COUNCIL & NYPH MOU: Appears to Agree to Surrender Approval Power to Planning Brd

Hits: 0

WPCNR Common Council Chronicle-Examiner. By John F. Bailey. October 27, 2006, UPDATED 1:30 P.M. EDT: The Memorandum of Understanding between the city and New York Presbyterian inched closer to acceptance by the Common Council Thursday evening.  


 



 


The council demonstrated  no objections to the major effect of the MOU—relinquishing right of the Common Council approval of the project to The Planning Board. That happens once the Council accepts the MOU  which if executed in full, secures 5.5 acres or more of parkland from the hospital for the city.  In exchange the NYPH is given a  ready-to-go subdivision layout of 114 lots that will produce a 125-unit subdivision on 60 adjacent acres paralleling Bryant Avenue.  Mayor Joseph Delfino (back to camera) assured the Common Council that the hospital “has no plans at this time to develop the property.” Photo by WPCNR News


 





The council was informed by the city Planning Commissioner that the total budget for preparing the subdivision would be $635,500, with the city paying $60,000 out of pocket (for its 5.5 acre park portion of the subdivision) and the hospital reimbursing the city for the balance of the costs.  The Planning Commissioner said it was up to the council whether they required the reimbursement in cash or in extra land added to the 5.5 acres on the wetslopes and forested area descending from the 5.5. acre “park area.”


 


It was made clear that if the Common Council agrees to the Memorandum of Understanding (planned for as early as the November 6 Council Meeting), that the only opportunity for the Common Council to bail out of the deal would be when it comes time for the Common Council to remove the 65 acres from the Hospital Use Special Permit that now is attached to the targeted property. By refusing to remove the property from under the Special Permit, they violate the aggreement, in effect,  killing the park, and the property reverts to as of right.


 


WPCNR wants to point out that the Planning Board, by state law, is the agency charged with reviewing proposed subdivisions, however, by presenting the MOU to the Council, the council in effect has this one opportunity to either buy in or reject this concept of a subdivision on this property.


 


City Gets to Choose the Land with a Conservation Development


 


It was painstakingly pointed out by the Planning Commissioner that the Planning Board which under Zoning Law retains exclusive jurisdiction over “Conservation Developments”  would hold public hearings each step of the way as part of their series of steps to final approval of the subdivision.


 


Council President Rita Malmud told WPCNR after the meeting broke up that the Council can reject the park/subdivision plan and the 125 home development by either not signing the Memorandum of Understanding or by not approving the removal of the land from the Special permit.


 



 


The Planning Commissioner explained to the Council, by proposing the Conservation Development, the city is able to dictate where the parkland would be, while if a site plan were submitted, though the Common Council would have approval rights, the hospital could dictate where the parkland would be. Photo by WPCNR News


 


In contrast the Memorandum of Understanding gives New York Presbyterian Hospital the right to approve all access roads to the subdivision being designed for them by the city.


 


A troubled Dennis Power


 


Councilman Dennis Power expressed his desire to see a clause written in to the Memorandum of Understanding that if the New York Presbyterian Hospital were to entertain the sale of the land, that the Trust for Public Land be allowed to obtain it as a right of first refusal. Planning Commissioner Susan Habel said the Trust for Public Land did not buy land, that the organization was a negotiator only to try and bring two parties together. Asked what the value of the sixy-five acres now was, Paul Wood, Executive Officer said between 1.1 and $2 Million, but he did not know.


 


Mayor Delfino was adamant that he would not add any clause allowing the Trust for Public Land to attempt to broker a land deal. It was calculated by Councilman Thomas Roach that the land at 60 acres at $1.3 Million an acre would require an investment of $78.6 Million. Mayor Delfino said he did not think adding a right of refusal clause was legal. He said he might be able to get a separate letter from the New York Presbyterian Hospital to that effect.


 


Assessment Shot.


 


After the meeting, Wood  told WPCNR that upon approval of the Conservation Development plan, the city would obtain the 5.5 acres of park for immediate development into a park. He added on questioning that once the Conservation Development was approved by the Planning Board, (anticipated in August, 2007), the 60 acres would return to the assessment roles. He estimated that would add about a million dollars to the city budget (and WPCNR estimates $4 Million to the City School District coffers).   


