Rankled Democrats: District Leaders Some Miffed at “the Process,” to Vote on Whether or Not to Nominate Interim Candidate Nadine Hunt-Robinson (Council’s Choice) to run for rest of Boykin Term

 

WPCNR BACKROOM BULLETIN. By John F. Bailey. May 22, 2014:

Democratic City District leaders are scheduled to hold a vote tonight to decide on whether  Nadine Hunt-Robinson, the interim appointee to the White Plains Common Council selected by Mayor Thomas Roach and the other six Common Council members,  or Tom Caruso, a Democratic Party District Leader, should be nominated to run in a Special Election this fall to fill out the balance of former Councilman Benjamin Boykin’s  term on the Council expiring at the close of 2015.

Caruso has surfaced as a rival candidate after District Leaders have become upset about how Nadine Hunt-Robinson was chosen to serve on the Council until a special election can be held.

A number of district leaders are annoyed  Hunt-Robinson was suggested by the White Plains Ministry Fellowship  Council as a replacement for Mr. Boykin, apparenlty it seems to continue the Council with a councilperson who represents the Black community. Mr. Boykin who held the seat is Black.  Some district leaders have referred to Mr. Boykin’s former seat as “The Black Seat.”

WPCNR has been told that the nominating committee was not consulted on possibilities on Ms. Hunt-Robinson’s appointment, but this is denied in a letter received by District Leaders this week from Mayor Thomas Roach and 4 other councilpersons.

Some district leaders are, WPCNR is told,  troubled that Ms. Hunt-Robinson is not a registered Democrat, but instead a member of the Independence Party, and has not yet changed her party affiliation, but may be in the process of doing so.

This week a letter was mailed to District Leaders, signed by Mayor Tom Roach, Council President John Martin, Councilman John Kirkpatrick, Councilman Dennis Krolian and Councilwoman Beth Smayda, defending Ms. Hunt-Robinson’s appointment, and asking for District Leaders’ support for Ms. Hunt-Robinson in the election tonight it reads:

May 16, 2015

Dear District Leader:

As you know the White Plains Democratic City Committee(WPDCC)   will be voting this Thursday night (tonight) for its candidate to run in the November 2014 election to fill the remainder of Ben Boykin’s Common Council term. We are reaching out to you to let you know of our support for Councilwoman Nadine Hunt-Robinson and make sure you are aware of the following:

  • After considering numerous candidates, the Common Council voted unanimously to appoint Nadine to the White Plains Common Council at its February 3, 2014 meeting, in accordance with the City Charter.
  • After interviewing several candidates, the Nominating Committee recommended Nadine to represent the Party for the unexpired term of Hon. Benjamin Boykin in the Common Council of White Plains.
  • Nadine has already been working hard as a Councilwoman, chairing the City’s Youth Board, attending City Planning Board, Zoning, Budget & Management Advisory and other Committee meetings, participating in events throughout the City, and preparing extensively for each of the City’s Common Council meetings and work sessions.

 

Please join us in supporting Nadine on Thursday night at the WPPDCC meeting. If you have any questions or are unable to attend and you can provide a proxy, please contact any one of us.

 

With much gratitude for all you do to keep our party strong and vibrant and our city moving forward.

 

Yours truly,

 

Tom Roach, Mayor of White Plains

 

John Martin, Council President, White Plains Common Council

 

John Kirkpatrick, White Plains Common Council Member

 

Dennis Krolian, White Plains Common Council Member

 

Beth Smayda, White Plains Common Council Member

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Voters Pass $199.9 M 2014-15 Proposed Budget by 4 to 1 Margin. Eller, Stein Returned to Board of Ed (unopposed).

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. May 20, 2014: 

IMG_1293[1]

Interim Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors , far left,observes the final numbers go up as the final election district results are chalked up by Michele Schoenfeld. Observing are Board of Education members: left to right: Charlie Norris, Rosemarie Eller, Rose Lovage and Peter Bassano

At 9:28 P.M. Tuesday evening, Clerk to the School Board Michele Schoenfeld wrote the final outstanding polling district still not accounted for, and once again White Plains voters representing 3% of all the city registered voters had overwhelming passed the proposed $199.9 Million school budget by  4 to 1 margin, 81.5% of voters approving the budget.

Interim Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors called it “a good showing.”

A total of 875 voted in favor and 199 voted opposed.

