NY SAFE ACT Disclosure Exemptions Could Mean Every Gun License Holder Is Exempt

WPCNR For the Record. By John F. Bailey with the Text of the new NY Safe Act. January 16, 2013:


Examination of the text of the NY SAFE Act signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo yesterday seems to indicate that the identities of most gun permit holders will in the future be much harder to get, eliminating the controversy of exposing gun permit holders through the media.


The context of making public names and addresses of gun permit holders has been changed substantially by the new act.


Specific types of persons are described as being eligible for exemption from disclosure (to public and media), but the text of the law appears to allow gun license owners to apply for exemption from disclosure if they even consider they may be endangered or be subject to harassment by such disclosure. 


Individuals not fitting the specific categories of person who may request exemption request will be decided by the clerk or agency locally recording the permit. The law appears to make the decision to withhold disclosure purely subjective on the part of the county, jurisdiction or municipality keeping the gun permit record. The decision to not withhold appears to be based solely on whether the official deciding to exempt feels the request is “null and void,” whatever that means. The new act in terms of disclosure appears to eliminate the accessessbility to the public and the press of what could mean every gun permit holder.


WPCNR is seeking comment from authorities on whether this is a possibility.


The text of the section of the law dealing with disclosure as passed and signed, regarding the new grounds for individuals who may claim such exemption from disclosure of their name and address follows:


 

(I) THE APPLICANT’S LIFE OR SAFETY MAY BE ENDANGERED BY DISCLOSURE


BECAUSE:


(A) THE APPLICANT IS AN ACTIVE OR RETIRED POLICE OFFICER, PEACE OFFICER, PROBATION OFFICER, PAROLE OFFICER, OR CORRECTIONS OFFICER;



(B) THE APPLICANT IS A PROTECTED PERSON UNDER A CURRENTLY VALID ORDER


OF PROTECTION;



(C) THE APPLICANT IS OR WAS A WITNESS IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING INVOLV


ING A CRIMINAL CHARGE;



(D) THE APPLICANT IS PARTICIPATING OR PREVIOUSLY PARTICIPATED AS A


JUROR IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING, OR IS OR WAS A MEMBER OF A GRAND JURY;


OR



(E) THE APPLICANT IS A SPOUSE, DOMESTIC PARTNER OR HOUSEHOLD MEMBER OF


A PERSON IDENTIFIED IN THIS SUBPARAGRAPH OR SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS


PARAGRAPH, SPECIFYING WHICH SUBPARAGRAPH OR SUBPARAGRAPHS AND CLAUSES


APPLY.



(II) THE APPLICANT HAS REASON TO BELIEVE HIS OR HER LIFE OR SAFETY MAY


BE ENDANGERED BY DISCLOSURE DUE TO REASONS STATED BY THE APPLICANT.



(III) THE APPLICANT HAS REASON TO BELIEVE HE OR SHE MAY BE SUBJECT TO


UNWARRANTED HARASSMENT UPON DISCLOSURE OF SUCH INFORMATION.



(C) EACH FORM PROVIDED FOR RECERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B)


OF SUBDIVISION TEN OF THIS SECTION SHALL INCLUDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE


APPLICANT TO REQUEST AN EXCEPTION FROM THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON SUCH


FORM BECOMING PUBLIC RECORD PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION.


SUCH FORMS SHALL NOTIFY APPLICANTS THAT, UPON DISCOVERY THAT AN


APPLICANT KNOWINGLY PROVIDED FALSE INFORMATION, SUCH APPLICANT MAY BE


SUBJECT TO PENALTIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 175.30 OF THIS CHAPTER, AND


FURTHER, THAT HIS OR HER REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION SHALL BE NULL AND


VOID, PROVIDED THAT WRITTEN NOTICE CONTAINING SUCH DETERMINATION IS


PROVIDED TO THE APPLICANT. FURTHER, SUCH FORMS SHALL PROVIDE EACH


APPLICANT AN OPPORTUNITY TO EITHER DECLINE TO REQUEST THE GRANT OR


CONTINUATION OF AN EXCEPTION, OR SPECIFY THE GROUNDS ON WHICH HE OR SHE


BELIEVES HIS OR HER INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. THESE


GROUNDS, WHICH SHALL BE IDENTIFIED IN THE APPLICATION WITH A BOX BESIDE


EACH FOR CHECKING, AS APPLICABLE, BY THE APPLICANT, SHALL BE THE SAME AS


PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION.



(D) INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON THE FORMS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH (B) OF


THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE EXCEPTED FROM DISCLOSURE AND MAINTAINED BY THE


ENTITY RETAINING SUCH INFORMATION SEPARATE AND APART FROM ALL OTHER


RECORDS.