 


The substance of the agreement was not challenged by the Council members accept in the matter of the length of the lease and its renewal, the terms and circumstances on how the city expenses (on the residential parcel) would be paid. The agreement binds both city and hospital to a strict 9-month timeline (in which Draft and Final Environmental Impact statements and Findings Statements would expect to be completed in time for an approval by next August) which the Commissioner of Planning was going to rework  


 


Councilman Arnold Bernstein made clear that the Council could refuse to renew the Proton Accelerator/biomedical facility Special Permit and use it as “a club” to enforce the agreement should the hospital refuse to pay city expenses if they violated or dragged their feet on the subdvision timetable.

Posted in Uncategorized

K.K. All the Way! WPHS Junior Outruns County. Wins XC Crown

Hits: 0

WPCNR PRESS BOX. Special to WPCNR From Tim Sheehan. Written by John Bailey. October 27, 2006: Junior Kaylin Gilmartin-Donohue of White Plains High School won the Westchester County Cross Country Championship Thursday running 2-1/2 miles in 15 minutes and 6 seconds, pulling from behind going into the woods and coming out of the woods she was winning going away, splitting between the two rivals and winning with one of the classic kicks you’ll ever see.  


 


KK (15:06) beat out Tori Flannery (15:08) of Bronxville, Meghan Houser (15:14) of Horace Greeley and Bronxville’s  Emma Clarke (15:22)


 



The Agony of Victory: K.K. in the chute after win. The look on her face says it all about the heart, the effort, the will to win and be first. Photo, Armory Foundation website.


 



Kaylin Gilmartin-Donohue in 2004 at the Manhattan High School Invitational 2 years ago.  She’s Out of Sight Now! Photo, WPCNR Sports Archive


 


Two weeks ago, the poker-faced Ms. Gilmartin-Donohue, a star on the WPHS Cross Country team since eighth grade ran the course at Van Cortlandt Park in Da Bronx  in 15:27 and Thursday in perfect runners’ weather beat that by an incredible 21 seconds. Tim Sheehan, the cross country aficionado said K.K. was neck and neck with her two rivals from Bronxville just behind the pair going into the woods prior to the finish. He said he felt with her great finishing kick she could overtake them and K.K. came through. Sheehan reports it was an amazing, great Cross Country race. One to remember.


 


This is the second all-County Championship, “K.K.” has won.. 

Posted in Uncategorized

In search of an Athletic Scholarship? Do Homework. Reach Out, Mazzoni Says.

Hits: 0

WPCNR PRESS BOX. By John F. Bailey. October 26, 2006: Why do WPHS Athletes earn scholarships year after year? Because the White Plains coaches and Guidance Counselors take a professional attitude towards helping their athletes find the schools where they can excel. Last night, the traditional appearance of Wayne Mazzoni of Sacred Heart University took the mystery out of getting athletic scholarship.


 



 


On the day after yet another White Plains High athlete, Liz Flooks of Tiger Basketball fame, had chosen to accept a 4 year athletic scholarship to Niagara University, Sacred Heart University baseball coach, Wayne Mazzoni addressed about 25 parents and student-athletes at WPHS on how to get an athletic scholarship. Photo, WPCNR Sports


 


His advice: evaluate your abilities, be realistic, and search out schools that will be a good fit for you, and sell yourself. Go after the coaches, the colleges and the programs you want to be a part.





 How do you do that? Mazzoni advises you to find first the kind of college you want for your aca in the location you desire.  How do you do that? He suggests using the website http://www.collegecoachesonline.com the parent and their athlete can locate 20,000 coaches from NCAA Division I,II, and III teams to isolate your sport and the colleges in the regions you want to go. Then Mazzoni says, it is up to the athlete and the parent to find from that list of some 20 to  50 schools – the handful of schools you want to target.


 


What is the right fit? Mazzoni says it’s at a school that has the academic disciplines you’re interested in, and where you will play, where the coach and his philosophy are right. He says with the right amount of pre-research you can control the recruiting process. Mazzoni made the point last night that the college coaches are not going to be knock-knock-knocking on your door – you as the student athelete and the parent have to knock on theirs.


 


To evaluate your own talent, you have to talk to college coaches, go to camps and get straightforward appraisals of whether you are Division III, II or I material and concentrate your efforts on the level that you can play. Start with your high school coach, he says. Once you deterimine the level of play you can collect a series of colleges where you can help their program and their program fits your expectations of college play.


 


The ideal time to start making your “playlist” is at the beginning of your Junior year.


