Mayor Sworn In. Malmud’s Full House Trumps Bernstein for Council Pres.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. January 4, 2006: In the business of the Common Council Tuesday evening, Mayor Joseph Delfino was sworn in for a third term as Mayor of White Plains by City Judge Jo Ann Friia. Thomas Roach was sworn in for his second term as Common Councilman, Glen Hockley was sworn in for his first full term as councilman, and Rita Malmud for her fifth term as Common Councilperson.



America’s Favorite Mayor Raises His Right and Places His Hand on The Bible for a Third Term last night. Photo, WPCNR News.


 Malmud as predicted yesterday afternoon by the CitizeNetReporter was elected Common Council President by a vote of 5-2, Councilmen Hockley and Bernstein demurring, over Councilman Arnold Bernstein, who spoke on his own behalf, after nomination by Glen Hockley. Bernstein appeared to have his colleagues and the Mayor squirming in their seats  when he said,


 “I find Councilwoman Malmud, who has served several terms as president competing for the position (of Council President). Selecting a Council President is not supposed to be a popularity contest or subject to machinations of any kind for any reason. There is precedent, a process and tradition to be honored and not in the breech… I have yet to receive a satisfactory or creditable explanation from any of my colleagues, ANY of my colleagues, as to why my right is being challenged. Now I know there was an exception 14 years ago but I have no idea of the reason and interestingly enough it happened to Ms. Malmud. It seems to me that there has to be a serious reason for an exception. I have not been given a straight answer from my colleagues, as to why this is an appropriate time to break with precedent.”



Arnold Bernstein, Making his Speech to the Common Council Colleagues last night. Glen Hockley, left, observes. Photo, WPCNR News.


Nevertheless, Councilman Roach, said it was not a given that those who had not served as Council President should have the position, and that he himself who received the Council Presidency two years ago (after just two years in office), was surprised to be elected. Roach proceeded to nominate Councilwoman Malmud. 


Councilman Boykin noted that several councilpersons in their first term had never served as Council President, notably Bill Brown and William King. Neither Mr. Roach nor Mr. Boykin said why Ms. Malmud was more qualified than Mr. Bernstein, or why they were voting her in. The Common Council President is the city officer who succeeds the Mayor should the Mayor, for any reason, cannot serve. 



A rejected Councilman Bernstein, far right, looks on, as Judge Friia swears in Rita Malmud as Council President, her second term as Council President in 6 years. She held the office in 2001-2002. Mr. Boykin from 2003-2004, and Mr. Roach, 2004-2005. Photo, WPCNR News.


After the council meeting, all councilpersons with the exception of Robert Greer, (who had to leave halfway through the televised council meeting), shared a rich, calorie-packed chocolate ice cream cake with the Mayor in the Mayor’s Conference Room in a most convivial manner.

Posted in Uncategorized

Carhart Neighborhood Association Endorses Hale Ave Condos & Metropolitan Condos.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. January 4, 2006. UPDATED 8:16 A.M. E.S.T.: The public hearings on the Hale Avenue Condominiums on both corners of Hale & Maple Avenues, and the Metropolitan condominium targeted for DeKalb Avenue and Maple received enthusiastic endorsement by the Carhart Neighborhood Association Tuesday evening in the first Council meeting of the new year. The Metropolitan project (89 Units) seems to be cruising for a March approval with no problems on the horizon.


Carhart President Robert Vogel said the association endorsed both projects, and praised Commissioner of Planning Susan Habel in bringing the developers and the neighbors together. Hearings on all three projects were adjourned to February 6. Approvals may very well come as early as March.



The Metropolitan with 89 Condo units in 12 stories, as it appears facing Maple Avenue (bottom of picture), and as it appears on DeKalb Avenue (top picture). Photo, WPCNR News.



The Hale Avenue condos (shown in an overhead here on either side of Hale Avenue) are not out of the woods yet.  The 57 units planned at 111 Hale and 70 in 114 Hale, both 10 story buildings dropping to six stories along both sides of Hale Ave )were put on notice by the Common Council, (speared by Rita Malmud), that the Council would look upon the Hale Avenue condos more favorably if the developer  built his affordable housing units instead of paying a “fee in lieu of.” A feature of the development is the green traffic island planned for the middle of Hale Avenue. Photo by WPCNR News.


The spokesperson for the development group, Hale LLC said that if they were able to purchase a home adjacent to the west building, which they said they were attempting to purchase for an independent appraised price from the owner, they would be more able to build the affordable housing apartments. The owner has not decided whether to take the Hale LLC offer on the house.


What does a home cost in White Plains? The lowest priced home (4 Bedroom, 1 bath) currently on the market in White Plains is on Denison Street and Orawauppum Street off South Lexington Avenue and is priced at $399,600. The highest priced home is in the Rolling Ridge Road area, priced at $2.65 Million.