IMG_1296[1]

Elected without opposition to second terms were Board of Education President Rosemarie Eller, left and Randy Stein. Eller received 908 votes, Stein 858

The approved budget raises the cost per pupil in White Plains (7,050 students is the enrollment anticipated for school year 2014-15) to $28,354 per student.

The budget increases the tax rate 2.9% from $183/$1,000 of assessed valuation to $600/$1,000 of assessed valuation to pay for a 2.3% increase in spending of $6.5 million over last year’s $193.4 Million budget.

As presently constituted, the $199.9 budget voters approved today increases the property taxes on a $650,000 home (median priced home) to approximately $10,000 ($9,885–an increase of $281) in school taxes next year, compared to $9,604 last year.

In 10 years, the school district has cut the budget only once and that was in 2010-11, under Dr. Christopher Clouet when he was Superintendent of Schools.

At the present growth rate of the school district, if wages stay the same and staff stays the same, and costs stay the same the district budget will reach $220 Million in 2019-20, four years from now.

The turnout according to Ms. Schoenfeld was slightly more than the 2013 budget turnout which saw 888 vote.

The unofficial totals on the budget vote by Election District:

Fire Station 7:   52 YES, 6 NO

Church Street School: 209 YES 44 NO

Rochambeau School: 65 YES 13 NO

Middle School 215 YES, 51 NO

Mamaroneck Ave School, 61 YES 10 NO

Ridgeway, 270 YES 75 NO

TOTAL; 875 YES, 199 NO

 

Posted in Uncategorized

IN THE MONEY: The Mayor Gets Raise. Council Increases Commish Salaries 2%, as 2014-15 Budget Passes with no cuts. Callahan Declines Full 2%, Increase, Takes 1%

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CLARION-LEDGER. By John F. Bailey. May 19, 2014 UPDATED 9:20 A.M. E.D.T. UPDATED 11:50 A.M. E.D.T. UPDATED MAY 21, 2014. CORRECTION, May 21, 2014, 9 A.M. BOLD TYPE:

The Common Council passed the $176.1 Million proposed 2014-2015 budget Monday night, and increased salaries for Mayor Tom Roach,  City Commissioners, Deputy Commissioners, managerial and confidential employees by 2%. The increase was previously predicted on WHITE PLAINS WEEK, the city news roundup show weeks ago.

John Martin, White Plains Common Council President,  confirmed the across-the-board increases to WPCNR Monday evening, in a written statement, saying, the increases in administration salaries “match the increases under the 3 current labor agreements (fire, CSEA, Teamsters). Basically we are keeping these employees in sync.”

The White Plains Police contract dispute awaits a binding arbitration recommendation.

The Common Councilmember salaries, according to Mr. Martin remain the same, at $38,971 for the Common Council President (Martin), and $36,471 for Common Council members.

Mayor Tom Roach will now earn  $148,800, an increase of $2,919, an increase of 2%.

“I felt we needed to amend the Mayor’s salary as it has not changed in 8 years and it does not make sense to pay the Mayor that much less than commissioners,” Martin told WPCNR Monday night. He pointed out that all the raises  authorized Monday night were “budgeted,” in the $176.1 Million spending program for 2014-15 approved Monday evening.

The highest paid city official, though will not be the Mayor.

Mr. Martin Tuesday morning contacted WPCNR to advise the present Corporation Counsel  John Callahan, though eligible for a $3,954 increase has declined to accept the new salary level he is eligible to receive under the increased salary structures (computed by WPCNR unofficially below)  adopted last night. Martin wrote in a statement this morning–

” I read your story this morning, and have a correction for you. John Callahan (Corporation Counsel) did not accept the 2% offered to him. His salary did not break the $200,000.00 figure.”

Upon examination of the approved salary schedule by WPCNR, Mr. Callahan will be getting a 1% raise instead of the 2% beginning July 1, 2014

His new salary as Corporation Counsel in Sec. 2-5-76 Appendix 1 Elected and Appointed Officials is reported as $199,653, $327 shy of $200,000.

The decline of the salary increase means he  will not  break the $200,000 salary watermark that would have made him the the first city official to break the $200,000 barrier.

Had Mr. Callahan chosen to accept the 2% across-the-board increase applied to the Corporation Counsel salary, he would have received a raise of $3,954, instead of the $1,977 (1% raise) he will be increased. It should be pointed out Callahan functions as Corporation Counsel and Mayor’s Chief of Staff.

The rest of the city legal brain trust does well.. The Chief Deputy Corporation Counsel receives a $3,288 raise to $167,671. The Deputy Corporation Counsel gets a $3,142 bump to $160,242.