 


Next, Mazzoni says you have to make a play on the coachof the sport at the schools you like. You can write them. (The NCAA rule is coaches cannot contact you – but you can contact the coach all you want.) You can send them videos. You can visit a campus on your own to see them play, and talk to the coach.  Mazzoni says do not be afraid to follow up and ask those “coaches of opportunity” what they think about how you can help their program. Remember, it is all about you. You have to be happy, because as Coach Mazzoni says transferring if you have misevaluated a program is a “hassle.”


 


The coach remarks that  you learn something by proselytizing yourself. Some coaches will tell you you are not good enough, and that is helpful. Others will express and interest and you are on your way. Then you take those schools (which presumably you have already determined you like academically) where coaches like you as a player and athlete and concentrate on them.


 


Mazzoni cautions against attending showcase camps unless you can be specifically assured that certain coaches you want to see you play are going to be present. He is more positive about personal communication with the coach on your development and achievements. If the coach likes what you say you offer, he or she will make an effort to watch you hit, run, catch, pass, tackle or skate. Another tactic is to call the coach or coaches you want to see you play and find what tournaments they regularly attend and play in those tournaments.


 


At the end of the Junior year, Mazzoni says you must register with the NCAA Clearinghouse with the guidance department or at NCAA.org. The site provides the grade requirements for you to participate in NCAA sports as a freshman. The


 


Mazzoni encourages you to make campus visits. He notes you may make one campus visit paid for by the college, but subsequent visits you pay for. He encourages you to interview the coach, players, players paents. Find out how the team travels (bus or van, Mazzoni prefers bus for safety). Ascertain the mix between academics and sports, what your academic requirements will be and how much the team will respect them.


 


Do not hesitate, if the coach is interested in you, to ask the coach to make his appreciation of you known to the Admissions Office. He encourages you to be proactive in asking if there is any aid available. However, he warns against being an over proactive parent.


 


 


Mazzoni advises against recruiting services, because he feels “they are a waste of time and money.”


 


In deciding where you will go should you be offered a scholarship or merely accepted, Mazzoni notes you have to consider the academics, the Coaching, the Recruiting (how many you will be competing against), the Philosophy (why you are wanted, your responsibilities), how the team is managed.


 


In closing, what I took from Mazzoni’s talk was that you have to treat acquiring a scholarship for athletics as competitively as you do an athletic contest. You have to prepare. You have to scout. You have to hone  your skills (academics and athletic). And you have to be better prepared. If you approach a coach knowing about his program, showing by doing so natural leadership qualities, you stand a much better chance with that coach – any coach – than the passive prospect. You will stand out, and be better informed in choosing which school to play at – scholarship or not.

Posted in Uncategorized

Flooks Chooses Niagara on 4 Year Basketball Scholarship

Hits: 0

WPCNR PRESS BOX. October 26, 2006: Congratulations are in order for Liz Flooks, forward on the  White Plains High Tigers 2005 and 2006 Women’s Basketball Runnersup on being awarded a 4-year scholarship to play basketball for the Niagara University Purple Eagles. Liz announced her choice this week.



Liz Flooks far left, at Pregame Ceremonies at the States, 2006. Photo, Courtesy Tim Sheehan.

Posted in Uncategorized

NYPH Memorandum of Understanding to be Discussed Thurs Evening.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. October 25, 2006: The Memorandum of Understanding that Mayor Joseph Delfino is encouraging the Common Council to approve, which would essentially put the city on record as endorsing city acceptance of a massive subdivision on the Bryant Avenue side of the New York Presbyterian Hospital property  with the city receiving 5.5 acres of hospital land for a park of two ballfields, which would be constructed and maintained at city expense will be discussed Thursday evening at a meeting of the Common Council at 6 P.M. Two routine public hearings are scheduled, as well as an Executive Session on “litigation” and “employment/promotion of an individual.” The Agenda:


 


 


PUBLIC HEARINGS:


 



1.                  Public Hearing on an application submitted on behalf of Heyman Properties, LLC for a proposed amendment to an “S Zone” Ordinance entitled, “An Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of White Plains in relation to a change of district of Lots 8, 8A, 9 and 10, Block 9, Ward 4 (“White Plains Plaza Zone Ordinance”).


 


2.                              Communications from          Deputy Commissioner of Building (2)


3.                                                                              Design Review Board (2)


4.                                                                              Commissioner of Public Safety


5.                                                                              Commissioner of Traffic


6.                                                                              Traffic Commission


7.                                                                              Commissioner of Parking


8.                                                                              Environmental Officer


 


9.                              Environmental Findings Resolution


 


10.                         Second Reading Ordinance amending an Ordinance entitled, “An Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of White Plains in relation to change of District of Lots 8, 8A, 9 and 10, Block 9, Ward 4. “


 


11.                         Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains approving the application submitted on behalf of Heyman Properties, LLC, (“Applicant”), owner of the property known as One North Broadway and 445 Hamilton Avenue for an amendment to an approved site plan to permit alternations and minor ground level additions to the existing building known as One North Broadway (“White Plains Plaza LLC”) exclusive of signage approval.