During the public hearing, former Councilperson Mary Ann Keenan expressed her opinion that the approval of the Hale projects would start a real estate speculation boom in the Carhart neighborhood, one of the last “affordable” neighborhoods in the city.   In the Pinnacle hearing that followed, Mark Weingarten, spokesperson for the Ginsburg Development Group rejected Ms. Keenan’s fears, saying the city had its 2-family lot zoning to project the neighborhood against such incursions by speculators.



The Pinnacle as seen from across City Place (standing at entrance to Target). Photo, WPCNR News.


The Pinnacle presented its Draft Environmental Impact Statement showing the project as it would be constructed to the public for the first time since Martin Ginsberg had struck an accommodation with Cappelli Enterprises in June to build Louis Cappelli’s affordable housing units Cappelli owes the city for the Trump Tower and his 221 Main project. The Pin received lavish praise from the Common Council for its design, with only two residents complaining about the project. Of course, The approval of The Pinnacle has to be executed in order for Mr. Cappelli to receive his certificate of occupancy for 221 Main, so approval of that project is essentially assured.



The Pinnacle Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The project picture shows the Affordable Housing consist of 50 units at the left, and The 23 Story, 230 foot, Pinnacle condominium towers at the right. Retail lines the front of the project on Main Street. The DEIS notes only two more school children would come to the district as a result of the project, and that there would be no impact on traffic, and that it would add $2 Million in property taxes for the city and school district, and $563.000 in sales taxes.  Photo, WPCNR News.


The pungent odor of White Plains sewage floated figuratively to the surface in the course of the public comments on the Pinnacle, when Dan Seidel produced a letter quoting the Department of Public Works Commissioner  that upgrading of the Broadway and Main Street sewer line had to be executed to be able to handle the sewage from The Pinnacle.


Mayor Delfino, when asked by the CitizNetReporter what had to be done to the sewer, relining or new pipes, and what specifically Public Works Commissioner Jospeph Nicoletti recommends, the Mayor said “I don’t know, but whatever needs to be done we’ll do it. Why would you think we would build a building and not do what has to be done?”



The Pinnacle from the steps of City Hall, looking across Main Street. Photo, WPCNR News.



The affordable housing component, foreground, looking West down Main Street. Photo by WPCNR News.



The simulated White Plains skyline looking West from Westchester Avenue gateway. The Pin is the second building from right. Photo, WPCNR News.


The only issue raised by the Common Council was the one way-in, one-way-out parking setup where cars enter and exit the Pin on Main Street. Councilman Glen Hockley called the Pinnacle the most beautiful, elegant building in White Plains and suggested a ball be suspended at the top to give a permanent ball-drop device for New Year’s Eve.

Posted in Uncategorized

Council Begins a New Year With CondoMania, $1,366,354 in 455 Ham Cert, Rita # 1

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. January 3, 2006: Hearings on the condominiums on Maple Avenue begin in seriousness tonight at the Common Council.


 


According to the “backup material,” the Council will approve $1,366,354 in certioraris on the One North Broadway/455 Hamilton Building, a $2.6 Million settlement to the New York City Water Board, and a $600,000 subsidy to build affordable condominium housing at 7 Minerva Place.


 


This evening Glen Hockley, Rita Malmud and Tom Roach will be sworn in for new terms on the Common Council and a new Common Council President will be nominated and elected. WPCNR has learned that Rita Malmud, according to our source, “has the votes” to become Common Council President by a 5-2 margin, usurping Councilman Arnold Bernstein who is the only councilperson who has not held the Presidency.


 


Public hearing will be held on the two Hale Avenue Condominium projects, 97-111 Hale LLC and 100-114 Hale LLC, a hearing will also be held on the  BNE Investors project, The Metropolitan at DeKalb and Maple Avenues, and a hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Martin Ginsberg development, The Pinnacle on Main Street will begin.


  

The Complete Agenda:

 


 


WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. January 3, 2006: Hearings on the condominiums on Maple Avenue begin in seriousness tonight at the Common Council.


 


The Council will also approve $1,366,354 in certioraris on the One North Broadway/455 Hamilton Building


 


This evening Glen Hockley, Rita Malmud and Tom Roach will be sworn in for new terms on the Common Council and a new Common Council President will be nominated and elected. WPCNR has learned that Rita Malmud, according to our source, “has the votes” to become Common Council President by a 5-2 margin, usurping Councilman Arnold Bernstein who is the only councilperson who has not held the Presidency.


 


Public hearing will be held on the two Hale Avenue Condominium projects, 97-111 Hale LLC and 100-114 Hale LLC, a hearing will also be held on the  BNE Investors project, The Metropolitan at DeKalb and Maple Avenues, and a hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Martin Ginsberg development, The Pinnacle on Main Street will begin.


 


The council is also scheduled to approve a $600,000 city subsidizing of affordable condominium housing on 7 Minerva Place. It will also approve a $2.65 Million settlement of a suit against the city by the New York City Water Board brought in 1998. The setllement of $2.65 Million is a saving of about $1.5 Million more that would have been paid had the city lost the suit over water rates, according to the city Legal Department.


