Standard Amusements, Labor, Parks, Planning Housing Committee and Astorino Team Massage Legal Issues Behind Closed Doors. Committee in Recess All Morning.

WPCNR PLAYLAND GO-ROUND. By John F. Bailey. June 15, 2015:

The Labor, Parks, Planning and Housing Committee that was supposed to meet Monday morning to iron out nebulous legal requirements not spelled out to Legislators Benjamin Boykin, Catherine Parker and MaryJane Shimsky’s satisfaction last Wednesday has been in recess all Monday morning, working out “tweaks” to meet those legislators’ objections with the Astorino administration and Standard Amusements, prior to a scheduled vote this evening.

Matt Richter spokesperson for Chairman of the Board of Legislators Mike Kaplowitz said that Nick Singer, principal of Standard Amusements, and the legislators have been going back and forth between the 8th and 9th floors. Singer’s consultant has been carrying the legal ball for Mr. Singer. Legislators have been in their offices on the 8th floor. The negotiations through this “shuttle diplomacy” are, Richter said expected to be completed soon with “final tweaks.” He said he expected the Committee to resume proceedings soon.

A call to Ms. Parker, who raised the primary objection that the legal steps to determine what Capital Improvements were required in the future between the county and the operator, Standard Amusements were not “specific” enough, has not been returned to WPCNR.

MaryJane Shimsky’s reservation about the Memorandum of Understanding that acceded authority to determine the fate of the swimming pool solely to Standard Amusements to determine whether the Playland Pool remained in some form or just turned into a “water feature” was another issue.

Legislator Benjamin Boyin wanted it spelled out that Standard Amusements would reimburse the county directly when it retained county employees.

As of 11:20 A.M., the Labor, Parks, Planning Housing Committee was still “in recess.”

Posted in Uncategorized

THE LETTER TICKER: WP REAL ESTATE VALUES, FASNY AND THE POOR REPRESENTATION PUBLIC HAS HAD FROM THE COMMON COUNCIL OVER THE YEARS.

Hi Mr Bailey,
I am a life long White Plains resident; I grew up in Gedney Farms, and currently live in the Soundview neighborhood.I see your site no longer posts letters, but I am compelled to write anyway, to offer you food for thought (for what its worth).
Two thoughts: The mere threat of FASNY has already had a very negative and significant impact on real estate values in Gedney Farms specifically, and WP generally. Proof: go to Zillow, and peruse recent sales data for the last 2-3 years.
Then go to any Real Estate site and peruse the market for WP homes in the 650-950K range.  You will see that prices for WP homes in general, and for Gedney specifically, have plummeted–especially remarkable given that mortgage rates remain at historic lows.
Yes, the financial crisis  knocked prices down perhaps 20-25%, but current prices show a considerably larger decline than is accounted for by the financial crisis when measured from the 2007 market peak.  FASNY and the city’s real estate taxes are among the main reasons why this is true.
FASNY is most certainly a major (though not the only) reason for these depressed values.
 I think that the majority of White Plains residents don’t really care about FASNY, as they see the issue as a “Gedney” issue.
It’s not. All real estate values across the city are related; if the values in the crown jewel neighborhood are suffering, it has a negative impact on all real estate values, as evidenced by the small number of homes for sale in the 800K+ category across WP, and especially in Gedney. A check of the price data for sales and current listings is quite sobering.
My second thought concerns the second major reason WP real estate values remain depressed: our real estate taxes. My real estate taxes have doubled over the last decade, and city services have declined.
And yet, the country has been in a zero interest rate, <2% inflation rate for nearly the last 10 years.  An $800K house in WP now has taxes of 17k-20K. This too is a major drag on real estate values.
I find it incredibly irritating to think back over the decades to the representations the Common Council and Mayor made regarding the development of downtown WP–how such development would be a boon to our tax base, how it would assure a “vibrant” downtown, and of course, it would be great for the city. All of it hogwash.
There is nothing downtown except over-priced chain restaurants and bars for 20-30 somethings. And of course, lots of malls, many with lots of vacant space. Basically nothing of the vision we were sold on materialized.
I think it fair to say we citizens were poorly represented by past administrations, who either knowingly lied, or were simply incompetent to lead us to a better future. I have to wonder if history will repeat itself with this administration when it comes to FASNY.
Cheers
(Editor’s Note: WPCNR  publishes letters that are thoughtful, rational, push the dialectic, are not libelous and whose authors identify themselves to me. I reserve   the discretion to delete sections of letters that I deem libelous, unsubstantiated, or direct personal attacks on persons written about. Letters may be addressed to [email protected]. Thank you for writing.)
Posted in Uncategorized

THE LETTER TICKER: DOWNTOWN RESIDENT CHALLENGES COMPATIBILITY OF THE COLLECTION

6-SHOCKER INVERTED

Plan of The Collection development on Westchester Avenue, looking east. The Westchester is on the right.

 

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. JUNE 13, 2015:

A downtown resident with the call for scoping comments on The Collection, the new proposed development on Westchester Avenue opposite the The Westchester at Bloomingdale Road and Westchester Avenue, has written the Mayor and Common Council, raising questions on congestion the new project may create:

TO:

The Honorable Tom Roach, Mayor of White Plains,and Common Council Members

RE:

The DEIS for “The Collection” development project at 60 – 96 Westchester Avenue (236,000 square feet of new commercial space, 261 residential units, and 1,233 parking spaces)

Introduction: Where is the Open Space? Outdoor Seating Areas? Plantings? Is the developer trying to cram too much into this small area? Is there only one driveway that will access the hotel, the retail and residential components, and municipal lot? What will access by vehicles be like during rush hours? AND … do we really need more retail space in White Plains?

Dear Mayor Roach and Common Council Members.

I am responding to the request for statements about the potential environmental impact of the proposed “Collection” project on Westchester Ave. My comments below relate to

1) the plan’s lack of Open Space, of Seating Areas, of Plantings, and Screening near a neighboring building;

2) pedestrian safety;

3) the amount of new retail space planned in the complex;

4) the number of driveways required (that pedestrians will have to cross);

5) the width of the pedestrian sidewalks for entering the complex;

6) location of the dog park for the residential component;

7) location of waiting area for a possible shuttle bus to the railroad station from the large residential component;

8) location of garbage staging and pick-up;

9) location for storing snow.

1)    The plan is noteworthy for its lack of Open Space, lack of Seating Areas, lack of Plantings, and lack of Screening of the proposed large residential building from the existing apartment building at 26 Franklin Ave. What gives White Plains its charm? Trees, parks, plantings, and sitting areas add to the livability and charm of the relatively dense neighborhoods close to the downtown.

2)    The Scoping document for the project very briefly mentions bicycle and pedestrian improvement (see section C-9-C-d.), including enhanced pedestrian access from Franklin Ave. to Westchester Ave.

But what about those attempting to cross Westchester Avenue? Now and for years, for pedestrians, there is no safe time to cross near the Stop&Shop driveway over to The Container Store (at the corner of Westchester Ave. and Bloomingdale Rd). The WALK sign appears even when vehicles may be making a left turn (going south) from the Stop&Shop driveway.

I have been almost hit by a vehicle twice. Could this crossing be made safe before we get into more development on Westchester Ave.? Any new crossings should be completely safe when there is a WALK sign.

3)    Please note the many existing retail vacancies on both sides of Main St. (near the new hotel and near Walmart), between City Place and N./S. Broadway; and also on Post Rd. and on Mamaroneck Ave.

The Collection plan includes 236,000 gsf of commercial space. (Some of that is a proposed hotel and a car dealership.) The remaining retail space seems to be at least 14,790 gsf + 46,790 gsf = 61,580).

4)    How many driveways will pedestrians have to cross along Westchester Ave.’s east side? Please note that the push-button mechanism for “requesting” a crossing of the Stop&Shop driveway was removed years ago.

5)    How will pedestrians enter the Collection complex, with its multi destinations? The width of the pedestrian sidewalks for entering the complex is important.

This is one problem at the City Center, at the Five Guys Burgers corner, 240 Main St., corner of City Place. Many people, some with baby strollers or personal shopping carts, bump into each other going into or exiting City Place because of the too-narrow sidewalk on the corner and along City Place.

6)    Where will the dog park be for residential units (possibly 261 total)? A dog park used all hours was built for the large rental apartment building at 2 Canfield (corner of Main St.) after the fact. It was positioned relatively near another apartment building. A dog park should not be near or opposite other residences or residential complexes.

7)    Where will the waiting area be for a possible shuttle bus to the railroad station from the large residential component? Will the waiting bus block traffic on Franklin Ave.? Will it block the circular driveway for “The Collection”?

8)    Many are aware of the odorous garbage staging area on Martine Ave. for the City Center. This is across the street from residential buildings. How will this be handled for “The Collection,” so that it will be hygienic and safe? How will garbage pick-up be handled?

9)    Where will snow be stored?

Renee Marks Cohen

White Plains NY

Posted in Uncategorized