 


 


 


12.             Public Hearing in relation to the application submitted on behalf of the Jefferson at White Plains, L.P. for an amendment to the site plan of its existing special permit/site plan for certain changes to the project known as The Jefferson, a 281 Unit Luxury Residential Apartment Development, located at 300 Mamaroneck Avenue (Section 130.28, Block 12, Lot 2.1) originally approved by the Common Council on June 4, 2001, and extended by resolution adopted February 3, 2003 and October 7, 2003, and amended by resolution adopted September 6, 2005, to permit (1) the reallocation of parking on the property as a result of changes in the City’s trash collection procedures; and (2) the authorization of the use of a model unit for residential use.       


 


13.                         Communications from          Deputy Commissioner of Building   


14.                                                                         Design Review Board   


15.                                                                         Commissioner of Public Safety


16.                                                                         Commissioner of Traffic


17.                                                                         Traffic Commission


18.                                                                         Commissioner of Parking


19.                                                                         Environmental Officer


                       


20.                                     Environmental Findings Resolution


 


21.                                     Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains approving the application submitted on behalf of The Jefferson At White Plains, L.P. (“Applicant”), formerly J.P.I. Apartment Development, L.P., for an amendment to the previously approved Special Permit/Site Plan for changes to the project known as The Jefferson, a 281 unit luxury residential apartment development, located at 300 Mamaroneck Avenue (Section 130.28, Block 12, Lot 2.1) originally approved by the Common Council on June 4, 2001, and extended by resolutions adopted February 3, 2003 and October 7, 23003, and amended by resolution adopted September 6, 2005, to (1) decrease the approved number of parking spaces by one (1) parking space to accommodate changes in the City’s trash collection procedures; and (2) to authorize the use of a model unit for residential use.


 


 


 


DISCUSSION:


 


22.             Proposed alterations to 1133 Westchester Avenue.


 


23.             New York Presbyterian Hospital Memorandum of Understanding.


 


24.             Inter-municipal Agreement Solid Waste.


 


25.             Agreement with N.Y.S. Department of Transportation to erect a decorative trowel at Hamilton Avenue and Tarrytown Road.


 


26.             Building Department Electric Inspection Fees.


 


27.             Entertainment of a motion to enter into Executive Session to discuss pending litigation, and matters related to the appointment, employment and/or promotion of a particular person. 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

The Exit 8 Nightmare Should End by Nov. 1. Last Blast today.

Hits: 0

WPCNR BUMPER TO BUMPER. From Don Hughes. October 25, 2006: Don Hughes, occasional contributor to WPCNR commentary and provider of informative “bits,” notes this from the New York State Department of Transportation:


The blasting on I-287 near Lake Street has been completed.  There will be two test blasts today on the West side of I-287 near Grant Avenue and then blasting will start up again in about a two weeks.

As before, traffic on I-287 and surrounding streets will be stopped in both directions prior to the blasting.

Also, the bridges near Bloomingdale Road are being demolished and traffic on Westchester Avenue is congested.  This will last for a few weeks.

Avoid the areas if at all possible.  Especially prior to the scheduled blasting. 

The good news is that the stop sign on the on-ramp near Ebersole (exit 8) should be gone by Veterans Day and the traffic pattern should be back to what it was previously.

Posted in Uncategorized

Residents Transcenter Meter Permits on Sale Nov 15. Parking Officers on Bikes.

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE PARKING NEWS. October 25, 2006: The White Plains Department of Parking, acting on the suggestions of residents that long lines to purchase the annual TransCenter Resident Meter Parking Permits at the White Plains Metro North Station, force applicants to stand outside in cold inclement December weather has announced the coveted permits will go on sale November 15 at the TransCenter Office, beginning at 7:15 A.M.


The permits allow White Plains residents to park at metered slots in the TransCenter after 10 A.M., and are meant for residents who do not commute regularly on the Metro North line but find the need to park at the TransCenter to make infrequent trips by train. The permit costs $5.