(E) (I) UPON RECEIVING A REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION FROM DISCLOSURE, THE


LICENSING OFFICER SHALL GRANT SUCH EXCEPTION, UNLESS THE REQUEST IS


DETERMINED TO BE NULL AND VOID, PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B) OR (C) OF THIS


SUBDIVISION.



(II) A REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION FROM DISCLOSURE MAY BE SUBMITTED AT


ANY TIME, INCLUDING AFTER A LICENSE OR RECERTIFICATION HAS BEEN GRANTED.



(III) IF AN EXCEPTION IS SOUGHT AND GRANTED PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B)


OF THIS SUBDIVISION, THE APPLICATION INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE PUBLIC


RECORD, UNLESS THE REQUEST IS DETERMINED TO BE NULL AND VOID. IF AN


EXCEPTION IS SOUGHT AND GRANTED PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS SUBDI


VISION, THE INFORMATION CONCERNING SUCH RECERTIFICATION APPLICATION


S. 2230 30 A. 2388


SHALL NOT BE PUBLIC RECORD, UNLESS THE REQUEST IS DETERMINED TO BE NULL


AND VOID.



(F) THE INFORMATION OF LICENSEES OR APPLICANTS FOR A LICENSE SHALL NOT


BE DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC DURING THE FIRST ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS


FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE CHAPTER OF THE LAWS OF TWO THOUSAND


THIRTEEN, WHICH AMENDED THIS SECTION. AFTER SUCH PERIOD, THE INFORMA


TION OF THOSE WHO HAD APPLIED FOR OR BEEN GRANTED A LICENSE PRIOR TO THE


PREPARATION OF THE FORM FOR REQUESTING AN EXCEPTION, PURSUANT TO PARA


GRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, MAY BE RELEASED ONLY IF SUCH INDIVIDUALS


DID NOT FILE A REQUEST FOR SUCH AN EXCEPTION DURING THE FIRST SIXTY DAYS


FOLLOWING SUCH PREPARATION; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT NO INFORMATION


CONTAINED IN AN APPLICATION FOR LICENSURE OR RECERTIFICATION SHALL BE


DISCLOSED BY AN ENTITY THAT HAS NOT COMPLETED PROCESSING ANY SUCH


REQUESTS RECEIVED DURING SUCH SIXTY DAYS.



(G) IF A REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION IS DETERMINED TO BE NULL AND VOID


PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B) OR (C) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, AN APPLICANT MAY


REQUEST REVIEW OF SUCH DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVENTY-EIGHT


OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAWS AND RULES. SUCH PROCEEDING MUST COMMENCE


WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE WRITTEN NOTICE CONTAINING THE


ADVERSE DETERMINATION. NOTICE OF THE RIGHT TO COMMENCE SUCH A PETITION,


AND THE TIME PERIOD THEREFOR, SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF THE DETERMINATION.


To Read the comple SAFE Act, go to http://open.nysenate.gov/legislation/bill/S2230-2013

Posted in Uncategorized

Governor Cuomo Signs NY SAFE Law. Toughest Gun Law in USA

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From the Governor’s Press Office. January 15, 2013:


Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today signed into law the NY SAFE Act (Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act) that will give New York State the toughest gun laws in the nation. The legislation includes provisions to keep guns out of the hands of convicted felons and potentially dangerous mental health patients, and ban high capacity magazines and assault weapons.

Under the legislation, New York will be the first state in the nation to ban any magazine that can hold more than seven rounds and run instant background checks on all ammunition purchases at the time of sale.


The legislation will allow authorities to track ammunition purchases in real time to alert law enforcement to high volume buys, and will include a statewide standard requiring recertification of pistol permits every five years.


The legislation also closes a private sale loophole to ensure all gun purchases are subject to a background check, and toughens criminal penalties on those who use illegal guns.


“The new law will limit gun violence through common sense, reasonable reforms that include addressing the risks posed by mentally ill people who have access to guns and banning high capacity magazines and lethal assault weapons,” Governor Cuomo said. “This legislation is not about hunters, sportsmen, or legal owners who use their guns appropriately. It is about reducing gun violence and making New York a safer place to live. I thank leadership of both the Assembly and Senate for their action on this important legislation.”

Key provisions of the NY SAFE Act include:

Mental Health Alert: Under the legislation, mental health professionals will be required to report to local mental health officials when there is reason to believe a patient is likely to engage in conduct that will cause serious harm to themselves or others. This information will then be crosschecked against the new comprehensive, and regularly updated, gun registration database. If the patient possesses a gun, the license will be suspended and law enforcement will be authorized to remove the person’s firearm.