 


The Complete Agenda:

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Faces Its Future: The Issues That Won’t go Away.

Hits: 0

WPCNR MAIN STREET JOURNAL. By John F. Bailey. January 2, 2006 (Second In a Series): The issues will be coming at the White Plains Common Council, the City School District,  and the city’s residents and new residents-to-be at a relentless pace. WPCNR continues to identify “incoming” on the city radar which will have to be dealt with in the months and years ahead.


 


 


9. South Lex Revitalization.


 


According to the Mayor the city’s West Side will be next for his latest revitalization plan, however, there is no plan, as has been stated frequently by the Mayor’s Office to this reporter. However, the property owners in that area have been approached for appraisals. Now, how will the residents of South Lexington Avenue and merchants and property owners be involved in forming that plan? After the fact? Or before the fact?


 


10. Affordable Housing.


 


The Lake Street Townhouses, the South Kensico Avenue Senior housing project, senior housing on the post office site are all interesting in that there is no movement on them at this time. More to the point, the city funded the Lake Street Townhouses and the Kensico Avenue sites with grants with no payback requirement and no performance guarantees. In the future the city can expect more affordable housing projects, but with what assurances they will be sturdily capitalized? And where will they be built? How will the population be served with shopping and educational services? What city bureaucracy will be needed to administer the awarding of the below-market rate apartments?


 


11.The School District Infrastructure & $65 Million Bond.


 


Next week, the Board of Education continues consideration of how much of their school facilities renovation and infrastructure plan (the plan is mandated by the state but implementation of recommendations is not required) they want to do. The cost has been stripped down to a “bare bones” $67.5 Million, approximately $40 million of that is earmarked for a redo or a completely new Post Road School and renovation of Loucks and Parker Stadiums. About $25 Million is earmarked for the infrastructure and expansion of the other schools in the district. The bond would add some $500 to school taxes beginning in 2007-2008. Residents should involve themselves in helping the Board make the right calls here.


 


12. 40 Story Development Parcels in the Downtown.


 


The current new zoning for the downtown core provides for limitations on heights of buildings limiting 40 story buildings to assemblages of 300,000 Square Feet. Should some developers acquire properties to string together the required square footage, the prospect of more 40-story buildings in the downtown will be a spectre the Common Council will have to consider.


 


13. Wal-Mart Impact.


 


The nation’s number one retailer is expected to open doors on Main Street in February. (It cannot come soon enough for city hall.) The question that will answer itself with no solution is whether Wal Mart will cannibalize the retail sales of Target, Macy’s and Sears, or supplement them.


 


14.    The Transit System.


 


Mayor Delfino announced in the wake of Election Night triumph that a transit system, rubber-wheeled, of course, will be the next step in the downtown. How this system is planned, operated and paid for will be a significant issue. Frequency of stops and locations of stops has to be seriously considered, otherwise, it will fail like all other transit systems in the city have failed.


 


15.    Planning White Plains.


 


In the next month or so, the Comprehensive Plan Review Committee will submit its final report to the Common Council, and the Citizens Plan Committee will weigh in saying it does not go far enough. However, the vagueness of Comprehensive Plan Review Committee efforts to date as well as the criticisms of their opponents underscores a problem. No one has said specifically, “well, we need more supermarkets, we need a park here, a school there, a mall here, an arena here,” concrete planning suggestions. It is not all about zoning or sketchy building heights. Any planning has to consider what should go here, what do we need, who is coming to live in the city – questions like that – including demographics and educational needs. Planning to date does not address this in a specific way. There is no futuristic model of the city on display.


 


16.    Housing & Population Demographics.


 


In November, 2005, according to a local realtor, the median price of a single family home in Westchester County was $711,700, up from $570,000 in 2002. The median price of a condominium was $390,000, up from $283,500 in three years. The median price of a 2 to 5 family home was $575,000, up from $380,000 in 2002. Our realtor source says the price of one-family homes in White Plains is “slowing down?”


 


Will apartments and condominiums continue to rent and sell briskly?  Will the housing prices in White Plains continue to rise? If they do not, the city tax base will be in serious trouble, necessitating substantial tax increases on residents.


 


The City School District predicts a stable student population over the next five years, but they are right at capacity now. Any demographic uptick in new students brought in by new residents (in apartments and condominiums) is going to require adjustments on the part of the school district. An ongoing demographic analysis of the city’s population changes as they happen should be considered.


