EMERGENCY ROOMS ARE NOT OKAY.

Hits: 2954

View in browser

Si quiere leer la versión en español, pulse aquí.


Emergency rooms are not okay

It has now reached a crisis point. It is killing people.

We are slowly coming down from a peak in respiratory illness. This past winter was a real test. How will our hospitals—the safety net of our society—fare, given the combination of:

  1. Year 4 of a pandemic with a new threat to our repertoire,
  2. A recent surge of respiratory viruses,
  3. An aging population, and,
  4. A massive infrastructure problem decades in the making.

The answer is in—our hospitals are overwhelmed. And it has now reached a crisis point. It is killing people.

Emergency medicine doctors across the country have been sounding the alarm. Americans are noticing it too. In a recent poll, nearly half of Americans said they avoid the ER—avoid critical care they need—given the wait times.

Here’s what is happening on the front line and how to fix it.

A dangerous hospital overload problem called “boarding”

The emergency room (ER) is the front door of the hospital. Patients come and are quickly seen by a physician, who addresses medical emergencies and other needs. After evaluation and treatment, many are well enough to go home, and some require admission to the hospital. Those admitted patients are seen by the inpatient team of doctors and taken to a hospital bed upstairs.

Figure by YLE

But what if there are no open beds upstairs? Those patients wait in the ER until a bed opens. These patients are called “boarders.”

Figure by YLE

Over the last two decades, this problem has grown and grown, causing a nasty clog. We haven’t fixed it, and it’s now overwhelming ERs nationwide.

The fallout

Boarding patients are waiting hours, days, or even weeks in the ER. It creates an unsafe environment for patients:

  • Dangerous medical errors: ER boarding is associated with increased medical errorsworse patient outcomes, and higher risk of in-hospital death.
  • A recent study found that an extra hour of boarding was associated with a 16.7% increase in the odds they would require a higher level of care in the hospital (i.e., they were going to the floor, but now need the ICU.)
  • Death: In a nationwide survey, multiple ER physicians reported deaths that occurred because their ER was overwhelmed with boarding. For some, the backlog of patients is so bad that patients are dying in the waiting room before they can see a doctor.

Here’s why:

  1. Waiting too longCritically ill patients in the waiting room may not be recognized fast enough, and patients may leave because of the wait, only to come back the next day much sicker than before.
  2. Unsafe nursing ratios. Unlike inpatient floors and the ICU, there are often no caps on the number of patients an ER nurse is assigned. In the ICU, each nurse has 1-2 patients. In the ER, a single nurse can have 7 patients or more, some requiring ICU level of care.
  3. No inpatient doctor. Normally when a patient is admitted to the hospital, the ER doctor’s role ends and the inpatient doctor takes over, freeing up the emergency physician to see new patients. For boarding patients, often there is no inpatient doctor. Instead, emergency physicians are ordering critical medications and checking on boarding patients when they can. But realistically, they can only do so much while still responding to all the new cardiac arrests and strokes coming through the door.
A crowded emergency department waiting room

Why is boarding happening?

The primary problem is not the number of patients coming to the ER. It’s the lack of open beds upstairs. A recent NEJM commentary provided some insight:

  • No buffer in the hospital. To optimize revenue, hospitals try to keep their beds full, which means there’s little buffer for predictable surges of patients.
  • Weekend delays. Many hospital operations stop on weekends. Patients who otherwise could be discharged are delayed because a service they need is not available.
  • Prioritizing elective surgeriesElective surgeries bring in more money, so sometimes hospitals prioritize beds for surgeries instead of sick patients waiting in the ER.
  • Nursing home shortages. Sometimes patients are ready to be discharged, but no nursing home bed is available. (Or a bed is available, but their insurance hasn’t approved it yet.)
  • Staffing shortages. As we learned during the pandemic, it doesn’t matter if we have an open bed upstairs if there isn’t staff for it.

How do we fix this?

Hospitals are financially disincentivized from fixing this problem. We need regulatory institutions to step in. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is a strong player as they certify hospitals to receive Medicare funds, define safety standards, can require public reporting of hospital data, and manage many “pay for performance” programs. If CMS approves a new quality measure focused on boarding, it has the potential to do 3 things:

  1. Get data. We do not have national data on the boarding crisis because hospitals are not required to report it. We are dependent on on-the-ground anecdotes, which hospital staff are often afraid to share. CMS can require public reporting of this data.
  2. Set standards. Currently, there are no standards defining how long patients can board in the ER or how many patients a single ER nurse can cover.
  3. Create better financial incentives. Once publicly reported, quality measures may be used in pay-for-performance programs that would reward hospitals that best manage capacity challenges by minimizing boarding.

new CMS clinical quality measure on boarding is finally in the works, but it’s not yet approved. For a limited time (until February 16, 2024), the public can comment on this proposed measure and provide input. Typically, only parties invested in ignoring the problem comment. I’m asking you to change that:

  • ER physicians/nurses/staff: Look at the proposed metrics to track boarding, and provide any input you have here. These are metrics that hospitals would be required to report if the CMS measure is approved.
  • Everyone else: If you don’t have the time or experience to comment on the specific metrics, then go to the second page of the survey, and tell your stories about ER boarding. Thousands of responses from all of you will show CMS this is a giant problem that needs to be fixed.

