Money Chill

WPCNR QUILL & EYESHADE News & Comment by John F. Bailey January 31, 2014:

Money.

Everbody is talking about. The Governor is promising property tax refunds if the school district and the city holds their tax levies under a 1.5% increase.

White Plains is starting to think about it.

The Mayor’s Budget and Advisory Committee is going to meet February 10 at 7:30 and they will be briefed on the effect of the Affordable Health Care Law, After Retirement Benefits, including retiree health insurance, and Governor Andrew Cuomo’s tax relief proposal.

A funny thing about those tax relief proposals of the governor—in order to have tax payers get a refund of any property taxes, the city has to keep the rise in its tax levy to 1.5%. Last year the allowable cap was 2%.

This year’s current adopted budget predicts a 4% rise in expenses, salaries, benefits, pension costs in 2014-15.  Hopefully that will not happen.

Tell you why:

A 4% rise in expenses amounts to a $7 million increase in the overall $171.2 Million budget to about $178.2 Million.

To cover a $ 7 Million increase in the budget the property tax levy has to hit $60 Million, which would raise the property tax rate per $1,000 of assessed value to $216 from the present $192, a 12% property tax increase.

On a $650,000 home in White Plains this amounts to $3,559 in city taxes compared to $3,163 that owner is paying the city this year. That’s a $400 increase.

A 13% increase in the levy is unthinkable. It is far from the 1.5% cap. That 13% is not counting any retroactive increase an arbitrator may impose on the city in settlement of the police arbitration.

Perhaps the city will come to their financial senses and not roll over the budget as they do almost every year.  Of course a ¼% raise in the sales tax would cover that $7 Million increase nicely, wouldn’t it? They had better crank up that sales tax request to our legislators soon.

If they increase the levy 13% , the property tax rate could be 12%  higher. This is what happens when you roll over.

In order for the city to get their property tax rebate from Governor Cuomo, this year,  the city has to cut millions out of the payroll—read jobs –or raise the sales tax. If parking revenues are down, and I would bet they are, it will compound the problem.

Governor Cuomo’s promise of continued property tax refunds to our citizens if the city of White Plains saves 1% a year for three years 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 does not appear possible.

That is not happening with this administration or an administration around New York State. The 1.5% tax levy cap and the governor’s property tax rebates proposal appears to ignore the history of city budgeting at least in White Plains this city has cut the budget once in 14 years.

The city, in order to avoid raising the tax levy beyond the 1.5% cap (1.5% on a 53.3 Million dollar levy is $799,500, has to find more revenue. Will they raise parking rates? Raise sales tax to fund a rollover budget? Or layoff?

They need to find some money now. The effects of business as usual are chilling.

Posted in Uncategorized

Frigid weather in Westchester County ups Oil consumption up 25% in December-January

 

2014131 006

Ahh the joys of huddling around a fire when the thermostat must be turned down.

 

WPCNR THE BIG HEAT. By John F. Bailey. January 31, 2014:

My fuel supplier has been filling up my oil tanks once every two weeks this month. I asked a sales person from my oil company if consumption of fuel oil from their customers was up due to the unusually cold January weather.

They told me fuel oil consumption  of their oil customers is up 25%.

I checked and since December 19, I have used 24% more fuel oil than I did in early December.  This is with keeping my thermostat at 65 during the day and lower at night.

We used 177 gallons of fuel oil in the last two weeks of December  and 177 between January 7 and January 24, compared to 142 gallons delivered December 19. That is 24% more.

001

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Come in, She Said I’ll Give You Shelter from the Cold. How to Get County Homeless Services

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From the Westchester County Department of Communications. January 28, 2014:

The Housing Office of the Westchester County DSS provides temporary shelter to homeless families, singles and childless couples.

The office partners with not-for-profit agencies who provide case management services in shelter facilities, transitional residences and emergency apartments.

Homeless programs are designed to lead the homeless population toward permanent housing and independence. The WCDSS Housing Office provides the following services:

  • Placement and Payment – The office handles the placement of homeless in Westchester County and payment to agencies who provide services.
  • Housing Resources Development – The office has oversight of homeless units and facilities as well as construction and renovation projects and other building-related issues of homeless facilities.
  • Case Management Services – The office oversees casework services to the homeless provided by the not-for-profit agencies and provides direct casework services to the hard to serve population.

Applying for services

Eligibility for temporary shelter and services is determined at the social servicesdistrict offices, depending on where you last lived in the county of Westchester. They are open Monday – Friday, 8:30 a.m. – 5 p.m.

