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2012. From George Latimer. March 20, 2012:


George Latimer, a longtime Sound Shore resident, businessman and public official, has announced he will be seeking the Democratic nomination for the New York State Senate, 37th District, currently held by Sen. Suzi Oppenheimer, who is not seeking re-election.

Mr. Latimer is a Westchester native, graduate of local public schools, with degrees from Fordham University (B.A.) and New York University’s Wagner School (M.P.A.). For 20 years, he served as a sales and marketing executive with major U.S. corporations, subsidiaries of Nestle and ITT, with on-site assignments with IBM and AT&T operations, among other responsibilities.

In his public life, Latimer has served as a member of the Rye City Council, and the Westchester County Board of Legislators, where he was twice elected Chairman of the Board, and ran a highly successful bi-partisan legislative administration for four years. He is completing his 8th year as a member of the New York State Assembly.

In the community, Mr. Latimer is a frequent volunteer with groups too numerous to mention individually, ranging from youth baseball to Helping Hands, and has served on many volunteer boards. He has been honored for his service by non-profit groups of all type, from local Chambers of Commerce to advocacy groups. He is a visible participant in the life of his home region in Westchester.

In a partial comment on why he is running, Latimer released this statement:

“Property taxes are too high, and I have worked hard to address that major worry many of us face; it always comes up as the #1 local issue homeowners are concerned about.

But I’m also worried that we are going to wreck the good things we’ve created, over many years: our transportation system, our police and fire protection, health care for our seniors and veterans, education for our kids, all because our political system has been captured by cynical politicians who play to people’s anger. Their voices are drowning out the reasonable and rational majority of us. Those politicians are trying to tear down the very things our grandparents and parents fought so hard to build.”








 

Posted in Uncategorized

Give Us Our Money, Please, HUD, Astorino Demands

WPCNR THE HOUSING NEWS. From the Office of the County Executive, Robert P.Astorino. March 19, 2012:


 


Westchester County Executive Robert P. Astorino today called on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to immediately release the $7 million in affordable housing money that it has withheld in an attempt to force Westchester to take actions that go beyond the terms of the 2009 housing settlement.


            Astorino said that the U.S. magistrate’s ruling last week (See Friday’s story), clearly showed that Westchester County has been complying with the settlement and that it was time for HUD to start undoing the damage caused by its unilateral decision in May to withhold previously approved housing funds.


            The county was forced to lay off five workers, abolish 10 jobs and curtail funds for various community organizations and many local governments as a result of HUD’s action to withhold what are called Community Development Block Grants (CDBG).


           


“HUD’s preemptive move to try to punish the county before the court had ruled in the case was unconscionable,” said Astorino. “The primary purpose of the money was to advance the progress of the settlement, so HUD was only hurting the people it claims to help. HUD’s actions were purely an attempt to get the county to do things that were not in the settlement. I took a principled stand to say HUD was overreaching. The court agreed. Now it is time for HUD to release the money and put its energies toward actually helping to build affordable housing.”


 


On Friday, Westchester County won a major victory in court when the federal magistrate in the case ruled that the monitor selected by HUD “erred in concluding that the County Executive violated the settlement.”


 


            Astorino said he is sending a letter to HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan asking him to release the money immediately and he is also calling on the entire Westchester congressional delegation to intervene if the money is not released promptly.           


 


 “Going up against HUD has been like David against Goliath,” said Astorino. “But with the ruling by the magistrate, there is no good reason for HUD to withhold affordable housing money that it had promised to the county and our communities three years ago. It is  time for the Congressional delegation to step up and be counted on the side of Westchester’s residents.” 


            HUD and the monitor had argued that the 2009 settlement compelled Astorino to sign source of income legislation that would have required property owners to accept government vouchers as rental payments, as well as the regulatory obligations that go with them.


            Astorino challenged the federal government’s contention, saying that the settlement only called for the county executive to “promote” the source of income legislation “currently before the Board of Legislators” back in 2009 and that former County Executive Andrew Spano, who approved the settlement, met that obligation at that time.


            U.S. Magistrate Gabriel Gorenstein sided with Astorino, saying:  “We conclude that the parties did not intend the County’s duty to ‘promote’ obligated the County Executive to sign source-of-income legislation passed by the BOL.”  


            The magistrate also said that Astorino was within his rights to veto source of income legislation  in July 2010 and supported that decision with case law, stating: “Courts must abide by the express terms of a consent decree and may not impose supplementary obligations on the parties even to fulfill the purposes of the decree more effectively.”


            Gorenstein’s opinion then goes on to state: “Accordingly, we conclude that the able Monitor erred in concluding that the County Executive violated the Settlement by vetoing the source-of income legislation enacted by the BOL.”


            Astorino vetoed the source of income legislation that came before him 2010 calling it “hopelessly flawed.”


            “My decision was based on my belief that the legislation was a violation of basic property rights,” Astorino said. “Landlords who want to accept federal vouchers are free to do so, but it should not be compelled. This was a governmental intrusion that had the unintended consequence of actually working against the settlement because it would have made housing more expensive and less available.”


            With respect to the zoning portion of the case, the magistrate ruled that the monitor is entitled to information with respect to zoning practices. The county believes this requirement was met on Feb. 29 (after the court papers were filed) when it submitted to the monitor its extensive review of 43 municipal zoning ordinances covering 853 zoning districts.


            The county is awaiting HUD’s response and will continue to work cooperatively with the monitor and HUD going forth, Astorino said.



             


            Despite HUD’s legal challenges, the county is ahead of schedule with respect to the settlement’s fundamental requirement of developing 750 units of fair and affordable housing over seven years in 31 mainly white communities. The agreement includes benchmarks for financing and obtaining building permits that must be in place by the end of each year. It also requires the county to market the housing in a way to primarily reach African Americans and Hispanics not only in Westchester but also in New York City and surrounding counties. The county faces severe financial penalties if it fails to meet certain benchmarks.