Bottom line

Emergency rooms are the only place in the U.S. healthcare system that will never turn a patient away. And we don’t want them to. But a backlogged ER is the canary in the coal mine—our inadequate healthcare infrastructure showing its massive cracks. It is unsafe, and we must fix this.

Love, KP and YLE


Kristen Panthagani, MD, PhD is an emergency medicine physician at Yale. In her free time, she is the creator of the medical blog You Can Know Things. You can subscribe to her newsletter here

“Your Local Epidemiologist (YLE)” is written by Dr. Katelyn Jetelina, M.P.H. Ph.D.—an epidemiologist, wife. During the day, she is a senior scientific consultant to several organizations, including CDC. At night, she writes this newsletter. Her main goal is to “translate” the ever-evolving public health world so that people will be well-equipped to make evidence-based decisions. This newsletter is free, thanks to the generous support of fellow YLE community members. To support this effort, subscribe below:

Posted in Uncategorized

TOO MUCH DEVELOPMENT ADVOCATED BY ONEWHITEPLAINS DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. RESIDENT POINTS OUT

Hits: 310

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. February 7, 2024:

 

February 5, 2024

To Common Council Members:
Mayor Thomas Roach
Justin Brasch
Jeremiah Frei-Pearson
Richard Payne
John M. Martin
Jennifer Puja
Victoria Presser
CC:
Planning Board Members
Christopher Gomez, Commissioner of Planning

Subject: Opposition to the Draft Comprehensive Plan: liveWP 13 and liveWP 14

Dear Common Council Members,

I am writing to express my opposition to specific sections of the draft One White Plains Comprehensive
Plan – namely, liveWP 13 and liveWP 14. These sections propose amendments to zoning regulations that
would allow clustering techniques for large properties in single-family zoning districts on parcels greater
than 10 acres and permit attached housing units on parcels greater than five acres. These suggested
modifications deviate from the City’s existing Comprehensive Plan and present a substantial risk to the
distinctive character and open spaces of our R-30 districts, potentially resulting in significant
consequences for the affected neighborhoods.

In addition to conflicting with the goals of the current Comprehensive Plan, permitting changes in R-30
zoning to allow cluster and attached housing in the last open spaces, such as golf courses and
environmentally-sensitive areas, can create various problems for the landscape and the community,
including environmental concerns, loss of open space, increased density, and population and traffic
congestion.

One of the primary concerns is that alterations in land use, particularly the expansion of
impervious surfaces through development, can impact surface water runoff and result in shifts in water
flow patterns and flooding. The notion of altering zoning regulations to allow attached housing units and
clustering in R-30 zones under the guise of conservation is fundamentally contradictory. True
conservation efforts should focus on safeguarding open spaces, preserving natural habitats, and
maintaining the ecological balance of an area. The introduction of attached housing and clustering in
these zones stands in stark contrast to the very essence of conservation.

With a substantial increase in multi-family apartments in White Plains over the last decade, it becomes
crucial to question the relentless march of development. The City’s charm and character are at stake, and
the proposed changes in zoning, allowing for more attached housing and clustering in single-family
residential areas, signal a potential tipping point. Thousands of apartment units have already altered the
landscape of our community; thus, we must ask ourselves: when does it stop? The solution isn’t to change
zoning for more development, more attached housing, and more clustering. Instead, the long-term plan
should prioritize protecting the character of our neighborhoods and preserving the remaining open spaces
that make White Plains unique.

In addition to considering changes to zoning regulations for single-family areas greater than five and 10
acres, the draft also proposes potential revisions for institutional campuses like New York Presbyterian
Hospital and Burke Rehabilitation Center (liveWP 12). Furthermore, major properties such as
Bloomingdale’s and the former Windward School are also being evaluated for potential redevelopment.

These additional alterations to the Comprehensive Plan, combined with the suggestion to explore the
potential for permitting two-family residences, townhomes, and/or medium-density housing along parts of
the North Street Corridor (liveWP16), underscore the significant and potentially negative impact of the
proposed changes on the City.

When considering the broader picture, including potential revisions on institutional campuses and redevelopment of significant properties, alongside the proposed changes in zoning for multi-family housing and clustering in single family districts, it becomes evident that the draft advocates for even more density development and substantial modifications across various segments of
the City.

These proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan raise serious concerns about the long-term impact on
the City’s character, open spaces, and overall quality of life for its residents. I strongly urge you to
reconsider these proposed changes and prioritize the preservation of the City’s unique neighborhoods and
the true essence of conservation.

Sincerely,
Melanie Kolby

 

Hello, Editor…

I wanted to inform you that a Common Council public hearing took place Monday night to discuss the draft comprehensive plan. The meeting drew a significant crowd to the City Chambers, as well as several neighborhood association presidents questioning the proposed zoning changes and lack of neighborhood association input.
Many attendees expressed concerns about the proposed shift towards greater density in the south end of the city. As you may be aware the city wants to change zoning in single family districts on larger properties to allow clustering and attached housing, which would dramatically change the landscape of the south end.