 


(To Be Continued)


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Brave New White Plains: Controversial Issues Face White Plains in 2006

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR MAIN STREET JOURNAL. By John F. Bailey. January 1, 2006: On the first day of the New Year, White Plains is poised to continue its brave journey into a future with issues looming that the Common Council, the School District, and residents can choose to make decisions about in a proactive or passive stance. WPCNR presents just some of issues that will matter in the months ahead:


 


 



  1. The New York Presbyterian Hospital Site Plan Renewal –

 


The issue of the proton accelerator-biomedical research project on the NYPH drawing board for three years since its approval in 2002, is up for renewal again with not one shovel of dirt broken on the project. Whether the NYPH will ask for a renewal of the site plan is not known at this time. But why wouldn’t they? A site plan approval in effect is an asset that makes their land more valuable. The Common Council has talked bravely in the past of needing to see some “progress” and “intentions” of the New York Presbyterian Hospital. Last month WPCNR learned the NYPH was going to brief the council on their progress in January. What does the city want now? Will they ask for the commercial-medical zoning in return for park deal as the Mayor suggested two years ago? A hot one for the Six Blind Mice.


 



  1. New Residential Development Approvals.

 


Hale Avenue and DeKalb Avenue Condos come for hearings January 2. Avalon Bay Apartments will be coming in to build about 400 more residential units in the downtown. What will be next and where? Does the Common Council have any position on city development at all? Do they believe in “Development Forever?”


 



  1. The Cappelli Hotel Deal.

 


The Super Developer has told WPCNR at last look he was negotiating with three hoteliers to come into the 221 Main site. But, will the design and structure of the 221 Main complex change again when Louis Cappelli strikes a deal and has to tweak design to accommodate his new partner(s)?


 



  1. The Homeless Housing.

 


As we write, the county and the city are wrangling over where to place the drop-in homeless each night. Does the Common Council want to have a say in this? Can they step up and tell Andy Spano what they think? Or are they going to simply stand aside and go meekly without saying anything about this issue? A little leadership please? Can White Plains do better than the county?


 



  1. The Sales Tax Target.

 


This is the year the City Center development has been operating at full steam. Will Sales Tax continue to grow? Will Wal-Mart come in in February and juice the numbers or cannibalize other retailers, notably Target, Macy’s, Sears? Will we hit the $45 Million level in Sales Tax or higher? What did the Oct-Nov-Dec holiday season bring in? (Hopefully more than last year’s $10,760,486.)  The city budget demands need the sales tax to grow to meet salary, infrastructure, and ballooning budget demands negotiated in the 2005 election year. The well-documented discretion and outright secrecy surrounding sales tax reporting by the city, makes it difficult for the citizenry to judge how development is contributing, though it most certainly is.


 



  1. The School Budget and Certioraris

 


The Tuesday Common Council meeting will not be where the action is this month. The action will be at 5 Homeside Lane where the first “runthrough” on the school budget will be presented at request of the Board of Education which WPCNR predicts will be about $170 Million – meaning that the school budget is on pace to go over $200 Million by the budget year 2009-2009.


 


The School District anticipates $16 Million in new certiorari givebacks by the school district, expected to be approved by the city.   Citizens should participate and educate themselves on the School Budget.


 


 


7. Performing Arts Center Future.


 


White Plains is in danger of losing its White Plains Performing Arts Center as reported losses continue to mount with no explanation forthcoming. Will the Common Council take control of this issue and be proactive in finding out the real financial picture of this operation in order to make correct decisions about the theater future? The Council’s documented lack of interest in doing due diligence on the Performing Arts Center has to change if that theatre is going to live.


 


8. North Street Community Approval.


 


The project that would bring 391 units of senior luxury condominiums in a quasi-health care facility to the former St. Agnes Property will pose new possible directions for the New York Presbyterian Hospital property adjacent to it. The hearings will begin this spring. Where does the council stand on the vision for that whole complex? What does Planning think about it? It’s a bigtime issue that the Council has to really think about with the community, with the hospital, and, of course with the East side retail strip.


 


(To Be Continued).

Posted in Uncategorized

Council of Neighborhood Associations Taps Ken Werden Of Highlands for President.

Hits: 0

WPCNR NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH. From John Vorperian. December 31, 2005: The “Neighborhood Watchdogs” — the White Plains Council of Neighborhood Associations has named its officers for 2006. 
          Ken Werden of the Highlands Association will serve as President. The council is an  umbrella group of the city’s 29 neighborhood  associations.  Other members of the 2006 Executive Board are:



Vice-Presidents Charles Lederman of Gedney Association, Suzanne Vorperian of Old Oak Ridge Residents Association, and Roberta West of Fisher Hill Neighborhood Association, Secretary Bob Meyerson of Haviland Manor Association, and Treasurer Ralph Nagan of North Street Association.

    The council meets the second Tuesday of each month. CNA’s first meeting of the New Year will be held
Tuesday,  January 10, 2006, 7:45pm, White Plains Education House, 5 Homeside Lane. All city residents are welcome to attend the event. 

For more information, call 914-946-6707.

Posted in Uncategorized

Adam In Albany: Future of Gun Legislation in the Assembly.

Hits: 0

WPCNR’S ADAM IN ALBANY. By Assemblyman Adam T. Bradley. 89th Assembly District. December 30, 2005: The state Legislature’s special session last week produced a bipartisan agreement that will help protect our families and law enforcement officers from gun violence. This legislation represents a positive step in our effort to address gun crimes; however, further action must be taken to protect our communities from gun violence.