The Assessor will earn $134,774, an increase of $2,643

The Commissioner of Building, $150,161, an increase of $2,944

Deputy Commissioner of Building,$133,712, a raise of $2,622

The City Clerk gets a $2,102 raise to $107,182

The Commissioner of Finance moves up to $179,181 from $176,060–a raise in salary of $3,121. He will also be paid an additional $20,000 for double duty as Chief Fiscal Officer according to the same ordinance, Sec. 2-5-76 (D) (1) (d). The Commissioner of Finance beginning July 1, 2014 will be paid $179,181 (including the additional compensation that was not increased). The $20,000 stipend was not increased. The percentage in increase in pay including the stipend is 1.77% (previously, WPCNR had placed the decimal point in the wrong position.)

The salary for the Commissioner of Finance effective July 1, 2014 is correctly listed on the ordinance adopted for Sec. 2-5-76 (A)(1) as $159,181. In addition to that salary the Commissioner of Finance also receives additional compensation as Chief Fiscal Officer, per that same ordinance for Sec. 2-5-76 (D)(1)(d), in the amount of $20,000 for serving as Budget Director.
So the total compensation effective July 1, 2014 is $179,181, with $20,000 of that amount representing a stipend to which no increase has been applied and which may be terminated at any time by the Common Council.

His Deputy Commissioner of Finance will receive $137,427–UP $2,695

The Director of Information Services (supervising the city website) receives a $2,705 raise to $137,957.

The Library Director moves from $146,696 to $149,630, an increase of $2,934.

The Personnel Officer moves on up to $158,120– up from $155,020, a $3,100 increase. Her Deputy Personnel Officer goes to $96,900, receiving a $1,900 increase

The Physician moves up $1,030 to $52,030.

The Parking Commissioner receives a $3,059 raise to $155,998, and his deputy Commissioners of Parking 1 & 2, receive $130,050  (up $2,550) and $136,896 (increase of $2,684).

The Commissioner of Planning moves up from $147,217 to over the $150,000 plateau to $150,161 (up $2,944). Her Deputy Commissioner of Planning is upgraded $2,497 to $127,345.

The Commissioner of Public Safety ascends to $187,294 a year, an increase of $3,672.

The Commissioner of Public Works receives a $3,537 salary increase, breaking through the $180,000 milestone for the first time. The Commissioner will be paid $180,405 in 2014-15.

His Deputy Commissioners of Public Works, 1 & 2 will  receive $146,447($2,870 raise) and $133,131 ($2,611 increase), respectively.

The Purchasing Commissioner is increased $2,310 to $117,794

Commissioner of Recreation and Parks moves up in salary to $145,900, a $2,861 raise and his Deputy Commissioner is granted a $2,464 increase to $125,653.

The Director of the Youth Bureau receives a $2,559 raise to $130.528.

Ten of the Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners will earn more money than the Mayor of the city when the fiscal year begins July 1.

The total cost of the raises approved last night for commissioners, and management: $78,113, an average of  $2,789 per Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, and the other posts.

The City budget for 2014-15 goes up 4 Million to $176.1 Million, a 2.3% increase over 2013-14, and raises property taxes 2.3% and the tax rate to $1,000 of assessed valuation to $196.14. It is the thirteenth straight year the Common Council has raised the city budget.

Martin, in his reporting Callahan’s decline of  the approved Corporation Counsel 2% increase, included this comment on the city budget,  echoing his commentary made in the televised Common Council Special Meeting Monday night:

I am disappointed that your story did not highlight the work that all of our city staff does to keep delivering the same level of services to our citizens despite being at the lowest employee count in many, many years.
I’m also disappointed that you did not mention that our budget does not borrow for pension costs unlike the state, county and over 130 other municipalities in NY that borrowed a record amount this year.
Last, I also wish you mentioned that we are not borrowing to pay tax refunds like so many others.
I am proud of this budget including the 2% raises we gave to virtually all city employees next fiscal year. They deserve it as does any hard working man or woman out there.
The comments of the members of the Common Council on the passage of the budget may be viewed at
http://whiteplainsny.swagit.com/play/05192014-1296

Tuesday, the city voted to approve the 2014-15 White Plains School Budget of $199.9 Million, enacting a $17 increase in the tax rate to $600 per $1,000 of assessed valuation, that will increase the taxes on a $650,000 home approximately $300

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

FBI, D.A. CHARGE “20-SOMETHING HACKERS” IN WORLDWIDE MALWARE DATA STEALING

WPCNR FBI WIRE. Special to WPCNR from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. May 19, 2014:

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and George Venizelos, the Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), announced today the unsealing of an indictment charging Alex Yücel, the owner of an organization known as Blackshades, that, since 2010, has sold and distributed to thousands of people in more than 100 countries a sophisticated and pernicious form of malicious software, or malware, known as the Blackshades remote access tool, or RAT.

