KING KOMMENTS: Reflections on White Plains Future

Hits: 0

WPCNR KING KOMMENTS By William King. January 6, 2004: The proposed Main Street mixed-use condo-retail project I read about on your website from the Business Journal which appears more real with Martin Ginsburg being involved is just one of at least ten potential mid-to-high-rise development projects other than the City Center twin behemoths (I think that’s what the New York Times called them in Sunday’s Westchester section) proposed by Lou Cappelli … and there are certainly other potential development projects being formulated out
there that only a few people working on them know about.

In my last work session with the Council in December I threw out on the table, in vain I think, that the Council should keep in mind that other potential developments were out there that might be good for the City but, if the Council approved the full scale of Cappelli’s proposal, it could soak up all the traffic-carrying capacity of the downtown street network and make the rest of the downtown less appealing to other developers and their potential tenants.  The mayor responded that a bird in the hand was better than 2 in the bush. 


However, it seems there might be at least ten in the bush.  The Common Council would be right to ask Planning Commissioner Sue Habel and the outside environmental review consultants, if they show up again, about this and it would be better if they would do this at a monthly televised meeting so the public could hear and chew on any meaningful answers. 

Sue Habel once said when we were reviewing the traffic impacts of the City Center project before it was approved that the downtown street network could handle more residential and entertainment type uses, where traffic is more dispersed throughout the day and on weekends, but not much more office development because the downtown streets during weekday rush hours were already at or near capacity. 


However, in the DEIS for 221 Main there is an argument made somewhere that the offices proposed at 221 Main were only one of three approved office projects (one of the other 2 was Gateway II by the Train Station over the parking lot at South Lex and Hamilton) and thus, since the other 2 were probably not going to happen, it was actually ok for the 221 Main mega project to move forward, that traffic would be less bad than if all 3 office
projects were to be built.  You get all kinds of arguments like this in DEIS’s. 

While I was on the Council there were presentations of six different development proposals that have not been built: 


1.  Barker and Church 10-12-story condo;


2.  Church St. office condo bldg. between Main and
Hamilton;


3. A possible residential overbuild over and behind the stores
on the northeast corner of Mamaroneck and Post;


4.  A mixed-use office/residential/retail project over the county-owned parking lot at
Court and Quaroppas behind the old Post Office Bldg. on Grand Street;


5. The Chelsea Piers-type of kids-focused project by Leon and Bonnie
Silverman between Mamaroneck and Court at Martine;


6. The 25-story or so residential/retail project on Main that Martin Ginsburg is now involved
with. 

Four other potential redevelopment sites include: 


1. the retail portion of the north side of Westchester Ave. between Bloomingdale Road
and North Broadway – some have mentioned in the past that the new
private parking garage built over the Stop & Shop parking lot was
partially built for such a possibility;


2. the White Plains Mall – possible mixed use overbuild;


3. possible overbuild combined with redevelopment (I would especially like to see) of the Verizon Building
between Main and Hamilton at MLK Blvd., aka Darth Vader’s Headquarters.  I have mentioned this last possibility to both Bruce Berg of Lou Cappelli and to Verizon – they could do a sale of their property and
then lease back space in a new, taller, more attractive building or could be a co-owner of a new building and take greater advantage of their prime downtown location. 


I just hate the appearance of the windowless Verizon Building – it’s like a black hole in the middle of
Downtown WP.  In addition, I have heard directly from two other major developers who are interested in White Plains. 

But development has to be controlled – it’s better for everybody, residents and developers (including Lou Cappelli).  It’s also good to put the horses before the cart:  get the State to fund the MLK/Grove St. extension project, get the I-287 project finished at least east to White Plains to drain off some of the cut-through traffic and get more
meaningful mass transit into White Plains (not just a downtown circulating trolley that is mostly for show), do something to inhibit traffic from cutting through Battle Hill and other surrounding neighborhoods  … all virtually ignored by the 221 Main St. DEIS.