            As of this month, the county has 206 housing units approved by the federal housing monitor, of which 196 have all financing in place and 108 units have building permits in place. Under the terms of the settlement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the county was only required to have 100 units with financing and 50 units with building permits by the end of 2011. The settlement calls for 200 units with financing and 125 with building permits by the end of 2012. The county expects to meet these benchmarks this spring, almost a year ahead of schedule.


 


–30–


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Text Your Questions to White Plains Library

WPCNR CITY CIRCUIT. From the White Plains Public Library. March 19, 2012:


Responding to the popularity of text messaging, residents of White Plains can now ask questions and get information from White Plains Public Library by text message. White Plains is the first public library in Westchester County to offer the service.

On average, Americans text message almost twice as much as they talk on mobile phones, according to a recent Nielsen Mobile Survey, making it a preferred means of communication while on-the-go. “The White Plains Public Library is once again at the forefront of utilizing technology to reach users and make library services more accessible,” said White Plains Mayor Thomas Roach, “The new service provides an easy-to-use interface for our librarians and maintains the privacy of our patrons information.”



With Text a Librarian, patrons ask questions by sending text messages
with their mobile phones and librarians answer on a web-based interface,
keeping a “live archive” of all the questions and answers. The
service does not display phone numbers and generates an anonymous ID for
each patron in order to reference conversation history.

Using the service is easy:  text WPPL to 66746 for instructions.
Message and data rates may apply. The service is available whenever the
Library is open.

Text a Librarian was developed by Mosio, an award-winning mobile
technology company that enables companies and institutions to harness
the power of mobile communications. Public and academic libraries across
the country use it, including the Free Library of Philadelphia and the
New York Public Library.

“Mobility is a way of life for most students and increasingly for
society in general, making the way in which we stay connected a central
issue for many libraries,” said Noel Chandler, Mosio CEO. “Text a
Librarian makes it possible for students and patrons to tap into the
wealth of knowledge of local librarians from their mobile phones, while
keeping patron information private and secure.”

For more detailed information about the Text a Librarian service at
White Plains Public Library please visit www.whiteplainslibrary.org.

Posted in Uncategorized

U.S. Court: Landlords Not Required to Accept Subsidies for HUD-ordered Housing

WPCNR WHITE PLAINS LAW JOURNAL. From Westchester County Department of Communicatiions. March 17, 2012 (Edited):


Westchester County won a major victory today in its fight with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development over the affordable housing settlement, when a federal magistrate ruled that the monitor in the case selected by HUD “erred in concluding that the County Executive violated the settlement.”


 


“My decision was based on my belief that the legislation was a violation of basic property rights,” Astorino said. “Landlords who want to accept federal vouchers are free to do so, but they should not be required to do so. This was a governmental intrusion that would have had the unintended consequence of actually working against the settlement because it would have made housing more expensive and less available.”


County Executive Robert P. Astorino said the decision by the magistrate showed that HUD had clearly overreached in the demands it was trying to impose on the residents of Westchester.


“My position from the beginning has been that the county will fulfill its obligations under the settlement, but it will not be bullied by the federal government into doing things that were never agreed to,” said Astorino. “I have taken principled stands where I believe the government has overreached, and I am pleased and heartened that the magistrate’s decision vindicates my actions.”


          


 


    In the case before United States Magistrate Gabriel Gorenstein, HUD and the monitor had argued that the 2009 housing settlement compelled Astorino to sign source of income legislation that would have required property owners to accept government vouchers as rental payments.


            Astorino argued that the settlement only called for the county executive to “promote” source of income legislation “currently before the Board of Legislators” back in 2009 and that former County Executive Andrew Spano, who approved the settlement, met that obligation at that time.


             Siding with Astorino’s position, the magistrate wrote: “We conclude that the parties did not intend the County’s duty to ‘promote’ obligated the County Executive to sign source-of-income legislation passed by the BOL.”


The magistrate also said that Astorino was within his rights to veto source of income legislation that came before him in July 2010 and backed up his decision with case law stating: “Courts must abide by the express terms of a consent decree and may not impose supplementary obligations on the parties even to fulfill the purposes of the decree more effectively.”


Gorenstein’s opinion then goes on to state: “Accordingly, we conclude that the able Monitor erred in concluding that the County Executive violated the Settlement by vetoing the source-of income legislation enacted by the BOL.”


Astorino vetoed the source of income legislation that came before him in 2010 calling it “hopelessly flawed.”


 


With respect to the zoning portion of the case, the magistrate ruled that the monitor is entitled to information with respect to zoning practices. The county believes this requirement was met on Feb. 29 (after the court papers were filed) when it submitted to the monitor its review of 43 municipal zoning ordinances covering 853 zoning districts.


The housing settlement requires the county government to ensure the development of 750 units of fair and affordable housing over a seven-year period in 31 mainly white communities. The agreement includes benchmarks for financing and obtaining building permits that must be in place by the end of each year. It also requires the county to market the housing in a way to reach non-white populations, not only in Westchester but also in New York City and surrounding counties. The county faces severe financial penalties if it fails to meet certain benchmarks.


As of this month, the county has 206 housing units approved by the federal housing monitor, of which 196 have all financing in place and 108 units have building permits in place. Under the terms of the settlement with HUD, the county was only required to have 100 units with financing and 50 units with building permits by the end of 2011. The settlement calls for 200 units with financing and 125 with building permits by the end of 2012. The county expects to meet these benchmarks this spring, placing almost a year ahead of schedule.


 


—


 

Posted in Uncategorized