President Bush’s State of the Union Address

Hits: 0

WPCNR FOR THE RECORD. From the Republican Party. January 24, 2007: Here is the text of President George W. Bush’s address to the nation before Congress Tuesday evening:


Madam Speaker, Vice President Cheney, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:


This rite of custom brings us together at a defining hour – when decisions are hard and courage is tested. We enter the year 2007 with large endeavors underway, and others that are ours to begin. In all of this, much is asked of us. We must have the will to face difficult challenges and determined enemies – and the wisdom to face them together.


Some in this Chamber are new to the House and Senate – and I congratulate the Democratic majority. Congress has changed, but our responsibilities have not. Each of us is guided by our own convictions – and to these we must stay faithful. Yet we are all held to the same standards, and called to serve the same good purposes: To extend this Nation’s prosperity … to spend the people’s money wisely … to solve problems, not leave them to future generations … to guard America against all evil, and to keep faith with those we have sent forth to defend us.


 We are not the first to come here with government divided and uncertainty in the air. Like many before us, we can work through our differences, and achieve big things for the American people. Our citizens don’t much care which side of the aisle we sit on – as long as we are willing to cross that aisle when there is work to be done. Our job is to make life better for our fellow Americans, and help them to build a future of hope and opportunity – and this is the business before us tonight.


A future of hope and opportunity begins with a growing economy – and that is what we have. We are now in the 41st month of uninterrupted job growth – in a recovery that has created 7.2 million new jobs … so far. Unemployment is low, inflation is low, and wages are rising. This economy is on the move – and our job is to keep it that way, not with more government but with more enterprise.


Next week, I will deliver a full report on the state of our economy. Tonight, I want to discuss three economic reforms that deserve to be priorities for this Congress.


First, we must balance the federal budget. We can do so without raising taxes. What we need to do is impose spending discipline in Washington, D.C. We set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009 – and met that goal three years ahead of schedule. Now let us take the next step. In the coming weeks, I will submit a budget that eliminates the federal deficit within the next five years. I ask you to make the same commitment. Together, we can restrain the spending appetite of the federal government, and balance the federal budget.


Next, there is the matter of earmarks. These special interest items are often slipped into bills at the last hour – when not even C-SPAN is watching. In 2005 alone, the number of earmarks grew to over 13,000 and totaled nearly $18 billion. Even worse, over 90 percent of earmarks never make it to the floor of the House and Senate – they are dropped into Committee reports that are not even part of the bill that arrives on my desk. You did not vote them into law. I did not sign them into law. Yet they are treated as if they have the force of law. The time has come to end this practice. So let us work together to reform the budget process … expose every earmark to the light of day and to a vote in Congress … and cut the number and cost of earmarks at least in half by the end of this session.


Finally, to keep this economy strong we must take on the challenge of entitlements. Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are commitments of conscience – and so it is our duty to keep them permanently sound. Yet we are failing in that duty – and this failure will one day leave our children with three bad options: huge tax increases, huge deficits, or huge and immediate cuts in benefits. Everyone in this Chamber knows this to be true – yet somehow we have not found it in ourselves to act. So let us work together and do it now. With enough good sense and good will, you and I can fix Medicare and Medicaid – and save Social Security.


Spreading opportunity and hope in America also requires public schools that give children the knowledge and character they need in life. Five years ago, we rose above partisan differences to pass the No Child Left Behind Act – preserving local control, raising standards in public schools, and holding those schools accountable for results. And because we acted, students are performing better in reading and math, and minority students are closing the achievement gap.


Now the task is to build on this success, without watering down standards … without taking control from local communities … and without backsliding and calling it reform. We can lift student achievement even higher by giving local leaders flexibility to turn around failing schools … and by giving families with children stuck in failing schools the right to choose something better. We must increase funds for students who struggle – and make sure these children get the special help they need. And we can make sure our children are prepared for the jobs of the future, and our country is more competitive, by strengthening math and science skills. The No Child Left Behind Act has worked for America’s children – and I ask Congress to reauthorize this good law.


A future of hope and opportunity requires that all our citizens have affordable and available healthcare. When it comes to healthcare, government has an obligation to care for the elderly, the disabled, and poor children. We will meet those responsibilities. For all other Americans, private health insurance is the best way to meet their needs. But many Americans cannot afford a health insurance policy.


Tonight, I propose two new initiatives to help more Americans afford their own insurance. First, I propose a standard tax deduction for health insurance that will be like the standard tax deduction for dependents. Families with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $15,000 of their income. Single Americans with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $7,500 of their income. With this reform, more than 100 million men, women, and children who are now covered by employer-provided insurance will benefit from lower tax bills.


At the same time, this reform will level the playing field for those who do not get health insurance through their job. For Americans who now purchase health insurance on their own, my proposal would mean a substantial tax savings – $4,500 for a family of four making $60,000 a year. And for the millions of other Americans who have no health insurance at all, this deduction would help put a basic private health insurance plan within their reach. Changing the tax code is a vital and necessary step to making healthcare affordable for more Americans.


My second proposal is to help the states that are coming up with innovative ways to cover the uninsured. States that make basic private health insurance available to all their citizens should receive federal funds to help them provide this coverage to the poor and the sick. I have asked the Secretary of Health and Human Services to work with Congress to take existing federal funds and use them to create “Affordable Choices” grants. These grants would give our Nation’s governors more money and more flexibility to get private health insurance to those most in need.


There are many other ways that Congress can help. We need to expand Health Savings Accounts … help small businesses through Association Health Plans … reduce costs and medical errors with better information technology … encourage price transparency … and protect good doctors from junk lawsuits by passing medical liability reform. And in all we do, we must remember that the best healthcare decisions are made not by government and insurance companies, but by patients and their doctors.


Extending hope and opportunity in our country requires an immigration system worthy of America – with laws that are fair and borders that are secure. When laws and borders are routinely violated, this harms the interests of our country. To secure our border, we are doubling the size of the Border Patrol – and funding new infrastructure and technology.


Yet even with all these steps, we cannot fully secure the border unless we take pressure off the border – and that requires a temporary worker program. We should establish a legal and orderly path for foreign workers to enter our country to work on a temporary basis. As a result, they won’t have to try to sneak in – and that will leave border agents free to chase down drug smugglers, and criminals, and terrorists. We will enforce our immigration laws at the worksite, and give employers the tools to verify the legal status of their workers – so there is no excuse left for violating the law. We need to uphold the great tradition of the melting pot that welcomes and assimilates new arrivals. And we need to resolve the status of the illegal immigrants who are already in our country – without animosity and without amnesty.


Convictions run deep in this Capitol when it comes to immigration. Let us have a serious, civil, and conclusive debate – so that you can pass, and I can sign, comprehensive immigration reform into law.


Extending hope and opportunity depends on a stable supply of energy that keeps America’s economy running and America’s environment clean. For too long our Nation has been dependent on foreign oil. And this dependence leaves us more vulnerable to hostile regimes, and to terrorists – who could cause huge disruptions of oil shipments … raise the price of oil … and do great harm to our economy.


It is in our vital interest to diversify America’s energy supply – and the way forward is through technology. We must continue changing the way America generates electric power – by even greater use of clean coal technology … solar and wind energy … and clean, safe nuclear power. We need to press on with battery research for plug-in and hybrid vehicles, and expand the use of clean diesel vehicles and biodiesel fuel. We must continue investing in new methods of producing ethanol – using everything from wood chips, to grasses, to agricultural wastes.