Tougher assault weapons ban: The legislation outlines a stricter definition of assault weapons, and implements an immediate ban of defined assault weapons. Under the stricter definitions, semi-automatic pistols and rifles with detachable magazines and one military style feature will be considered assault weapons. Semi-automatic shotguns with one military style feature will also be considered assault weapons.


Assault weapons possessed before the effective date must be registered within a year and recertified every five years. Owners of grandfathered assault weapons may only sell out of state or through an in state federal firearms licensee. Under the legislation, the Bushmaster used in the Newtown, Connecticut shooting will be illegal.

Stronger regulations on ammunition: Under the legislation, New York will have the strongest ban on high capacity magazines in the country, with a limit on capacity of seven rounds, down from the current limit of ten. The legislation includes a ban on possession of pre-1994 high capacity magazines, and will require owners to sell the banned magazines out of state within one year. Existing ten round magazines can be grandfathered in, but may only be loaded with 7 rounds.

To track high-volume ammunition purchasers, the legislation will make New York the first state in the nation to track ammo purchases in real time. All dealers in ammunition must be registered with the State Police, and each sale will require both a state background check and transmission of a record of the sale to State Police, so as to enable alerts of high volume purchases. Ammunition records will be purged within a year of submission.


Dealers must report any loss of inventory. The legislation will also include a ban on direct internet sales of ammunition. Ammunition ordered over the internet must be delivered in a face-to-face transaction with a firearms dealer and the purchaser will be subject to the state background check. The Aurora shooter reportedly amassed 6000 rounds through direct online purchases.

Statewide recertification of handguns and assault weapons: The legislation will require individuals who have a handgun license or have registered an assault weapon in New York State to recertify every five years through their county of residence. With this more accurate information, the state will establish an electronic gun permit database that may be run against other databases containing the names of people who will be disqualified from possessing firearms, including those with criminal convictions, involuntary commitments, and those subject to orders of protection, as well as death records.

Universal Background Checks – closing the private sales loophole: The legislation will require all gun transfers between private parties, except immediate family, to be conducted through a federal firearms licensee, subject to a subject to a federal National Instant Criminal Background Check.

Webster Provision: Under the legislation, murder of a first responder who is engaged in his or her duties will become a Class A-1 felony, with a mandatory penalty of life in prison without parole. This provision was created to honor the memory of Lt. Mike Chiapperini and Tomasz Kaczowka who were victims of a fatal shooting in Webster, New York, on December 24, 2012.

Extending and Strengthening Kendra’s Law: Kendra’s law will be extended for two years – through 2017 – and the period of mandatory outpatient treatment will be extended from 6 months to one year. In addition a review will be required before a mentally ill inmate is released.

Protecting Families: When a judge issues an order of protection and finds a substantial risk that the individual subjected to the order will use a gun against the person protected by the order, the judge is required to the surrender of the weapon.

Safe Storage: To better ensure that guns are kept inaccessible to those who are barred from possessing them, the legislation requires safe storage of firearms in households where individuals live who have been convicted of a crime, involuntarily committed, or are subject to an order of protection. Existing state law already requires that all guns sold at retail in the state be sold with a gun lock.

Keeps Guns Out of Schools: Under the legislation, the penalty for possession of a firearm on school grounds or a school bus will be increased from a misdemeanor to a Class E Felony.


The state’s SAVE Act (Safe Schools Against Violence in Education) requires school districts to develop school safety plans including evacuation, dismissal, community response, and alerting family, law enforcement and other schools in the area in the event of a violent incident or other emergency.


The legislation will allow school districts to submit their school safety plans to a newly created New York State School Safety Improvement Team, consisting of representatives from state agencies with relevant expertise (e.g. DHSES, State Police, DCJS), which will review plans and assist localities in developing plans.


Some designated safety system improvements will be eligible for enhanced re-imbursement under the state’s School Building Aid formula. New York City, Buffalo, Rochester, Yonkers and Syracuse will be exempted.

Tougher penalties for illegal gun use: The legislation establishes tougher penalties for those who use illegal guns as well as measures to help combat gang violence. Tougher penalties under the legislation include:


    · Possession of an unloaded gun will be raised from a misdemeanor to a Class E felony.
    · Recklessly injuring a child by a firearm will become a Class D felony
    · The purchase of a gun for someone the buyer knows to be disqualified because of a conviction of a crime, an involuntary commitment or other disqualifier, will be raised to a Class D felony from a misdemeanor. This also raised to a class D felony the sale or transfer of a firearm to an individual known to be prohibited from possessing a gun.
    · Tougher penalties to permit more effective gang prosecutions, allowing a prosecutor to ask for 25 to life (previously was just 15 years) for an entire group when a gang is involved in murder.
    · Using or carrying a firearm during drug trafficking or a violent felony will include a 5 year mandatory minimum sentence if the gun is loaded and a 3½ year mandatory minimum if unloaded. (The Court could impose a lower sentence in drug trafficking cases depending on mitigating factors).
    · Sharing a gun with an individual who is not authorized to possess a gun and commits a crime will constitute criminal facilitation.