Mounted P.E.O.’s On Bikes


In another innovation, the Department of Parking has confirmed, (after a Parking Enforcement Officer was reported to WPCNR as riding a bicyle this week on his rounds), that White Plains now has  mounted five Parking Enforcement Officers on Bikes


The new “mounted Parking Enforcement Officers,” charged with awarding $15 tickets to unfortunate motorists who lose track of the time, are patrolling  for parking violations in White Plains from 8 A.M. to 4 P.M. There is also one  P.E.O. who patrosl on bike from 4 P.M. to midnight. The bicylces have been purchased by the Department of Parking, according to a department spokesperson. Asked if this mounted innitiative had resulted in an increase in parking tickets, the Department of Parking spokesperson said it was too soon to tell, but that the bicycling ticket hawks liked the mobility; the bicycles did not block traffic in double-parks, as their white parking patrol vehicles do, and the bikes save their legs.


The P.E.O.s on Bikes are in radio communication with the Department of Public Safety and were trained in the operation of the bikes by the Department of Public Safety.

Posted in Uncategorized

BOARD OF REGENTS PROPOSES MAJOR REFORM IN STATE AID TO SCHOOLS

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. From NY State Education Department. October 24, 2006  UPDATED 10/25/06 3:30 P.M. EDT: The Board of Regents today recommended a $1.48 billion increase in State Aid to schools for 2007-2008. Most of this funding would go to school districts educating the State’s neediest children.


According to John Burman, spokesperson for the State Education Department, the Foundation Formula proposed by the Regents would not penalize a district such as White Plains which spends more money per pupil.  Burman reports to WPCNR that the proposal includes a guaranteed increase of 2% in Foundation Aid for all school districts to help them meet rising costs.


             The Regents propose an increase in State Aid to schools that is designed to link funding to the cost of a successful education. Like last year’s proposal, the proposal this year features a simple Foundation Formula that would replace 31 separate aid categories. The Formula:


 


 


                                                              State Aid= 


                                   [Foundation Cost X Pupil Need


                                                    X Regional Cost Index] 


                                                   – Expected Local Share.


– –                                                


            This $1.48 billion increase is based on data available now. However, new information will become available after November 15, and this amount will likely change.  Historically, four aids in particular have experienced significant increases as schools report their expenditures: Building, Transportation, Public Excess Cost (special education) and BOCES aids.  As a result, the Regents eventual recommendation may vary by as much as $200 million. An update will be available in December.   


    “Student achievement has been improving, but we have far to go,” Regents Chancellor Robert M. Bennett said. “To accelerate this progress, we must invest the funds our neediest children deserve so they can all get a good education. The Regents are urging full access to pre-kindergarten for all four year olds. Our total State Aid proposal offers a fair and sustainable solution to one of New York’s most critical issues.”


 “New York and the nation face intense competition from other countries that are moving quickly to raise the educational level of all their children,” State Education Commissioner Richard Mills said. “We need an integrated approach, from pre-kindergarten through college graduation, and fixing State Aid is a key part of that. Now is the time to reform the State Aid system to ensure that all children get an equal opportunity to reach high standards.”


            Here is what makes up a District’s State Aid provided under the Foundation Formula:                        

Foundation Cost: This is the cost of educating the average student to the learning standards, based on a study of successful school districts, using instructional costs and controlling for regional cost differences and the number of needy pupils.  


Pupil Need: High need students require more help, so the Regents proposed a weighting that increases State assistance for them.    


            Regional Cost Index: Additional funds would go to schools in areas where wages and the cost of living are higher.


            Expected Local Contribution:  Funding is a State and local partnership. The expected local contribution is based on the district tax base multiplied by the expected local tax rate. The district tax base is the total property value of the district. The expected local tax rate is based on local ability to pay, as measured by the district property value and income per child. Lower income communities would be expected to contribute less. Higher income communities would be expected to contribute more. However, the expected local contribution is not mandatory.  


 


Will Not Affect Construction, Transporation, Books, ESOL, Special Ed, Pre-K, BOCES


            The Foundation Formula includes most of the State funding of schools, but not all. Important categorical aids that are still kept separate include aid for school construction, transportation, textbooks, limited English proficient students, special education students, universal pre-K and BOCES.  The Regents proposal includes a guaranteed increase of two percent in Foundation Aid for all school districts to help them meet rising costs. 


            The Regents propose an increase of $1.48 billion for 2007-2008 from all State Aid. Of that, 51.4 percent would go to New York City.


 


Special Ed


             The Regents propose other changes in State Aid: the most significant of these relate to special education and early childhood education.  With regard to special education, the Regents recommend a simplification of the financing formula.  They propose that funding be generated from the same foundation formula for each school district, although an additional weight will be applied to reflect the greater cost of educating children with special needs. 