We have made a lot of progress, thanks to good policies in Washington and the strong response of the market. Now even more dramatic advances are within reach. Tonight, I ask Congress to join me in pursuing a great goal. Let us build on the work we have done and reduce gasoline usage in the United States by 20 percent in the next ten years – thereby cutting our total imports by the equivalent of three-quarters of all the oil we now import from the Middle East.


To reach this goal, we must increase the supply of alternative fuels, by setting a mandatory Fuels Standard to require 35 billion gallons of renewable and alternative fuels in 2017 – this is nearly five times the current target. At the same time, we need to reform and modernize fuel economy standards for cars the way we did for light trucks – and conserve up to eight and a half billion more gallons of gasoline by 2017.


Achieving these ambitious goals will dramatically reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but will not eliminate it. So as we continue to diversify our fuel supply, we must also step up domestic oil production in environmentally sensitive ways. And to further protect America against severe disruptions to our oil supply, I ask Congress to double the current capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.


America is on the verge of technological breakthroughs that will enable us to live our lives less dependent on oil. These technologies will help us become better stewards of the environment – and they will help us to confront the serious challenge of global climate change.


A future of hope and opportunity requires a fair, impartial system of justice. The lives of citizens across our Nation are affected by the outcome of cases pending in our federal courts. And we have a shared obligation to ensure that the federal courts have enough judges to hear those cases and deliver timely rulings. As President, I have a duty to nominate qualified men and women to vacancies on the federal bench. And the United States Senate has a duty as well – to give those nominees a fair hearing, and a prompt up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.


For all of us in this room, there is no higher responsibility than to protect the people of this country from danger. Five years have come and gone since we saw the scenes and felt the sorrow that terrorists can cause. We have had time to take stock of our situation. We have added many critical protections to guard the homeland. We know with certainty that the horrors of that September morning were just a glimpse of what the terrorists intend for us – unless we stop them.


With the distance of time, we find ourselves debating the causes of conflict and the course we have followed. Such debates are essential when a great democracy faces great questions. Yet one question has surely been settled – that to win the war on terror we must take the fight to the enemy.


From the start, America and our allies have protected our people by staying on the offense. The enemy knows that the days of comfortable sanctuary, easy movement, steady financing, and free flowing communications are long over. For the terrorists, life since Nine-Eleven has never been the same.


Our success in this war is often measured by the things that did not happen. We cannot know the full extent of the attacks that we and our allies have prevented – but here is some of what we do know: We stopped an al Qaeda plot to fly a hijacked airplane into the tallest building on the West Coast. We broke up a Southeast Asian terrorist cell grooming operatives for attacks inside the United States. We uncovered an al Qaeda cell developing anthrax to be used in attacks against America. And just last August, British authorities uncovered a plot to blow up passenger planes bound for America over the Atlantic Ocean. For each life saved, we owe a debt of gratitude to the brave public servants who devote their lives to finding the terrorists and stopping them.


Every success against the terrorists is a reminder of the shoreless ambitions of this enemy. The evil that inspired and rejoiced in Nine-Eleven is still at work in the world. And so long as that is the case, America is still a Nation at war.


In the minds of the terrorists, this war began well before September 11th, and will not end until their radical vision is fulfilled. And these past five years have given us a much clearer view of the nature of this enemy. Al Qaeda and its followers are Sunni extremists, possessed by hatred and commanded by a harsh and narrow ideology. Take almost any principle of civilization, and their goal is the opposite. They preach with threats … instruct with bullets and bombs … and promise paradise for the murder of the innocent.


Our enemies are quite explicit about their intentions. They want to overthrow moderate governments, and establish safe havens from which to plan and carry out new attacks on our country. By killing and terrorizing Americans, they want to force our country to retreat from the world and abandon the cause of liberty. They would then be free to impose their will and spread their totalitarian ideology. Listen to this warning from the late terrorist Zarqawi: “We will sacrifice our blood and bodies to put an end to your dreams, and what is coming is even worse.” And Osama bin Laden declared: “Death is better than living on this Earth with the unbelievers among us.”


These men are not given to idle words, and they are just one camp in the Islamist radical movement. In recent times, it has also become clear that we face an escalating danger from Shia extremists who are just as hostile to America, and are also determined to dominate the Middle East. Many are known to take direction from the regime in Iran, which is funding and arming terrorists like Hezbollah – a group second only to al Qaeda in the American lives it has taken.


The Shia and Sunni extremists are different faces of the same totalitarian threat. But whatever slogans they chant, when they slaughter the innocent, they have the same wicked purposes. They want to kill Americans … kill democracy in the Middle East … and gain the weapons to kill on an even more horrific scale.


In the sixth year since our Nation was attacked, I wish I could report to you that the dangers have ended. They have not. And so it remains the policy of this government to use every lawful and proper tool of intelligence, diplomacy, law enforcement, and military action to do our duty, to find these enemies, and to protect the American people.


This war is more than a clash of arms – it is a decisive ideological struggle, and the security of our Nation is in the balance. To prevail, we must remove the conditions that inspire blind hatred, and drove 19 men to get onto airplanes and come to kill us. What every terrorist fears most is human freedom – societies where men and women make their own choices, answer to their own conscience, and live by their hopes instead of their resentments. Free people are not drawn to violent and malignant ideologies – and most will choose a better way when they are given a chance. So we advance our own security interests by helping moderates, reformers, and brave voices for democracy. The great question of our day is whether America will help men and women in the Middle East to build free societies and share in the rights of all humanity. And I say, for the sake of our own security . . . we must.
In the last two years, we have seen the desire for liberty in the broader Middle East – and we have been sobered by the enemy’s fierce reaction. In 2005, the world watched as the citizens of Lebanon raised the banner of the Cedar Revolution … drove out the Syrian occupiers … and chose new leaders in free elections. In 2005, the people of Afghanistan defied the terrorists and elected a democratic legislature. And in 2005, the Iraqi people held three national elections – choosing a transitional government … adopting the most progressive, democratic constitution in the Arab world … and then electing a government under that constitution. Despite endless threats from the killers in their midst, nearly 12 million Iraqi citizens came out to vote in a show of hope and solidarity we should never forget.


A thinking enemy watched all of these scenes, adjusted their tactics, and in 2006 they struck back. In Lebanon, assassins took the life of Pierre Gemayel, a prominent participant in the Cedar Revolution. And Hezbollah terrorists, with support from Syria and Iran, sowed conflict in the region and are seeking to undermine Lebanon’s legitimately elected government. In Afghanistan, Taliban and al Qaeda fighters tried to regain power by regrouping and engaging Afghan and NATO forces. In Iraq, al Qaeda and other Sunni extremists blew up one of the most sacred places in Shia Islam – the Golden Mosque of Samarra. This atrocity, directed at a Muslim house of prayer, was designed to provoke retaliation from Iraqi Shia – and it succeeded. Radical Shia elements, some of whom receive support from Iran, formed death squads. The result was a tragic escalation of sectarian rage and reprisal that continues to this day.


This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we are in. Every one of us wishes that this war were over and won. Yet it would not be like us to leave our promises unkept, our friends abandoned, and our own security at risk. Ladies and gentlemen: On this day, at this hour, it is still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle. So let us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory.


We are carrying out a new strategy in Iraq – a plan that demands more from Iraq’s elected government, and gives our forces in Iraq the reinforcements they need to complete their mission. Our goal is a democratic Iraq that upholds the rule of law, respects the rights of its people, provides them security, and is an ally in the war on terror.