The RAT was co-created by Yücel and has been used to infect computers throughout the world to spy on victims through their web cameras, steal files and account information, and log victims’ key strokes.

Also unsealed today were criminal complaints against Brendan Johnston, who was paid by Blackshades to help market and sell malware, including the RAT, and provide technical assistance to its users; Kyle Fedorek, who purchased the RAT and used it to steal online account information from hundreds of victims; and Marel Rappa, who purchased the RAT and used it to spy on dozens of victims and steal online account information.

Yücel was arrested in Moldova in November 2013 and is pending extradition to the United States. Johnston was arrested yesterday in Thousand Oaks, California, and will be presented today in the Central District of California.

Fedorek and Rappa were arrested at their residences this morning and will be presented later today before United States Magistrate Judge James L. Cott in Manhattan federal court.

Michael Hogue, the co-creator of the RAT, was arrested in June 2012 as part of the government’s investigation known as Operation Cardshop and subsequently pled guilty before U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel in January 2013. A transcript of his guilty plea was unsealed this morning.

In addition to the criminal charges, a domain name associated with the Blackshades website was seized pursuant to a seizure warrant obtained in Manhattan federal court.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said,

“Blackshades’ flagship product was a sophisticated program known as the remote access tool, or RAT for short. The RAT is inexpensive and simple to use, but its capabilities are sophisticated and its invasiveness breathtaking. As today’s case makes clear, we now live in a world where, for just $40, a cybercriminal halfway across the globe can—with just a click of a mouse—unleash a RAT that can spread a computer plague not only on someone’s property but also on their privacy and most personal spaces.”

Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI George Venizelos said,

“Armed with $40 and a computer, an individual could easily get the Blackshades remote access tool and become a perpetrator. It required no sophisticated hacking experience or expensive equipment. This tool was purchased by thousands of people in more than 100 countries. The charges unsealed today showcase the top to bottom approach the FBI takes to its cases. We tackled this malware starting with those that put it in the hands of the users, the creators, and those who helped make it readily available, the administrators. We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to bring to justice anyone who used Blackshades maliciously.”

According to the allegations contained in the indictment and criminal complaints unsealed today in Manhattan federal court:

Overview

Since at least 2010, an organization known as Blackshades has sold and distributed malicious software to thousands of cybercriminals throughout the world. Blackshades’ flagship product was the Blackshades remote access tool, or RAT, a sophisticated piece of malware that enabled cybercriminals to secretly and remotely gain control over a victim’s computer.

After installing the RAT on a victim’s computer, a user of the RAT had free rein to, among other things, access and view documents, photographs and other files on the victim’s computer, record all the keystrokes entered on the victim’s keyboard, steal the passwords to the victim’s online accounts, and even activate the victim’s web camera to spy on the victim—all of which could be done without the victim’s knowledge. The FBI’s investigation has shown that the RAT was purchased by at least several thousand users in more than 100 countries and used to infect more than half a million computers worldwide.

Purchasing and Installing the Blackshades RAT

The RAT was typically advertised on forums for computer hackers and marketed as a product that conveniently combined the features of several different types of hacking tools. Copies of the Blackshades RAT were available for sale, typically for $40 each, on a website maintained by Blackshades.

After purchasing a copy of the RAT, a user had to install the RAT on a victim’s computer—i.e., “infect” a victim’s computer. The infection of a victim’s computer could be accomplished in several ways, including by tricking victims into clicking on malicious links or by hiring others to install the RAT on victims’ computers.

The RAT contained tools known as “spreaders” that helped users of the RAT maximize the number of infections.

The spreader tools generally worked by using computers that had already been infected to help spread the RAT further to other computers. For instance, in order to lure additional victims to click on malicious links that would install the RAT on their computers, the RAT allowed cybercriminals to send those malicious links to others via the initial victim’s social media service, making it appear as if the message had come from the initial victim.

For example, a RAT user could send an instant message, or IM, to potential victims that appeared to come from the initial victim, inviting them to click on a link that appeared to lead to a legitimate website but that in reality would install the RAT on the potential victim’s computer.