Warming/Drop-in centers located throughout Westchester

The following warming/drop-in centers for single individuals seeking shelter from the cold are open and may be contacted directly. Families seeking shelter after hours or during weekends should contact DSS Emergency Services at (914) 995-2099.

Click on a facility’s street address for a location map and link to create directions.

Peekskill and Surrounding Area
Jan Peek Shelter
(Co-ed facility)
200 North Water St.
Peekskill
(914) 736-2636
Accessible by Bee-Line bus route # 14,15,16,17
White Plains and Surrounding Area
Samaritan House Shelter

(Female only facility)
33 Church St.
White Plains
(914) 948-3075
Accessible by Bee-Line bus route # 1,5,6,13,14,15,40,41
Oasis Shelter
(Co-ed facility)
19 Washington Ave.
New Rochelle
(914) 633-0101
Accessible by Bee-Line bus route # 7,42,45,60,66
Open Arms Shelter
(Male only facility)
86 East Post Rd.
White Plains
(914) 948-5044
Accessible by Bee-Line bus route # 1,5,6,13,14,15,40,41
Yonkers and Surrounding Area
Sharing Community
(Co-ed facility)
1 Hudson St.
Yonkers
(914) 963-2626
Accessible by Bee-Line bus route # 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,25,30
 
Posted in Uncategorized

The Magnificent 7s

WPCNR NEWS & COMMENT. By John F. Bailey. (This column was originally published in 2003, observing the Space Shuttle Columbia tragedy):

Twenty-eight years ago  today marks the day in 1986 when the crew of the Challenger Space Shuttle perished when the Challenger exploded seconds into its launch on a cold day in Florida, much like this one.

There have been tragedies associated with striving for the stars and being the best, achieving the best, working for the good.

This Saturday, February 1, is the eleventh observance of the day the Columbia Space Shuttle was lost upon reentry after 19 days in space in 2003.

750px-Challenger_flight_51-l_crew

The Crew of the Challenger, 1986: The Magnificent 7 : Back row:  Ellison S. Onizuka, Sharon Christa McAuliffe, Greg Jarvis, and Judy Resnik. Front Row:  Michael J. Smith, Dick Scobee, and Ron McNair. All were killed when Space Shuttle Challenger blew apart 73 seconds after liftoff on this day, January 28, 1986.

001

The Crew of the Columbia. They died February 1, 2003: Left to right, Rich Husband, Laurel Clark, Kalpani Chawla, William McCool, Mike Anderson and IIan Ramon

Those are the persons who keep the dreams alive by their deaths and personal sacrifice. I wrote the following after the explosion of the Columbia Space Shuttle upon reentry after 19 days in space in January 2003.

Saturday’s fatal Columbia Space Shuttle accident killing all 7 astronauts aboard when the historic spacecraft broke up over East Texas at daybreak Saturday morning begins a period of national mourning. 


The expected media speculations have started, guessing at the cause of the reentry that went bizarrely, awfully wrong.


The truth is the civilized world takes absolute scientific miracles for granted. We do not appreciate the courage and skills of the men and women creating the future.


Those of us with cell phones, internet connections, high-speed trains, satellite communications and entertainment (all products made possible by the space program), do not realize the magnitude of daring achievements that you and I have come to accept to be executed like clockwork.

I first learned of Columbia’s fate late Saturday afternoon when my wife mentioned that instead of sports programming being videotaped on our television, there was coverage of a live NASA event on ABC.

As I watched the close of Mr. Jennings’ coverage at about 3 PM, he signed off with no recap, no names of astronauts, and some parting words about what he thought was the cause of the disaster.

I’ll say what he should have said.


Columbia’s seven astronauts who died — we know their names: they were 
Columbus, Magellan, Cook, Lewis, Clark, the Wrights, Lindbergh, De Laroche, Earhart, Markham, Gruber, Chaffee, Grissom, White, Gargarin, Komarov, the Challenger Crew, the crew of Soyuz 11. They are a handful of the hundreds of brave men and women who went into the unknown.

America’s Spacemen and women and the explorers before them are the people who trust in their ability and their vessel to expand the world’s horizons, to know the unknown, whose legacies build a better world. Whose deeds inspire and achievements are the catalyst for achievements to come.

From Cook’s fragile vessel which sailed the Pacific, to the marvel that was the Columbia, the captains courageous who sailed the Roaring 40s, blazed the Oregon Trail, discovered how to fly, and flew the oceans, journeyed to the stars, knew the risks they were taking.

 
The media  trivializes their courage, their skills, and the difficulty of what they did and wanted to do, to concentrate on the causes of their failure, as if knowing the cause will make their loss acceptable.

