Hearings Set 4 Rec Zone; FASNY. Campus Office Mix Use OK’d. Habel May Return

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. August6, 2012. UPDATED AUGUST 8, 2012 UPDATED AUGUST 8, 2012 11:20 A.M. E.D.T.UPDATED AUGUST 8, 5 P.M. E.D.T.:


Viewers observing the Monday evening Common Council meeting saw the city take key steps forward into the development  (or lack thereof)  for some of the last remaining private tracts to develop in White Plains.


Viewers also saw Councilman David Buchwald thank former Commissioner of Planning Susan Habel for her service,(who retired Friday without a successor being named), indicating that the city may be calling on Ms. Habel’s  expertise in the future without elaborating.


Mr. Buchwald took the time, at the end of the consent agenda  segment to praise Ms. Habel’s service to the city:


“I want to note that in our agenda .this is the last item in our agenda before we get to the public hearings, and it is the last item to which the signature of our just-retired Commissioner of Planning,Susan Habel, has put her name. And, I want to thank her for her work on this particular issue (solar energy) and for her contributions over a very distinguished career here in the city of White Plains. She’s a resident of the city,dedicated to it, in many ways she will continue to enjoy the fruits of her labor on behalf of the city. On behalf  of the entire Common Council, I want to extend our gratitude to  her and I wish her best of luck in her continued enjoyment of her semi-retirement. We’re not letting her completely go because we all hope that she’ll continue to provide some institutional knowledge and perspective on things that are going on in the city. But I did want to thank her again for her years in the Planning Department and prior to that.”


The Council set the stage for opening up the office campuses along Westchester Avenue for new development to supplement the campuns office properties  currently suffering from a high vacancy rate.


They approved a Campus Office District mixed-use zoning change allowing housing, scientific uses, research and limited retail use. Each property owner would be required to submit a unique “overlay” master plan for their properties subject to approval by the Common Council. Mayor Thomas Roach told the public “we already have committals,” without elaborating.


The Common Council approved hearings to receive public input on the Open Space Recreational Ordinance  setting requirements for privately owned golf course properties in the city for September 4. Councilpersons urged residents to come out and make their views known on the ordinance.  Gwo consecuive public hearings on the French American School of New York project to build a school campus  on the former Ridgeway Country Club were also approved for September 19, 7 PM and October 17, also at 7 PM.


Councilman Benjamin Boykin said the setting of the public hearing was merely accepting the Draft Environmental Impact Statement as complete, and “didn’t necessarily mean we (the council) agreed with them.” Boykin said now it was the public’s turn to comment and that the council would hear input on the project “for as long as it takes,” and would be thorough.


The council also approved the first step in the ongoing Winbrook Revitalization Project, approving a 10-story building,housing an Educ ation Center , which will be built first, however funding is only available for the first floor housing the education center on the first floor. The city is funding $1.5 Million of the project and the Housing and Urban Development, $3,500,000 as of this spring.


Wednesday after the Housing and Urban Development press office in New York confirmed to WPCNR, HUD is still funding the $3.5 Million “only for the education facility,” the spokesman explained.


During the hearing on the Winbrook project, William Null, the attorney for the enterprise said in response to a question by Council President Beth Smayda that plans for subsequent buildings in the project would be submitted on a project-by-project basis and built individually according to the individual’s financial model, and not as part of a connected project. Design, Null said would depend on whom the Housing Authority was working with to develop each building in the future, so, Null suggested that it was somewhat impossible to present the kind of comprehensive plan that Smayda suggested.


Smayda asked about the amount key finding agencies the Housing Authority was providing. The architect for the project stepped up to say that the Authority had not applied for the financing yet, because it needed tonight’s approval to do so and would be applying to state agencies for tax credit financing after approval.


The Housing and Urban Development agency in Washington told the authority in the spring of this year, its funds were no longer available for financing the entire project.TO read that story click on http://whiteplainscnr.com/article9115.html


Smayda expressed concern about a future environmental review of the effect on the infrastructure of the city since the Environmental Officer of the City had requested one. Null said that since the entire project was replacing what was already there, it was the Housing Authority position that a new environmental review was not necessary, but the Authority was willing to consider it.