I think this story can help WP residents understand how the new Comprehensive Plan aims to alter the city’s landscape.I am a resident of Gedney Farms and also very concerned about the proposed changes to zoning in single family districts.

Attached is a letter I wrote to the Common Council, Planning Board and Commissioner Gomez, and also below is a link of the video which includes the public hearing from last night: Feb 05, 2024 Regular Stated Meeting of the Common Council – White Plains, NY (swagit.com)

I hope you consider writing about this issue.

Thank you,
Melanie Kolby
Posted in Uncategorized

STATE OF AFFAIRS FEB 6–FROM YOUR LOCAL EPIDEMIOLOGIST– DR. KATELYN JETELIA

Hits: 163

View in browser

Si quiere leer la versión en español, pulse aquí.


State of Affairs: Feb 6

Still a lot of sickness out there, marking the longest respiratory season since the beginning of the pandemic.

After a few weeks of nosediving, things are, unfortunately, stabilizing. Does it feel like this respiratory season is never-ending? That’s because this is the longest respiratory season since the beginning of the pandemic.

Here is your state of affairs.

Influenza-like illnesses: High and plateauing

The climate of respiratory health in the United States (coined “influenza-like illnesses” by CDC) remains above the epidemic threshold and has plateaued due to children returning to school after the holidays.

We are going into our 13th week of being above “epidemic” levels. Last year, our entire season was 11 weeks. (The year before was 7 weeks). It’s looking more and more like “pre-pandemic” times, where we had ~15-18 weeks of illness during the winter.

Outpatient Respiratory Illness Visits (Source: CDC; Annotated by YLE)

Covid-19 still takes the cake for respiratory deaths. By how much? We don’t know yet. The data below are from death certificates, which are pretty accurate for Covid and RSV but not for flu. CDC annually adjusts flu deaths post-hoc to account for underreporting. We must wait to see how those calculations play out.

Trends in Viral Respiratory Deaths in the United States (Source: CDC; Annotated by YLE)

Covid-19: High and… stabilizing? 

Nationally, Covid-19 in wastewater is still “high.” Unfortunately, levels have stabilized in all regions except the South, where exponential growth started again. This could be a “noise” signal due to unstable reporting or a “real” signal due to, perhaps, it getting colder later in the South.

Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral activity level on a national level (Source: CDC; Annotations by YLE)

Covid-19 hospitalizations are slowing down, too, after a few weeks of nosediving. Are Covid-19 hospitalizations higher than flu? Well… it depends on which CDC graph you look at, which is confusing. The top graph below shows Covid-19 hospitalizations winning while the bottom shows flu winning.

(Top) Covid-19 and Influenza Hospitalization Rates (Source: CDC) (Bottom) Weekly Rates of Respiratory Virus-Associated Hospitalizations by Season (Source: CDC); Annotated by YLE

Why the different data stories? The sources are different. The top graph is from all hospitals mandated to report due to the pandemic, and the bottom is a few hospitals representing only 10% of the population from mostly urban areas. This is probably causing two things to happen:

  1. Vaccine effect. Urban places have more Covid-19 vaccinated than rural; thus Covid-19 hospitalizations are lower on the bottom graph than the top.
  2. Case definition differences may be happening. The data in the top graph is reported by hospitals, which may differ from the bottom graph, reported by a review of lab records.

I trust the top graph more. Unfortunately, this data story will stop in April because the reporting mandate is ending. Hospitals hate reporting this metric, but if you ask me, I don’t care. We need this data.

Flu: High and stabilizing

Influenza is still surging. Emergency department visits for flu increased due to one particular group: 5-17 year olds.

Percent of Emergency Department Visits for Flu, by age. (Source CDC; Annotated by YLE)

RSV: Moderate but nosediving

RSV continues to go down and down. Good riddance.

(Source: CDC)

Other things I’m paying attention to:

  • New CDC data show that the 2023 fall Covid-19 vaccines provide 54% increased protection against infection. In other words, fall Covid vaccines were a good call. A few more thoughts of mine are here.
  • Norovirus (think throwing up and diarrhea) has been a rollercoaster, but is now increasing quickly. Historically, this is about the time that norovirus takes off. Wash those hands.

(Source: CDC)

Bottom line

We are still very much in the middle of the “feeling crappy” season. And, unfortunately, it’s already longer than last year’s. Hopefully we get a reprieve in the next month or two.

Love, YLE


“Your Local Epidemiologist (YLE)” is written by Dr. Katelyn Jetelina, M.P.H. Ph.D.—an epidemiologist, wife. During the day, she is a senior scientific consultant to several organizations, including CDC. At night, she writes this newsletter. Her main goal is to “translate” the ever-evolving public health world so that people will be well-equipped to make evidence-based decisions. This newsletter is free, thanks to the generous support of fellow YLE community members. To support this effort, subscribe below:

Posted in Uncategorized

SOCIAL MEDIA AND TEEN MENTAL HEALTH: YOUR LOCAL EPIDEMIOLOGIST EXPLAINS

Hits: 309

Si quiere leer la versión en español, pulse aquí.