Posted in Uncategorized

Appeals of Tax Assessments Decline in 2012: Idoni

WPCNR QUILL & EYESHADE. From the Westchester County Clerk Office. January 15, 2013:


Westchester County Clerk Timothy C. Idoni is reporting a slight decline in the number of local tax assessment appeals his office received in 2012. This is encouraging news after the record-breaking numbers over the last few years including a high of 10,596 appeals received by the County Clerk in 2011.


The appeals, officially known as Small Claims Assessment Reviews (“SCARs”), are filed when the local city, town or village grievance board formally rejects a property tax assessment grievance by a property owner.


“A decline in the volume of appeals means less stress on local tax rolls”, said County Clerk Timothy C. Idoni, who warned, “When appeals are granted or settled, it forces municipalities to identify equivalent reductions in spending or unpopular increases in revenue.”

Posted in Uncategorized

David Buchwald Explains New NY Gun Law Passed Today

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From NY Assembly District 93 Assemblyman David Buchwald. January 15, 2013 UPDATED 10:45 P.M. E.S.T.:


Assemblyman David Buchwald helped passed the landmark New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (NY SAFE ACT), just passed early Tuesday afternoon, supported by Governor Cuomo. Governor Cuomo signed the bill into law in late afternoon.


In light of recent acts of gun violence in our state and around the country, this legislation gives New York State the most comprehensive set of gun laws in the nation, Mr. Buchwald reports:



Assemblyman Buchwald


Comprehensive Gun-Safety Measures


The Assembly’s legislation would strengthen New York’s existing assault weapons ban. In addition, clips with the capacity to hold more than 7 rounds can no longer be sold in the state. There would also be a grandfather clause for current owners of legal semi-automatic weapons, provided they register those weapons with the state police, renew the registration every 5 years, and undergo a background check.


WPCNR asked Mr. Buchwald via E-mail how would the provisions of the bill be newly enforced, implemented, and whether there is a procedure set in place to execute the law. He issued this comment:



“The bill has a variety of different provisions, but many parts are handled by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services and the State Police.”


The Governor’s Press Office did not respond to WPCNR’S question as to how the provisions of the law will now be implemented and what agencies and procedures will do to begin to enforce the new requirements.


In addition, the bill will:



  • Revoke and/or suspend the gun license of an individual upon issuance of an order of protection by a court of law;

 



  • Establish a statewide database of handgun licenses to enable the state police to crosscheck the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to determine if any current licensees have been legally disqualified from possessing firearms under federal law;

 



  • Create statewide standards for handgun-license applications;

 



  • Require mental-health professionals to report to law enforcement when they believe a person receiving mental-health services is a danger to themselves or others. Those who possess a firearm license would have their license revoked or suspended and be required to surrender their firearms;

 



  • Allow schools to qualify for reimbursement building aid assistance if they choose to add electronic systems and hardened doors to increase safety;

 



  • Update the New York gun licensing statute to ensure those prohibited from possessing firearms on the federal level are not granted a gun license from the state;

 



  • Require re-certification of gun licenses on a 5-year cycle to include current name, date of birth, current address and the make, model, serial number and caliber of all firearms possessed;

 



  • Allow counties to keep the names and address of gun licensees confidential under certain circumstances;

 



  • Require all private sales of firearms, shotguns and rifles to be made through a licensed gun dealer to ensure that a proper background check is performed, unless the sale is between immediate family members; and

* Require owners of firearms to safely store such weapons if he/she resides with a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm under certain provisions of federal law.


“When I ran for office, one of my top priorities was ensuring the safety of our families and our community,” said Assemblyman David Buchwald (D-Westchester). “As we’ve seen in recent tragedies, the consequences of dangerous weapons falling into the wrong hands are too great to ignore.”


“These new gun-safety measures will severely inhibit dangerous criminals from gaining access to firearms, expand truly universal background checks on guns and ammunition, and ban dangerous assault weapons,” Buchwald concluded. “I will continue to do everything in my power to make sure our community in Westchester is a safe place to raise a family. I am proud of the work we did in the legislature today.”

Posted in Uncategorized