 


 


The recent tragic deaths of two NYPD officers provided yet another chilling reminder of the dangers that these brave heroes face daily. These new laws significantly increase penalties for those who commit crimes against police officers, sending the message that such acts will not be tolerated.  This agreement institutes a mandatory life sentence without parole for the killing of a police officer and significantly increases penalties for a broad range of other crimes committed against law enforcement officials.  Additional legislation has been signed into law that will create tougher penalties for gun traffickers. While this is real progress in the fight against gun violence, there is much more that needs to be done.  We must continue to work to pass common-sense legislation that will serve to keep our families and law enforcement safe.


 


One of the first issues we must address in the coming session is the banning of cop-killer bullets.  Over 140 police and sheriff departments across the state support this measure; however, the Senate has failed to act.  Such legislation deals with ammunition that can pierce a police officer’s bullet proof vest.  These bullets do not belong on our streets.  If we are serious about protecting those who regularly keep us safe, there is no reason why this legislation should not be passed and signed into law.


 


The Assembly will also pass a measure that will close some very basic loopholes in current law.  Proposed by Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, this legislation will help thwart the flow of illegal firearms on our streets by cracking down on gun sales to “straw purchasers” who buy guns for resale to criminals.  Further, it will require that gun dealers cooperate with the police during investigations of violent crimes, and provide better security so that guns do not fall into the hands of dangerous individuals.


 


Nearly 1,000 New Yorkers are killed each year by gun violence.  According to a report issued by Senator Schumer, New York holds the alarming distinction of being first nationally in crimes committed with out-of-state guns.  Unfortunately, there is a weak spot in the federal law and criminals exploit it, as evidenced by the fact that 67% of guns traced in crimes in New York come from other states. The only way to solve this problem is for Congress to act quickly to stop illegal gun trafficking by passing uniform federal laws.


 


The Assembly, Senate and governor did the right thing in passing legislation that protects law enforcement and helps keep illegal guns off our streets. However, we can do more to put a stop to senseless gun violence.   As we begin a new session, one of our primary objectives must be to once again come together and do what is best for the safety of our communities. 


 


Assemblyman Adam T. Bradley


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Schwartz Gives City Homeless Ultimatum. Mayor Delfino Responds.

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE HOMELESS NEWS. By John F. Bailey. December 30, 2005 UPDATED WITH GRAPHIC PHOTOS, 9:06 p.m. E.S.T.: Where the “hardcore homeless” will stay in White Plains after January 10 is still at issue going into the New Years Weekend. Persons who attended the meeting with Deputy County Executive Larry Schwartz last week have told WPCNR under condition of anonymity that Mr. Schwartz told the city the homeless are going into 85 Court Street, or if that is not acceptable, the White Plains Business Improvement District should find a place to house the White Plains homeless who gather each night to be driven to the airport shelter, or the county can simply stop the homeless service all together if the city does not want the County’s help.


In a further development, sources who were at that meeting say privately to WPCNR that the Department of Social Services is not too pleased either at housing the “hardcore homeless” in their office basement.



The Mayor of White Plains today issued a letter to Mr. Schwartz stating the city’s position and a solution and defending the city’s record in handling the homeless population. It notes the new day center to be opened by Grace Community Services in a storefront (between two bars) at 96  East Post Road will serve only 7 persons at any one time. The Mayor is directing Executive Officer Paul Wood to meet with Mr. Schwartz next week, calling the county proposal “ludicrous” and “secretive.” The Mayor also accuses a media outlet of not reporting his position fairly.  Photo of the Mayor, WPCNR News Archive.


Here is The Mayor’s Letter to Mr. Schwartz, photographs provided by WPCNR News:



                                                December 30, 2005


 


Mr. Lawrence S. Schwartz,


Deputy County Executive 


County of Westchester


148 Martine Avenue


White Plains, NY 10601


 


 


Dear Larry,


 


 


I am writing regarding your decision to move the homeless drop-in shelter from the County airport to 85 Court Street in downtown White Plains and the subsequent press reports generated by that decision including an editorial which appeared in the Journal News on December 27 entitled “We’re All Ears – Got a better plan for the homeless in White Plains?”  


 


I believe that we do have a better plan, and although it’s been expressed to the media covering this matter, it’s been largely ignored in favor of more sexy sound bites and sensationalistic headlines.  To clarify it for you, I have said all along that the airport facility should remain open (no clear reason has ever been provided as to why it needs to be closed) until a comprehensive plan can be established that addresses the needs of this population and shares the burden equitably throughout all municipalities in the County.


 


The current population sheltered in this facility do not all come from White Plains – a fact you acknowledged during your meeting with the White Plains Business Improvement District recently, and I feel it is a big mistake, and an unfair burden, to move them into downtown White Plains. I expressed similar concerns regarding the County practice of bussing them into the downtown following the murder of Connie Russo, whose family’s world did fall apart, when she died at the hands of a resident of this facility.  White Plains cannot be a dumping ground for this population of the homeless simply because the County doesn’t know what else to do with them.  It’s not fair to the homeless and it’s not fair to the 53,000 residents and more than 250,000 visitors of our City daily.