In order to make progress toward this goal, the Iraqi government must stop the sectarian violence in its capital. But the Iraqis are not yet ready to do this on their own. So we are deploying reinforcements of more than 20,000 additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq. The vast majority will go to Baghdad, where they will help Iraqi forces to clear and secure neighborhoods, and serve as advisers embedded in Iraqi Army units. With Iraqis in the lead, our forces will help secure the city by chasing down terrorists, insurgents, and roaming death squads. And in Anbar province – where al Qaeda terrorists have gathered and local forces have begun showing a willingness to fight them – we are sending an additional 4,000 United States Marines, with orders to find the terrorists and clear them out. We did not drive al Qaeda out of their safe haven in Afghanistan only to let them set up a new safe haven in a free Iraq.


The people of Iraq want to live in peace, and now is the time for their government to act. Iraq’s leaders know that our commitment is not open ended. They have promised to deploy more of their own troops to secure Baghdad – and they must do so. They have pledged that they will confront violent radicals of any faction or political party. They need to follow through, and lift needless restrictions on Iraqi and Coalition forces, so these troops can achieve their mission of bringing security to all of the people of Baghdad. Iraq’s leaders have committed themselves to a series of benchmarks to achieve reconciliation – to share oil revenues among all of Iraq’s citizens … to put the wealth of Iraq into the rebuilding of Iraq … to allow more Iraqis to re-enter their nation’s civic life … to hold local elections … and to take responsibility for security in every Iraqi province. But for all of this to happen, Baghdad must be s ecured. And our plan will help the Iraqi government take back its capital and make good on its commitments.


My fellow citizens, our military commanders and I have carefully weighed the options. We discussed every possible approach. In the end, I chose this course of action because it provides the best chance of success. Many in this chamber understand that America must not fail in Iraq – because you understand that the consequences of failure would be grievous and far reaching.


If American forces step back before Baghdad is secure, the Iraqi government would be overrun by extremists on all sides. We could expect an epic battle between Shia extremists backed by Iran, and Sunni extremists aided by al Qaeda and supporters of the old regime. A contagion of violence could spill out across the country – and in time the entire region could be drawn into the conflict.


For America, this is a nightmare scenario. For the enemy, this is the objective. Chaos is their greatest ally in this struggle. And out of chaos in Iraq, would emerge an emboldened enemy with new safe havens… new recruits … new resources … and an even greater determination to harm America. To allow this to happen would be to ignore the lessons of September 11th and invite tragedy. And ladies and gentlemen, nothing is more important at this moment in our history than for America to succeed in the Middle East … to succeed in Iraq … and to spare the American people from this danger.


This is where matters stand tonight, in the here and now. I have spoken with many of you in person. I respect you and the arguments you have made. We went into this largely united – in our assumptions, and in our convictions. And whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure. Our country is pursuing a new strategy in Iraq – and I ask you to give it a chance to work. And I ask you to support our troops in the field – and those on their way.


The war on terror we fight today is a generational struggle that will continue long after you and I have turned our duties over to others. That is why it is important to work together so our Nation can see this great effort through. Both parties and both branches should work in close consultation. And this is why I propose to establish a special advisory council on the war on terror, made up of leaders in Congress from both political parties. We will share ideas for how to position America to meet every challenge that confronts us. And we will show our enemies abroad that we are united in the goal of victory.


One of the first steps we can take together is to add to the ranks of our military – so that the American Armed Forces are ready for all the challenges ahead. Tonight I ask the Congress to authorize an increase in the size of our active Army and Marine Corps by 92,000 in the next five years. A second task we can take on together is to design and establish a volunteer Civilian Reserve Corps. Such a corps would function much like our military reserve. It would ease the burden on the Armed Forces by allowing us to hire civilians with critical skills to serve on missions abroad when America needs them. And it would give people across America who do not wear the uniform a chance to serve in the defining struggle of our time.


Americans can have confidence in the outcome of this struggle – because we are not in this struggle alone. We have a diplomatic strategy that is rallying the world to join in the fight against extremism. In Iraq, multinational forces are operating under a mandate from the United Nations – and we are working with Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the Gulf States to increase support for Iraq’s government. The United Nations has imposed sanctions on Iran, and made it clear that the world will not allow the regime in Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons. With the other members of the Quartet – the UN, the European Union, and Russia – we are pursuing diplomacy to help bring peace to the Holy Land, and pursuing the establishment of a democratic Palestinian state living side-by-side with Israel in peace and security. In Afghanistan, NATO has taken the lead in turning back the Taliban and al Qaeda offensive – the first time the Alliance has deployed forces outside the North Atlantic area. Together with our partners in China, Japan, Russia, and South Korea, we are pursuing intensive diplomacy to achieve a Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons. And we will continue to speak out for the cause of freedom in places like Cuba, Belarus, and Burma – and continue to awaken the conscience of the world to save the people of Darfur.


American foreign policy is more than a matter of war and diplomacy. Our work in the world is also based on a timeless truth: To whom much is given, much is required. We hear the call to take on the challenges of hunger, poverty, and disease – and that is precisely what America is doing. We must continue to fight HIV/AIDS, especially on the continent of Africa – and because you funded our Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the number of people receiving life-saving drugs has grown from 50,000 to more than 800,000 in three short years. I ask you to continue funding our efforts to fight HIV/AIDS. I ask you to provide $1.2 billion over five years so we can combat malaria in 15 African countries. I ask that you fund the Millennium Challenge Account, so that American aid reaches the people who need it, in nations where democracy is on the rise and corruption is in retreat. And let us continue to support the expanded trade and debt re lief that are the best hope for lifting lives and eliminating poverty.


When America serves others in this way, we show the strength and generosity of our country. These deeds reflect the character of our people. The greatest strength we have is the heroic kindness, courage, and self sacrifice of the American people. You see this spirit often if you know where to look – and tonight we need only look above to the gallery.


Dikembe Mutombo grew up in Africa, amid great poverty and disease. He came to Georgetown University on a scholarship to study medicine – but Coach John Thompson got a look at Dikembe and had a different idea. Dikembe became a star in the NBA, and a citizen of the United States. But he never forgot the land of his birth – or the duty to share his blessings with others. He has built a brand new hospital in his hometown. A friend has said of this good hearted man: “Mutombo believes that God has given him this opportunity to do great things.” And we are proud to call this son of the Congo our fellow American.


After her daughter was born, Julie Aigner-Clark searched for ways to share her love of music and art with her child. So she borrowed some equipment, and began filming children’s videos in her basement. The Baby Einstein Company was born – and in just five years her business grew to more than $20 million in sales. In November 2001, Julie sold Baby Einstein to the Walt Disney Company, and with her help Baby Einstein has grown into a $200 million business. Julie represents the great enterprising spirit of America. And she is using her success to help others – producing child safety videos with John Walsh of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Julie says of her new project: “I believe it’s the most important thing that I’ve ever done. I believe that children have the right to live in a world that is safe.” We are pleased to welcome this talented business entrepreneur and generous social entrepreneur – Julie A igner-Clark.


Three weeks ago, Wesley Autrey was waiting at a Harlem subway station with his two little girls, when he saw a man fall into the path of a train. With seconds to act, Wesley jumped onto the tracks … pulled the man into a space between the rails … and held him as the train passed right above their heads. He insists he’s not a hero. Wesley says: “We got guys and girls overseas dying for us to have our freedoms. We got to show each other some love.” There is something wonderful about a country that produces a brave and humble man like Wesley Autrey.


