Castelli Forum Asks Questions That Need to be Addressed on Spending

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From Assemblyman Robert Castelli’s Office. August 27, 2012:


Assemblyman Robert J. Castelli today hosted close to 30 local business, education and industry leaders at a forum at the Harrison Town Hall to discuss the continued need to deliver unfunded mandate relief to local governments, school districts and taxpayers, along with the urgency of creating more private-sector jobs in the Lower Hudson Valley.  


“Westchester County taxpayers are tired of paying the highest property taxes in the nation, and a full 90 cents of every county property tax dollar goes to Albany to fund state mandates,”  Castelli said. “I am pleased to join with local taxpayers and business leaders to say ‘enough is enough’ to Albany’s practice of forcing Westchester County taxpayers to foot the bill for state government mandates.”

Unfunded mandates occur whenever state government tells local governments and school districts to do something, such as implement a new program, expand a service or even build a new school, yet provides zero funding to pay for it. New York’s largest unfunded mandate on municipalities each year is Medicaid spending, which has an $8 billion price tag in the current Fiscal Year. New York’s combined federal, state and local spending on Medicaid is the highest in the nation at $54 billion; the Empire State spent more than California and Florida combined.

“We gathered business and community leaders at the Harrison Town Hall today to ask them three important questions: Should New York institute a state spending cap? Should there be a moratorium on unfunded mandates on local governments and school districts costing more than $10,000 annually or $1 million statewide? And how can we support local businesses so they can create and retain quality jobs in our communities? I look forward to taking their ideas and concerns to Albany to fight for lower taxes, unfunded mandate relief and a better business environment in the Westchester,” Castelli continued.

Forum participants included John Ravitz, Executive Vice President of the Business Council of Westchester, Sergio Brasesco of Emilio Ristorante, Amy Allen and Dorothy Forcina of the Westchester County Association, Alexander Roberts of Community Housing Innovations Inc., Mark Jaffe, Presdient/CEO of the Greater New York Chamber of commerce, Michael Schiliro, Vice President of CMS Bank, Norm Michaels, President of Michaels & Assocites, Deborah Patterson of Con Edison, and Mary Ann Luna of the United Way of Westchester and Putnam. Participants discussed strategies to deliver unfunded mandate relief as well as create and maintain private- sector jobs in the Lower Hudson Valley.

The Steering Committee, a public policy vehicle for the New York State Assembly Minority Conference, is a strong voice for private-sector job creators and improving New York’s business climate. The Conference’s “Taxpayer Protection and Mandate Relief Act” (A.8447, Kolb) would cap state spending, prohibit any new unfunded mandates on local governments and school districts and require the Governor to submit an annual plan to repeal unfunded mandates.

 “Unfunded mandates and runaway cost increases in state spending result in the same thing – higher taxes and fees for our small business owners,” said Assemblywoman Jane Corwin (R, C, I – Clarence), chair of the Steering Committee. “The Westchester business owners we spoke with today gave us valuable feedback on the most efficient, effective ways to help them create more jobs, right now.”


Posted in Uncategorized

Should County Add Bicyle Lanes to Parkways? Step Away from the Bicylce, Sir.

WPCNR PHOTOGRAPH OF THE DAY. By the WPCNR ROVING PHOTOGRAPHER. AUGUST 27, 2012:


An enterprising bicyclist decided to take the direct route north in Westchester County which this reporter believes prohibits bicyclists and pedestrians. Nevertheless, this intrepid cyclists noting the usual 2 mile standstill of northbound traffic going intothe Cross County parkway interchange, choose to peddle the Hutchinson River Parkway northbound.


He was doing very nicely until the ever-vigilant Westchester County Police swung into action and pulled the biker over.The unique, alert pull-over occurred at 5:44 P.M.Sunday afternoon on the Hutchinson River Parkway and was captured by the ever-alert companion to this reporter,Brenda Starr.




A Westchester County  Police patrol car responded to the intrepid cyclist interloper, the police officer, maneuvering carefully on the paved shoulder, approached, lights flashing pulling the cyclist over.Perhaps he only gave the bicyclist a warning. Photos by Brenda Starr on the Brenda Phone, the WPCNR Roving Photographer


 


Kirin O’Leary of the Westchester County Police said the bicyclist could have been issued a summons for driving a “restricted vehicle” on the parkway. O’Leary said that it is a New York State Law that restricts bicyclists from using parkways. He was checking to see what the penalty if any, is for riding a bicycle on a county highway. O’Leary said bicyclists could ride from the Bronx to the Putnam County border on the County Trailway that begins in Yonkers


 


Brenda wonders since bicyclists do not require a Bicylers License (now there’s a revenue -raiser to ease the new Tappan Zee Bridge toll!), and bicycles do not require bicycle license plates (Governor slaps forehead! Why didn’t I think of that?), and bicyclers will be accommodated on the new Tappan Zee Bridge, regulation of bicyclists, bicyle registration, and a Bureau of Bicycles are idea whose time is now.

Posted in Uncategorized

Settlement with Teachers Not Settled Yet.

BREAKING NEWS!


EXCLUSIVE!


TEACHER NEGOTIATIONS in END GAME


NO SETTLEMENT YET


TEACHERS: AREAS STILL REMAIN TO BE WORKED OUT.