It also became clear that the first building setting the tone for the project would be made up exclusively of present Winbrook residents. Milagros Lecuona, the Councilwoman, emphasized that she wanted the  project (as it was originally envisioned) to be mixed income. Mack Carter, Executive Director of the Housing Authority stepped up and said that the first building is now being financed hopefully as a tax credit project which required that the building be low and moderate income housing only similar to present Winbrook Housing tenant income levels and that mixed income levels could not be accommodated, though incomes would vary in the building based on Winbrook tenants moving in (when the residential portion of  the building is completed, which still has to be financed).


Smayda asked if co-op or condominium ownership would be available. Null said that they are not prohibited from that, but it is not being considered at this time.


Outdoor dining was approved for Esposito’s Restaurant on a rooftop deck, and outdoor patio dining was approved for Noodles Restaurant.


The Council authorized the purchase of a third one-man garbage truck for $250,000 and 100,000 containers to go with the truck. Councilman John Martin and Council President Beth Smayda lauded the one-arm, one-man truck system of collecting garbage as a money-saving long-term move.


However to date the Common Council and the Department of Public Works have not said how much savings the new truck system in effect with the first in-service truck have achieved in dollars or how long it will be before the trucks payout in savings long-term. There has been talk about saving costs on labor but how that saving is achieved (other than reassignment of personnel) has not been defined. The truck in service has mainly been a “neat” thing.


The Council also voted to purchase 200 Westchester Avenue  for $500,000.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Bombing of Hirosima Took Place 67 Years ago Today

 


 


WPCNR MILESTONES. August 6, 2012:


  


Sixty-seven years ago, the Enola Gay, a single American bomber dropped an Atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The terrible effects of that single bomb are a horror that has never been repeated


 


A second bomber, Bock’s Car on August 9, dropped a similar bomb on Nagasaki. Unknown thousands of Japanese citizens’ lives were vaporized, burned,  and maimed and two cities leveled to the ground in an instant in both bombings.


 


To grasp what one atomic bomb did to Nagasaki. Readers may see the photographs Japanese photographer Yosuki Yamato took of the aftermath of Nagasaki the day it happened at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/photos.html#journey/63.jpg


 


The decision to drop the bombs was made after the United States, Great Britain and the Republic of China demanded Japan  surrender in the Potsdam Declaration on July 26 or face  “prompt and utter destruction”. The Japanese government did not.


 


The United States deployed two nuclear weapons  dropping one on Hiroshimi today, 67 years ago and one on Nagasaki on August 9.


 


Over four months the bombs resulted in the deaths of   90,000–166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000–80,000 in Nagasaki, half dying the day the bombs fell.


 


The Hiroshima prefecture health department estimated that, of the people who died on the day of the explosion, 60% died from flash or flame burns, 30% from falling debris and 10% from other causes. During the following months, large numbers died from the effect of burns, radiation sickness, and other injuries, compounded by illness. In a US estimate of the total immediate and short term cause of death, 15–20% died from radiation sickness, 20–30% from burns, and 50–60% from other injuries, compounded by illness. In both cities, most of the dead were civilians, although Hiroshima had a sizeable garrison.


The horror of those two bombings and the aftermath, the injuries have created  an effort and reluctance on the part of nuclear-armed powers to avoid any nuclear attacks since that date.


Within a few days of those bombings, Japan surrendered unconditionally, officially ending World War II.


 


The decision to use the bombs by the United States has long been debated. A dialogue on what the bombs did, why the decision was made was collected in 1995, the fiftieth year since the bombings. It is available at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/commentary/decision.html

Posted in Uncategorized

Astorino:Tripling New TZB Tolls Needs Better Mass Transit NOW. Gov Defends Tolls

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE NEWS. AUGUST 4, 2012:


Governor Andrew M.Cuomo issued perhaps the shortest “reaction” statement of his term today, defending tripling of the Tappan Zee Bridge Tolls. His office late Friday afternoon issued this statement on the Governor’s website:


“On the cost the choice is clear — a new better bridge will require about the same tolls as just fixing the old bridge and about half the toll of a new bridge plus a new bus system,” stated Governor Cuomo.