Tommy Rieman was a teenager pumping gas in Independence, Kentucky, when he enlisted in the United States Army. In December 2003, he was on a reconnaissance mission in Iraq when his team came under heavy enemy fire. From his Humvee, Sergeant Rieman returned fire – and used his body as a shield to protect his gunner. He was shot in the chest and arm, and received shrapnel wounds to his legs – yet he refused medical attention, and stayed in the fight. He helped to repel a second attack, firing grenades at the enemy’s position. For his exceptional courage, Sergeant Rieman was awarded the Silver Star. And like so many other Americans who have volunteered to defend us, he has earned the respect and gratitude of our whole country.


In such courage and compassion, ladies and gentlemen, we see the spirit and character of America – and these qualities are not in short supply. This is a decent and honorable country – and resilient, too. We have been through a lot together. We have met challenges and faced dangers, and we know that more lie ahead. Yet we can go forward with confidence – because the State of our Union is strong … our cause in the world is right … and tonight that cause goes on.

Posted in Uncategorized

6 Weeks to Get a Passport, County Clerk Warns.

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From The County Clerk’s Office. (Edited)  January 23, 2007 Previous Interview with Timothy Idoni included: As WPCNR reported in an interview with Westchester County Clerk Timothy Idoni nine months ago, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 requirements for border crossings went into effect today.  This federal act, aimed at tightening borders and facilitating efficient passage in and out of the United States, requires that air travelers possess a passport to travel into the United States as of today.  The requirement will be extended to cover land and sea crossings as early as January 1, 2008.  Residents who may have traveled to the United States from Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, and the Caribbean using only a birth certificate and a driver’s license for identification in the past may be surprised to find out that as of January 23, 2007, a passport is required.



Westchester County Clerk Timothy Idoni urged residents not to wait until the last minute to apply for passports and to be prepared with the necessary documentation.  “Routine passport applications generally take approximately six weeks.  As a result, applicants should review our website or call us to be sure that they bring the proper documentation, including original documents with raised seals, to avoid having to make a second trip to our office.” 


            Applicants must provide proof of identity, proof of citizenship and passport photos.  Children must be present when their passport is being applied for.  Specific requirements are outlined on the Westchester County Clerk’s website at www.westchesterclerk.com or can be obtained by calling the office at 995-3086.  The fee for an adult passport (age 16 and over) is $97.00 and the fee for a child’s passport (from birth to age 15) is $82.00. If a passport is needed in fewer than six weeks, an expedite fee of $60.00 per application can be paid in order to decrease the processing time to three weeks.


With new passport requirements in effect as of January 23, 2007, Westchester County Clerk Timothy C. Idoni is reminding Westchester residents to renew or obtain a United States passport now to avoid any inconvenience when traveling.  “We recognize that national efforts to provide for safe and secure air travel may cause inconvenience to travelers without United States Passports,” stated Idoni.  “And so we wanted to remind residents that our office is available to assist them in obtaining their passport.”


The Office of the Westchester County Clerk, which serves as an agent for the United States Department of State, processes U.S. Passport Applications in their office located at 110 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. in White Plains between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  For more information, or for a copy of the 2006 Annual Report, please visit our website at www.westchesterclerk.com or contact Executive Deputy County Clerk Eileen Songer McCarthy at (914)995-4287 or esm2@westchestergov.com. 


 


Timothy Idoni on Passporting, May 6, 2006:


 


Here is what the Count Clerk had to say about passports in WPCNR’s original interview with him last May on the new passport policies:


 













WPCNR: What are the new requirements for persons traveling to the Americas and other international destinations as of January 1, 2007?

Mr. Idoni: You always needed a (U.S.) Passport to go anywhere besides the Americas, those plans stay in place. But, to travel by air and by sea, beginning January 1st of next year, you must have a passport to any place in the world outside of the United States of America.
Whether it be Canada, Mexico, if you’re flying to Toronto (Cananda) for some reason during the day, you’re going to need a passport. If you’re flying to the Bahamas, you’re going to need a passport. In the past a birth certificate as sufficient. That is no longer going to be the case.
       It’s very important that every U.S. Citizen, man, woman and child gets a passport for identification purposes in our opinion.
       And, on December 31, 2007 (19 months from now), you’ll need it to pass U.S. borders by car. You may as well get them all now (for your family) in case you’re doing any international traveling in the next twelve months, because twelve months later you’ll need it no matter what.

WPCNR: Even to Mexico, Canada?

Mr. Idoni: Correct.  The  passport is quickly becoming the form of identification internationally and probably will be nationally. It will be so important for you to have a passport to go anywhere outside the United States.  I encourage people to get it because it is a really fine form of identification.
                The federal government does background checks. Most people think the passport is just a book that is sent to you and you have one. They do a background check to make sure you’re an American citizen that you are who you are and you’re not going to be using it for some sort of illicit operation or terrorist purposes.
                We think it is a very fine idea to come in and get one.

WPCNR: What do you think has prompted this, other than the obvious security concerns?

Mr. Idoni: I think obviously international relationships have prompted it, even between Mexico, Canada and the islands. It is very important that these countries know exactly who is coming in and out, and from a United States standpoint. 
              Let me just point out that we have heard some stories of people who have traveled to the Dominican Republic and some of the Central American countries and have problems getting back onto the plane to go back to the United States because they don’t have the passport to show the agents as they’re getting on to the plane to get back to their native country. Because it’s such a good identification form, it’s important we encourage everybody to do this.

WPCNR: Your assistant told me there are new requirements for getting passports for minors. Could you explain?

Mr. Idoni: Sure. Children under the age of 14 years require both parents to appear with the child to apply for the (child’s) passport with a valid i.d. If one of the parents cannot come in, the absent parent has to send a notarized consent form to permit the other (present) parent to apply for the passport for their child.

For children 14 to 16 need to come in with one parent with a valid i.d. Fees: adults 16 years and up it is $97. Minors up to 15, $82. Photos are $10 to be taken here (at the County Clerk’s office). If you want it by overnight mail it’s $14.40 extra. Expedited form passport is $60. Expedited means you get it in less than four weeks.

The County Clerk’s office isn’t the only place you can get a passport. You can get them at local post offices, we just happen to think we do a superior job here at the County Clerk’s office
.

WPCNR: Are you anticipating long waiting periods?

Mr. Idoni: The waiting periods  are basically the same. They (the State Department) guarantee less than six weeks. We’ve very rarely seen anybody take more than four weeks, quite honestly. We don’t recommend the expedited if its four weeks or more you have to wait (until you travel).  Anything less than four weeks, you’re probably better off going with the expedited fee.

WPCNR: What about emergencies?

Mr. Idoni:  If you have an emergency situation, you can get a passport within 48 hours, but you have to call the passport office in Norwalk, Connecticut, directly, and they do it by appointment. They will make an appointment for you and you can go up and explain the situation. Nobody can get a passport in less than two weeks unless you can show proof that you’re flying in 14 days. They will not give it to you because you want it that fast you have to prove a reason for having it.

WPCNR: What is needed to get a first passport?

Mr. Idoni: You’re required to have a birth certificate, an old passport, or a naturalization certificate. Two photos, 2 inch by 2 inch on a white background, and a driver’s license or a federal or state identification card.

WPCNR: What does an American citizen have to do to get a passport under the new guidelines?

Mr. Idoni: There are really no changes. Give as much information as the form requires. It is not difficult at all. You just have to be able to identify yourself that is the most important thing. A lot of people come in, they don’t have a driver’s license, which is the easiest identification to use.  You’re required to bring in someone you’ve known for at least two years who does have a driver’s license so we can do a background check on that person and two other forms of I.D.: they can be a social security card, credit card, learner’s permit, driver’s permit, an employee i.d., a school i.d., library card,  health insurance card – any two forms of  identification with another person who will vouch for you.