 



The 85 Court Street Proposed Location (White Building-also home to the Department of Social Services) for the Hardcore Homeless is next to Mulino’s Restaurant. Photo, WPCNR News Archive.


 



Day-time Drop-In Facility Location (96 East Post Road) is next to ‘Los Amigos” Bar and a liquor store, slightly to left of the white van. Photo, WPCNR News Archive.


 


Until now, the reasons given for the choice of 85 Court Street have been ludicrous.  This population, the “hardcore homeless” as you have dubbed them, refuse to comply with regulations and refuse services.  We need to move them closer to services they refuse anyway?  In addition, the day-time drop-in facility that will be opened by Grace Church on Post Road, which has been cited as another good reason to move them here,  has a capacity to serve seven clients potentially leaving 36 homeless residents out in the cold.  Also, since these are the “hardcore homeless,” are we to believe that they will gather at a point one block away from where they will be taken by bus?  Despite your denials, and in light of these questions and the secretive nature in which this plan was derived, I can only conclude that this decision was made for political purposes.


 


This type of knee-jerk policy making which leaves White Plains now burdened with this issue is unacceptable.  Despite the County administration’s warnings that people will freeze or sleep in boxes throughout our City, I know this will not be the case.  This isn’t a question of what to do with White Plains’ homeless population, this is about where to house the people who refuse to take medication, accept counseling or follow such simple requirements as providing a name to shelter workers.


 


If it were about the White Plains homeless population, I can tell you that we already do an outstanding job.  Despite press portrayals to the contrary, I have been a tireless advocate for providing services to the homeless population.  I voted for the Coachman, the homeless residence on the Post Road, when I served as County Legislator and I continue my support for this 400 bed facility to this day.  I advocated and supported SHORE, Westhab and other programs designed to care for the homeless. White Plains has more than 500 beds devoted to the County’s homeless population in our downtown.  This includes 400 families at the Coachman, a women’s center at Grace Church and a shelter at Open Arms.  The City has almost 14% of the County’s total stock of beds for the homeless.  Yet, the permanent population of the City is a little over 5% of the County’s population.  No one will freeze on our streets.  Our public safety employees have always seen to that.  Anyone without shelter is transported to one of these facilities whenever they are found on our streets at night.  I would also ask what services and facilities Yonkers, New Rochelle and Mount Vernon (the three largest cities in the County) and the other 40 some-odd municipalities provide.


 


I believe White Plains is doing more than its fair share to aid the County in their mission to care for the homeless.  Despite this, I have asked my executive officer, Paul Wood, to meet with you once you have established a clear and comprehensive plan to service the needs of this population of the homeless and to share the burden equitably throughout the County.


 


Ideally, in the future, it is my hope that the County Executive would convene a meeting with Mayors, Supervisors and other municipal decision makers to discuss how to ensure an equitable solution to this issue.


 


 


                                                Sincerely,


 


 


                                               


                                                Joseph, M. Delfino, Mayor


 


Cc:       Ron Patafio, The Journal News Editorial Board


            Rick Ammirato, White Plains Downtown Business Improvement District


            Keith Eddings, The Journal News

Posted in Uncategorized

Public Safety Will Not Replace David Chong in Immediate Future.

Hits: 0

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. By John F. Bailey. December 29, 2005: It has been four weeks since Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety, David Chong, left the Department of Public Safety for personal reasons.  The Department has no immediate plans to replace him, according to his counterpart, Dr. Charles Jennings, the remaining Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety.


Jennings said the department is covering Mr. Chong’s duties with present staff taking up the slack. Mr. Chong, Jennings said previously supervised operations and other responsibilities, but those duties are now being handled by present supervisors distributing the workload. Asked if the position was going to be filled internally, Commissioner Jennings said that was “premature.” Asked if a national search to replace Mr. Chong was underway, Mr. Jennings said no. Asked when and if Mr. Chong would be replaced, Jennings had no comment.

Posted in Uncategorized

Meet The Writers: Creative Trio Creates a Charmer on First Try.

Hits: 0

WPCNR STAGE DOOR. By John F. Bailey. December 28, 2005: Along about this time at Westchester Broadway Theatre, the cast of  Are We There Yet? the musical review that has its New York area premier this evening at the dinner Theatre for a four week run, are preparing. Meanwhile, its writers know they have a show that strikes a chord with audiences. The Wichita Eagle called it  “such a fresh, rib-tickling, heart-touching romp- that you’ll leave the Theatre humming and feeling better about being human.”


WPCNR sat down with “The Writers” Tuesday afternoon at the WBT at a break in rehearsal to get their story of this “hit” coming in from the road.



