FBI ANNOUNCES $731 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH POKER STARS AND FULL TILT POKER

WPCNR FBI WIRE. Special to WPCNR from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. July 31, 2012:


Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that the United States has entered into settlement agreements with PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker—two of three online poker companies sued by the U.S. in a money laundering and forfeiture complaint that was originally filed in April 2012—that were approved today by U.S. District Judge Leonard B. Sand.


Under the terms of the settlement with Full Tilt Poker (“Full Tilt”), the company agreed to forfeit virtually all of its assets to the U.S. to fully resolve the charges in the complaint.


Under the terms of the settlement with PokerStars, the company agreed to forfeit $547 million to the U.S. and to reimburse the approximately $184 million owed by Full Tilt to foreign players in order to fully resolve the allegations in the complaint. The settlement further provides that PokerStars will acquire the forfeited Full Tilt assets from the government. Full Tilt’s U.S. fraud victims will be able to seek compensation for their losses from the Department of Justice from the $547 million forfeited by PokerStars.


Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said,


“We are pleased to announce these settlements by Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars, which allow us to quickly get significant compensation into the victim players’ hands. Today’s settlements demonstrate that if you engage in conduct that violates the laws of the United States, as we alleged in this case, then even if you are doing so from across the ocean, you will have to answer for that conduct and turn over your ill-gotten gains.”


“Today’s forfeiture is another important step in the FBI’s investigation, allowing for serious compensation of victims. This should serve as a deterrent to others who look to actively circumvent United States law—onshore or offshore, you will be held responsible for those actions. Pokerstars and Full Tilt bet the house on their illicit scheme; fortunately, we were holding the trump card,” said FBI Assistant Director Janice K. Fedarcyk.


Under the terms of the settlement with Full Tilt, U.S. victims of the company’s alleged fraud will be able to seek compensation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The funds that will be used to compensate qualifying victims will come from the $547 million that will be forfeited by PokerStars as part of its settlement with the government.


In addition to forfeiting $547 million to the U.S., under the terms of the settlement with PokerStars, the company must make available to foreign players all balances that were held in the Full Tilt accounts within 90 days; the amount of those balances is approximately $184 million.


Pokerstars will also acquire the forfeited Full Tilt assets from the government. PokerStars’ acquisition of the forfeited Full Tilt assets will be complete upon the government’s receipt of a $225 million payment from PokerStars, which must take place within six days of the entrance of today’s settlement.


Additional terms of the PokerStars settlement include:



  • Within 45 days of the acquisition of the forfeited Full Tilt assets, Isai Scheinberg, who is presently under indictment in a related criminal case, shall not serve in any management or director role at PokerStars. This provision is subject to re-evaluation by the parties upon the resolution of the criminal case.
  • PokerStars is also prohibited from employing, or otherwise hiring, Full Tilt Poker insiders Raymond Bitar, Howard Lederer, Rafael Furst, Chris Ferguson, and Nelson Burtnick. Bitar and Burtnick are also named as defendants in a related criminal Indictment. Bitar, Lederer, Furst, and Ferguson are named as civil money-laundering defendants in this complaint.
  • PokerStars is prohibited from offering online poker in the U.S. for real money unless and until it is legal to do so under U.S. law.
  • The government will maintain a portion of the $547 million forfeited by PokerStars as a substitute for the forfeited Full Tilt assets to cover the litigation of claims by other parties asserting interests in the forfeited Full Tilt assets.

The settlements entered today with regard to Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars, and the proposed settlement with regard to Absolute Poker, do not constitute admissions of any wrongdoing, culpability, liability, or guilt by any parties. Under the terms of a “domain name use” agreement entered into between PokerStars and the government on April 20, 2011, the company previously settled its accounts with U.S. players.


In a related matter, the U.S. Attorney’s Office also filed a motion requesting that the court enter a settlement agreement reached with Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet that requires the company to forfeit all of its assets in order to fully resolve this action.


The motion also requests that the government be permitted to liquidate the Absolute assets, with the net proceeds of that sale to be held pending the resolution of claims filed by other parties who have asserted an ownership interest in the Absolute assets.