WPCNR: Do you anticipate any rush or more delays because of these new rules (and a rush to get passports)?

Mr. Idoni: We don’t expect delays in terms of the processing (by the state department). What we do expect is longer lines of people coming in for passports because of the changes, especially at times of year when students are on their mid winter breaks or spring breaks, they’ll be coming six to eight weeks before hand in order to get their passports. We’re encouraging people to do it on the offseason to come in as soon as possible to get their passports because while you probably get it in six weeks, you’ll stay in line longer. We’re recommending people get passports as soon as possible. It’s good for ten years, it’s not like you’re wasting money getting it sooner rather than later.

WPCNR: What documents do legal aliens need to move into and out of the United States?

Mr. Idoni: We’re not responsible for that. Generally they travel on Visas which are not handled by the County Clerk’s Office. They would probably go to their own consulate.

WPCNR: What advice do you have on passports for Westchester residents?

Mr. Idoni: This is going to be the primary form of identification over the next decade internationally. You should certainly have one, carry it with you whenever you’re going to any place in the least bit sensitive that wants a great form of identification. A passport is better than a driver’s license when it comes to I.D. They’re very hard to duplicate. Where there are a lot of phony driver’s licenses out there. There aren’t many phony passports. It’s  also important for people to have the best kind of identification in emergency situations.

WPCNR: As of January 1, 2007, take me through what I will face leaving and reentering the country.

Mr. Idoni: I don’t think you’re going to see much changes in the customs situations. We have not received any information that they’re going to make any draconian change in the customs. Security has been picked up dramatically over the years on airports and cruise ships.

One of the things I’ve been told is that a number of cruise lines are asking for passports even if they’re not going any place. If they’re just taking a cruise out into the ocean and coming back to a New York port, they’re still asking for a passport because you’re going into international waters. You really should check with your cruise lines to see if they require it (a passport).

You will need a passport to leave the United States.

WPCNR: Have the new passport requirements necessitated any changes in the County Clerk’s office and the way you’re set up for it?

Mr. Idoni: We think we have the best operation here in terms of passports. We (the Westchester County Clerk’s Office) process more passports than anybody in this region (NY, Connecticut and New Jersey). There are only 17 regional offices in the country, and a lot of passports are processed by the Norwalk office. We are their number one provider of passport applicants. We do over 5,000 a year. We’re ready for the next rush, and we do believe there’s going to be a rush.

WPCNR: What other places in the area can you get a passport?

Mr. Idoni: Every single United States Post office,  but you’d have to provide your own photographs. We can do it right here for you.


 


The County Clerk’s Office is accessible from the Westchester County Court House entrance on Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard, and is open five days a week. You will be processed through the courthouse security check and be directed to the third floor where you follow the hall signs to the clerk’s office.

The County Clerk’s office is not accessible from the Michaelian Building by the public.  For more information on line, you may contact the clerk’s office website at www.westchesterclerk.com.


 













 



 



 














Options

Posted in Uncategorized

Bradley Budget Reforms Go to Senate.

Hits: 0

WPCNR’S ADAM IN ALBANY. By Assemblyman Adam T. Bradley, 89th L.D. January 23, 2007: I am pleased to announce an agreement on a variety of measures to improve our state’s budget process.  The Assembly passed A.2755, which I sponsored, that will ensure greater transparency and fiscal responsibility.  Throughout my tenure, I have continually advocated for more transparency in our budget process, but for too long, secrecy was the norm and the budget process lacked fiscal restraint, contributing to the steady rise of our middle-class taxes.   We finally appear ready to push through these common-sense reforms.

One important reform proposed is shining some light on how the annual $200 million in “lump sum” appropriations is distributed.  In the past, Governor Pataki simply provided each house with sums of money for local initiatives and the funds were later distributed.  This agreement now will require each dollar to be outlined in the budget so the public, the legislature and governor can see how the money is being allocated.  While this money is vital for our local communities, the practice was shrouded in secrecy and there was no accountability. 


 


Other reforms outlined in the legislation include:


 


·        Requiring the legislature to enact a balanced budget instead of proposing a balanced budget;


·        Requiring that the fiscal impact of the budget on local governments be determined;


·        Requiring the legislature to explain the fiscal impact of any changes made in the budget to the public;


·        Increasing the state’s Rainy Day Reserve fund from 2 percent of general fund expenditures to 5 percent;


·        Directing the state comptroller to establish a revenue forecast by March 5 if the governor and legislature fail to agree on a forecast by March 1; and


·        Requiring the executive and legislative branches to meet quarterly to update financial plans.


 


Since my first days in Albany I have been pushing to reform the way state government works – we successfully opened up budget negotiations through public hearings and we passed two, consecutive on-time budgets.  This legislation moves us closer to ensuring that we not only have on-time budgets every year, but that the process is transparent and produces balanced budgets. 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Torches Needed. Superficial Survey prelude to Strategic Plan Meeting Wednesday

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS  News & Commentary By John F. Bailey. January 22, 2007: Mr. and Mrs. And Ms. White Plains have just five days to complete the Looking to the Future Survey issued by the City School District that seeks WP residents’ views “about our past performance and our future challenges,” that will be “shared with the team developing our plan for the future.” The survey is available online at www.whiteplainspublicschools.org and your answers may be submitted on that website. The District also reports the members of the Core Strategic Planning Group have not as yet, been determined. Availabilities of candidates are now being sought by the district.


 


WPCNR has learned the survey was only made available online, and is not translated in Spanish on the website. The content is troubling.


The survey was developed by Transformation Systems, Ltd., a strategic planning consultant to the school district. TSL was commissioned to guide the district and help it develop a strategic plan development for the next 5 to 10 years at a cost of $70,000. (Approximately $35-$40,000 of that fee will be refunded to the district by BOCES.  Transformation Systems handles strategic planning for school districts and countries all over the world.)


 


Distribition Limited.


 


The survey has been made available online only, and not mailed to residents of the city. It was not publicized in the  December About Our Schools Newsletter about its availability on line. The only copy is available electronically on the www.whiteplainspublicschools.org website. But it is not translated into Spanish. Residents have until Friday of this week to online their answers.


 


Residents without a computer to voice their opinions, have to descend en masse to the White Plains High School Wednesday evening to make known issues they feel the district should deal with over the next ten years


 


However, in this reporter’s opinion, the survey will not expose problems, but earn  a pat on the back from citizens for “a job well done.”


 


No Depth.


 


When I punched it up on the website, I plunged right in only to have my jaw drop on my keyboard  when I discovered it was five statements long. This reporter can name 21 issues this school district needs to probe and mull and address off the top of my head.


 


It’s how the survey is designed that is disturbing.


 


There are five statements, phrased in the term of absolute statements. You’re asked to “Strongly Agree,” “Agree,” “Disagree,” “Strongly Disagree.” The statements highlight areas planners perhaps can ask questions about during the World Café meeting Wednesday.


 


I would hope so, because who in their right mind would “Strongly Disagree” with these statements:


 



  1. Classes are small and allow individual attention to students.
  2. School facilities are an asset.
  3. Our curriculum encourages critical thinking and provides a solid academic program.
  4. Our extra-curricular and athletic programs provide enrichment opportunities for students.
  5. Overall, White Plains Schools’ services and programs are high quality and well managed.
  6. For any statement with which you disagreed, please give specific reasons so we can work to improve.

 


 


The first five  force the White Plains parent or resident to be negative to highlight a concern.  Notice of the survey was telephoned to parents of school attendees in a tape-recorded telephone call last week via the school district call-out notification system. All residents of the city were not telephoned.