Mediator attempts to Bring Sides Together


 


WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. WPCNR EXCLUSIVE. August 24, 2012 UPDATED 6:35 P.M. E.D.T. UPDATED SATURDAY AUGUST 25, 2012 UPDATED MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 2012:


The head of the White Plains Teachers Association, Kerry Broderick, told WPCNR Monday morning that a tentative settlement has not been officially reached with the City School District.


Ms. Broderick, in a written statement wrote WPCNR:


“There is no settlement.  Both sides have worked hard for a settlement, but  a couple of areas remain difficult to resolve.

 

We are working with the mediator to provide a recommendation for both parties.  When we receive the recommendation, both sides will present to the respective negotiation teams.





 



When decisions are made, I will be sure to let you know.  I don’t expect any decisions until late this coming week.


White Plains Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Christopher Clouet in a statement to WPCNR Saturday confirmed he had reached an agreement on a new contract with union leadership with ratification by union membership the next step. Asked about length of contract and details, Clouet wrote


“I cannot have union members reading about the details in the media, before they have a chance to read the agreement and react (and hopefully ratify).

The Board will be briefed in executive session at Tuesday’s meeting.

I envision being able to discuss the specifics during the first week of school.”


The Superintendent issued this statement late Friday afternoon, indicating agreement had been reached;


“Very close.Still requires union ratification and Board approval.”


A session with a mediator Thursday had not yielded a settlement between White Plains teachers and the city school district yet. A source involved in the negotiations told WPCNR they would return with the mediator today and were “very close,” and that has come true.





 

 


Posted in Uncategorized

County Yields to Court Demand for Mandatory Sec 8 Acceptance Law in Affordables

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER From the Westchester County Department of Communications. August 24, 2012:


In a news release Thursday, Westchester County said it would move ahead to reintroduce legislation that would require owners of affordable housing to accept Section 8 Vouchers without question. The County Executive had previously refused to consider such legislation.The county faced a possibility of being charged with contempt of court.


This move comes after a county appeal still not decided, of the Housing and Urban Development directive to do so as part of a housing settlement in the Astorino administration ongoing fight against HUD positions on the the county’s settlement on providing 750 units affordable housing.


County Executive Robert Astorino outlined the county’s dispute with HUD on constitutional grounds Wednesday evening before over 100 persons in a Town Meeting in White Plains.


The release details the reasons for moving ahead with the Section 8 mandatory acceptance legislation. The County Executive is also fighting HUD on its demand county cities and towns remove all restrictive zoning.


The release:


 


      


    ” As part of Westchester’s ongoing efforts to comply with the federal affordable housing settlement, County Executive Robert P. Astorino today sent a letter to the monitor in the case stating how the county would comply with an Aug. 10 order by U.S.  District Judge Denise Cote.

            In the letter to James Johnson, the monitor, Astorino makes the following points:


·        The county is well ahead of schedule in meeting the benchmarks for building the 750 units of affordable housing required in the 2009 housing settlement signed by former County Executive Andrew J. Spano and ratified by the Board of Legislators.


·        The county believes its appeal before the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals will vindicate its position that the federal government’s demands go far beyond the terms of the settlement.


·        The county’s actions continue to demonstrate its compliance with the terms of the settlement.


           


            “Our case continues,” Astorino said. “The arguments we have made to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals are strong and grounded in the principles that are fundamental to our Constitution. While I think it would have made much more common sense for the government to wait until the Second Circuit rules in the case, the District Court has told me to move forward on source of income legislation and I am compelled to follow the order of the judge.”


            The letter to Johnson addresses the three points in Judge Cote’s order: reintroduction of source of income legislation, followed by analysis and signing of the legislation.


·        On point one, the county executive will submit a letter to Board of Legislators Chairman Ken Jenkins by Aug. 31, asking him to have the board reintroduce the prior source of income legislation that had been before the board.


·        On point two, the administration will provide information and assist the board in analyzing the impact of the legislation.


·        On point three, the county executive will wait to see the final legislation before making a determination of whether he will sign it because its content will not be known until then.


 


            The last point is at the heart of the county’s legal case. The county maintains there is nothing in the settlement that requires the county executive to sign source of income legislation – the agreement says only that he must “promote” it. In addition, the county believes the source of income requirement expired in 2009 because legislation referenced in the settlement was “currently” before the board at that time.


            “To compel an elected official to sign legislation sight unseen and to give up his or her responsibility to vote his conscience goes against everything our country stands for,” Astorino said. “We don’t think the settlement says that, and that is one of the issues we are fighting in court.”


            Astorino has taken a principled stand against source of income legislation because he believes it would take away the rights of property owners and hurt the prospects of building affordable housing. At the heart of the legislation is the requirement that property owners must accept Section 8 vouchers as rent. The program now is voluntary. If made mandatory, every property owner offered a Section 8 vouchers would be required to accept it and be bound by all the rules and regulations and potential fines attached to the program.


            Astorino stressed, “I will continue to abide by all lawful orders of the Court in effect at any given time.”


            The 2009 housing settlement requires the county government to take steps to ensure that 750 units of fair and affordable housing are built in 31 so-called “eligible,” or mostly white communities.


            Just this week, the county exceeded the two key benchmarks for the end of 2012; it has in place 130 building permits and secured financing for 207 units. The settlement required 125 building permits and 200 units with financing by the end of the year.

Posted in Uncategorized