I remember once having coffee with Leon Silverman, who I knew from being at workshops together during the citizen involvement phase of the Comprehensive Plan in the mid-90’s, after I first came on the Council.
Leon talked about 10 to 20-story buildings along Mamaroneck Avenue between Maple and Main.  I joked that wouldn’t we need the 7th Avenue Subway Line to come up from the West Side of Manhattan, where Leon grew
up, to White Plains to handle all the people?  I was only half joking.


 
Downtown White Plains’ street network can only handle so much traffic and a good portion of what comes into the Downtown now cuts through the surrounding low density residential neighborhoods, something no resident
wants, so if you want to have development and redevelop some dead spots in the Downtown you can’t go crazy and you have to have a way for people to come and go other ways than by car.

The last thing I could add is that I have heard from life-long White Plains residents, including several residents of color, maybe not as old as the mayor but still life-long, who are not happy with what they see as Manhattanization.  In the last few years I’ve heard phrases from those in favor of development to the max including “We’re not Mayberry,” “Halo Effect” and “Little Manhattan” repeated.  I’m sure we’ll hear these again.

William King

Posted in Uncategorized

DFEIS PUNDITS entrench. Longhitano Revealed to have Applied for Landmark Status.

Hits: 0

WPCNR Common Council Chronicle. By John F. Bailey. January 6, 2003: The long running classic “221 Main” continued its long run playing at “Common Council Theatre” Monday evening, bringing forth a series of new revelations from a dramatic cast.


 


 


Mr. Stackpole of the Planning Board recounted the history of how elimination of the Bar Building developed as part of the plan. He said the Planning Board became convinced that the bulk, parking needs, and space needed to extend Court Street required the Bar Building to go. He also pointed out how the Bar Building was not the work of a major architect, did not represent a distinctive style, and had no significant history.



Jack Harrington, shown, with back to camera on the WPGA-TV telecast of Monday evening’s Public Hearing,former President of the White Plains Historical Society, indignantly denied that the Historical Society was being “used,” by Anthony Longhitano, owner of the Bar Building, saying the Society was continuing their mission to preserve buildings of significance in the city. Harrington revealed that Mr. Longhitano had sat down with Mr. Harrington to fill out an application to have the Bar Building designated an historical landmark in New York State on September 18, the first time this has been publicly stated. A letter to Michael Seymour from the New York preservation agency confirmed that it could be “considered” for historical preservation in Mid-October.


Mr. Longhitano, as you recall, in his appearance at the Common Council December 1 did not reveal he had either applied for preservation status or had been notified of his building being “considered.”


Harrington added that the Bar Building was a piece of a block of seven historic buildings in the city, including, The Kennedy, 2 William Street, The North Court Building, The Bar Building, Grace Church, The Lawyers Title Building and City Hall. Harrington was magestically indignant and earnest as only Jack Harrington can be, turning to the gallery, looking at developer Louis Cappelli, and referred to his (Harrington’s) long history on the Conservation Board, and characterized the mission of the Conservation Board as being a group of citizens who defined “what they expect in their city and what they expect from developers who come into the city.”


Allowed with respect by Council Clerk to continue well past his five minute time limit, Harrington refuted early statements by Robert Stackpole,  that the Bar Building did not fit the criteria for historic preservation or landmark status. Harrington, reading from what is believed to be Longhitano’s application, said the Bar Building qualified on the basis that it played an ongoing role “in the broad patterns of our local history,” and that it “embodies distinct character of a type, or period.”


The Levine Planning Course


Robert Levine, the architect intimately involved in persuading the Common Council with Mr. Stackpole and William Rose, that one big building was too much and to bring in Frederick Bland to design the City Center project, in 2001, said 221 Main was “A rare planning opportunity not to be repeated for a long time.” He cited “4 Major Planning Courses”  for the Council to proceed with the project.


1.) The Court Street extension was a key objective the city needed to secure.


2.) The inclusion of the entire Bar Building into the site “is essential”. 


3.) The Council had to prevail on the developers, Mr. Cappelli and Mr. Longhitano to come to the table and negotiate a sale of the Bar Building.


4.) “Then and only then can we take up the issues of density, parking below ground, designs of buildings.”


Two speakers warned the council of violating the constitutional amendment prohibiting seizure of private property, referring to the possibility that the Council could choose to use eminent domain to seize the Bar Building property to develop the full scale of the Cappelli Hotel-Office complex.


Duelling Barristers.


Anthony Longhitano’s attorney, Carl Finger,  reiterated his comment that other alternative building designs were not being considered by the Cappelli organization, saying he felt the Council should encourage alternatives that would allow both projects, Longhitano’s and Cappelli’s to be constructed on the same site in consort.


 



Mark Weingarten, (shown above on White Plains Government Access Television Monday night), the attorney for Louis Cappelli, with the Super Developer looking on, rejected Mr. Longhitano’s olive branch, pointing out that Mr. Longhitano’s plan for redeveloping the Bar Building takes the entire back of the Bar Building, meaning the tenants there “would have to move anyway.”


Weingarten pressed the attack on another front, warning the Common Council not to confuse the difference between exercising the discretion of using eminent domain and the power to do so. Weingarten told them, “you have that power,” saying the right of using eminent domain for the public benefit has been upheld up to the Supreme Court: “You have the legal authority to do so, you may want to use it (eminent domain) on the next one (project)”.


Weingarten laid on some harsh reality, saying that “without the Cappelli project, Court Street doesn’t happen.” He asked rhetorically who would pay for the extension of Court Street (about $3-4 Million) if Mr. Cappelli doesn’t do it?


Bar Building Red Herring


Ken Worden, CoPresident of the Highlands Civic Association, said he’d been asked by his association to speak. He said the Council is focusing to much on the Bar Building, instead of considering the bulk, impact, and infrastructure effects of the Cappelli Hotel project. “The only Council concern (should be) is the basic project itself.” Worden said the Environmental Impact Statement was “chockful of problems,” that “Mr. Adler’s (traffic) solutions boggle the mind, and fly in the face of common logic.” He said the problems of the Bar Building would be decided between Mr. Cappelli and Mr. Longhitano, but the problems of “bulk, infrastructure, impact have to be decided by you.(The council).”


An attorney noted that the Bar Building future extension and expansion pictured in the New York Times Westchester Section over the weekend, appeared to him not to involve removing tenants from the back of the building as Mr. Weingarten had noted. Mayor Delfino refuted this to the attorney, saying “one of the troubles here is people state things that aren’t true. I’m not here to argue. When presented to me, it did take the back of the building.” 


Another person worried about businesses already closing and moving out along the Main Street corridor. However, later in the Council meeting, permits were renewed for Paparazzi and Coughlin’s two restaurants who are staying and liking what is happening in White Plains. Decision was tabled on a matter involving the number of parking spaces for a doctor’s office, at 170 Maple Avenue pending a discussion with the business.


 



Posted in Uncategorized

Boykin, Greer, Bernstein, Embark on New Council Voyage. Roach Named Pres

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL TODAY. By John F. Bailey. January 6, 2003, UPDATED WITH VIDEO CAPTURES, 10:05 A.M. E.S.T.: At the Common Council Monday night, Robert Greer was sworn in as Councilman for his fourth 4-year term on the White Plains Council, and Benjamin Boykin, Jr. took the oath for his second term, and they were joined in ceremony by Arnold Bernstein, being sworn in for his first term. Eric Press was sworn in as Acting City Court Judge. Councilman Tom Roach was elected 6-0, with himself, abstaining, to serve as Common Council President for the years 2004 and 2005.



ROBERT GREER BEING SWORN IN MONDAY NIGHT FOR TERM FOUR AS A COUNCILMAN. WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE



JUDGE JO ANN FRIIA MAKES IT OFFICIAL FOR COUNCILMAN BENJAMIN BOYKIN at Monday evening’s Council meeting, swearing Mr. Boykin in for his second four year term. WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE



ARNOLD BERNSTEIN IS SWORN IN BY JUDGE JO ANN FRIIA WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE



Judge Sam Fredman Swears ERIC PRESS as Acting City Court Judge WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE



MAYOR DELFINO CONGRATULATES TOM ROACH AFTER SWEARING MR. ROACH IN AS COMMON COUNCIL PRESIDENT. WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE

Posted in Uncategorized

SHOCKER: City Caught Red-handed Suppressing Cappelli DFEIS from Public on TV

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. January 6, 2003, UPDATED 8:26 A.M. E.S.T. UPDATED 4:10 P.M. E.S.T: A crusading environmental lawyer has pried loose a copy of the mysterious “for council eyes only” Draft Final Environmental Impact Statement  on the Cappelli Hotel project from city hall after pointing out to George Gretsas, City Executive Officer and City Corporation Counsel, Edward Dunphy  that the city was in violation of New York State law in denying the public the right to see  the DFEIS once it was filed the week of  December 15.



DAN SEIDEL CATCHES THE CITY IN A COVERUP:  Mr. Seidel brandishes a copy of New York Code of Rules and Regulations with highlighted copy expressly saying that filed documents must be made available to the public. The picture is from the live Common Council telecast on WPGA-TV Monday night. this dramatic meeting will be recablecast in its entirety evenings at 8 P.M. through the week on WPGA-TV, “The Face of City Hall,” Channel 75. WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE.


 


The revelation of the conscious city decision to withhold the document from examination by the public was made on television at Monday evening’s Common Council meeting when leadoff speaker, Dan Seidel,  at the resumption of the Cappelli Hotel (221 Main project) public hearing held up the actual copy of the New York Code of Rules & Regulations, (6NYCRR Part 612.12 Sub. B3), specifically stating that all EAFS, EIS’s  “once filed must be maintained in files readily accessible to the public.”


 


The Media Denied a Copy


 


WPCNR requested the DFEIS document December 16, approximately one week after it was submitted in segments by the Cappelli organization, filed and was informed by Commissioner of Planning, Susan Habel, that the DFEIS was not going to be made available to the public because it was a “draft” document.  This struck WPCNR as strange at the time because WPCNR’s news archives has a Draft copy of the New York Presbyterian Hospital proton accelerator Final Environmental Impact statement. The Common Council was informed by the city that the 221 Main Draft Final Environmental Impact Statement was not going to be available to the public, and apparently, accepted this as standard procedure.


 


Technical Analysis by Member of Public


 


However, here on White Plains Government Access Television,  was attorney Dan Seidel going into technical analysis of the DFEIS, which supposedly no one other than the Common Council, the Planning, Building, and Cappelli organization and consultants have seen.  Seidel began his talk by saying there were many questions about the content of the DFEIS, including alleged failure to deal with recently passed county regulations for treatment of storm water runoff that White Plains has not complied with, inappropriate standards calculating waste water generated by the project hotel and condominiums, the letter reporting The Bar Building could be “designated” an historic site, among three major issues and he urged the council to delve into a laundry list of issues that he generalized about.


 


 


Stunned Disbelief.


 


Glen Hockley, with a glassy look in his eye, interrupted Mr. Seidel and remarked that the Common Council had been told the DFEIS would not be made available to the public, (wondering how Seidel had gotten a copy). Seidel said that he took up that issue with the Mayor’s Executive Officer. He said he found it “chilling” that the public had been denied access to a document which he said New York State law entitles the public to see.


 


 Seidel explained he obtained  his own copy of the DFEIS when he met with City Executive Officer George Gretsas and City Corporation Council Edward Dunphy two weeks ago, informing them they were violating the New York Code of Rules and Regulations by suppressing documents (not SEQRA as we had written previously),  once they had been filed and that he was entitled to see them.


 


In a late night interview with WPCNR Monday, Seidel said of the Gretsas-Dunphy meetings with him,  he could not understand why Michael Gerard, the city environmental lawyer allowed the DFEIS to be suppressed. (Mr. Seidel notes to WPCNR that Mr. Dunphy did not meet with him and Mr. Gretsas in person, writing us, “Dunphy was not at my meetings with George. He was called on the phone several times for a decision and he finally gave one (to release the documents) on Monday (1/5).”


 


The Council did not seem to remember what letter this was until Tom Roach said it was a letter, turned in December 18, that reported the Bar Building could be “considered” an historic site.


 


Again, Mr. Hockley, speaking slowly, said he wanted to know the reason why the DFEIS document was given to Mr. Seidel. Seidel answered the question holding up a copy of the New York Code highlighted by yellow marker saying, “By law I’m entitled to it. If it’s been filed the public can sure enough be entitled to look at it.”


 


Mr. Hockley again returned to the explanation for the sudden selective issue of the DFEIS, asking for a clarification.



 


MOVING ON QUICKLY, Mayor Delfino snapped to  Mr. Hockley first, “Ed will clarify it for you ” and  pursued Mr. Seidel on a question wanting to know what letter “qualified” the Bar Building as an historic site. Seidel recalled it was first mentioned at the December 19 Council meeting on the DFEIS. The Council seemed to not remember what letter this was until Tom Roach recalled it was a letter that said the Bar Building could be considered as an historic site. Mr. Seidel closed by saying there were many laws that were not being addressed. Delfino said “every law that’s out there will be considered, will be looked at, and will be reviewed. It will be looked at” and thanked Mr. Seidel for his comments and pushed on to the next speaker.  WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE


 


DUNPHY CLARIFIES IT ALL.


 


About eleven speakers later, after Mr. Seidel, we believe had left the meeting,  Edward Dunphy was brought to the podium by the Mayor to explain why the city thought it necessary to release the DFEIS to Mr. Seidel and the public.


 



THE CLARIFIER CLARIFIES: At the conclusion of the public hearing on 221 Main, after all speakers on the subject had appeared and spoken, and several prods by Councilman Glen Hockley, the Mayor called back Edward Dunphy, Corporation Counsel, to explain to Councilman Glen Hockley why the decision to release the DFEIS to Mr. Seidel was made. WPCNR VIDEO CAPTURE


 


 Dunphy did not agree that Seidel’s quotation of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations was the reason why the documents were released. He told the White Plains television audience and the Common Council , “Under normal codes the draft documents are not foilable,” but that it became clear  that “someone outside city government” had seen the documents, so “that’s how it became a FOIL able document,” and that was why the documents were available to the public. Dunphy did not disclose who outside city government had been determined to have seen the documents.


 


Mr. Dunphy’s exact quote was:


 


“Under normal circumstances as we are all aware a draft document is not subject to requests of FOIL (Freedom of Information Law), and the government does not have to release the document. However, we have discovered that the document has been shared with people outside the City of White Plains, and I rendered an opinion that it comes under the cloak of FOIL. Subsequent to that, checking with Bob Freedman in Albany, he concurred with my opinion that it does become a FOILable document. So that’s  how it became a public document. People in the public have seen the document.”


 


After Mr. Boykin asked for explicit explanation, Dunphy said, the document “has been shared with people other than the City of White Plains.”


 


Seidel Responds


 


Mr. Seidel, in a comment attached to this article, received today, elaborated on  why the city had to release the DFEIS:


 


 It’s not that it was shown to others, but that it was officially FILED on Dec 15 which means the public has a RIGHT to see the documents. SEQR is not subject to FOIL – there is no provision in that law to subject a request to see documents under the FOIL law. “

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS WATCH Informs Advertisers It Cannot Continue.

Hits: 0

WPCNR Main Street Today. January 6, 2004. Updated 12 Noon E.S.T. : The signs in the Main Street window of White Plains Watch headquarters told a sad story Monday morning.


 


Another independent newspaper was dying.


 


 Office workers were still at the computer consoles getting out the January issue.


 


However, the monthly paper offices on Main Street had signs in its window saying there is space “to sublet” with a telephone number. In additon, on Monday advocates for the popular paper, WPCNR has learned, and confidantes of Ms. Chang were confirming and spreading the word that the White Plains Watch would not be published again, saying that efforts to save the paper had failed.


Later, Monday afternoon, WPCNR learned Ms. Chang has sent a letter notifiying her major advertisers within the last week just in advance of the paper advertising deadlines for a February issue, that the January edition will be her last.


 


Susan Chang, the pioneering White Plains resident, who started the beloved paper in 1997, did not return WPCNR calls for comment Monday evening to confirm or deny the report or discuss her future plans for the paper.