The Writers on stage at Westchester Broadway Theatre: Ray Roderick, left,  (who also directs the show and got his Equity Card in  1981 at WBT’s production of Oliver!), Cheryl Stern, and Jim Hindman — Creators of Are We There Yet? — which premiers tonight for the first time in the New York area at Westchester Broadway Theatre. Photo, WPCNR StageCam.


That’s because most of the new musical — created just 18 months ago — is based on true life stories compiled by its three writers: Jim Hindman, Ray Roderick (tonight’s director), and Cheryl Stern, who together weaved the “My Family’s True Story(ies)” into a 20 Sketch, 26 song review that The Sun-Sentinal of South Florida said when it ran last summer in Coral Gables, “The pace is strong and steady, as the material swings between humor and pathos, and, though staged as a light diverson, their sketches can be surprisingly poignant and moving.”


WPCNR: How did you come up with the idea for the show?


 


Jim Hindman: We were looking at the idea of the family and how the family over time has changed and how one defines a family. Some people, their pets become their children. There’s a family at work. There’s the internet family. People who are sports fans become a family. All these different extreme ways we define a family. We wanted to explore that and not only the whole idea of family values, but what is a family now, and how do we hold onto that in that everchanging world and how through the eyes of a family, how in our lives, which is how we got the title, Are We There Yet? Is that we say, “As soon as I get married, I’ll be there.” “As soon as we get the kid to college, I’ll be there,” “As soon as I get this, I’ll be there.”


 


But, we’re never there, because you do it all the way to retirement. Well, as soon as I retire, and move to Florida then are you there? When is ever there? So that is the journey we’re exploring with the show and that’s where we came up with the idea and said well let’s explore that and do a bunch of funny vignettes that try and reflect that.


 


WPCNR TO Cheryl: How did you get into it?


 


Cheryl Stern: Jim and I have collaborated before  and I’ve collaborated on a piece called Christmas Survival Guide. I was a contributing writer to that piece which was done here a couple of years ago. We were kicking around the idea of doing a new review and the idea was exciting to us about the contemporary American Family. Where are we  in the 21st century,  how do we define ourselves today as opposed to how we defined ourselves 50 years ago.


 


 I’ve been very interested in this whole looking at how we created today extraordinary families, through adoption, interfaith marriages, and people having children. We looked at it sort of outside the box as sort of an atypical American family and a typical American family, and the stuff that touches all of us..


 


Also, all these stories (dramatized in Are We There Yet?) are based on true stories, things that really happened. They are stories people gave us that we either knew from our own families or friends who we interviewed, various people we interviewed. We wanted to just look at the whole spectrum. The whole point of all of these stories is we hope everybody sees themselves in it. Each one of these stories has got something for everybody.


 


WPCNR: How long did it take you to write it?


 


JIM:  A year and a half a go we had the idea. Then after six or seven months we had our first little workshop thing in Wichita. (Editor’s Note:  ) and so we hurried and got a version of it up and got that together. It’s been a year and a half we’ve been working on it and exploring and getting all the research together.


 


WPCNR: How do you structure the various duties?


 


Cheryl: Primarily I write the lyrics, Jim writes the sketches, and Ray contrinutes on all fronts and we sort of work back and forth, writing and editing one another. We created an outline for the show, some ideas we had about things that had happened to us or people we knew and we created that outline and we went in and starting writing scenes and organizing them into this review format that we’re all kind of familiar with. We’ve all sort of lived it as actors, performers.  Both Ray and I have been in “I love you. You’re Perfect. Now Change.” which was a long-running off-Broadway hit. So we used ILYYPNW as a bit of a role model for this piece and then went off on our own and developed and hopefully created something that’s complete original.”


 


WPCNR: How did you sell it to Westchester Broadway Theatre?


 


JIM – We did a little version down in Florida at the Broward Stage Door (Coral Gables), and two or three people came down to see it. By intermission, they said, they wanted to do this, because as Cheryl had mentioned, it’s all true stories, and what we added into the show, and what the audiences here (beginning tonight) will contribute as well,  is that we will tell people’s stories at the end of the night. If people will write them down or send them to our website, www.miracleor2.com, and we are going to read them before or after or during intermission. I do not know exactly how we’re going to do it here. People will just have to come and see.


 


Cheryl: They may not be read at that show, but maybe at another one (Are We There Yet? Plays through January 28. )Or you may see it on the internet. There’s a part in the show where they read a story every night. Everybody’s family is important, and everybody’s


real stories are interesting. It’s just like something that may have happened in your life?


 


WPCNR: How many stories did you have to choose from for the work?


 


CHERYL: Dozens. We just kept writing


 


JIM: Some kind of melded into one, or as time went on, some didn’t speak, some didn’t “sing,”  You had to find ones that did sing, so you could make a number about it or spoke strong enough that you wanted to write a monolog or a scene. They sort of found themselves.


 


WPCNR: How did the show play in Florida?


 


CHERYL: We were a big hit in Florida (running six weeks). We had a good older community in the summer, but the younger audiences on the weekend and we are very  excited that it speaks to many generations. People in their 20s up through their 80s.