The following allegations are based on the Amended Civil Forfeiture Complaint filed in September and the indictments returned in the related criminal action:


On October 13, 2006, the United States enacted the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), making it a federal crime for gambling businesses to “knowingly accept” most forms of payment “in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful Internet gambling.”


Despite the passage of the UIGEA, Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars, and Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet (the poker companies), each located offshore, continued operating in the United States.


Because U.S. banks and credit card issuers were largely unwilling to process their payments, the poker companies allegedly used fraudulent methods to circumvent federal law and deceive these financial institutions into processing payments on their behalf.


 For example, the poker companies arranged for the money received from U.S. gamblers to be disguised as payments to hundreds of non-existent online merchants purporting to sell merchandise such as jewelry and golf balls. Of the billions of dollars in payment transactions that the poker companies deceived U.S. banks into processing, approximately one-third or more of the funds went directly to the poker companies as revenue through the “rake” charged to players on almost every poker hand played online.


To accomplish their fraud, the poker companies worked with an array of highly compensated “payment processors” who obtained accounts at U.S. banks for the poker companies.


The payment processors lied to banks about the nature of the financial transactions they were processing and covered up those lies, by, among other things, creating phony corporations and websites to disguise payments to the poker companies.


For example, a PokerStars document from May 2009 acknowledged that they received money from U.S. gamblers through company names that “strongly imply the transaction has nothing to do with PokerStars” and that PokerStars used whatever company names “the processor can get approved by the bank.”


Full Tilt Poker further defrauded players by misrepresenting that player funds on deposit in online gambling accounts were safe, secure, and available for withdrawal at any time.


In reality, the company did not maintain funds sufficient to repay all players and, instead, utilized players’ funds to distribute more than $400 million to Full Tilt’s owners.


By March 31, 2011, two weeks before the initial complaint in this action was unsealed, Full Tilt Poker owed approximately $390 million to players around the world, including approximately $160 million to players in the United States.


At that time, Full Tilt Poker had only approximately $60 million on deposit in its bank accounts.


Full Tilt Poker’s scheme continued even after the civil forfeiture action commenced and the related criminal indictment was unsealed in April 2011. Full Tilt Poker continued accepting foreign player funds despite the fact that it had liabilities to players around the world for over $300 million yet held only a small fraction of that amount in its bank accounts.


Eleven defendants were charged criminally in connection with the original Internet poker indictment, seven of whom have been arrested.


The defendants who have been arrested are: Raymond Bitar, Bradley Franzen, Ryan Lang, Ira Rubin, Brent Beckley, Chad Elie, and John Campos.


All seven defendants except Bitar have each pled guilty and await sentencing with the exception of Campos, who was sentenced in June 2012 to three months in prison. Charges are still pending against the remaining four defendants—Nelson Burtnick, Isai Scheinberg, Paul Tate, and Scott Tom—who remain at large. The charges and accusations against them are allegations, and they are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.


U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara praised the FBI for its outstanding leadership in the investigation, which he noted is ongoing.


This matter is being handled by the Office’s Asset Forfeiture and Complex Frauds Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sharon Cohen Levin, Michael Lockard, Jason Cowley, and Andrew Goldstein are in charge of the civil money laundering and forfeiture action. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Arlo Devlin-Brown, Nicole Friedlander and Niketh Velamoor are in charge of the criminal case.

Posted in Uncategorized

Council Mulls Accepting FASNY RIDGEWAY EIS and OPEN SPACE ORDINANCE

 


 


WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE EXAMINER By John F. Bailey. July 31,2012:


 


The Common Council met before a phalanx of barristers and interested parties Monday evening to consider whether the French American School of New York  Environmental Impact Statement was “complete” and all scoping questions raised by the Draft Environmental Impact statement were covered.  The Open Space Zoning Ordinance generic environmental impact statement was also considered for its completeness.


 


No connection, but the Open Space Zoning Ordinance, would ban housing subdivisions on the three golf course properties in the city (Fenway Golf Club, Westchester Hills Golf Club and the defunct Ridgeway Golf Club where the French American School is planning a 7 -building campus, the subject of the Environmental Impact Statement)  and expand the distances of setbacks for any school or institutional buildings on those three properties.