 


When asked three weeks ago by WPCNR if the rumors in the city were true that the paper was going out of business, Ms. Chang declined to comment or to deny it to WPCNR. WPCNR asked if she was pleased with the subscription response she had gotten, and she said “it’s coming along,” but was not specific.


 


The Watch had a guaranteed circulation of 24,000 when it was distributed free to residences in the city. At various solicitations and personal meetings in the last four months around the city, it appeared she was hoping to gain at least 5,000 paid subscriptions at $25 per subscription, that would generate $125,000 in capital to keep the paper afloat, pay production costs and staff.


 


Monday afternoon, WPCNR contacted a leading advertiser in The Watch (as it is affectionately known) who confirmed that “within the last few days” his business had received a letter from The Watch informing them of the paper’s troubles. It came as a surprise to him, he said.  Asked specifically whether or not The Watch had informed him that January was the last issue, he said, “I think that has to come from her. She owes it to her subscribers and her advertisers.”


 


WPCNR asked if Ms. Chang was attempting to find partners to keep the paper alive, and the source said she had been advised to do so, but to their knowledge she was not.


 


Ms. Chang did not return WPCNR’s calls to comment on the future of The Watch. It is not known whether she plans to suspend publication temporarily rather than permanently, or how she plans to deal with subscription monies collected or advertising contracts paid in advance.


 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

“From the Wings” Takes Off January 23 at “The Roch-zy”

Hits: 0

WPCNR STAGE DOOR. From Jim Brownold. January 4, 2004: Fort Hill Players presents From the Wings an evening of showcase scenes — produced, acted and directed by up and coming FHP actors and directors.  The evening features scenes from All in the Timing, Burning Down the House,Fool for Love,The Individuality of Streetlamps,The Wager, and Overtones, as well as a Dance solo.  General Admission: $5.00, open seating.  FHP members and Subscribers: Free.  Tickets will be available only at the door.  Rochambeau School, 228 Fisher Ave. White Plains. Friday and Saturday, January 23 & 24.  8 PM.  Further information:  forthillplayers.com

Posted in Uncategorized

Republicans to Rally Around The Bar Building?

Hits: 0

WPCNR MAIN STREET TODAY. By John F. Bailey. January 4, 2004: WPCNR has learned that the Republican City Committee is considering voting on a resolution that would ask the Common Council and the Mayor’s Office to take a position that would in essence, urge the Bar Building, 199 Main Street, be saved and preserved as part of White Plains historic heritage. The policy, not yet voted on by the Republican leaders, asks specifically that the council not use eminent domain to take the Bar Building to make way for the 221 Main Street Cappelli Hotel project.



THE BAR BUILDING (on right) LOOMS OVER RENAISSANCE PLAZA IN EARLY NOVEMBER: According to Michael Seymour, President of the White Plains Historical Society, The New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Office advised the owner of The Bar Building in October that it could be considered for historical landmark status, but as of yet the owner has not applied for that status. Now some Republican District leaders are urging the party to endorse its preservation. Photo by WPCNR News.


Jonathan Rodney, a District Leader proposed the policy at the December 15 meeting of the Republican City Committee at Clayton Park, according to WPCNR sources. WPCNR has obtained a transcipt of the proposal that Mr. Rodney proposed at that meeting, and this is what it says:







Whereas the Bar building, at 199 Main Street, White Plains, is one of few remaining architecturally distinctive structures in downtown White Plains which predate Urban Renewal;


And whereas the White Plains Republican City Committee recognizes the essential role of our physical history in the city’s continued vitality and growth;


And whereas the Committee recognizes that a community cannot thrive absent a sense of its own heritage, and a city bereft of links to its past will lose key attributes which make it a community;


And whereas the loss of physical links to our history will relegate White Plains to becoming a “cookie cutter” city, comprised of homes, shopping centers, office towers, and apartment structures architecturally indistinguishable from contemporary developments across the nation;


And whereas the destruction of the Bar building will constitute a rapid step toward the city’s transformation into a mere “place,” and the irrevocable loss of White Plains’s cherished urban identity;


Therefore, the Republican City Committee appeals to the Council and Mayor to embrace the value to White Plains of our history in general and the Bar building in particular; to recognize the preservation of our urban heritage as a mission parallel to that of preserving open space; to resolve decisively against the use of eminent domain power for any purpose which will lead to the Bar building’s destruction; and to act proactively if necessary to preserve this building and similar monuments to White Plains’s heritage.