 


WPCNR: Did you make some cuts, additons?


 


Jim:  We cut a couple of numbers, added a few different things.


 


WPCNR: How do you sell the show?


 


Ray Roderick (Director-Writer) : It’s in 10 or 12 theatres all over the country. And we have a production Rhode Island coming up. We’re heading to Springfield, Mass from here. Texas in March. Most of the times it’s a fresh company depending on where it is, depending on whether the theatre itself is producing it or our company is producing it. If the theatre wants the show and us to provide the show, we can. But traditionally, they’ll produce it themselves.


The early productions I’ve directed. Probably if we  brought the show to New York or to Chicago there’s a good chance I would try to direct it, only because we would all want to be involved creatively to be sure those productions  are of a certain level and we had control of it, and made certain someone did not make the wrong choices.


There’s already been 8 directors of this show.  It’s been  in Alabama, Louisiana, Illinois,  Massachusetts, Florida, Kansas. This is the first production in the New York area.


 


WPCNR: How’s the show coming for tonight?


 


Ray: We’re on track. We’re where we ought to be because this is such a tight turn around here. We added our band Tuesday night for the first time. We’re filtering our costumes in. I think we’re. We’re a little behind technically, but slightly ahead overall.


 


WPCNR: Tell Mr. and Mrs. White Plains about your actors


 


Ray: We have an astoundingly talented group of actors. A cast of four, Duke Lafoon, Susan Haefner, Beverly Ward and Kevin Pariseau.  It’s a little like I Love You. You’re Perfect. Now Change, in terms of everybody playing a multitude of parts, singing in a variety of styles, and their comedic skills have to be very sharp because it’s kind of like sketch comedy meets original song, and some of the song is kind of parody takeoffs, like there’s a take-off on a Fosse number, there’s a Lieber & Stoller number,  there are familiar themes meeting familiar styles.


 


They have to be adept in all of those styles, a rock n roll style and also old-fashioned. There’s a lot of different places they have to go. They love it.


 


Cheryl:  Because they’re asked to play so many different characters, these are all triple-threats. They all sing and dance wonderfully. Often, as an actor you’re asked to create one role a night. In this show each is asked to create 30 roles each. So they’re asked to flip very quickly from one character to another, and they’re all terrific. You’re really a chameleon all night.


 


WPCNR: Why is it something for everyone?


 


Cheryl: We were hoping to show the whole spectrum of what it’s like to be in a family, from newlyweds, young moms, dads, divorce and getting married again. We have an older man, Bernie Buffet who sings about the second time around, he in his 80s and still dating. There is something for everyone in the show.


 


WPCNR: Does it connect?


 


Jim:  We have everything from a baby to people retiring to move to Florida.


 


Ray: You can definitely relate.


 


Jim.: The best compliment we got was that people would come up to us and say even it it wasn’t them, it was someone they knew. Oh, there’s my cousin Ted, or there’s my Aunt Shirley. So they could relate to all the different people even though they had not gone through that scenario themselves.


 


Cheryl: You can’t make this up. It’s true, the most richest, most wonderful stories come from what’s true. There’s a lovely sequence in the second act, where there’s a guy who’s gotten divorced, and he’s never dated because he married his high school sweetheart. We actually based that on Ray’s personal story.


 


The show begins in a car and it comes full circle. By the end of the night, all sorts of things happen. There’s a baby doing a rap. And in the end the story comes full circle when the family is retiring to Florida. It’s the whole cycle of life.


 


Jim: We do wind our way chronologically, starting with birth and ending with retirement. There are 20 sketches and 26 songs.


 


WPCNR: What are your hopes for it in the future?


 


Jim: I think  the main thing is to reach as many people as we can. Because of the way shows are being created in New York not all the shows that are being created in New York are really right for the traditional demographic of the subscription-based house. One of the reasons we wrote this show was to not think in terms of we want to open this show on Broadway or Off-Broadway, but we want this to strike a nerve out there in the world, across the country.


We wrote this show not for the New York critics, not for the New York audience, but for an across the board American audience. Really holding a mirror up to America.


 


That’s why this thing has really grown dramatically. Our fIrst production was last spring, less than a year ago. For to have this many productions that quickly, and the notices we’ve gotten, the momentum we’ve created is rather astounding.  We haven’t gone to NY, and we will go to New York when the time is right.


 


In the meantime our goal is to get this product to theatres who really need this kind of product. The subscription theatres can’t do the shows that are coming out of Off-Broadway, it’s just not possible.


 


WPCNR: How Do You Promote the Show?


 


Ray: It’s a very small community the world of theatre, and everybody talks to everybody, so when they find out there’s a new show that’s successful in a theatre, they start talking with each other. So the theatre producers and artistic directors start talking to one another and one thing leads to another.


 

Are We There Yet? Opens this evening and runs through January 28 at the WBT.
For information, on dinner, showtimes and prices, contact 914-592-2222

Posted in Uncategorized