 


Looking for Positive Reinforcement


 


Who would not want to have small classes? Who would not agree  that school facilities are an asset that our curriculum is solid, or say they are against extra-curricular activities and sports, that the services and programs are not high quality and well-managed? Who would know if you were not a parent?  


 


Many will simply check agree and send in the survey with some comments. You have to be really in tune with what is going on in the district to not agree to these rosy scenario statements.


  


Now, suppose you do disagree. Well you are asked to write up your concern. It will be interesting to see how many comments are generated. However, what most likely will happen is the consultant will report something like this: 


 


Endorsing the past as the future


 


“Of Over 500 persons responding to the survey,  80% of persons completing the survey strongly agreed that “facilities are an asset,” (obliquely justifying building new facilities) or “90% agreed that services and programs are well-managed,” (implying they do not have to be examined and we should add more) and “95% agreed that classes are small and allow individual attention to students,” (endorsing maintaining small classes instead of expanding class size to trim faculty and support staff).” (NOTE THIS IS AN EXAMPLE, NOT FACT)


 


The survey is programmed to return an endorsement of the status quo. It subtly justifies where present management has gotten the district and produces a “public community wide” endorsement for more of the same. It is up to the public to think this one out and come out and voice concerns Wednesday evening.


 


Limits Universe


Proselytizes


 


Most distributing,  this survey was not sent to every resident of the district and it frames discussion in terms of outcomes the district wants and has now (in their opinion).  The issue of what the true position of the school district is in the eyes of the public is not sought.


 


When I saw this survey I was shocked, considering what Dr. Steven Barone of Transformation Systems said in his address to the Board of Education this month about involving critics of the district and identifying negatives. The questions above in Dr. Barone’s company survey do not identify negatives.


 


It asks condescendingly, do you think small classes, buildings (instead of tents supposedly) to go to school in, challenging academics, extra-curricular acitivies, and programs are well managed  are good??????


 


No Demographic Profile Asked


 


There is no effort on the website  to get a demographic profile of the respondent, so the results are meaningless.  You have to wonder the demographics of the persons taking the survey. Respondents might be 95% white and 95% well over the median income,  an effort should be made to survey the minority and lower income segments of the population – with a section identifying your race, income level and what part of town you live.


 


21 Issues Facing the School District


 


 


In case Dr. Barone and his staff have been talking to the client instead of the people,  here are just 21 odd issues any planner should take into account in devising a strategic plan for this district:


 



  1. Tax Base and Rising School Tax Sensitivity of the Populace—employed and retired.
  2. Administration cost oversight
  3. Projected budget growth of the district and tax impact over next 15 years.
  4. Demographics of the School Population, addressing bilingual issues.
  5. Neighborhood Schools—Eliminate busing or retain.
  6. Structure of the School Day – Longer Hours? Summer Program
  7. Future of the existing buildings: Build New, Repair?
  8. Selling of District property, Acquiring New Property.
  9. Partnering with local businesses on academic subjects.
  10. Closing Minority Achievement Gap; Succeeding or Not?
  11. District Maintenance: Outsource or Keep In House
  12. Testing Policies: Balanced, Remedially Effective?
  13. Advanced Placement Courses: Enough? Not enough?
  14. Security Facilities Policies: Adequate or In need of improvement
  15. Student Conduct, Supervision: Dealt With Fairly, Effective Discipline?
  16. Universal Pre-Kindergarten Programs for all.
  17. Expansion of class size
  18. Communication with residents, parents and non-parents.
  19. Representating district concerns to city, county, state government representatives  (lobbying)
  20. Income generating opportunities for the School District through its facilities.
  21. Where should School District allocate its financial resources.

 


 


 


The homework that Transformation Systems has done, based on the survey they created, apparently has not acquainted them with these issues that the district should consider in forming any strategic plan. 


 


Hopefully White Plains citizens will get out their old torches and descend on the high school at 7:30 P.M. Wednesday night and move from table to table and raise issues: talk about them, demand they be addressed.


 


The Runaway Freight


 


Otherwise,  assuming a 9% annual budget increase plus 2.5% inflation a year, the district will continue on the inexorable budget track it is on now. We will see the school district budget reach $410 Million in 2015-2016, which I assure you will become more of an issue every year, unless the school district addresses it.


 


Here is the very rough “basic math.”


 


2007-2008 — $175M


2008-2009 — $191M


2009-2010–  $213M


2010-2011–  $238M


2011-2012 — $265M


2012-2013–  $296M


2013-2014–  $330M


2014-2015 — $368M


2015-2016–  $410M


 


WPCNR will be there Wednesday evening, 7:30 P.M. to see what Mr. and Mrs. And Ms. White Plains really think at the World Café Session at White Plains High School.

Posted in Uncategorized

State of the Arts in Westchester

Hits: 0

WPCNR GALLERIA. From Westchester Arts Council. January 21, 2007: As the government in Albany transitions, Westchester’s New York State Legislators will have the opportunity to discuss their views on the arts with our County’s leading arts administrators during The State of the Arts in New York, a conversation with Dean of the Westchester Legislative Delegation Assemblyman Richard Brodsky and members of the Westchester Delegation.   An awards ceremony during which the Westchester Arts Council will announce the recipients of its Arts Alive Grants for 2007 will follow the discussion. The event will take place at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, January 25, in the Grand Banking Room at the Arts Exchange, 31 Mamaroneck Avenue in White Plains. For more information, please contact Catherine Bruno at (914) 428-4220 x238.

 “Edward Hopper once said that ‘Great art is the outward expression of an inner life of an artist,’” remarks Assemblyman Richard L. Brodsky, D-Greenburgh and Dean of the Westchester Legislative Delegation. “In the same way, ample government funding for the arts is often the outward expression of the interior mechanics and priorities of a legislature. Hopefully, our discussion on January 25th will give local arts leaders a better appreciation of the dynamics of the budget process and better sense of the prospects for arts funding as Albany moves through a transitional period.”



 


The event will kick off with introductory comments by New York State Council on the Arts (NYSCA) Chairman Richard Schwartz and Assemblyman Brodsky, and will be followed by a Q & A, during which audience members will have the opportunity to hear what their legislators have to say about the state of the arts in Westchester County. Participants include Adam Bradley, Ruth Hassell-Thompson, Suzi Oppenheimer, Gary Pretlow, Andrea Stewart-Cousins, and Mike Spano. The public is encouraged to come and listen and to ask questions.   The Q&A will be followed by a brief awards ceremony in honor of the thirty three Arts Alive grantees, who represent a wide cross-section of Westchester’s cultural community.


Arts Alive Grants are awarded in two categories. Arts Alive Project Grants, which are funded by the Decentralization Program of the New York State Council on the Arts, provide financial and technical support for Westchester-based organizations and artists at the grassroots level. As the name indicates, these grants offer project support rather than general operating funds. Priority is given to emerging cultural groups, ethnically based cultural activities, and services to areas where the need is greatest. In Y2006, funds totaling $50,000 will be awarded to groups located throughout the county. Arts Alive Artist Grants are funded by the Artist Tier of the Decentralization Program of the New York State Council on the Arts and provide direct support to artists to create original new work related to the community. The variety of projects that received funding – from outdoor heritage festivals and concerts in parks, to painting workshops for seniors, to community theater productions and fully staged operas- truly show that the arts are thriving in Westchester County.  (Complete listing of grantees and their projects follows the press release).