Posted in Uncategorized

Calling All Cars: WPPD Goes to a New Look Police Car in 2004

Hits: 0

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. By John F. Bailey. January 2, 2004: The White Plains Police Department is driving a new look this week with the delivery of the first two new Police Cars of 2004. The sleek, low slung “Impalas” made their debut on the streets this week under cover of darkness and deliver a whole new look, departing from the traditional “Blue-Yellow & Whites” so familiar from I-287 to Route 22, from Central Avenue to the Hutch.



NEW IMPALA POLICE CAR, shown in its pinup photo, sports the traditional WPPD badge on the tailfin, and the legend “City of White Plains” on the front fender. Inspector Daniel Jackson said the department will be replacing its rolling fleet at the rate of two a year with this new style, one of two certified police cars departments can buy in bulk in New York State. Right now, Jackson reports, the cars are being tested by the officers for size and performance.  Inspector Jackson advised WPCNR that depending on how the officers rating the cars feel, the department will be going to the new “NYPD North” look on future police cars.  Photo From White Plains Police Department.



THE BEAUTY ON DUTY ON NEW YEAR’S EVE: Here’s how the “fastback” look views at night. Reflector paint on the “911” and the “POLICE” really snaps to attention when it is caught in headlights, and increase police car recognition. Photo by WPCNR News.



ANOTHER LOOK AT THE ROLLING ROOKIE. Photo from White Plains Police Department.

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS WEEK Reviews The Big Stories of 2003 on Channel 76 Monday.

Hits: 0

WPCNR TV. January 2, 2004: White Plains Week, the City News Roundup Show, on WPPA-TV, White Plains Public Access Television on Channel 76, “The Spirit of 76” will rundown the highlight stories of the city in the year 2003 Monday evening on Channel 76 at 7:00 P.M. Alex Philippidis, Editor of Westchester County Business Journal, and John Bailey, The White Plains CitizeNetReporter will do the honors. Commentary on what lies ahead in 2004 will be lively.

Posted in Uncategorized

Mary Jane Denzer Ltd., Fortunoff, Sholz Cadillac and WPPAC Dress to Thrill

Hits: 0

WPCNR STAGE DOOR. From Oscar Sales, Jr. White Plains Performing Arts Center. January 2, 2003: Mary Jane Denzer Ltd., Fortunoff, Sholz Cadillac, and the White Plains Performing Arts Center present Dressed to Thrill, a Broadway-style fashion show to benefit the WPPAC and celebrate the opening of the musical comedy Fashion, The Musical. Dressed to Thrill will take place at the White Plains Performing Arts Center on Monday, March 1st at 7pm preceded by a champagne reception at 6pm and a post-show dessert reception supplied by Trotters Restaurant. 





The excitement and sex appeal of the fashion runways of Paris and Milan merge with the passion and dazzle of the Broadway stage to create a unique and thrilling event. Dressed to Thrill will feature New York’s most beautiful models and Broadway’s hottest young actresses in elegant designer collections from Westchester’s premier couture boutique, Mary Jane Denzer Ltd.


 


Bedecked in fabulous jewels from Fortunoff and with an original score by Jordan Rudess, keyboardist with the internationally known rock band, Dream Theater, Dressed to Thrill will offer the latest fashions from the leading design houses of Europe and the United States. And, don’t be surprised when you hear the fashionable actresses perform a few show-stopping songs during the evening. Scheduled to appear as of this writing: Broadway’s Rupert Holmes as the emcee and Felicia Finley from Aida.


 


Jordan Rudess, composer of the score for DTT, entered the prestigious Juilliard School of Music at the age of nine for classical piano training. At age of nineteen, he began to include the rapidly developing world of synthesizers in his recordings and Performances. Today, Jordan is a recording artist, composer, producer and performer and is the newest member of the group Dream Theater. Jordan has recorded tracks with David Bowie and he has toured internationally with fellow keyboardist, Jan Hammer and legendary drummer Tony Williams, has appeared in concert with Enrique Iglesias, and regularly performs and records with Grammy award winners the Paul Winter Consort.


