WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From the Office of the County Executive. (EDITED) March 25, 2013:
The county position (with HUD) is that it is in full compliance – in fact ahead of schedule – with the (HUD-Westchester County) settlement requirements and that the most recent HUD letter received today is just one more example of the federal government trying to bully Westchester to do things that go far beyond the terms of the settlement and dismantle local zoning.
HUD’s latest action of unilaterally demanding that the county give up either its constitutionally protected rights or $7 million that it was promised two years ago – money that goes not only to build affordable housing but to communities not involved in the settlement and most in need – shows that HUD has no regard or respect for fairness, due process and the judges of the U.S. Second Circuit who are charged with resolving this dispute.
The statement from the County Executive’s office was also partly in reaction to County Legislator Catherine Borgia, Chair of the County Board of Legislators Government Operations Committee who issued this statement:
“It is truly unfortunate and disgraceful that Westchester County may lose over seven million dollars in federal funding, already promised to Westchester communities and not-for-profit organizations to support vital programs and capital projects. Losing this funding will hurt Westchester’s low-income and most vulnerable residents immediately, but, in the long-term, all of the county’s taxpayers will be impacted by this.
“We can’t have any more stalling, political posturing and finger-pointing. I call on County Executive Astorino to work collaboratively with the Board of Legislators and the federal government to remedy this perilous situation before more harm is done to Westchester.”
The county is a year ahead of schedule in meeting the key benchmark of having 300 affordable units with financing in place by the end of 2013. As of today, the county has 305 units.
In all matters, the county has complied with the dispute resolution process outlined in the settlement.
On the issue of source of income, the matter is now before the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals, where the county is confident that the U.S. Magistrate’s ruling in its favor will be upheld.
On the zoning issue, the county has supplied volumes of data as well as a thorough legal analysis showing Westchester’s zoning is not exclusionary.
The county would not be ahead of schedule in developing affordable housing in the 31 eligible communities if the zoning in those communities was exclusionary. The impasse is over HUD’s refusal to accept the county’s well documented conclusions.