The Capabilities of the RAT

The RAT featured a graphical user interface, which allowed its users to easily view and navigate all of the victim computers that they had infected.

Among other things, the user interface listed IP address information for each infected computer, the computer’s name, the computer’s operating system, the country in which the computer was located, and whether the computer had a web camera.

Once a computer was infected with the RAT, the user of the RAT had complete control over the computer. The user could, among other things, remotely activate the victim’s web camera. In this way, the user could spy on anyone within view of the victim’s webcam inside the victim’s home or in any other private spaces where the victim’s computer was used.

The RAT also contained a keylogger feature that allowed users to record each key that victims typed on their computer keyboards. To help users steal a victim’s passwords and other login credentials, the RAT also had a “form grabber” feature. The form grabber automatically captured login information that victims entered into forms on their infected computers (e.g., login screens or order purchase screens for online accounts).

The RAT also provided its users with complete access to all of the files contained on a victim’s computer. A RAT user could use such access to view or download photographs, documents, or other files on a victim’s computer. Further, using a tool known as file hijacker, the RAT enabled users to encrypt, or lock, a victim’s files and demand a “ransom” payment to unlock them. The RAT even came with a prepared script demanding such a ransom.

The RAT also allowed users to exploit victims’ computers to launch other cyber attacks. Infected computers could be gathered into a network and used to launch Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks against particular websites by repeatedly sending requests to the website in an effort to disable the website and deny service to legitimate customers.

Yücel and the Blackshades Organization

Yücel was the co-creator of the RAT and owned and operated the Blackshades organization. Yücel employed several paid administrators, including a director of marketing, website developer, customer service manager, and a team of customer service representatives; he hired and fired employees, paid employees’ salaries, and updated the malicious software in response to customers’ comments and requests. Blackshades generated sales of more than $350,000 between September 2010 and April 2014.

The Other Defendants

Johnston used Blackshades malware and was a paid employee of the Blackshades organization who, among other things, marketed and sold the RAT and provided technical assistance to users of the RAT to assist them in infecting and remotely controlling victims’ computers with the RAT. In certain online postings, Johnston described himself as an “authorized seller” and “admin,” or administrator, of Blackshades.

Fedorek was a customer of Blackshades who purchased the RAT and used it to steal financial and other account information from more than 400 victims. A search of Fedorek’s computer conducted by the FBI showed that Fedorek was also deploying a variety of other types of malicious software against his victims.

Rappa was a customer of Blackshades who purchased the RAT and used it to infect victims’ computers, spy on those victims using their web cameras, and steal personal files from their computers. A search of Rappa’s computer by the FBI showed that Rappa was also deploying a variety of other types of malicious software against his victims.

* * *

Yücel, 24, of Sweden, is charged with two counts of computer hacking, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison; one count of conspiring to commit access device fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of seven-and-a-half years in prison; one count of access device fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison; and one count of aggravated identity theft, which carries a mandatory term of two years in prison consecutive to any other sentence that is imposed.

Johnston, 23, of Thousand Oaks, California, is charged with two counts of computer hacking, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.

Fedorek, 26, of Stony Point, New York, is charged with two counts of computer hacking, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, and one count of access device fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.

Rappa, 41, of Middletown Township, New Jersey, is charged with two counts of computer hacking, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.

Hogue, 23, of Maricopa, Arizona, pled guilty in January 2013 to two counts of computer hacking, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. He is awaiting sentencing before the Honorable P. Kevin Castel.

The maximum potential sentences are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencings of the defendants will be determined by the judge.

The charges unsealed today are part of an unprecedented global law enforcement operation involving the participation of 19 countries. As part of the operation, more than 90 arrests have been made and more than 300 searches have been conducted worldwide. Mr. Bharara noted that the investigation is ongoing.

Mr. Bharara praised the extraordinary investigative work of the FBI. Additionally, Mr. Bharara specially thanked all the international law enforcement agencies that assisted this investigation, including the Moldova National Investigation Inspectorate of General Police Inspectorate of Ministry of Interior; the International Relations Department of Prosecutor’s General Office of the Republic of Moldova; Eurojust; the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service and United States Embassy personnel in Chisinau, Moldova; the FBI’s Office of the Legal Attaché to Romania and Moldova; and the FBI’s Office of the Legal Attaché to the Netherlands. He also thanked the Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs and Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section for their support.

The case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys James Pastore and Sarah Lai are charge of the prosecution. Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni with the Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Unit is in charge of forfeiture aspects of the case.

The charges contained in the indictment and complaints are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Posted in Uncategorized