            Although the special education formula builds upon the foundation amount approach, the general and special education funding streams will remain separate.  The Regents proposal guarantees all school districts against loss on a per pupil basis in the move to the new special education funding formula. The Regents further recommend that the city school districts of Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers be given authority to contract with BOCES for educational services such as arts and cultural programs and career and technical education.  


PRe-K Statewide


In terms of State Aid for pre-kindergarten education, the Regents propose an increase of $108 million to provide full access to high quality education for all four-year-olds.  Funding for the four-year old pre-K student population will not be consolidated in the foundation amount, but will remain a separately funded program. The Regents propose planning grants for school districts that do not operate full-day kindergarten programs, with funding to phase-in full-day kindergarten programs over the subsequent three years. 


White Plains City Schools Implemented Pre-K across the district three years ago, anticipating this policy.

Posted in Uncategorized

Board of Ed Ratifies New Ref Tally. Voting Machines Not Opened and Checked.

Hits: 0

 

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. October 23, 2006: The city Board of Education ratified Michele Schoenfeld’s second, corrected canvas of the $69.6 Million Referendum proposition election Monday evening.  The vote was held in White Plains last Tuesday, with the final vote total being as reported by WPCNR Friday, 1,050 in favor, and 934 against. Board members, Michele Trataros, Peter Bassano, Terry McGuire and Rosemarie Eller voted in favor, with Donna McLaughlin, Rick Tompkins and Bill Pollak not present for the vote. Mr. Pollak arrived late.


 


Ms. Schoenfeld reported to WPCNR that the voting machines were not reopened to verify their election night counts reported by the election inspectors, employed by the City School District, most of whom are trained by the County Board of Elections.






Ms. Schoenfeld told the Board that the 10-vote swing in the Yes votes (down from 1,060, as first reported), was caught when it was noticed on the voting sheets that the number of voters did not match the number of votes (being 10 more). Upon inspection of the tally sheets, she said, it was discovered that a 9 (in the 10s column) had been read instead of an “8” on the vote total at District 4, The Middle School,  leading to a 10-votes in the Yes total. Instead of 283, the sheet had been read as 293, Schoenfeld said, leading to the revision downward of 10 votes in the Yes category.


 


Schoenfeld said this was a very smooth election. “This was one of the smoothest elections ever. There were no machine malfunctions. No problems with voters and no one did not show up.”


 


After the Board vote, WPCNR asked Ms. Schoenfeld if she and her assistants had opened the voting machines to validate the machine counts. Ms. Schoenfeld said, “We didn’t open the machines,” that the inspectors opened and read the totals on the counters visible in the back of the machine on Referendum Night and locked up the machines.  Schoenfeld said the reading of the counters on Referendum Night was the only time the machines were read.


 


Asked why the machines were not reopened to check the readouts, Schoenfeld said three inspectors read the counts on each machine. Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors told WPCNR when asked why a recount machine-by-machine had not been undertaken, said “It was not that close.”


 


No recount is planned.


 


The final numbers approved Monday night show 1,845 machine voters; 122 absentee ballots and 17 Affidavits for a total of 1,984 votes. The totals by District:


 


 


 



 


The Absentee Ballot Count, (included in the above YES-No Totals)  for the record provided by the City School District Friday to WPCNR:


 


District 1: Fire House     2 Ballots    — 1 YES  1 NO


 


District 2: Church Street School —  16 Ballots – 10 YES,  6 NO  (2 Machines)


 


District 3: Rochambeau School – 64 Ballots – 57 YES, 7 NO


 


District 4: Highlands (Middle Sch)   11 BALLOTS   7 YES, 4 NO   (2 Machines)


 


District 5: Mamaroneck  Av  — 8 Ballots —  7 YES    1   NO


 


District 6: Ridgeway School – 21 Ballots – 14 YES  7  NOs


 


 


                                     Absentee Ballot Totals – 96 YES 26 NO


 


Affidavit Ballot Counts


 


Station 1 :     Zero


 


Station 2:    1  YES, 1  NO


 


Station 3:     1 YES,


 


Station 4:     3 YES, 3 NO


 


Station 5:     2 YES 1 NO


 


Station 6:     3 YES, 2  NO


 


         Affidavit Ballots:   10 YES, 7 NO


 


 



 


The Voter Count. Source: Michele Schoenfeld, WP City School District.

Posted in Uncategorized