In reaction to Governor Cuomo’s endorsement today of  a tripling of the tolls (to $14 for cash payers; $13.30 for EZ PASS Holders and $8.50 for Commuters)  on the new Tappan Zee Bridge, the County Executive of Westchester County, Robert P. Astorino issued this statement through Phil Oliva, a spokesman;


“The new toll amount underscores the need for some type of mass transit and we are working with the governor’s office on a framework for what can be done immediately in regards to bus rapid transit and what can be done mid to long term,”


This evening, WNYC Radio ran audio of Governor Cuomo supporting the toll increase on the grounds that fixing the old bridge would cost the same amount about $12 a trip, and repeating his stance that the bridge is going to built, it has to be built.


Paul Feiner, Greenburgh Town Supervisor released this statement in reacton to the shock at the Governor’s Secretary Larry Swartz making public the new toll amounts (which this website predicted five months ago).


“Greenburgh Town Supervisor Paul Feiner is calling for a summit of elected officials from Westchester/Rockland to discuss the projected toll rate hikes once the new Tappan Zee bridge is built.  The state is now estimating that tolls on the Tappan Zee bridge could jump to  close to $14 in December 2014. (WPCNR is checking with Mr. Feiner as to if this is true.)Tolls are expected to almost triple from the current amount.  There would be discounts for commuters who would pay in the neighborhood of $8.40 to cross the 3 mile span.


The Tappan Zee bridge should not be a bridge for only the rich, said Feiner. The projected increases are excessive –especially without bus or mass transit. This will be a tremendous burden for lower income residents of both counties, for seniors and young people. The state would set the income guidelines to qualify. The Tappan Zee bridge projected toll hikes make the bridge unaffordable for many.


A possible suggestion (in addition to lobbying for mass transit/bus service)….a new discount card for commuters who are on fixed incomes. A photo id card could be issued to those who qualify. They would show the card to toll collectors and pay the reduced fares.


Westchester/Rockland residents currently subsidize Buffalo residents who receive a significant discount on the Grand Island bridge. Grand Island residents pay 9 cents to cross the bridge. Non residents pay $1 per trip. Why does the Thruway Authority give residents of the Buffalo area a big discount  on their local bridge and not do the same for residents of Westchester/Rockland? 


Feiner is planning to write to the Governor, the Westcheste/Rockland delegation to the NYS Legislature and to local officials requesting a meeting.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

State: New TZB Toll About $14 Exceeding WPCNR Conservative Estimate

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE NEWS. August 4, 2012:


A state official last night told persons attending a Tappan Zee Bridge public meeting that tolls on the new Tappan Zee Bridge, optimistically predicted by the state to be constructed and opened about 2017 would be about $3 more than predicted by WPCNR in a rough estimate last February.


At the Rockland County Tappan Zee Bridge public meeting to inform Rockland residents on the latest Tappan Zee Bridge facts and figures (the meeting had been scheduled for last Thursday had been postponed), Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo, White Plains’ Larry Schwartz stated that tolls for the new Tappan Zee Bridge would be appoximately $14 with discounts to “commuters” of $8.40 and E-Z Pass holders $13.50 per trip.


Schwartz said the toll would be $12 if the old bridge had been upgraded.


AS OF 3:15 P.M., Governor Andrew Cuomo’s new Tappan Zee Bridge website, www.newnybridge.com has not posted any news release detailing this important new information divulged by Mr. Schwartz last night at the Rockland County public meeting.


Schwartz’s estimate comes after WPCNR had republished its prediction of five months ago that a rough toll would have to be about $11.50 to cover the debt service of the $5.2 to $6.2 Million the state will have to borrow to build the bridge.


As an aid, WPCNR had calculated in February that to finance $6.2 Billion through the TIFIA program,  at its current rate and pay the maintenance costs of the new bridge, tolls would have to go up to $11.50 a Trip. To read that commentary go to  www.whiteplainscnr.com/article9023.html

Posted in Uncategorized