 


Denzer Finds an Affinity Between Broadway and Fashion


 


“I’ve always compared the Paris fashion shows to the beauty and excitement of Broadway productions,” said Mary Jane Denzer. “The skill and detail that must be applied to make all the pieces come together and achieve an exceptional product is the same in the fashion industry as it is the entertainment industry.”


 


Mrs. Denzer should know. She has been clothing the female power elite of the tri-state area for over 23 years building from a modest clothing shop into a couture fashion boutique with over $3 million dollars worth in annual sales. “Showcasing those beautiful gowns in a new and innovative way is truly exciting. Accessorizing the gowns with the gorgeous jewels from the Fortunoff collection will be outstanding.”


 


Louis Fortunoff Joins Fashion Forces


 








Continued…

Fortunoff, with a new 185,000 square foot store in White Plains, has been a New York legend for over 80 years and is considered one of the premier specialty retailers in the Northeast. With six retail stores specializing in fine jewelry and home furnishings in New York and New Jersey, Fortunoff has earned a reputation for its unparalleled selection, remarkable prices and legendary integrity.


 



“We are excited to participate in an event such as this,” said Louis Fortunoff, Executive Vice-President of Fortunoff and Founding Board member of WPPAC. Mr. Fortunoff, at center of picture is shown at the WPPAC Gala on November 9. “Fortunoff is renowned for its fine associations and we look forward to working with Mary Jane, Sholz Cadillac and the White Plains Performing Arts Center in showcasing these glamorous gowns and fine jewelry and infusing them with a little Broadway magic.” Photo by WPCNR StageCam


 


Buicks Included in the Show.


 


“It’s a pleasure for Sholz Cadillac to provide our newest models (Standard of the World) to help Mary Jane Denzer, Fortunoff and the White Plains Performing Arts Center present this exciting Broadway-style fashion show, “ said Bob Sholz, President of the Sholz Auto Group. 


 


Family-owned and operated in White Plains for nearly 60 years, Sholz enjoys an enviable reputation for honesty, superior customer satisfaction and fair prices.  A full-service dealership, Sholz provides both new and factory certified pre-owned cars and truck sales as well as superior mechanical and collision repair services.  Large new and factory certified pre-owned inventories permit a full selection and immediate delivery.  In January 2003, General Motors chose Sholz to take over representation of its luxury line, Cadillac, in White Plains.  The Sholz Auto Group is now the largest Cadillac, Oldsmobile, Buick, Pontiac, GMC Truck, Kia and Isuzu dealership in the tri-state area. 


 



 


 


“Where else can you get an incredible fashion show and a stunning Broadway production at the same time?” says Tony Stimac, (Right, with Jeffrey Rosenstock, his partner, at the WPPAC Gala Opening November 9)  Producing Director of the White Plains Performing Arts Center. “It will be quite thrilling to see a gorgeous woman stop in mid-runway and belt-out a show-stopping song from a Broadway show. We are thrilled to be partnering with Mary Jane Denzer, Fortunoff and Sholz Cadillac for this event. And we are equally happy that this event will serve as a grand precursor to Fashion, The Musical.” Photo by WPCNR StageCam


 


Dressed to Thrill will take place at the White Plains Performing Arts Center on Monday, March 1st at 7pm. There will be a champagne reception at 6pm and a dessert reception after the event supplied by Trotters Restaurant. Tickets to Dressed to Thrill are $250 and include the event, the pre- and post receptions to the event and one ticket to the performance of your choice to Fashion, The Musical. (The ticket to Fashion, The Musical also includes dinner prior to the performance at either: Papa Razzi, Trotters or the Vintage Restaurants.) Fashion, The Musical, with Book by Mr. Stimac, premiers March 20.


 


To order tickets to Dressed to Thrill, call the Box Office at 888-977-2250. To make reservations to Fashion, The Musical and dinner prior to the performance, call Melinda O’Brien at the WPPAC office at 914-422-1376.


 


 


                                                                   

Posted in Uncategorized