Social media and kids’ mental health- An update

The public health datastory behind the congressional hearing

Public health touches all aspects of our lives, not just during a pandemic and not just with infectious diseases. Thanks to your feedback, this newsletter will continue with Covid-19 updates and address other public health topics, like mental health. To choose what topics land in your inbox, click HERE.


Strong bipartisan statements came out of a congressional hearing yesterday about the harms of social media use among children and teens. Parents of kids harmed by social media showed up in immense force.

“You have blood on your hands.”— Sen. Lindsey Graham to five social media CEOs.

“I’m sorry for everything you have all been through.”— Mark Zuckerberg to parents in the audience.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks directly to audience members of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the dangers of child sexual exploitation on social media. Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Is social media dangerous for children and teens? And, if so, what are our options?

Here is the nuanced public health data that (hopefully) congressmen/women are using to (hopefully) make meaningful and needed change. But, as we know by now, policy isn’t always based on science.

Note: The below was published 8 months ago, and some things have changed since. We bolded the changes to bring you along for the ride. As a parent, I still root for Option #4.

Love, YLE

YLE MENTAL HEALTH

Mental health and social media among teens

·
MAY 18, 2023
Mental health and social media among teens

Protecting youth from the potential negative mental health effects of social media is front and center in the mass media, in conversations around dinner tables, and in federal- and state-level bills.

Is the teen mental health crisis a real thing?

Mental health and social media among teens

47
Share

This post contains sensitive information, including a discussion of suicide. If you are in need of help, there is an abundance of resources on the National Suicide Prevention Hotline website, which includes an anonymous chat function and a direct line at 800-273-8255.


Protecting youth from the potential negative mental health effects of social media is front and center in the mass media, in conversations around dinner tables, and in federal- and state-level bills.

Is the teen mental health crisis a real thing?

Yes. Rates of mental health problems have continually increased among young people over the past 15 years, regardless of how you measure it:

In 2021, 42% of U.S. high school students reported “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness,” up from 28% in 2011. The increase was especially dramatic among girls.

According to diagnostic measures (structured interviews by a trained professional), depression has increased 7.7% in U.S. teens—and 12% among girls—between 2009 and 2019.

According to U.S. death certificates, suicide rates among youth ages 10-14 increased 139% for girls and 70% for boys since 2012. However, this is a bit difficult to interpret given low the rates to begin with for girls.

(The trends are increasing fast among teens. But, for perspective, the rates of suicide are significantly higher in adults.)

Is this rise due to social media?

Teens use social media. A lot. Almost one in five teens use YouTube “almost constantly.” Nearly half of teens use TikTok (48%) and Snapchat (44%) several times per day. And the total hours of use have increased in recent years among teens.

But using social media doesn’t necessarily equate to mental health problems. Correlation doesn’t always equal causation. And, to make things more complicated, there are harms and benefits of social media.

Harms of social media 

We have a lot of correlational evidence, and some—but not much—causal evidence of the harms of social media on teens’ mental health.

Correlational studies ask teens how much time they’re spending on social media, and ask them about mental health. In general, these point to weak but statistically relevant correlations between social media use and lower teen well-being.

In terms of causal evidence, we have a couple of studies:

  • Some studies randomly assigned people (both adults and teens) to stop using social media (and others not to stop) and then evaluated their well-being. The results of these studies are mixed. Variability seems to depend on the details of the design: How long did they stop using social media?  Did they “detox” completely or just reduce the time spent? What are they using social media for?
  • Other studies have taken advantage of circumstances that naturally occurred in the world to mimic an experimental design. One study ​​looked at when Facebook was introduced on different college campuses (which varied randomly) and found that after Facebook showed up, rates of mental health concerns increased. A few others (like this and this) look at the introduction of high-speed Internet in different areas and found associations with poorer mental health after its introduction. Generally, these do not address social media specifically.

What is clear is that we need more research with more rigorous designs.

Benefits of social media 

Competing with these harms are studies that show social media has benefits for mental health, too. Teens report that social media is important for:

  • Helping them stay connected with friends
  • Meeting like-minded peers
  • Exploring their interests
  • Learning
  • Discovery

These benefits can be especially important for those who may be socially vulnerable in their offline lives, like LGBTQ+ youth.

What else could explain it? 

Assessing causality means understanding what other factors may also explain the rise of mental illness among teens. A few alternative explanations have been proposed:

  • Rising income inequality
  • Wars
  • Violence and access to firearms (suicides)
  • Global financial crisis
  • Racial inequality
  • Academic and social pressures
  • Political views on current events
  • Climate change
  • The opioid epidemic
  • Unhelpful narratives around mental health

Of course, many of these explanations may be intertwined with and amplified by social media, but the short answer is that we likely can’t blame social media alone. Mental health is complicated, and there is unlikely to be a single, simple explanation for a large-scale phenomenon like this one.

So, what should we do about it?