 


“Arts Alive Grants support cultural activities in communities throughout Westchester, a county with over 1 million residents from various cultures and ethnicities,” says Richard Schwartz, Chairman of the New York State Council on the Arts (NYSCA). “Grants also support the creation of new work, related to the community, by local artists. This past year alone, almost $60,000 has been allocated to the Westchester Arts Council through NYSCA’s Decentralization program.  I would like to commend the Westchester Arts Council for their dedication and service in working in partnership with NYSCA. Together we hope to continue the tradition of a healthy arts environment for Westchester County.”


 


“I am gratified that the Westchester Arts Council strongly supports the work of community-based, grassroots cultural organizations,” says Judy Matson, Chair of the Arts Council’s Grant Committee and Director of Corporate and Community Relations for Fujifilm U.S.A., Inc. “By promoting partnerships between Westchester artists and their communities, while encouraging the participation of people of diverse backgrounds, Arts Alive Grants help make the arts accessible and meaningful to every sector of our community.”


 


Westchester Arts Council, founded in 1965, is the largest, private, not-for-profit arts council in New York State. Its mission is to provide leadership, vision, and support, to ensure the availability, accessibility, and diversity of the arts. In 1998, the Arts Council purchased 31 Mamaroneck Avenue, now known as the Arts Exchange, and has since developed the building as a multi-use resource for artists, cultural organizations, and the community.


 


Y2007 Awardees: Project Grants


1.      Western Hemisphere: The African Diaspora. New Rochelle, with African American Art & Cultural Appreciation Council.


2.      Soiree Musicale Concert Series. White Plains, with Soiree Society of the Arts with Alliance Francais de Westchester.


3.      Westchester Music of the Month Series. Yonkers, with the Artemis Chamber Ensemble.


4.      Facing Life. Yonkers, with artist Lily Schor with Blue Door Art Association.


5.      Concerts for 2007. Ossining, with Collegium Westchester.


6.      Seen and Heard.  Croton-n-Hudson, with Croton Teen Theatre with Croton Council on the Arts.


7.      Three Philharmonic Matinee Concerts w/ an Original Composition, & the Annual Concerto Winners’ Concert. Bronxville, with Fine Arts Orchestral Society of Yonkers.


8.      Free Summer Theater in the Parks. White Plains, with the Fort Hill Players.


9.      Times of Our Lives.  Greenburgh, with Greenburgh Arts and Culture Committee.


10.  Kid’s Short Story Connection. Greenburgh, with the Greenburgh Arts and Culture Committee.


11.  A New Play on the Theme of Cultural Identity. Yonkers, with Hamm & Clov Stage Company.


12.  Four Daytime Chamber Music Concerts. Irvington, with Hudson Valley Music Club.


13.  Advocacy Theatre. Tarrytown, with Jewish Community Center on the Hudson.


14.  Spring Community Outreach Concert. Yorktown Heights, with Kol Rinah.


15.  Singing Harp at St. Mark’s. Elmsford, with Singin Harp with Lagond Music School


16.  Mainstage Concert Series.  Yorktown Heights, with Mainstage Coffeehouse Foundation Corp.


17.  Mohegan Colony Storytelling Festival.  Crompound, with Mohegan Colony Association Storytelling Festival.


18.  The Songs of Praise: Settings of the Te Deum by Dvorak, Haydn and More. Scarsdale, with New Choral Society.


19.  Production of Rigoletto. New Rochelle, with New Rochelle Opera.


20.  The Drum Call African Drum and Dance Program Mount Vernon with O’bey Foundation.


21.  Asian American Heritage Festival 2007. Millwood, with Organization of Chinese Americans.


22.  Peekskill Artist District Open Studios. Peekskill, with Peekskill Arts Council.


23.  Original Dramatic Adaptation of William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Dobbs Ferry, with Red Monkey Theater Group.


24.  The Liar Show. Pleasantville, with Deep End Productions with Richard G. Rosenthal Jewish Community Center.


25.  Three Saint Thomas Orchestra 2007 Concerts. Mamaroneck, with Saint Thomas Orchestra.


26.  American Renaissance and Holiday Series. Ossining, with Sing We Enchanted.


27.  Composers of the Future VI. New Rochelle, with Songcatchers, Inc.


28.  2007 Two-Concert Series. Yorktown Heights, with Taghkanic Chorale.


29.  Community Concert Series. White Plains, with Westchester Symphonic Winds.


30.  Poetry Slam Coffee House-Live @ The White Plains Public Library. White Plains, with White Plains Public Library Foundation.


 


 


Y2007 Awardees: Artist Grants



  1. Jessica DeMauro of Mount Kisco for the com*mu*ni*ty; a ten part evening length dance performance that explores the fundamental aspects that make up the Westchester community
  2. Hilda Green-Demsky of Larchmont for Creating an Exhibition of the Bronx River as a Great Community Resource in Westchester
  3. HEARING SPACE: What Our Ears Can Tell Us about Living Right Here, Right Now; a room-sized sound installation designed to make the residents of Westchester more aware and curious about the local auditory environment by artist Bruce Odland of Croton-on-Hudson.

 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Devices Banned from WP Mid-Terms Named in Letter. No Evidence of Cheating

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. January 20, 2007 UPDATED January 21, 2007 4:30 PM EDT: The White Plains City School District, in a letter received in most homes of parents this morning, has listed the devices banned in  mid-term examination rooms beginning Tuesday and clarified their communication device policy on exams that begin Tuesday with high school midterms — in examination rooms or on supervised “breaks.”


Today Monday, the District reported the ban extends only to high school exams, and that the ban on cellphones and other devices listed below does not apply yet in the two White Plains Middle Schools, Highlands and Eastview or the Elementary Schools.


The District also said no evidence of cheating using electronic devices has been uncovered at the high school.


The letter from White Plains High School Ivan Toper reads:


“Your child may not use any communication device while taking a State examination (or local school exam), either in the room where the test is being administered or while on a supervised break (such as a bathroom visit).


Such devices include, but are not limited to, cellular telephones, pagers, CD and audiocassette players, radios, MP3 players, Personal Digital Assistants, video devices, and associated headphones, headset, microphones or earplugs.”


The letter states the following protocol should the student take a cell phone in with them,


” They may not answer it if it rings or vibrates.  If the child’s pager beeps or vibrates, they may not look at it. These and other devices (within the examination room) must be turned off and put away.”


Penalty: Exams invalidated


The penalty for answering a device or using it in an examination room is, “your child’s exmaination will be invalidated and no score will be calculated if they use any such device or related communications technology or if they wear headphones while in the testing room.”


The letter recommends students not bring communication devices of any kind to the exam room. The letter states — “if they do the aforementioned procedure will be followed. Violation of this policy during a state exam requires notification to the Office of State Assessment. Appropriate disciplinary action will be taken following procedural due process.”

Posted in Uncategorized

High School Bans Student use of Cellphones, Hi-Tech Gizmos in Mid-terms

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. January 19, 2007:  WPHS students may not use cellphones and similar electronic gadgets inside an active examination room when WPHS midterms are administered next week. The ban is historic.


 


 


Parents of White Plains High School students received a recorded telephone message Friday from WPHS Principal Ivan Toper alerting them that their students will not be allowed to use cellphones, I-pods, earphones, video devices, mp3 devices, and similar hi-tech devices when they take the school mid-term exams.


 


It could not be determined from the message whether the ban extended down to the White Plains Middle School and Elementary levels.


 


 


Mr. Toper’s message in English only, delivered by the district’s automated call-out system, said New York State has banned use of such devices by students in exam rooms and that students caught answering cellphones, using them for whatever purpose in exam rooms, wearing earphones during a test, among other tech-related “use-modes” will be stopped from taking the test and subject to discipline.


 


Toper’s message said students could have cellphones on their persons in the examination room, but that had to be turned off and could not answered by a student. (WPCNR advises students not to take any electronic devices to school that day if they’re taking an exam, this being the first-time the ban is going to be in effect during exams. You do not want to make a false move.)


 


HI-TECH CHEATS


 


The unprecedented ban comes after a series of news reports detailing how students across the country are using cellphone text messaging, cellphone cameras, and mp3 devices to send questions to classmates outside of an exam room, who then text-message back the answers.


 


The announcement today is the first public news that the high school was even considering such a ban.


 


The New York Times reported in May of 2006 a variety of ways students use electronic devices to cheat on the college level: via Sidekick e-mail devices, with camera and text message exchanges, recording notes on Ipods and playing them back in an exam (a reason for the WPHS “earphone-in-action” ban). The Boston Globe reported on this phenomena as early as 2004.


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

County Declares 85 Court St. as Temporary. Relocation Possible. Timetable ?????

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE HOMELESS NEWS. By John F. Bailey. January 19, 2007: Councilperson Rita Malmud, asked by Mayor Delfino to negotiate a removal of the 85 Court Street homeless shelter with Westchester County reports progress to WPCNR, revealing that the county is considering the shelter “temporary” — her words. Reporting to WPCNR on the results of her meetings with the county so far, Malmud issued this statement:


Mayor Delfino and I spoke about 85 Court Street a few weeks ago when I updated him on talks with County Executive Spano.   These talks were characterized as positive and productive.  I expressed confidence that the status quo would not remain.  Although I forget the specific and exact words used, it was clearly implied that this shelter was not permanent.


Ms. Malmud was asked by WPCNR Thursday in two separate telephone calls whether a new location in White Plains was being considered, whether a location outside White Plains was being looked at, whether better monitoring of the homeless during day was being developed, or even job and employment opportunities were being developed for the 85 Court Street population, but she did not respond to those questions.


Today, WPCNR has asked her for clarification on what the terms “positive and productive” mean, and when she thought it would be resolved.


This is the first time Westchester County has stated publicly that the 85 Court Street shelter is temporary. Previously when asked to remove the shelter by Mayor Joseph Delfino,due to its proximity to the downtown, and documented related incidents,  the county has balked — never indicating they were seeking alternate locations.


Donna Green spokesperson for the Westchester County Department of Communications, when asked if the county was viewing the 85 Court Street Shelter as “temporary” and was seeking to relocate it — something the county has refused to do in the political standoff between the County and the City — Green said “I have no answers for you at this time.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Firefighters Coat Drive

Hits: 0

WPCNR MAIN STREET JOURNAL. From the Mayor’s Office. January 19, 2007: The White Plains Firefighters want to help those in need. Please help them by dropping off your coats, hats, gloves, sweaters, scarves, and
other winter wear now!

They have made it easy. Just drop off any of the items listed above to any of our five White Plains firehouses – all winter long.

Thank you for your support!

White Plains Fire Stations:

Station 1 – Old Mamaroneck Rd./ Gedney Way
422-6305

Station 2 – 20 Ferris Avenue
422-6319

Station 3 – Warren Street & Terrace Avenue
422-6307

Station 7 – 665 North Street
422-6315

Fire HQ – 219 Mamaroneck Avenue
422-6322

Posted in Uncategorized

Traffic Commission Takes Up Double Jeopardy Parking

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE PARKING NEWS. Interview with Al Moroni, Commissioner of Parking with John F. Bailey. January 18, 2007: In response to citizen complaints, The City of White Plains is reviewing its on-street parking policies  that limit parking at downtown on-street meters and on unmetered streets in certain parts of town to the 1 or 2 hour time limits noticed on the meter or by signs,  regardless of whether you “feed the meter” when you park in or move your car to another spot on the same street.


 



Commissioner of Parking, Al Moroni.


 



Present White Plains Meters Do Not Advise Motorists Specifically they can only park for the limit imposed on a specific street once a day.


 


According to Mr. Moroni speaking to WPCNR today, the Traffic Commission has asked the Department of Parking, the Traffic Department and the Law Depart to meet and “to take a look at the ordinance and see what can be done to come up with an ordinance that is enforceable and understandable (to the public).”  Deputy Commissioner of Parking, John Larson said a date for that meeting has not been set.


 





An unspecified number of residents have gotten tickets when they have returned to the downtown, “fed a new meter” and still got a ticket when they parked on the same street they had parked on during their first trip to the downtown, according  to Commissioner of Parking, Al Moroni.


 


He said there have not been many persons this has happened to, but when it does, “it seems so unfair to them, they get pretty upset about it.” If, they return to the downtown and park on a different street at a meter, they would not get a ticket, Moroni said.


 


 


Moroni remarked that there are several issues the Commission is examining in addition to the controversial “Double Jeopardy” parking ordinance.  one  is parking beyond the limit in a parking lot beyond the 1 or 2 hour limit, regardless of whether you come back and feed the meter at the end of the two hours,  you receive a “Beyond the Limit” Ticket. After time has expired, you have to move your car to a garage or another parking lot, and cannot “feed the meter” to stay in the lot if if you move to a different space.


 


The second issue involves streets around the city which are not metered where signs say parking is limited to 1 or 2 hours. Neighborhoods don’t want people working in an adjacent area using their streets for parking for their business, Moroni said.


 


Double Jeopardy Clarification under review by “Task Force”


 


Moroni, whose Deputy Commissioner of Parking, John Larson, attended the Traffic Commission meeting Wednesday morning when the decision reexamine the “Double Jeopardy” issue was made, said “We are wrestling with how do we come up with a more fair way of treating this problem.”


 


The Traffic Commission, WPNCR had learned from a member of the commission, speaking to WPCNR under condition of anonymity, took up the “Double Jeopardy” problem and our original source reports that the commission members all agree it should be changed and it is “under review” as to how the meters can be “resigned” to cut down the possibilities of getting a second ticket even when you’ve fed the meter.


 


It has not been decided whether one of those options is eliminating Double Jeopardy.  Our source said, the talk is to make the meter instructions more explicit to enlighten motorists they can only park once on the same metered street during the meter enforcement times. 


 


White Plains Week First


 


The “Double Jeopardy Ticket” was first exposed by White Plains Week, the controversial Public Access Television news roundup show (cablecast to Mr. and Mrs. White Plains, Fridays at 7 and Mondays at 7:30 on Channel 76) last year.


 


 


Moroni explained how the White Plains street meter parker exposes himself to the “Double Jeopardy” Ticket:


 


“You park on Mamaroneck between Main & Post Road in the A.M . An officer scans your license into his computer at 9:30. You leave. You come back at 1:30 P.M., and park on the same street (Mamaroneck Avenue) but not in the same spot. The parking officer will give you a ticket (even if you have put money in the meter) because you have parked in violation of the beyond the limit of the area.” Moroni said “same area” means “same street.” “That’s how we’re interpreting and enforcing it,” Moroni confirmed.


 


 


The parking meters do not specifically warn you that you cannot park in another meter on the same street.


 


Moroni defended the Double Jeopardy system because he said, that without limiting parking on the same street, people who work in the stores in the downtown will be jockeying  their cars along the street their business is on, taking away space from legitimate shoppers.


 


$15 Fine Signs Placed in The Galleria


 


New signs warning motorists that after the Parking Office is closed in The Galleria, motorists are subject to a $15 fine, instead of the $2 overtime notice, have posted. Mr. Moroni said that $15 has always been in effect, and is not new, just that the signs are.

Posted in Uncategorized