The Magnificent Seven


I do not know the Challenger crew. I just see their smiling faces in their photograph, and I regret the loss of every one. They had achievement on their faces, pride in their demeanor. Their eyes shown with the glow of being alive and striving to do the great things they set out to do.

Civilization has been created because of people like the crews of The Challenger Magnificent 7 and of the Columbia’s Magnificent 7, not the incompetence we see demonstrated daily today where technology is concerned.

The Columbia itself had flown 26 missions since launching in 1981. It was guided and outfitted with the best 2003 communications and equipment had to offer.

Not like Captain James Cook’s bark, Endeavour, a 100-foot ship powered by sail that conquered the “space” of his time, the Pacific Ocean. It was the Columbia’s Magnificent Seven’s Endeavour. They were tracked, they were backed up, but they perhaps more than anyone here on the ground knew the high dangers of the shuttle mission.
Liftoff, as their predecessors, The Challenger crew fell victim to, is fraught with risk.

Reentry, which needs to be negotiated at precisely the right angle of attack, is equally risky. Soyuz 11’s spacecrew of Dobrovolskiy, Volkov, and Patsayev died in 1971 on reentry, when the Russian cosmonauts took too long to descend.


No guarantees in real life. Machines sometimes run out of miracles.


The magnificence of the explorers’ sacrifice and dedication, is that they accept the risk of “the endeavor.”

They accept the challenge, bear it alone, seizing challenge with an indomitable spirit and confidence, facing death when it comes with the satisfaction that they made the effort, and I suspect analyzing, coping, trying to fix it until the end, the very end. Then never give up.

Columbia’s Magnificent Seven, after 16 days in space, are gone now. My sorrow is with their families who will miss these Magnificent Seven, and who know in their hearts that they died trying to reach the pinnacle of their aspirations.

They are only human.

They tried their best, achieved their best, and experienced what they longed to experience. They dared to live the great adventure.

Not all of us have the courage to follow our longed-for adventures and make them real. You can watch movies that attempt to give that experience by transference. That’s why, I believe, you and I take it so personally when we lose heroic personalities of our time. We wonder what they are like. We glorify them, rightly so.

Follow Me! 

I wonder how those two Magnificent Sevens felt, how satisfying it must have been, to be at your best, doing what you love, coping with the risks. I envy them that.

The Challenger and Columbia Crews are the Miracle.

In reality it is not machines that conquer, it is the intrepid personalities, each unique, each contributing, who perform the miracles with God’s help. That they fall short is an example to us, not to take ourselves, our fates, or our existences for granted.

This is true of the everyday people we take for granted: the firefighter, the policeman, the train engineer, the airline pilot, the construction worker. All are highly trained disciplined workers, executing precise tasks for which the non-expert has no feel or understanding . What makes for the desire to achieve? What is out there or up there that leads them on?

The Feel of the Unknown

I took Anne Morrow Lindbergh’s biographical adventure diary, Listen! The Wind down from the bookshelf.

She was the young bride of the aviator-pioneer, Charles Lindbergh. She navigated for him in his aircraft, and ran his radio communications on his many exploratory flights around the world.

In a passage she describes a night flight over the ocean, in which she was operating the radio for her husband Charles, who was at the controls. Mrs. Lindbergh is describing the feelings she has as she tries to tune in the South American coast at sea in the dark of night in 1933, 80 years ago.

The feeling, the courage of the adventurer, the explorer has not changed. This is described unforgettably by Mrs. Lindbergh:


“Night was the hardest. It would be all right once it was day. I kept saying…We began to hit clouds. I could tell without looking up, for the plane bumped slightly from time to time, first one wing down and then the other. And the moon blackened out for short periods.

Then for longer periods. I could not see to write my messages. I stiffened, dimly sensing fear – the old fear of bad weather – and looked out. We were flying under clouds. I could still find a kind of horizon, a difference in shading where the water met the clouds. That was all. But it seemed to be getting darker.

Storms? Were those clouds or was it the sky? We had lost the water. We were flying blind. I turned off the light quickly (to give my husband a little more vision), and sat waiting, tense, peering through the night. Now we were out again. There were holes through which one could see the dark sky. It was all right, I felt, as long as there were holes.


More blind flying. This is it, I thought is what people forget. This is what it means to fly across the ocean, blind and at night. But day is coming. It ought to be day before long… Daybreak! What a miracle. I didn’t see any sign of day and yet it must be lighter. The clouds were distinguishing themselves more and more from water and sea.


Daybreak—thank God—as if we had been living in eternal night—as if this were the first sun that ever rose out of the sea.

Note: This column originally appeared February 1, 2003 on WPCNR.

Posted in Uncategorized