We’ve got a few options:

  • Option 1: Do nothing until research is “settled” on the issue before taking legislative action. Unfortunately, this may require a “burden of proof” that is rarely, if ever, established in psychology research. In this case, some evidence of harm, even if imperfect, may need to be enough to drive change.
  • Option 2: Put it on the parents. Parents certainly play a hugely important role in teens’ relationships with social media. Evidence supports parents’ active involvement in kids’ digital lives through ongoing conversations, reasonable limits, and appropriate monitoring. But can (and should) they manage it alone? If large-scale policy changes create safer social media platforms, individual disadvantages are minimized.
  • Option 3: Ban it among minors. No states have outright banned it among minors yet. This option would limit access to its benefits and would limit kids’ opportunities to practice using social media in safe and healthy ways prior to adulthood.  This has changed substantially since this piece was originally published. Many states, like Arkansas and Utah, have passed bills that limit social media use. In one case (Florida), it’s banned among kids under 16.
  • Option 4: Put reasonable protections in place. Social media is probably more like cars than drugs. We want protections in place (seatbelts, airbags, drivers’ ed), but an outright ban may go too far. Some options include: raising the minimum age from 13 to 15 or 16; requiring age verification of some kind; limiting recommendations of harmful or problematic content; limiting overall time spent (e.g., via forced “breaks” or overall time limits); and limiting targeted advertising.

Bottom line 

We have some evidence that social media is playing a role in the teen mental health crisis, but that evidence is not definitive. And social media can play a positive role, too. It is highly unlikely that social media is the only cause of mental illness among children. We can certainly take steps to make social media a healthier place, but if we truly want to support teens’ mental health, this is only the start.

Love, YLE and JN

 

Posted in Uncategorized

ALL NEW WHITE PLAINS WEEK THE FEBRUARY 2ND REPORT ON WWW.WPCOMMUNITYMEDIA.ORG

Hits: 446

JOHN BAILEY AND THE NEWS YOU NEED TO KNOW

THIS WEEK, EVERY WEEK ON WHITE PLAINS WEEK FOR 22 YEARS

TOM SOYK ON SPEED LIMITS

$1,000 DOLLARS AND UP CON ED BILLS  AS CITIZENS WITH NATURAL GAS IN WHITE PLAINS ARE BEING HEATED OUT OF THEIR HOMES, LIVELIHOOD AND THE STATE DOES NOTHING, WHISTLES BY THE GRAVEYARD.

44% INCREASE SINCE DECEMBER.  THE STORY OF THE STATE SELL OUT TO BIG POWER, LEADERS STAY SILENT ABOUT IT. NO MEDIA IS TALKING ABOUT, BUT WPW IS TELLING ABOUT IT~! SOMEBODY’S GOT TO DO IT.

DEVELOPMENT OF GOOD COUNSEL APARTMENTS COMES BACK TO THE COUNCIL

ATTORNEY WILLIAM NULL ON THE NEW SITE PLAN FOR 52 NORTH BROADWAY-WHAT’S AHEAD

WHITE PLAINS SALES TAXES  ON TARGET FOR RECORD BUT DOWN 1/2%

WESTCHESTER COUNTY EVEN BUT BLOWS SALES TAX FORECAST AGAIN–FACES $24 MILLION DEFICIT. WHERE’S THE LIFT FROM INFLATION? WHERE IS IT?  THE WESTCHESTER AND WHITE PLAINS ECONOMIES ARE FLAT

PART TWO OF JOHN BAILEY’S PREVIEW OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE DRAFT ONEWHITEPLAINS PLAN

THE STATE OF COVID DECLINING BUT VERY SLOWLY

THIS WEEK ON “PEOPLE TO BE HEARD” AT 7 SATURDAY NIGHT, CH 45 FIOS AND CH 76 OPTIMUM AND www.wpcommunitymedia.org

A REBROADCAST OF COMMISSIONER DAVID CHONG’S FENTANYL REPORT

IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, WHY IT IS SO DANGEROUS. A TIMELY REVIEW IN LIGHT OF OREGON DECLARATION OF A 90 DAY EMERGENCY because of fentanyl deaths fro overdoses.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

$1,093 to HEAT WITH NATURAL GAS FOR ONE MONTH? CON ED PRICES ARE INSANE. AND NO ONE IS DOING ANYTHING TO STOP IT. E.

Hits: 342

WPCNR CITIZENETREPORT NEWS TIP,  WITH NEWS AND COMMENT BY JOHN F. BAILEY:

 

IT WAS COLD IN WHITE PLAINS YESTERDAY MORNING 32 DEGREES.

I WAS WRITING MY SCRIPT FOR THE SHOW WHEN I GOT A DISTURBING CALL FROM ONE OF MY CITIZENETREPORTERS, THEY CALLED ME ABOUT THEIR  CON ED BILL FOR JANUARY, THEIR NATURAL GAS HEATING BILL WAS OVER $1,000.

“IT’S KILLING ME, I DON’T KNOW HOW I’M GOING TO MAKE IT.”

I WAS SHOCKED.

I THINK IT’S TIME SOME ASSEMBLY PERSON, SOME STATE SENATOR, GOVERNOR HOCHUL SHOULD HIT THE ROOF ABOUT THIS COLOSSAL RIPOFF OF EVERY CITIZEN WHO USES ELECTRICITY IN NEW YORK STATE.

CALL THE NEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS OPERATOR AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND YOUR ALBANY LEGISLATORS AND ASK THEM IF THEY EVEN KNOW WHAT THE NEW PRICE INCREASE  IS DOING TO THE THOUSANDS IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY THEY JUST APPROVED. 

THIS TIME I WANT A LEGISLATIVE HEARING WITH THE PSC AND NYISO WHY THE NYISO DECISION  SETTING THE HIGHEST COST SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY AS THE PRICE FOR BUYING ELECTRICITY OFF THE GRID.

  IN THIS CASE NATURAL GAS DETERMINES WHAT ALL BUYING ELECTRICITY THE GRID PAYS FOR ELECTRICITY HAS DONE. CAN THESE “LEADERS” IN ALBANY FIND OUT WHY DID THE NHYISO  DO THAT AND WHY AREN’T THOSE LEGISLATORS AND OUR GOVERNOR HAULING THOSE TWO AGENCIES AND CON ED AND EVERY ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY IN ON THE CARPET AND FIX THIS BEFORE THE SUMMER WHEN THE BILLS WILL BE JUST AS HIGH.

GOVERNOR HOCHUL MADE A STATEMENT  SAYING SHE WAS ASKING CON ED TO RE CONSIDER IT’S RATES TO GIVE NY CUSTOMERS A BREAK. THE LANDLORDS ARE HAVING BIG FUN PASSING THE INCREASE ON TO THEIR TENANTS.

PERHAPS THE GOVERNOR SHOULD HAVE TOLD THE PSC TO CUT IT. PERHAPS SHE SHOULD TELL THE NYISO TO CREATE A COMPETITIVE MARKET WITH COMPETITIVE PRICING NOW…BECAUSE PEOPLE CANT PAY $1,000 A MONTH JUST SO  THE NATURAL GAS GANG CAN MAKE BILLIONS ON THE MEEK, THE HARD WORKING MAN AND WOMAN, THE PERSONS TRYING TO AFFORD TO STAY IN THEIR HOMES THAT HAS BEEN  BY THIS NYISO POLICY RIGHT OUT OF THE ROBBER BARONS’ PLAYBOOK

THOSE DECISIONS ABSOLUTELY WRECKED THE SUCCESSFUL COMPETITOR OF OF  CON ED, WESTCHESTER POWER AND THE BIG TIME POWER SUPPLIERS.

IF THERE WERE A  REAL DICK TRACY  WORKING ROBBERY OUT THE BUNKO DIVISION, I WOULD TELL HIM THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND NYISO APPROVED DECISION DOUBLED WESTCHESTER POWER’S FIXED RATE.

I NEVER HEARD A SIGH FROM OUR FECKLESS GOVERNOR ON ENERGY,  OR OUR SAY NOTHING, DO NOTHING, READ NOTHING LEGISLATORS AND LEADERS.

THE CITIZEN WHO CALLED ME ABOUT $1,000 BILL SAID THE NEW GAS RATE WAS KILLING THEM. OF COURSE IT WAS A COLD WINTER.  

BUT IT’S NOT DOWN IN TEENS AND ALREADY BUT THESE NEW RATES ARE AN  ABSOLUTE GIFT TO HEAVY POLLUTING, WORLD DESTROYING, NATURAL GAS. HOW CAN THE GOVERNOR PERMIT THE PSC AND THE NYISO TO RUN A MONOPOLY IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE, RUNNING UP THE COST OF MAKING THE ELECTRICITY TO BEYOND ANY REALM OF AFFORDABILITY BY YOU AND ME. THEIR RATES GO UP AND DOWN ACCORDING TO OUR USAGE AND THEIR COSTS.

WELL IF YOU OWN A HOME IN WHITE PLAINS AND YOU HAVE GAS HEAT –FROM CON EDISON – YOU ARE GETTING KILLED BY ELECTRIC BILLS.  YOU’RE SCARED TO DEATH ABOUT HOW MY CALLER CAN PAY THIS.

THE CON EDISON CUSTOMER WHO HAS NATURAL GAS HEAT, TOLD ME THEIR CON ED GAS BILL WAS 1,063 DOLLARS IN JANUARY, UP FROM $744 IN DECEMBER — ONE MONTH AGO –THAT IS A 44% INCREASE IN USAGE AND PRICE IN ONE MONTH.

LOOK OUT EVIL DOERS, YOU HAVE PULLED THIS OFF FOR THE LAST TIME.

DO THING LEGISLATORS AND LEADERS, AT LEAST OPEN YOUR MOUTHS.

YOU ALL TURNED YOUR BACK AND IGNORED THIS PRICE INCREASE AND BEFORE THAT YOU LET NYISO UNDER THE EXCUSE THAT THEY “HAD TO MAINTAIN AN ORDERLY SUPPLY” PRICE FIXED, AND THERE TOOK OUT THE MAIN SELLING POINT OF WESTCHESTER POWER–FIXED RATE LOWER THAN CON ED’S. EVERYBODY LOVED THIS. I DID.

NYISO’S DECISION RESULTED BECAUSE THE NYISO DIDN’T THINK THIS THROUGH. WHAT HAPPENED WAS NO ESCO WOULD BID ON THE NEW WESTCHESTER POWER CONTRACT. WESTCHESTER POWER HAD TO PAUSE AND CON ED TOOK OVER THE ELECTRIC SERVICE. WHEN WESTCHESTER FINALLY WAS ABLE TO GET A FIXED RATE (DOUBLE WHAT THEY HAD IN 2022) CON ED RAMMED IN THEIR PRICE REQUEST QUOTING NICE LOW RATES.

NYISO’S DECISION AFFECTED 29 TOWNS AND CITIES IN WESTCHESTER IN WESTCHESTER POWER. 

NO ONE IN THIS COUNTY, ANY COUNTY OR  IN  NY GOVERNMENT SAID ANYTHING.

JUST PROFITS PROFITS PROFITS FOR BIG POWER AND THEIR STOCKHOLDERS.

WE HAVE TO CHANGE THE POWER POLICY SYSTEM TO LOWER COSTS, TEACH CUSTOMERS HOW TO SAVE ON CONSUMPTION AND INSTALL MORE SOLAR, WIND, WATER ENERGY TO SAVE THE STATE ECONOMY.

THANKS PUBLIC OFFICIALS. 

YOU DIDN’T PAY ATTENTION.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains CONSIDERS LOWERING speed limits to 25 MPH from 30 with some exceptions.

Hits: 271

.

WPCNR TRAFFIC TRIBUNE. From The City of White Plains. January 29, 2024:

Added to the agenda at the Special Meeting at City Hall Monday was an ordinance lowering the speed limit in White Plains with exceptions for key access  and egress routes.

 

Here are the street-by-street details showing exceptions to the 25 MPH limit:

  1. Central Westchester Parkway: from Grant Avenue to the City Line, 45 MPH
  2. Mamaroneck Avenue from Bryant Avenue to the City Line, 40 MPH EXCEPT SCHOOL DAYS, when it is reduced to 25 MPH in school zones marked by flashing lights and 25 MPH flasing signs.

 

  1. Mamaroneck Avenue From Bryant Avenue both North and South Bound to BLOMINGDALE RD, 30MPH

 

  1. North Street, both North and Southbound between Ridgeway and White Plains Avenue, 40MPH, except school days when limit is 25 MPH marked by flashing lights and signs reading 25MPH.

 

  1. North Street, both North and Southbound between Ridgeway to and the City line, 40MPH

 

  1. Westchester Avenue (eastbound) between White Plains Avenue and the City line, 40 MPH

 

  1. Westchester Avenue (eastbound) between Paulding Street and the Bloomingdale Road ramp, 30MPH

 

  1. Bryant Avenue, between North Street and Westchester Avenue both eastbound and westbound, 35MPH. From North Street to Mamaroneck Avenue, 30MPH

 

  1. Westchester Avenue Frontage Road eastbound from Bloomingdale Road ramp to I-287 eastbound junction, 40MPH

 

  1. Bloomingdale Road, 30MPH

 

  1. Central Avenue, 30 MPH

 

  1. North Broadway, northbound and southbound between Barker Avenue and the Cityline, 30MPH.

 

  1. Old Mamaroneck Road , northbound and southbound, between Bryant Avenue and the City line. 30MPH

 

  1. Tarrytown Road. 30MPH
  2. White Plains Avenue, 40MPH

A letter included in the “backup material” detailed the speed limit is being lowered under the new New York State Legislation (A.1007, A/S.2021-A)  which now allows cities to reduce city wide limits to 25 miles per hour in the amended Section 1643 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. The former traffic the default maximum speed through a city, town, or village was 30 MPH.

By giving  municipalities local control to reduce speed limits, this legislation  will improve public safety and prevent pedestrian fatalities.

The amendment to the city Traffic Ordinance is in accordance with recommendations of the Transportation Commission, Department of Parking/Traffic Division and is to become effective upon adoption by the Common Council.

Posted in Uncategorized

BLACK HISTORY MONTH STARTS TODAY

Hits: 345

en Español

Please join us virtually Monday night for our annual Black History Month Celebration streaming live from the BOL Chamber at 7 p.m. Video link will go live at westchestercountyny.legistar.com. To access, click on the link and scroll down to “Board of Legislators Meeting.” Scroll across to the video column and click where it says “in progress.”

We are so proud to be celebrating two exemplary honorees – Linda Tarrant-Reid and The Westchester County Press.

en Español

Acompáñenos virtualmente el lunes por la noche para nuestra celebración anual del Mes de la Historia Afroamericana, transmitida en vivo desde la Cámara BOL a las 7 p.m. El enlace del video se publicará en westchestercountyny.legistar.com. Para acceder, haga clic en el enlace y desplácese hacia abajo hasta ” Board of Legislators Meeting “. Desplácese hasta la columna de video y haga clic donde dice ” in progress.”

Estamos muy orgullosos de celebrar a dos homenajeados ejemplares: Linda Tarrant-Reid y The Westchester County Press.

Posted in Uncategorized

MEASLES

Hits: 440

View in browser

Si quiere leer la versión en español, pulse aquí.


I’m fully vaccinated against measles. What should I know?

Can I transmit the virus? Does vaccine protection wane? Does my child get antibodies?

Measles continues to pepper the news:

I am getting a lot of questions! Here’s what you need to know if you’re fully vaccinated.

Can I get measles if I’m fully vaccinated?

The MMR vaccine works incredibly well—you’re 35 times less likely to get measles than someone with no immunity.

But nothing is perfect. A breakthrough case is rare but possible (3 out of 100 fully vaccinated people will get infected). The disease does tend to be milder.

We don’t know why there are breakthrough cases, but there are two possibilities:

  1. Waning immunity (see more below); or
  2. Vaccine didn’t work in the first place for whatever reason5% of people do not get protection after the first dose, but 95% of those will be fully protected after a second dose.

If I am exposed, can I transmit measles?

Transmission after vaccination, especially if you’re asymptomatic, is rare:

  • We see this in the lab data. A small study found no viral shedding among asymptomatic or mildly ill patients. But this is a very old study, and we need to replicate findings with more sensitive lab equipment.
  • We see this in the epidemiological data. While there are several studies showing spread among vaccinated people, especially after intense or prolonged exposure, the epidemiological implications don’t seem to be dramatic. In other words, cases don’t transmit enough to sustain outbreaks.

In 2011, there was a well-documented outbreak in New York. This was the first documented measles outbreak where the index case had two doses of MMR. Out of 88 close contacts, 4 got infected and had symptoms. Those who got infected had more than 200 contacts, and none got measles. (Note: We would expect ~90% to get infected if this population didn’t have immunity.)

Figure by YLE

Why does the measles vaccine work better than the Covid-19 vaccine? 

These are very different viruses:

  1. Mutates differently. Measles is much more restricted in how it mutates compared to Covid-19. For example, new versions of measles don’t come out every few months to escape our immunity. The 1960 measles virus is largely the same today. (See this previous YLE post for more).
  2. Infects differently. Measles is a lot slower at infection. It requires going deep into the body to start replicating. Because of this, the measles vaccine is much better at stopping transmission, as our body has much more time to control measles infection. This is different from Covid-19, which replicates on the surface of the nasal cavity very quickly. It’s hard for our cells to reach it in time to prevent replication.

If we are protected from measles for life, why are there booster rumors?

I think this happening for a few reasons:

  1. MMR combines protection for three diseases into one shot: Measles, mumps, and rubella. Each of these wanes at different rates, which is confusing:
    1. Measles. Measles antibodies are incredibly durable (the most durable of the three) but wane over time. This isn’t too concerning because we have T cell protection, too. Studies that followed people for 17 years showed the vast majority (~91%) remained above the threshold needed for protection. What happens if they continue to wane? We are at the mercy of time, but currently, outbreaks continue to occur among unvaccinated people.
    2. Mumps antibodies are also durable but wane faster than measles. Approximately 25% lose protection within 8 years and 50% within 19 years of vaccination. This is why some consider a third dose of MMR before kids go to college.
    3. Rubella wanes, too, but you’re generally considered fully protected for life. Recent studies showed that the younger a person is, the quicker it wanes. This raises the question of whether women, especially those who get pregnant at an older age, need another booster.
  1. Other countries are discussing the possibility of a measles booster, for example for health care workers in Korea. Studies show a booster provides benefits, but they are short-lived.
  2. The guidance says if you were born before 1957, it is assumed you had measles and you’re fully protected. This group can probably skip getting MMR for measles protection unless other factors are at play (e.g., chemotherapy).

As vaccines have started eliminating diseases, people’s exposure to those diseases in the community has declined. This is good news, but it also means our immune systems have had less opportunity for boosting by asymptomatic infections (i.e., hybrid immunity). We don’t know the implications of this, but we are keeping a close eye on the data.

I hear measles infection-induced immunity is more durable than vaccine-induced immunity?  

This is true. Infection-induced antibodies wane less quickly among adults and fetuses compared to vaccine-induced immunity.

The problem is that an infection comes with many more risks than a vaccine. If I were to bet on it, I would rather have the odds on the right than left.

Are babies protected if their mom was fully vaccinated? 

Anyone trying to conceive should have MMR titers checked, and if levels are low, MMR should be administered 28 or more days before conception.

The vast majority of moms transfer antibodies of all three—measles, mumps, and rubella—to fetuses. Once born, antibodies wane really quickly and are almost all gone at 6-12 months of age.

So why do we wait until 12 months to get children vaccinated? 

We try to get to the sweet spot by balancing a few factors: maternal antibodies waning, maturity of the immune system, and the most common age of infection. For example, maternal antibodies can greatly reduce the infants response to the MMR vaccine. So we want to be sure these wane before getting a child vaccinated.

That said, if there is a measles outbreak, protection is needed ASAP for young children. Early vaccination is one provisional measure we can take.

Bottom line

If you’re fully vaccinated, you can be confident in your protection. We continue to follow the data, but failure to vaccinate still plays the biggest role in measles in the United States compared to vaccine failures.

Love, YLE

Posted in Uncategorized