Hits: 0
WPCNR Freedom Press. News Comment By John F. Bailey and the WPCNR Editorial Advisory Committee. July 4, 2006: This is a follow-up to the Carl Albanese saga. Yours truly was also targeted by the Mayor’s Office June 21 on that dark night in city hall when Mr. Albanese and I were informed, Mr. Albanese by Mayor’s Office personnel, and me by a police officer that we could not take pictures or videotape a work session and public hearing. I was shocked. I immediately interrupted the work session to clarify this with the Mayor, who immediately backed down and said I could take pictures. And I started snapping away.
The Common Council will vote Wednesday evening on rescinding the obscure piece of legislation from the City Charter which the Mayor used as a basis for the policy that was attempted that infamous night.

However, the Mayor’s actions to save the feelings of some important people who apparently, according to Mr. Albanese, did not like his videotaping them, were just one instance of supression of the press within the last two weeks of a far more sinister nature.
The most stunning in demonstration of the mental calibre of most of our representatives was a member of the United States House of Representatives saying The New York Times should be prosecuted for treason for revealing the administration is tracking dollar flows out of the country.
This would be funny if it were not so chilling.
It is amazing how our congressmen and senators think freedom of the press and the individual, and our laws against unreasonable search and seizure can be suspended, just like that. They can jail White Plains Elena Sassower for asking a question. They can climb all over a reporter asking for them to reveal a source. They can pass a Patriot Act and extend it! They can let slide a President tapping phones without a warrant. But hey, let the FBI with a warrant find cash in a congressman’s freezer — and well they don’t like that, and want to be notified so they can clear the money out of their own freezers.
Officials thinking to restrict press access, refusing to speak with the press, and, perish the thought, lie to the press, (though they love to use the gullible, wanna-be-loved members of the fourth estate), are precisely why there has to be freedom of the press — to ferret out connivers, the deal-makers, the hypocrites, the insiders wheeling and dealing and stealing — and exposing abuses of government and businessses and individuals that would go undetected without the reporter.
Now, Mr. and Ms. government representative or official, when you are sworn into office you swear to uphold the Constitution. I want to refresh all of your memories of what you swear to when you are sworn into office.
The very first amendment our founding fathers — who when they met to sign the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia, July 4, 1776, 230 years ago today — would have been hung if they were caught meeting together — felt the first thing the new country had to have was this amendment:
Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peacably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Please, Mr or Ms. Senator, or Mr. and Ms. Representative, and Mr. and Mrs. Councilperson and public officials everywhere remember this amendment the next time you even think about muzzling or attacking the press, or prosecuting it for treason.
There are 26 other amendments to the Constitution. I suggest all of you brush up on them.
Thank you, Carl Albanese for standing your ground.