 


Susan Habel, Commissioner of Planning in her last official week as Planning Commissioner (she retires August 4, unless the city reaches out and retains her in future weeks as these complex matters move forward) stated that all department heads had signed off on the 5oo-plus page document. The Environmental Impact Statement is scheduled for consideration for acceptance as  complete next Monday, to start the public hearing process on the French American in September.


 


Councilman John Martin and  Councilman Benjamin Boykin at the close of Ms. Habel’s report expressed anxiety that if public hearings on the FASNY Environmental Impact Statement were scheduled in September that the public would not have enough time to review the massive document in view of the Jewish holidays that are compressed this year.


 


Ms. Habel and Mayor Roach pointed out that legally the city is obligated to schedule hearings within 45 days of “acceptance” (not approval) that the French American School of New York Environmental Statement on their proposed site plan for their campus on the former Ridgeway Country Club is complete (which in this case, WPCNR notes is,if the Environmental Statement is accepted next Monday August 6), a public hearing would have to be scheduled the third week in September (the week of September 19)


 


There is the option of the Council sending the environmental impact statement back t o FASNY as incomplete. Points raised by Mr. Martin about safety issues and what the details of the conservancy planned on the site by FASNY as being vague, were not reasons for rejecting the document as being incomplete, Steven Silverberg, the city’s legal consultant said. Habel also pointed out that before any final action the Common Council to write in specific requirements of safety and conservancy, and traffic concerns.


 


Habel said the city was particularly going to evalutate the computer model of traffic flows supplied by the school with the environmental impact  statement. Habel said the school has suggested that changing timing on traffico lights at key intersections would ease traffic flow into the Ridgeway Avenue site. She said those suggestions would be analyzed by the Commissioner of Traffic.


 


The new Open Space Zoning Ordinance appears headed for a vote Monday to be scheduled for a public hearing in September, too. The ordinance unchanged with the effects of expanding setback distances for private institutions and eliminating housing subdivisions on two operating private golf courses in the city, Fenway Golf Club and Westchester Hills, and a third course, now not operating and owned by the French American School, the property that is the focus of the above Environmental Impact Statement.

Posted in Uncategorized

Carhart Association Protests Planned Detox Center at Former Miller Nursing Home


WPCNR NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH. From the Carhart Neighborhood Association  July 30,2012 UPDATED WITH PICTURE OF SITE:


 


On July 17th the Planning Board voted to recommend to the Common Council that they issue a special use permit and approve site plans for Sunrise Detox Center to operate a 31-33 bed facility at 37 De Kalb Avenue (the former site of the Nathan Miller nursing home) (below).


 



 


The proposed drug and alcohol detox center would be located in a quiet residential neighborhood with several elementary school bus stops within a few blocks including one on the same corner. There is also a special education day program at St. Matthew’s church two blocks away servicing developmentally disabled individuals.


 


There are also several liquor stores and drug stores within a short walk of the proposed site.


 


Fears over safety concerns have been fueled by reported police logs of assaults (including sexual) as well as several missing persons at the two existing Sunrise detox facilities in Florida and New Jersey.


 


This issue will come before the White Plains Common Council at their next meeting on Monday August 6th and all concerned citizens are urged to appear at 6:30 PM at the Municipal Building 255 Main Street- 2nd Floor to voice their opposition to this project.


 


In conjunction with an extensive White Plains wide petition drive, there is an online petition available at www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-detox.


 


A Public Hearing on this matter will most probably be set for the September 4  Common Council meeting, (not September 10, as previously stated).


 


For additional information, please contact the Carhart Neighborhood Association at [email protected]

Posted in Uncategorized

PLAYLAND REVENES DECLINE 10.6%. ATTENDANCE DECLINES 5.8% AT MIDSUMMER

 


 


WPCNR COUNTY-CLARION LEDGER. July 30, 2012:


 


The Journal News noted in a news brief Sunday that the County Board of Legislators received a report on 2012 Playland (the county-owned 1929-vintage amusement park in Rye) attendance.


 


The park through July 15 has attracted 193,749 visitors, 12,078 fewer paying customers than the 205,825 attracted in 2011, a decline of 5.8%. Revenues declined, the report to  the Board said, 10.6% from $4.7 Million in 2011 to $4.2 Million this year.


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized