WHITE PLAINS USHERS IN NEW TAXI REGULATIONS NEW TAXI RATES–METERS–DOUBLES COST OF CAB RIDES–TARGETS UNAUTHORIZED CABS CRUISING AND RESPONDING TO WP CALLS.

WPCNR TAXI TAXI! GET ME TO THE TRANSCENTER AND STEP ON IT! By John F. Bailey. April 8, 2016 UPDATED APRIL 9, 2016:

The Common Council voted to approve a sweeping revision of White Plains taxi regulations Monday evening, which sets new standards for taxi operations in the city and prohibits cabs and cab companies who do not have White Plains medallions from picking up customers within the White Plains city limits.

Of paramount interest to the consumer, the ordinance approved on the consent agenda sets new taxi rates, effectively doubling what you pay for a cab — the chart below shows the new rates. No longer will there be set zone fees, the taximeter, required in all White Plains cabs, instead you will pay by 1/8 of a mile traveled.

The rates below take effect approximately July 1.

10-TAXI REGS

The Ordinance appears to take an aggressive stance to private ride services responding to cellphone requests for rides from the White Plains downtown, and to target for fines and jailtime if caught picking up riders without having a White Plains-issued taxi medallion and an ovehead rooflight. The fines for unauthorized operation of a taxi in White Plains are detailed in the following graphic — direct from the city ordinance:

2016409 003

The new ordinance completely reorganizes taxi operations in White Plains and installs the new fees (above) for White Plains taxicabs, to wit:

 Authorizes five (5) additional White Plains taxicab medallions to be assigned to accessible vehicles only. White Plains will be the first Westchester municipality to incentivize the inclusion of accessible vehicles as part of its taxicab fleet;

 Allows hailing within a defined ‘Hail Zone’ located in the downtown area;  Replaces the Zone Map, which currently governs fares, with a requirement that all White Plains taxicabs utilize taximeters. The Hail Zone Map is largely regarded as confusing and has been a frequent source of customer complaints.

WP_20160408_01_04_45_Pro

THE NEW CAB HAIL ZONE AS DESCRIBED IN THE NEW TAXI ORDINANCE.

All White Plains licensed taxicabs are required to install a taximeter within 3 months from the enactment of the ordinance; Fares will increase as each cab ride progresses according to the graphic above.

 Requires that all White Plains licensed taxicabs be painted a uniform color (white) and attach a White Plains taxicab medallion sticker (to be provided by the WPPD) to the vehicle so that the riding public as well as the Police Department can easily identify licensed White Plains taxicabs.

The color requirement will take effect at the next annual medallion renewal. Medallions are generally renewed in November and December of each year;

 Requires that all White Plains licensed taxicab drivers submit to annual drug testing;

 Reduces the overall age and improves the condition of the City’s taxi fleet by requiring that cars be taken out of service when they reach 400,000 miles. This will ensure that the fleet is comprised of newer, more fuel efficient and lower-emission vehicles.

The maximum vehicle mileage requirement will take effect 6 months from the enactment of the ordinance;

 Simplifies the rate structure and provides a modest rate increase for all White Plains licensed taxicabs. The last rate increase was approved 14 years ago; and

 Requires that owners and drivers of taxicabs maintain vehicles in a clean and safe condition. These changes come on the heels of the installation of two Taxi Starters (Special Patrol Officers)

WP_20160408_01_02_21_Pro

New Fees as provided in the new City Ordinance.

Posted in Uncategorized

NOW ON PEOPLE TO BE HEARD: White Plains Jimmie Morricone on Uber Cabs and Westchester County…on www.wpcommunitymedia.org

ON PEOPLE TO  BE HEARD,

JIMMIE MORRICONE

WHITE PLAINS LIMO DRIVER, MOVIE PRODUCER

AN EXPERT ON THE TAXI AND LIMO SITUATION IN WESTCHESTER

TALKS

UBER

AS THE COUNTY LEGISLATURE TAKES UP WHETHER TO REQUIRE UBER TO BE LICENSED IN THE COUNTY.

IS UBER WRONG FOR WESTCHESTER OR RIGHT?

IS UBER SAFE FOR THE PUBLIC?

WHAT ARE THE COSTS?

WITH JOHN BAILEY SEE IT AT 7  SATURDAY EVENING ON

CHANNEL 45 VERIZON FIOS COUNTYWIDE

OR

ON WHITE PLAINS CABLEVISION CHANNEL 76

OR

GO TO

www.wpcommunitymedia.org

to see the program NOW

 

Posted in Uncategorized

87% of White Plains 3rd to 8th Grades TAKE the New State “Reviewed for Fairness” ELA Assessments; 13%, 414 OF 3,185 HELD Held Back by Parents

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. From the White Plains City School District and John F. Bailey. April 6, 2016:

Michele Schoenfeld, Clerk to the Board of Education reports that  87% of approximately 3,185  Grade 3 to 8 students took the ELA assessments yesterday.

A total of 414  students (13%)  of approximately 3,185 students in Grades 3 to 8 were held back by their parents from taking the English Language Arts Assessment Tests administered across White Plains’ five elementary and 2 middle schools yesterday.

Last year 10%, 327 of 3,213 students eligible to take the ELA Assessment tests in Grades 3 to 8 were held back by parents from taking the exams.

The ELA Assessments this year, were carefully gone over by 22 teachers for appropriateness and answerability by grade level.

According to a news release from MaryEllen Elia, released March 16, the tests administered Tuesday though originally created by Pearson, (the international educational materials publisher dismissed last spring as contractor for creating NYS assessments), were vetted for appropriateness by grade.

Ms. Elia in the news release went on record, assuring teachers and parents the tests this year should be “fair,” for all students each grade taking them, to wit:

“We hired a new company to help us develop future assessments (Questar, credited with upgrading Minnesota state assessments success). We brought teachers from across (N.Y.) state to review every reading passage, word problem, and multiple-choice question on this spring’s tests to make sure they’re fair. In all every item has been reviewed by at least 22 educators. Going forward, we’ll bring even more teachers into the process.”

On Tuesday, the majority of students held back in White Plains attended the middle school (grades 6 to 8). Here are the opt-out figures by grade as of this morning supplied by the Clerk to the Board of Education.

White Plains Grades 3 to 5: 7%, 118 students.

Grades 6 to 8: 18%, 296 students

Total, Grades 3 to 8: 414, 13%

 

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS ANNOUNCES VIRTUAL ZERO TAX INCREASE IN NEW BUDGET–LOWEST INCREASE IN 16 YEARS

CITY RAISES BUDGET $4.6M T0 $183.8 MILLION, AN INCREASE OF 2.6%, HOLDING TAX RATE TO $200.95

TAX RATE UP 21 CENTS 1/10 OF 1%!

WPCNR QUILL AND EYESHADE By John F. Bailey. April 4, 2016:

The White Plains city administration presented the 2016-2017 proposed City Budget to the Common Council this evening with a $183.8 Million budget raising property taxes 1/10th of 1 percent—the lowest tax increase since  before WPCNR started covering  the city finances (2000-2001).

In 2000-2001 the city tax rate per $1000 of assessed valuation was $91.48/M on a budget of $86,145,700 and now 16 years later it will be $200.95 per $1000 of assessed valuation on a budget of $183.9 Million.

The city Budget Director Michael A. Genito and Fiscal Advisor, Eileen Bradley presented a budget that rises $4.6 Million to $183.8 Million (a 2.6% increase from the $179.2 Million of 2015-16, (now in its 9th month)

However, the city has offset the increase with increases in licenses and permits of $1.6 Million and charges for services of $1.8 Million, (including an increase of 10% in parking permits).

The city plans a $5.1 Million appropriation to the general fund from the Tax Stabilization account which can only be used  “to address either a significant and unforeseen shortfall in a major revenue source; provide funding for a significant and unforeseen increase in expenditures and/or be appropriated in the adoption of an annual budget to reduce a property tax levy increase to no more than 2-1/2%. Section 68 of the City Charter further prohibits the Common Council from appropriating an amount in excess of the balance reported in the account at the close of the prior fiscal year.” The city transfers approximately this amount each year, which is why the Tax Stabilization Fund, created by a transfer of sales tax revenues each year, has not grown significantly.

The city says that the city tax rate will go up just 21 cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation, an increase of less than 1/10 of a percent.

The city says this will amount to a $3 (yes, $3 dollars) in city property taxes for the median home assessed at $13,600 assessed value.

The budget allows for all anticipated step raises and future negotiated contracts yet to be determined in the Reserve for Financing. The city is facing demands from three unions that are without a contract the fire union, the CSEA and the Teamsters mostly demanding parity with the police settlement through 2018 for 2%, 2-1/8% and 2.5%. According to the budget presented this evening the settlements the city anticipates are covered.

The city says sales taxes will decrease 2.4% to $45.1 million, though if March, April May and June sales receipts equal last year’s totals ($16 Million), the sales tax “take” will be approximately $54 Million, which would be an all-time high for the city.  The  city is forced by the Charter not to count revenue they have not taken in beyond the end of the last fiscal year.

The city budget document reports this the fifth year the city has proposed a budget within the New York State Tax Cap which this year plumetted to 1% of tax levy increase allowed. the tax levy is $56.3 Million (including the Business Improvement District) and is under the state levy cap by $13,000.
It is interesting to note that sixteen years ago in 2000-2001 the city tax rate per $1000 of assessed valuation was $91.48/M on a budget of $86,145,700 and now 16 years later it will be $200.95 per $1000 of assessed valuation on a budget of $183.9 Million.

The tax increases by the city in the last two years and the proposed 1/10 of 1% proposed for 2016-17 are the lowest in the last 16 years when increases averaged 5% a year.

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized